Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/347683327
CITATIONS READS
0 259
4 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Binod Kumar Rajak on 28 January 2021.
Deepika
Department of Commerce,
PGDAV College,
University of Delhi, India
Email: deepikakumari656@gmail.com
Sumanjeet Singh
Department of Commerce,
Ramjas College,
University of Delhi, India
Email: sumanjeetsingh@gmail.com
Abstract: The internet has given birth to the new industry called online
retailing, which involves vend via the internet. It is hot and fastest-growing
industries and can grab the attention of retailers as well as customers. Despite
this tremendous attention, the success rate did not meet the expectations. The
association between e-service quality (E-SQ) and customer loyalty (CL) has
remained ambiguous due to contradictory empirical results and how the
relationship between these two variables get affected when e-satisfaction (E-S)
and perceived switching costs (PSCs) also comes into the picture. There is such
study which talks about the moderated mediation effect of PSC and E-S
between E-SQ and CL. Data collected from 242 respondents who entertain
him/her self-shopping over the internet. The results exhibited that all three
constructs have strong association along with the mediating effect of E-S, but
we did not find the moderating role of PSC. Implication, limitation and future
study have explained in this investigation.
1 Introduction
In the era of fierce competition, the notion of loyalty has achieved a significant amount of
attention both from academicians and from business firms. The loyalty and satisfaction
concept becomes critical when it comes to the virtual world. Customer loyalty (CL) in the
virtual environment can be explained as an encouraging attitude towards the seller and
will make repeat purchases from the same service provider. Numerous studies have
explained the importance of CL in the virtual environment (Kim et al., 2009; Kassim and
Study of e-services quality and customer loyalty 3
Abdullah, 2010). Also pointed by Reichheld and Sasser (1990), a business firm can
accelerate more than 75% profits by an improvement in customer retention just by 5%
[cited by Aydin and Özer, 2005; Chan et al., (2001), p.5]. The loyal customer also does
not change service providers very frequently; instead, they are the ones who are keen to
pay even premiums price; loyal customers are the cheapest source of promotion as they
are likely to endorse the service provider to future potential customers (Ganesh et al.,
2000). Achieving CL in the virtual world is difficult to achieve as compared to traditional
brick and mortar but once the relationship has formed the profit will grow at a much
faster rate (Reichheld and Schefter, 2000).
The internet has given birth to the new industry called online retailing, which
involves buying and selling of goods via internet. It is hot and fastest-growing industries
and can grab the attention of retailers as well as customers. Despite this tremendous
attention, the success rate did not meet the expectations. Many online retailers tried their
luck over the internet, but only a few got success. The reason for their failure is that they
are not able to carry out the expectations of customers and hence, are not able to achieve
the loyalty of the customers; getting loyal customers in the online environment is a
difficult task due to lack of personal interaction. So, in getting loyal customers, online
retailers are faced with the question of what are those factors that are considered
necessary by online customers. Alternatively, in other words, what are the possible
antecedents of CL in online retailing. In finding out the antecedents of CL, the first thing
that clicks everyone’s mind is the quality of the service provider. Service quality (SQ)
has quite a high relevance in dealing with customers. Successful online retailers
understand the fact that mere presence on the online platform is not the key to get success
rather they have to continuously focus on improving SQ so that they will be valued
highly by the customers. SQ in the online environment also measured by several
dimensions as is the case with traditional brick and mortar. Online retailing websites have
become popular among Indian consumers as a result of the advent of the internet, and the
consumer relies heavily on such websites. Due to its popularity, it grabs the attention of
various service providers to invest in the Indian market but retaining the customers is a
crucial task for online retailers. It is imperative for an online seller to understand Indian
consumers and tries to find out which factors are contributing to getting and retaining
them.
SQ is a significant factor which is highly valued by both customers and marketers,
and it is different from the offline market. The measurement of SQ also differs and
depending upon the type of environment. The previous study pointed out that perceived
switching cost (PSC) may stimulus the consumer’s decision to buy the service or not
[Dick and Basu, (1994), p.106]. The prior investigation suggested that PSC play a critical
role in the strategic planning of the organisation to deal with today’s competitive
environment (Barroso and Picón, 2012). Recent exploration claimed that relationship
between SQ and CL has remained ambiguous due to contradictory empirical results
(Sachro and Pudjiastuti, 2013; Wong and Sohal, 2003; Solimun and Fernandes, 2018)
and how the relationship between these two variables get affected when moderated
mediation by PSC and e-satisfaction (E-S) also comes into the picture. Based on the
above discussion, the present research objective to explore the relationship between
e-service quality (E-SQ) and CL and moderated mediation model of PSC and E-S,
especially in the Indian market.
4 Deepika et al.
2.1 E-SQ
With the growth in the online retailing, the SQ has also gained immense importance in
determining the success of online retailers. There are online retailers which lose the
opportunity of earning loyal customers because of providing poor SQ. Poor SQ results in
customer frustration and hence, force them to exit. Online retailers have to retain their
customers. E-SQ helps in measuring the quality of Internet services. Like the traditional
business environment, the SQ measurement in a faceless environment determined
through various dimensions (Kim et al., 2006). Therefore, SQ is relevant in an online
environment which contributes to the success of the online retailer.
E-SQ has defined as “the extent to which a Web site facilitates efficient and effective
shopping, purchasing, and delivery of products and services” [Zeithaml et al., (2002),
p.363]. E-SQ is the arbitrated by the customers to find out the quality of service.
Shopping in the virtual marketplace is a very complicated process and includes a variety
of steps such as searching, transactions via the internet. It is unlikely that the customer
will evaluate each step and quality of the overall execution of service in the online
marketplace. It is easier for the customers to get detailed information about the product;
the importance of E-SQ has gained momentum. The customers do not want to sacrifice
the quality of the product by choosing the online marketplace for shopping over the
traditional ‘brick and mortar’ (Lee and Lin, 2005). With the rise in Internet technology,
Web is increasingly becoming a platform through with the companies make services
delivered to the customers (Casati and Shan, 2001). There is a direct interaction between
customer and website in online retailing, which has replaced the traditional interaction
between customer and service personnel (Lohse and Spiller, 2000). Customers interact
with the online store via the interface and not through any staff or personnel. Therefore,
website design acts as an interface and is an essential variable in determining the overall
service quality of the online retailer. Active website design influences the consumer’s
purchase intention also. It is how the content systematically presented to online shoppers.
The website plays a significant role in helping customers to collect the desired
information. Poor website designing may negatively influence the customer’s
satisfaction; it helps in mitigating the effect of product uncertainty (Luo et al., 2012).
Website design has defined as “an extent to which the consumer perceives
user-friendliness while shopping at an online retailer. Website usability, reliability,
access, convenience, and ease of use comprised website design” [Lin, (2007), p.367].
2.2 E-satisfaction
“Everyone knows what satisfaction is, until asked to give a definition. Then, it
seems, nobody knows.” (Oliver, 2010)
In a faceless environment, it is hard to satisfy the customers. Providing excellent services
is one way to satisfy customers. Satisfaction is a prime factor considered by the online
customer and captured the central position in marketing (Rahi et al., 2020). Satisfaction
can be the feelings about the product and service either pleasure or disappointment. In
short, customer satisfaction is the pleasure derived from the consumption of the product
or service (Churchill and Surprenant, 1982; Wong et al., 2020). Satisfaction is explained
by giving reference to the fulfilment. So, the judgment of the fulfilment requires some
Study of e-services quality and customer loyalty 5
standards which provide the base for the comparison. Thus, satisfaction includes outcome
and comparison factors. The comparison with the outcome will identify the satisfaction
level that a customer received from the offerings. The authors defined E-S as “the
contentment of the customer concerning his or her prior purchasing experience with a
given electronic commerce firm” (Oliver, 2010). The prior investigation pointed out that
SQ considered being an essential antecedent in determining customer satisfaction (Bolton
and Drew, 1991; Aydin and Özer, 2005). A recent study has pointed out that SQ has a
significant association with customer satisfaction (Solimun and Fernandes, 2018). A
recent study has explained that E-SQ has a significant association with customer
satisfaction (Agrawal et al., 2019). This implies that quality of the services directly
associated with the customer satisfaction, so the two factors are deemed to have a
positive relationship (Chang et al., 2009). Therefore, the framed hypothesis is:
H1 E-SQ has a positive impact on E-S.
2.3 CL
Attaining CL is essential for both customers and firms. Relevant for customers as it
decreases the time in searching for new alternatives or getting some loyalty points from
the retailers. Loyal customers are advantageous for firms. There are numerous benefits to
achieving CL. Loyal customer repeat purchases with positive attitudes to repurchase the
brand (Khan, 2013). The question now arises how to make a loyal customer or what are
the possible antecedents of CL. Satisfaction deliberated as the primary antecedent in
achieving loyalty of customers, but once loyalty achieved customer satisfaction becomes
less critical. Prior investigation has explained that E-S considered being an essential
antecedent of CL (Anderson and Srinivasan, 2003). Recent research examines and
suggested that E-SQ have a positive association with CL in telecom setting (Zhou et al.,
2019). However, the previous exploration suggested that providing high-quality services
will lead to higher CL (Wong and Sohal, 2003). A recent study pointed that satisfaction
leads to CL (Ramesh et al., 2020). Recent investigation explained that loyalty is a
behavioural intention and has an association with E-S (Wibowo, 2019; Walvekar and
Kamble, 2019). Satisfaction always stays the central point for the consumer, either it is
traditional consumer or consumer over the internet. A recent study has proven the
mediating role of satisfaction in the relationship service orientation and CL (Solimun and
Fernandes, 2018). Previous exploration has examined the mediation impact of E-S
between the E-SQ and E-loyalty (Wibowo, 2019). That is reason researcher frame the
below hypotheses.
H2 E-SQ has a positive impact on CL.
H3 E-S positively impacts CL.
H4 E-S mediates the relationship between E-SQ and CL.
2.4 PSC
Switching behaviour can explain as the termination of the relationship by the consumer
with the service provider. Switching costs is “onetime costs that consumers associate
with the process of switching from one provider to another” [Burnham et al., (2003),
p.110]. Switching costs comprise the loss of the benefits because of terminating a
6 Deepika et al.
relationship and switching over another vendor. The previous study pointed out that
switching coast is one of the reasons for customer stays with the current vendor/seller
(Pick and Eisend, 2014). The costs are the difference in amount and time from one
vendor to another are termed as switching costs (Shaik et al., 2020). PSC can act as a
barrier to changing from one vendor to another (Deng et al., 2010). Switching costs do
not need to be always monetary; rather it could be non-monetary; for example, search
costs or learning costs (Lam et al., 2004; Shaik et al., 2020). The past research has
established a negative moderation effect of PSC on the association of satisfaction and
loyalty (Yang and Peterson, 2004). Prior study has also pointed out that PSC not
moderated between the commitment and WOM (Han and Ryu, 2012). A recent study
revealed that PSC moderated the association between the CS and switching intention
(Mannan et al., 2017). With above extensive discussion, we can see the ambiguity
concerning the moderating effect of PSC in the different investigation and PSC is one of
the imperative element to study the CL that’s the reason we have considered as a
moderator in our study.
H5 The relationship between E-SQ and CL gets stronger when PSCs comes into the
picture.
H6 PSC moderate the relationship between E-S and CL.
3 Methodology
3.2 Methods
The collected data and analysed by applying SEM in AMOS. SEM consists of two steps:
at the first stage, CFA did which used to establish the reliability and validity of the data
(although internal reliability established by using Cronbach alpha) and the second stage
deals with regression analysis.
4 Data analysis
The results established the overall fit of the model. The chi-square value is 437.109,
and DF is 181. Value of CMIN/DF is 2.415, RMR is 0.041, CFI is 0.930 and RMSEA is
0.077. All the values are closer to the threshold limits, and hence, it suggests the good
overall fit of the model. After getting the results from the E-SQ model, the overall fit
model has tested. Some items have deleted to improve the overall fit of the model, and
desirable results have obtained. The hypothesise model’s reliability and validity have
checked, and the values of CR and AVE is above the recommended level. Discriminant
validity has also been checked here along with convergent validity, and there are no
issues regarding reliability and validity. The results show in Table 2. Fit indices
calculated by CFA to assess the model fitness, the overall model chi-square value is
964.496 and 449 DOF having statically significant p-value. However, the normed
chi-square, i.e., DOF value, should not exceed 3, our DOF value is 2.148. Other indices
such as RMSEA, RMR and CFI have also used to assess the model fitness (Table 3). The
values of RMSEA are less than 0.10; the value is acceptable. The values of RMR and CFI
are also nearer to the threshold limit. Hence, the overall fit of the measurement model
shows the good model fit as a result of which we can move further towards working on
the structural model.
Table 2 Construct reliability and validity
each other, whereas some of the constructs not correlated in the structural model.
Therefore, it is appropriate to check the overall model fit. Fit indices indicate that the
overall model is fit. The present study examined the association of E-SQ and CL
mediated by E-S and the moderating impact of PSC
a E-SQ
b E-S and CL.
The empirical results showed that E-SQ positively affects E-S (β = 0.876, p < 0.05) and,
CL (β = 0.939, p < 0.05), supporting H1 and H2. H3 relates to the link between E-S and
CL, and the empirical results support the link (β = 0.968 and p < 0.05). When testing the
mediation effect of E-S between E-SQ and CL, the study found a positive result. The
impact of E-SQ on the CL is much less when both, i.e., E-S and E-SQ took as the
independent variable, and the value of R has significantly improved. Although, we cannot
claim perfect mediation as the beta value for E-SQ is still significant (p < 0.05), but the
beta value has declined considerably (from 0.939 to 0.222), thereby, confirming the
partial mediation. Hence, we can say that E-SQ acts upon CL via E-S and supporting H4.
The study further checks the moderation effect of PSCs using process tool (Hayes, 2018).
The results show that PSC does not moderate on the relationship between E-S and CL,
since the interaction effect is coming out to be insignificant (p > 0.05). Similar results had
obtained when moderation checked between E-SQ and CL. The interaction is coming out
to be insignificant (p > 0.05), thereby, not supporting H5 and H6.
Table 4 Hypothesis results
Hypotheses Results
H1 E-service quality has a positive impact on e-satisfaction Supported
H2 E-service quality has a positive impact on customer loyalty Supported
H3 E-satisfaction positively impacts customer loyalty Supported
H4 E-satisfaction mediates the relationship between e-service quality Partially supported
and customer loyalty
H5 The relationship between service quality and customer loyalty gets Not supported
stronger when customers have low perceived switching costs
H6 The relationship between e-satisfaction and customer loyalty gets Not supported
stronger when customers have low perceived switching costs
The study developed a frame to analyse the impact of E-SQ on E-S and CL and also tried
to answer the question of whether E-SQ acts via E-S on CL or not. First, the effect of
E-SQ has been checked on E-S and found to be significant which goes in line with the
literature (Lee and Lin, 2005; Chang et al., 2009). Therefore, E-SQ is one of the primary
antecedents of E-S, as evidenced by empirical literature. Next, the impact of E-SQ on CL
is also significant, which proves that E-SQ is also one of the factors determining CL. The
study points toward the positive relationship shared between E-SQ and CL. The results
throw some light on the relationship between the two variables as the past literature is
quite ambiguous in their relationship. The study contributes to finding out the mediating
Study of e-services quality and customer loyalty 11
effect of E-S between E-SQ and CL. The empirical evidence shows a positive result
which implies that E-SQ acts via E-S on CL (Solimun and Fernandes, 2018). Although
perfect mediation not established, the study claims the partial mediation of E-S. It
empirically proved that by improving the quality of the services provided, the retailers
would be able to please the customers and make them stickier towards them. Therefore,
E-SQ is an essential tool to satisfy the customers and get closer to them so that the
customers do not switch over to the competitors. Investing in SQ is essential in the world
of stiff competition to make the overall experience as a satisfying one. Once the
customers are satisfied, it will be smoother for the retailers to gain loyalty.
Furthermore, the study checked the moderation impact of PSCs and did not find any
support for the same. Previous literature is ambiguous over the results since some studies
support the moderation role (De Ruyter et al., 1998) and some studies exist which do not
support the moderation role (Yang and Peterson, 2004). Since the level of PSC is too low
in online retailing, it might be one of the reasons for no moderation impact otherwise in
case of services industry where PSCs are too high; it serves as a crucial variable.
References
Agrawal, V., Seth, N., Seth, D. and Tripathi, V. (2019) ‘Exploring e-service quality and its relation
with customer satisfaction in the banking sector: an Indian experience’, International Journal
of Business Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 4, pp.489–506 [online] https://doi.org/10.1504/
IJBIS.2019.103792.
Anderson, R.E. and Srinivasan, S.S. (2003) ‘E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: a contingency
framework’, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp.123–138 [online] https://doi.org/
10.1002/mar.10063.
Awang, Z. (2012) Structural Equation Modelling Using Amos Graphic, UiTM Press.
12 Deepika et al.
Aydin, S. and Özer, G. (2005) ‘The analysis of antecedents of customer loyalty in the Turkish
mobile telecommunication market’, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39, Nos. 7–8,
pp.910–925 [online] https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560510601833.
Barroso, C. and Picón, A. (2012) ‘Multi-dimensional analysis of perceived switching costs’,
Industrial Marketing Management, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp.531–543 [online] https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.indmarman.2011.06.020.
Bolton, R.N. and Drew, J.H. (1991) ‘A multistage model of customers’ assessments of service
quality and value’, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 17, No. 4, p.375 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1086/208564.
Burnham, T.A., Frels, J.K. and Mahajan, V. (2003) ‘Consumer switching costs: a typology,
antecedents, and consequences’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 31, No. 2,
pp.109–126 [online] https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070302250897.
Casati, F. and Shan, M-C. (2001) ‘Dynamic and adaptive composition of e-services’, Information
Systems, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp.143–163 [online] https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4379(01)00014-x.
Chan, M., Lau, L., Lui, T., Ng, S., Tam, E. and Tong, E. (2001) ‘Final report: customer relationship
management’, Customer Relationship Management Consortium Study, Asian Benchmarking
Clearing House, Hong Kong.
Chang, H.H., Wang, Y.H. and Yang, W.Y. (2009) ‘The impact of e-service quality, customer
satisfaction and loyalty on e-marketing: moderating effect of perceived value’, Total Quality
Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp.423–443 [online] https://doi.org/
10.1080/14783360902781923.
Chou, S., Chen, C.W. and Lin, J.Y. (2015) ‘Female online shoppers: examining the mediating roles
of e-satisfaction and e-trust on e-loyalty development’, Internet Research, Vol. 25, No. 4,
pp.542–561 [online] https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-01-2014-0006.
Churchill, G.A.J. and Surprenant, C. (1982) ‘An investigation into the determinants of customer
satisfaction’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp.491–504 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602429.
De Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M. and Bloemer, J. (1998) ‘On the relationship between perceived service
quality, service loyalty and switching costs’, International Journal of Service Industry
Management, Vol. 9, No. 5, pp.436–453.
Deng, Z., Lu, Y., Wei, K.K. and Zhang, J. (2010) ‘Understanding customer satisfaction and loyalty:
an empirical study of mobile instant messages in China’, International Journal of Information
Management, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.289–300 [online] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.
10.001.
Dick, A.S. and Basu, K. (1994) ‘Customer loyalty: toward an integrated conceptual framework’,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp.99–113 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070394222001.
Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) ‘Structural equation models with unobservable variables and
measurement error: algebra and statistics’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 3,
p.382 [online] https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980.
Ganesh, J., Arnold, M.J. and Reynolds, K.E. (2000) ‘Understanding the customer base of service
providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and stayers’, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 64, No. 3, pp.65–87 [online] https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.3.65.18028.
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. (2009) Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.,
Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey.
Han, H. and Ryu, K. (2012) ‘Key factors driving customers’ word-of-mouth intentions in
full-service restaurants: the moderating role of switching costs’, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly,
Vol. 53, No. 2, pp.96–109 [online] https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965511433599.
Hayes, A.F. (2018) in Little, T.D. (Ed.): Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional
Process Analysis: Regression based Approach, 2nd ed., Guilford Publications, New York,
USA.
Study of e-services quality and customer loyalty 13
Hu, L-t. and Bentler, P.M. (1999) ‘Cutoff criterial for fit indexes in covariance structure anlaysis:
conventional criteria versus new alternatives’, Structural Equation Modelling:
A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp.1–55.
Kassim, N. and Abdullah, A. (2010) ‘The effect of perceived service quality dimensions on
customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in e-commerce settings: a cross cultural analysis’, Asia
Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics [online] https://doi.org/10.1108/
13555851011062269.
Khan, M.T. (2013) ‘Customers loyalty: concept & definition (a review)’, International Journal of
Information, Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp.168–191 [online] http://dx.doi.org/
10.1108/17506200710779521.
Kim, J., Jin, B. and Swinney, J.L. (2009) ‘The role of e-tail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in
online loyalty development process’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Vol. 16,
No. 4, pp.239–247 [online] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.11.019.
Kim, M., Kim, J-H. and Lennon, S. (2006) ‘Online service attributes available on apparel retail web
sites: an E-S-QUAL approach’, Managing Service Quality: An International Journal,
Vol. 16, No. 1, pp.51–77.
Lam, S.Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M.K. and Murthy, B. (2004) ‘Customer value, satisfaction,
loyalty, and switching costs: an illustration from a business-to-business service context’,
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp.293–311.
Lee, G.G. and Lin, H.F. (2005) ‘Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping’,
International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp.161–176
[online] https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550510581485.
Lin, H-F. (2007) ‘The impact of website quality dimensions on customer satisfaction in B2C
e-commerce context’, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 18, No. 4,
pp.363–378.
Liu, A.H. (2006) ‘Customer value and switching costs in business services: developing exit barriers
through strategic value management’, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 21,
No. 1, pp.30–37 [online] https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620610643157.
Lohse, G.L. and Spiller, P. (2000) ‘Online retail store attributes’, Communications of the ACM,
Vol. 41, No. 7, pp.81–88 [online] https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b013/07930f3764719d9c
da1c4c7c56bd768fb65b.pdf.
Luo, J., Ba, S. and Zhang, H. (2012) ‘The effectiveness of online shopping characteristics and well-
designed websites on satisfaction’, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp.1131–1144.
Mannan, M., Mohiuddin, M.F., Chowdhury, N. and Sarker, P. (2017) ‘Customer satisfaction,
switching intentions, perceived switching costs, and perceived alternative attractiveness in
Bangladesh mobile telecommunications market’, South Asian Journal of Business Studies,
Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.142–160 [online] https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-06-2016-0049.
Nunkoo, R., Teeroovengadum, V., Thomas, P. and Leonard, L. (2017) ‘Integrating service quality
as a second-order factor in a customer satisfaction and loyalty model’, International Journal of
Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 29, No. 12, pp.2978–3005 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2016-0610.
Oliver, R. (2010) Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective on the Consumer, 2nd ed., Routledge,
London, New York.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Malhotra, A. (2005) ‘ES-QUAL: a multiple-item scale for
assessing electronic service quality’, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp.213–233
[online] https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/articles/4x51hm21q.
Pick, D. and Eisend, M. (2014) ‘Buyers’ perceived switching costs and switching: a meta-analytic
assessment of their antecedents’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 42,
No. 2, pp.186–204 [online] https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-013-0349-2.
14 Deepika et al.
Rahi, S., Ghani, M.A. and Ngah, A.H. (2020) ‘Factors propelling the adoption of internet banking:
the role of e-customer service, website design, brand image and customer satisfaction’,
International Journal of Business Information Systems, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp.549–569 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2020.105870.
Ramesh, V., Jaunky, V.C., Roopchund, R. and Oodit, H.S. (2020) ‘Customer satisfaction, loyalty
and ‘adoption’ of e-banking technology in Mauritius’, in Satapathy, S.C. (Ed.): Embedded
Systems and Artificial Intelligence, pp.861–873, Springer, Singapore.
Reichheld, F.F. and Schefter, P. (2000) ‘E-loyalty: your secret weapon on the web’, Harvard
Business Review, Vol. 78, No. 4, pp.105–113.
Reichheld, F.P. and Sasser, W.E. (1990) ‘Zero defections: quality comes to services’, Harvard
Business Review [online] http://ksi.fp.uns.ac.id/box/agribisnis/0-Journal Agribisnis/Journal of
MarketingManagement/2006/Vol22issue3-4april2006/campuran/9010221736.pdf.Loyalty
basedmanagement.pdf.
Sachro and Pudjiastuti, R. (2013) ‘The effect service quality to customer satisfaction and customer
loyalty of Argo Bromo Anggrek Train Jakarta-Surabaya in Indonesia’, IOSR Journal of
Business and Management, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.33–38 [online] https://doi.org/10.9790/487x-
1213338.
Shaik, M., Bosukonda, N., Mittal, V. and Sridhar, S. (2020) ‘Price sensitivity and customer
perceived switching costs in business-to-business markets: joint effect on customer repurchase
intentions’, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp.1–40 [online] https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3530532.
Solimun and Fernandes, A.A.R. (2018) ‘The mediation effect of customer satisfaction in the
relationship between service quality, service orientation, and marketing mix strategy to
customer loyalty’, Journal of Management Development, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp.76–87 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2016-0315.
Walvekar, S. and Kamble, A.A. (2019) ‘Relationship between customer loyalty and service failure,
service recovery and switching costs in online retailing’, International Journal of Business
Information Systems, Vol. 32, No. 1, p.56 [online] https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbis.2019.
10024358.
Wibowo, H.A. (2019) ‘The mediating role of e-satisfaction on the effect of e-service quality
dimensions on e-loyalty: a lesson from Bukalapak.com Indonesia’, Humanities and Social
Sciences Letters, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.199–203 [online] https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.73.2019.
74.199.208.
Wong, A. and Sohal, A. (2003) ‘Service quality and customer loyalty perspectives on two levels of
retail relationships’, Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp.495–513 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040310486285.
Wong, V.C., Su, L. and Lam, H.P-Y. (2020) ‘When less is more: how mindset influences
consumers’ responses to products with reduced negative attributes’, Journal of Marketing
[online] https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920920859.
Yang, Z. and Peterson, R.T. (2004) ‘Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: the role of
switching costs’, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 10, pp.799–822 [online]
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20030.
Zeithaml, V.A., Parasuraman, A. and Malhotra, A. (2002) ‘Service quality delivery through web
sites: a critical review of extant knowledge’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.362–375 [online] https://doi.org/10.1177/009207002236911.
Zhou, R., Wang, X., Shi, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, L. and Guo, H. (2019) ‘Measuring e-service quality
and its importance to customer satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical study in a telecom
setting’, Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp.477–499 [online] https://doi.org/
10.1007/s10660-018-9301-3.