You are on page 1of 4

Brexit

Denmark accuses UK of breaking Brexit fishing deal


over trawling ban

Jennifer Rankin
Wed 17 Nov 2021 15.39 GMT

Denmark has accused the UK of breaching the post-Brexit fisheries deal over plans
to ban destructive bottom trawling in a North Sea conservation zone.

The UK announced in February that it wanted to ban bottom trawling at the Dogger
Bank conservation zone in the North Sea, a move hailed by environmentalists
hopeful of seeing a resurgence of halibut, sharks and skate in the once marine life
rich sandbank.

In an interview with the Guardian, Denmark’s fisheries minister, Rasmus Prehn,


said such plans were not in line with the post-Brexit deal.

“The Brexit agreement ensures full access [for EU vessels] to fish in UK waters until
2026. And therefore, of course, it is a very big problem for us if the British
government is going to change that. We find that unacceptable and it’s a breach of
our agreement,” he said.

The charge opens a new front for the UK government, which is already embroiled in
a rancorous dispute with France over fishing rights, against a wider backdrop of
post-Brexit tensions with the EU.

Dogger Bank, a large shallow sandbank about 90 miles north-east of the Humber
estuary, has been fished by Danish boats for centuries and is among the country’s
most important fishing grounds, according to the Danish government.

Under the Brexit trade and cooperation agreement struck between the EU and the
UK last Christmas Eve, EU fishers can continue to access UK waters as before until
30 June 2026, a transition to delay the blow of reduced fishing rights in future.

The deal also commits both sides to “promoting the long-term sustainability” of the
70 common fish in the shared waters.

Prehn said Danish fishers “are already in a very difficult


situation due to Brexit so this would be even more difficult for them and we can’t
really accept that”.

While he said it was premature to discuss potential retaliation, he revealed his


disappointment over how relations between the UK and Denmark had deteriorated
since Brexit.

“It’s really difficult to make an agreement and just one year after we have these
problems with one part; that is not really acceptable, that is not how we usually
make agreements. With the UK we used to have a very good relationship,” Prehn
said.

He was speaking from Brussels as the UK and EU embark on the final sprint of
negotiations to set catch limits for fishing in 2022, ahead of a 10 December deadline.

Denmark and the UK entered the then European Economic Community together in
1973, but arrived too late to influence the first version of the common fisheries
policy, leaving a lingering sense of resentment for British officials.
Denmark claims UK plans to protect the Dogger Bank fishing area breach Brexit
agreement

North Sea Norway

Dogger Bank Denmark


Copenhagen

Germany

Hull UK Netherlands
Hamburg
waters

Amsterdam

London

Belgium

Guardian graphic.

Between 2013 and 2020, Danish fishers landed catches worth 27m DKK (£3.05m) a
year from bottom trawling in Dogger Bank, mostly sand eel, which is used on fish
farms but is also an important source of food for puffins, kittiwakes and seals.

Germany and the Netherlands also have fishing interests in Dogger Bank, which
environmentalists say has been overworked by trawls and dredges, causing a drastic
decline in fish.

Bottom trawling involves dragging weighted nets across the sea floor.

Environmentalists have welcomed the government’s decision to protect Dogger


Bank, but said the UK needed to show the same efforts when it came to protecting
fish targeted by British fishers.

“The UK is proposing a brave and good deal on the Dogger Bank,” said Irene Kingma,
a Dutch marine biologist. “It’s also very easy … when it’s not your fisheries that
you’re impacting.”

“The UK is being very progressive on all environmental issues as long as it’s not
interfering with their own fishing interest,” she added. “They are good at
[protecting] Dogger Bank, because its flatfish are fished by the Dutch, and they are
good at the industrial fisheries [sandeel] because that’s fished by the Danish. But
they are very much not willing to move on cod when it’s the Scottish fishing boats.”

The UK government rejects the claim it is in breach of the TCA, arguing it allows
both sides to decide on regulatory measures. A spokesperson for the Department for
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: “The UK is a global leader in the fight to
protect our seas. As an independent coastal state the UK can decide on the
regulatory measures which apply to fishing in our waters, which includes taking
measures to follow scientific advice and protect our marine environment.”

… as you're joining us today from India, we have a small favour to ask. Tens of
millions have placed their trust in the Guardian’s high-impact journalism since we
started publishing 200 years ago, turning to us in moments of crisis, uncertainty,
solidarity and hope. More than 1.5 million readers, from 180 countries, have
recently taken the step to support us financially – keeping us open to all, and
fiercely independent.
With no shareholders or billionaire owner, we can set our own agenda and provide
trustworthy journalism that’s free from commercial and political influence,
offering a counterweight to the spread of misinformation. When it’s never
mattered more, we can investigate and challenge without fear or favour.
Unlike many others, Guardian journalism is available for everyone to read,
regardless of what they can afford to pay. We do this because we believe in
information equality. Greater numbers of people can keep track of global events,
understand their impact on people and communities, and become inspired to take
meaningful action.
We aim to offer readers a comprehensive, international perspective on critical
events shaping our world – from the Black Lives Matter movement, to the new
American administration, Brexit, and the world's slow emergence from a global
pandemic. We are committed to upholding our reputation for urgent, powerful
reporting on the climate emergency, and made the decision to reject advertising
from fossil fuel companies, divest from the oil and gas industries, and set a course
to achieve net zero emissions by 2030.
If there were ever a time to join us, it is now. Every contribution, however big or
small, powers our journalism and sustains our future. Support the Guardian from
as little as $1 – it only takes a minute. If you can, please consider supporting us
with a regular amount each month. Thank you.

Single Monthly Annual

You might also like