This document summarizes the key differences between inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning uses a bottom-up approach starting with observations and moving to tentative conclusions, while deductive reasoning takes a top-down approach starting with facts or theories and moving to specific conclusions. The validity of arguments also differs between the two methods, with inductive arguments having strong and weak forms and deductive arguments being valid, invalid, or invalid.
This document summarizes the key differences between inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning uses a bottom-up approach starting with observations and moving to tentative conclusions, while deductive reasoning takes a top-down approach starting with facts or theories and moving to specific conclusions. The validity of arguments also differs between the two methods, with inductive arguments having strong and weak forms and deductive arguments being valid, invalid, or invalid.
This document summarizes the key differences between inductive and deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning uses a bottom-up approach starting with observations and moving to tentative conclusions, while deductive reasoning takes a top-down approach starting with facts or theories and moving to specific conclusions. The validity of arguments also differs between the two methods, with inductive arguments having strong and weak forms and deductive arguments being valid, invalid, or invalid.
Specific to general(generalization process) General to specific (specialization process)
Bottom up approach Top down approach
Based on observation & patterns. Start Based on facts, start with premises. (truth with conclusion. (truth are probable) are guarantee) Observation –pattern-tentative hypothesis- Theory-hypothesis- observation- theory (known to unknown) conformation. (unknown to known) Arguments- strong's & weak. Arguments- valid (sound & unsound) and Invalid (unsound) Use some example as a tools. Use syllogism as tools. **Basically in inductive reasoning: fact to **Basically in deductive reasoning: theory law or theory. to fact or figure. **Valid Argument: 1. If all the premises are true, then the conclusion must be true. 2. If all the premises are true, then the conclusion can’t be false. 3. If premises of a valid argument entail the conclusion. 4. If it has no counter example(true premises+false conclusion) 5. If it’s conclusion follows with certainty its premises. **Invalid Argument: 1. If premises are true, but conclusion is false then the argument defiantly invalid. 2. If all the premises and conclusion are true. Then the argument defiantly valid and here invalid probable. 3. If all premises are false and conclusion are true then the argument probable. 4. If one premises are false and conclusion are false then the argument probable. **Inductive argument: • Strong argument: it is impossible that the promises are true &the conclusion false. • Weak argument: the conclusion probably does not follow from the argument. A deductive argument is valid if a. Premises are false and conclusion is true. b. Premises are false and conclusion is also false. c. Premises are true and conclusion is false. d. Premises are true and conclusion is also true.