Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Extensive reading
Extensive reading was first coined by Palmer (1917) defined as the type of reading that
is done rapidly, book after book, and focusing on meaning rather than on the language. Palmer
(1917) adds that extensive reading is a real-world reading with pedagogical purposes. This
definition is consistent with Bamford and Day’s (1998) who actually see extensive reading as an
approach for language teaching in which learners read for overall meaning, information, and
enjoyment. Even though this type of reading could be associated with Krashen’s free-voluntary,
or pleasurable reading (Krashen, 2004; 2011), Bamford and Day (2004) say that extensive
reading belongs in the ELT classroom, also Macalister (2010), and propose a series of core
principles upon which any extensive reading program should be constructed and that constitute
1. The reading material needs to be easy to read. Learners will be unlikely to succeed if
they read difficult material with many unfamiliar items of vocabulary or grammar.
2. Learners read as much as possible. The quantity of reading determines the benefits of
extensive reading.
to reading learners should have the possibility to find something they want to read.
4. learners choose what they want to read. Learners enjoy Extensive reading because they
are free to make choices or even stop reading materials that are not interesting for them.
5. Reading speed is usually faster rather than slower. Reading easy material encourages
in contrast to academic or intensive reading and the detailed information they require.
2
7. Reading is individual and silent. Learners read at their own pace and, although there is
silent reading in the classroom, most of the reading is done out of it.
8. Reading is its own reward. Reading is not usually followed by comprehension questions.
Teachers may ask the students to complete follow-up activities as long as these
9. The guiding role of the teacher is crucial for learners to make the most of reading. Part of
this guiding role is related to keeping track of what and how much learners read and
Macalister (2015) reconsiders these principles and defines them not as rigid
extended revision of literature on the implementation of extensive reading programs and the
aforementioned principles in 44 articles, Day (2015) concluded that some of the extensive
The work of Davis (1995) mentions numerous benefits of extensive reading for the ELT
classroom and improvement in multiple areas of language. Some of them include gain in active
and passive vocabulary, also reported in Kembo (1993), use of varied sentence structure,
writing and speaking skills, and identification and correction of grammatical mistakes; personal
growth such as positive attitude towards studying, greater knowledge of the world, and
increased understanding of other people; and of course reading skills such as engagement and
readiness to read, overall comprehension, reading fluency or speed (Mo, 2020), and positive
attitudes towards reading, the latter also in Macalister (2007) and Pino (1992). Other studies
have proved the effectiveness of extensive reading to promote learners’ language and cognitive
development when combined with Task Based Instruction (Chen, 2018; Green, 2005).
3
Despite being in the ELT field for long time, the multiple benefits it brings to language
learning, and a relevant degree of acceptance among teachers (Macalister, 2010), extensive
reading is surprisingly not very common in schools’ curriculums probably because of the
unfamiliar roles that both learners and teachers must open to experience when doing extensive
reading, the pressure of completing schools curriculums over a tight term time, and the fact that
benefits do not show immediately (Brown, 2009; Macalister, 2007; Renandya, 2007).
Nevertheless, the benefits of extensive reading clearly outweigh its drawbacks. Maley (2005)
argues that extensive reading is an effective method to improve language proficiency; similarly,
Davis (1995) forcefully declares that any ESL or EFL classroom would be the poorer for the lack
of extensive reading. As the evidence for extensive reading being an effective ELT methodology
cannot simply be ignored, and even in the case of not providing immediate measurable gains for
the learner, the opportunity of having an enjoyable learning experience in the ELT classroom
4
References
Brown, D. (2009). Why and How Textbooks Should Encourage Extensive Reading. ELT
Davis, C. (1995). Extensive Reading: an Expensive Extravagance? ELT Journal, 49 (4), 329-
336.
Day, R., & J. Bamford. (1998). Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom.
Day, R. & J. Bamford. (2004). Extensive Reading Activities for Teaching Language. Cambridge
University Press.
Day, R. (2015). Extending Extensive Reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27 (2), 294-301.
Green, C. (2005). Integrating Extensive Reading in the Task-Based Curriculum. ELT Journal, 59
(4), 406-311.
Kembo, J. (1993). Reading: Encouraging and Maintaining Individual Extensive Reading, English
(3), 248-256.
5
Education: Why Isn’t Everyone Doing It? Reading in a Foreign Language, 41 (1), 59-75.
Maley, A. (2005). Review: Extensive Reading Activities for Language Teaching. ELT Journal, 59
(4), 354-355.
Mo, A. (2020). Improving 9th Grade EFL Students’ Reading Speed Through an Enhanced
Palmer, H. (1917). The Scientific Study and Teaching of Languages. George G. Harrap
& Company LTD.
Pino, J. (1992). Extensive Reading: No Pain, No Gain? English Teaching Forum, 30 (2), 48-49.
Renandya, W. (2007). The Power of Extensive Reading. Regional Language Centre Journal, 38
(2), 133-149