Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Data was collected at Brendan T. Byrne State Forest Upper Mill Shortleaf Pine
Restoration site in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey. This site included 10 acres and underwent
thinning methods in 2016. Measurements in this report were taken in October of 2021. At the site
two different plots in the restoration site were observed to measure the species composition and
their DBH. This was done by marking a spot on the ground and using an angle gauge at 3.0
observing which trees around the marked spot fell into the plot. If a tree fell into the plot the
species and DBH for that tree was recorded. If the tree was borderline then the species, DBH,
and distance in meters from the marked plot were measured. If any snags were within the plot
they were measured as well. A pink tape was tied around the first tree measured so as to not
repeat any measurements accidentally. From there the data was entered into an excel file and the
TPA, BAPA and stocking were determined.
Results
Figure 1
Species composition in Plot 2:
Figure 2
Figure 1 and figure 2 show the species composition of the measured plot 1 and plot 2 of
the Upper Mill Shortleaf Pine restoration site. The most dominant tree in plot 1 is both Eastern
White Pine and Pitch Pine. The most dominant tree in plot 2 is Shortleaf Pine. Plot one was
located in close proximity to the road on the edge of the site and Plot 2 was deeper into the stand.
The species composition between the two plots vary where Pitch Pine was observed in plot 2
while being a dominant tree in plot 1.
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 3 and figure 4 represent the measured trees per acre and basal area per acre of the two
plots. Plot number one was too large to interrupt on the stocking chart. Plot number two came
out to 100 percent stocking.
Figure 5
Figure 5 shows a stocking chart with plot one and two trees per acre and basal area per acre data
applied. Plot one was determined to have 115% stocking and plot two was determined to have
79% stocking.
Discussion
The Post treatment target for the Upper Mill shortleaf restoration site was 30 percent to
75 percent. The observed trees per acre of plot one was 387.265078 and a basal area per acre of
129.6781. Plot two had a tree per acre of 195.542232 and a basal area per acre of 89.77716. The
restoration treatments did not reach the general goal of creating a woodland structure based on
the results found in this report. The stocking percentage was determined using the provided
stocking chart and the previously stated information from the thinning targets of the residual
stand. It had a stockting range of around 115% for plot 1 and around 79% for plot two. Based on
the results of plot one and plot two Stocking percentages were too high for the treatment target.
Plot one and plot two had varying tree compositions likely due to location. Plot one was located
along the edge of the stand near the road where mature trees were left on the border to provide
shade and seeds. Plot two was located further into the stand resulting in a higher composition of
shortleaf Pine. Other treatments to consider when restoring or maintaining this shortleaf pine
restoration are controlled burns every five to seven years. Controlled burns allow the shortleaf
pine to outcompete other or invasive species. Shortleaf Pine has the ability to resprout after a fire
and has high resilience to these high heat conditions. The time frame to burn is every five to
seven years because it gives enough time for the native desired vegetation to establish itself. This
time frame also mimics the historically observed fire frequency in these forest ecosystem types.
Another treatment method is to continually clear cut species such as mountain laurel that may
grow too fast and crowd out the canopy. Leaving unwanted species for too long can also result in
greater difficulty eradicating the species. Also resulting in a loss of time and money. This would
result in not enough sunlight for seedlings to grow. Keeping up with management will ensure a
successful restoration.
Works Cited