Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Studying Philippine History is important because you have to understand and know the things that happened in the
past for you to appreciate the future and present situation of the country. Studying History There are countless
reasons for studying history. They were followed by an influx from Malaysia.
Local history contains a wealth of details and stories that help reveal how societal changes impacted the lives of
ordinary people. By investigating local history, you can find documents such as accounts of the first cars in a town,
what people thought of them, and how they changed the lives of the community.
What is the importance of learning and understanding the history of the Philippines?
Studying history allows us to gain valuable perspectives on the problems of our modern society. Many problems,
features, and characteristics of modern Philippine society can be traced back to historical questions on our colonial
past, as well as our pre-colonial culture.
The Philippines is known for having an abundance of beautiful beaches and delicious fruit. The collection of islands is
located in Southeast Asia and was named after King Philip II of Spain. Here are 10 interesting facts about the
Philippines.
Global Filipino: The Authorized Biography of Jose de Venecia Jr., the Visionary Five-Time Speaker of the House of
Representatives of the Philippines Hardcover – Illustrated, December 1, 2008. Find all the books, read about the
author, and more.
The Philippines is one of the world’s largest archipelago nations. It is situated in Southeast Asia in the Western Pacific
Ocean. Its islands are classified into three main geographical areas – Luzon, Visayas, and Mindanao. Because of its
archipelagic nature, Philippines is a culturally diverse country.
The criteria for candidates to the National Artist Award is composed of at least five points with two already
delineating the weight attached to the title — they should be (1) artists who have distinguished themselves by
pioneering in a mode of creative expression or style, thus making an impact on succeeding …
The Order of National Artists aims to recognize: Filipino artists who have made significant contributions to the
cultural heritage of the country. Filipino artistic accomplishment at its highest level and to promote creative
expression as significant to the development of a national cultural identity.
What do you think is the important role of national artist in our society?
“Artists play one of the most important roles in our society. They can reshape our world into a better place, where
once again freedom of thought and real communication can be disseminated through art and the universal language
of realism.
https://www.mvorganizing.org/what-is-the-importance-of-philippine-history/
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SOURCES?
Primary sources are firsthand, contemporary accounts of events created by individuals during that period of time or
several years later (such as correspondence, diaries, memoirs and personal histories). These original records can be
found in several media such as print, artwork, and audio and visual recording. Examples of primary sources include
manuscripts, newspapers, speeches, cartoons, photographs, video, and artifacts. Primary sources can be described
as those sources that are closest to the origin of the information. They contain raw information and thus, must be
interpreted by researchers.
Secondary sources are closely related to primary sources and often interpret them. These sources are documents
that relate to information that originated elsewhere. Secondary sources often use generalizations, analysis,
interpretation, and synthesis of primary sources. Examples of secondary sources include textbooks, articles, and
reference books.
https://libguides.furman.edu/special-collections/for-students/primary-secondary-sources
Primary sources provide a first-hand account of an event or time period and are considered to be authoritative. They
represent original thinking, reports on discoveries or events, or they can share new information. Often these sources
are created at the time the events occurred but they can also include sources that are created later. They are usually
the first formal appearance of original research.
Secondary sources involve analysis, synthesis, interpretation, or evaluation of primary sources. They often attempt
to describe or explain primary sources.
Scholarly journals, although generally considered to be secondary sources, often contain articles on very specific
subjects and may be the primary source of information on new developments.
Primary and secondary categories are often not fixed and depend on the study or research you are undertaking. For
example, newspaper editorial/opinion pieces can be both primary and secondary. If exploring how an event affected
people at a certain time, this type of source would be considered a primary source. If exploring the event, then the
opinion piece would be responding to the event and therefore is considered to be a secondary source.
Primary sources
Library collection
Primary sources for history subject guide
Secondary sources
Secondary sources offer an analysis, interpretation or a restatement of primary sources and are considered to be
persuasive. They often involve generalisation, synthesis, interpretation, commentary or evaluation in an attempt to
convince the reader of the creator's argument. They often attempt to describe or explain primary sources.
https://www.library.unsw.edu.au/using-the-library/information-resources/primary-and-secondary-sources
What is the difference between external and internal criticism in criticizing primary sources?
External criticism is a process by which historians determine whether a source is authentic by checking the validity of
the source. Internal criticism looks at the reliability of an authenticated source after it has been subjected to external
criticism.
Primary sources can be described as those sources that are closest to the origin of the information. Secondary
sources often use generalizations, analysis, interpretation, and synthesis of primary sources. Examples of secondary
sources include textbooks, articles, and reference books.
External criticism, which is also known as lower criticism, is a tool used by historians and exegetes to determine the
validity of a document, particularly a document with some sort of historical significance. It is the first of two stages of
inquiry for it is followed by internal criticism.
What is the importance of internal and external criticism in evaluating primary sources?
In evaluating primary source both internal and external cristicisms are important. Internal cristicism questions the
credibility of the author and the primary source if it is genuine or fake. It determines the character of the author and
the corroboration. While external criticism deals with the problem of authencity.
External criticism refers to the authenticity of the document. Once a document has been determined to be genuine
(external criticism), researchers need to determine if the content is accurate (internal criticism). We conduct
historical research for a number of reasons: – to avoid the mistakes of the past.
A source-critical approach helps students evaluate the information they encounter. A lack of source criticism can
leave readers and viewers misinformed, leading them to draw incorrect conclusions and make faulty decisions based
on flawed data.
The ‘External Criticism’ is of a less intellectual type of criticism of the documents. It includes examinations of
document like manuscripts, books, pamphlets, maps, inscriptions and monuments.
There are two main types of historical sources: primary sources and secondary sources. A primary source is
something that originates from the past.
Is it necessary that primary sources be original?
They are the most direct evidence of a time or event because they were created by people or things that were there
at the time or event. These sources have not been modified by interpretation and offer original thought or new
information. Primary sources are original materials, regardless of format.
A primary source gives you direct access to the subject of your research. Secondary sources provide second-hand
information and commentary from other researchers. Primary sources are more credible as evidence, but good
research uses both primary and secondary sources.
In contrast, a secondary source of information is one that was created later by someone who did not experience
first-hand or participate in the events or conditions you’re researching. For the purposes of a historical research
project, secondary sources are generally scholarly books and articles.
Primary sources include: Government records – Parliamentary proceedings (Hansard), bills, acts, treaties, census
data, court transcripts.
Yes. Census data is a primary source because it is the official process of methodically collecting information about a
certain topic in a specific time period. Meaning, that it is a first-hand account of a topic, a.k.a. a primary source.
https://www.mvorganizing.org/what-is-the-difference-between-external-and-internal-criticism-in-criticizing-
primary-sources/