ommercial pplications esearch for xtraterrestrial echnology 4omayPro Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT DECEMBER 1986 PALO ALTO, CA AND = al PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORYPALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY 4-86 RESEARCH REPORT 1, OVERVIEW This document phase (refer intended as a primer on the tentative findings of the Q4 1986 research to here Palo Alto CARET Laboratory (PACL). In cordat ¢ goal of this research has been ac #4 greater understanding of extraterrestrial technology within the context of commercial applications and civilian use. Examples of such applica particular order, include transportation, medicine, construction, gy. computing and communication, The ullimate goal of this research is to provide a core set of adva technologies in a condition suitable for patent review. 2, EXTRACTION The process of conve: raw artifacts of extraterrestrial origin to usable, fully- documented human technology is termed extraction. The extraction process ultimatel + of two phases: first is the establishment of a complete theoretical and operational tanding of the artifact, and second is a distillation of the artifact’s underlying principles into a usable, product-oriented technology. Suggestions of specific product ns on behalf of PACL have been encouraged, but are nat considered mandatory esults of a successful extraction are collected in what is termed an extraction package ), which should include the following: 1, Complete theoretical and operational overview 2. Assessment and summary of compositional materials 3. At least (3) working prototypes, demonstrating multiple instances of successful, repeatable and reliable implementation 4. Assembly notes and BOM At the time of this writing, a fully successful extraction has not yet been achieved, although numerous threads of research are showing promise. Comprehensive documentation of PACL's extraction process can be found in document PACL- DO00G, entitled “PACL Extraction Procedure Guide”. 3, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF Q4-66. Q4-86 focused on four key subjects, all of which were based on artifacts of extraterrestrial origin obtained from crash site recovery operations conducted during the last two decades within the continental United States. These subjects are: “Personal” antigravity generator (so-named for its small, portable size) 2. Three-dimensional image recorder/projectorPALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT 3. Acomplex system of symbols and ¢ nstructs capable of both defining the functionality of certain artifacts as well as manipulating their behavior crudely analogous to a computer programming language but without the ry for a compilation or interpretation phase 4. RESEARCH SUBJECT: “PERSONAL” ANTIGRAVITY uitous recovered from extraterrestr with propulsion, the principles Antigravity techr crafts. While antig among the most w avity is most commonly tinderlying the technology extend into afar broader domain; indeed, virtually all aspects ‘of mosi extraterrestrial craft seem to incorporate its use in some way. A prominent example is the seemingly impenetrable field, trollable diameter and attenuation, surrounding the craft that protects it from we as well as debris, and, unsurprising mpening of G-force tehes (or th their closest equival conditions and the surrounding environment, Additional examples inelud: quipment, movement of doors and nM of fixtures (such as. control startling is the arto be held in means. This isa partial gers and on-boar lents), and even p ents) within in a given extraterrestrial c passe h con fact that the very components w place, in relation to one another, exclusively by antigravitation: explanation for the commonly noted lack of rivets and adhesives in the construction of these crafts, PACL aims to translate this technology into a product-oriented EP capable of direct application within the consumer market. However, since the sudden emery ally advanced technology would undoubtedly yield destructive consequences, F commends a strat ion in which deliberately downgrd ns of the original technology are released over a period of years or decades to soften the impact of integration with existing infrastructures, in technolc nd sacial terms. gy of increme omic L. WHAT IS PERSONAL ANTIGRAVITY? Not all recovered extraterrestrial technologies are equal, and many previous experiments on antigravity have been performed on cumbersome artifacts suffering from enermous form factors and impractical weights. An ironic consequen vious generations f experimentation is that many man-made aircraft that would be otherwise ideal y propulsion models a pable of supporting the weight of the device before its gravity- ing effects are activated. This has lead to many clumsy and accident prone solutions, such as using a second antigravity generator to load and position the first within the aircraft before a jon and takeoff, and then repeating the process in reverse after landing but be Despite some minor successes in narrowly defined domains, these appr able in the long term, eof these p: ore deactivatio aches are obviously notPALO ALTO GARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT eo. RESEARCH REPORT Recently, however, a rather different implementation of antigravity technology has red, und Hy the produ sumably more advanced source can sof magnitude: able to existing artifacts in a s than two feet across and we less than five pounds s termed this technology “personal antig, weight and dimensions suggest applications as focused as a ntigravity yy a single human user. Early experiments suggest, however, that despite its romarkabl Precision and focus, this technology is equally effeetive when br Twith avity”, as its virtually negligibh massive payloads of arbitrary seales 4.2. OVERVIEW OF RECOVERED ANTIGRAVITY ARTIFACTS 4.2.1, KEY ARTIFACTS PACL has conducted the brunt of its antigravity research is what PACL considers to be an “antigravity generator that appears to provide a source” of antigravity that « hin the craft. The second tw: beam segments (seen im figure 4.2) that, when p ator during a specific mode of its ope elative py The first 41), a device n then be projected onto or artifacts are ctirved [- ed anywhere within a certain radius ition, immediately fly into what is Hons within the original construction af the craft nee wi harnessed by other compon The generator artifact is assigned the identification code Al. The I-beam artifacts are assigned identification codes A2 and Aj 4.2.2. SECONDARY ARTIFACTS Additionally, PACL has been provided with a small, capable of controlling A1 by activating and deactivating its three primary modes of operation. This device, assigned the identification code is of amtioslaely scusitive importance, as itis the only known method of contralling AL 4.2.3, RIGID SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS Unlike the more general-purpose antigravity fields generated by implementations of this technology obtained from other sources, Al is capable of multiple modes of operation and varying levels of precision. Perhaps the most compelling aspect of Al's functionality is its ability to focus its antigravitational effects on specifi objects, rather t spatial volumes, creating what PACL has termed a rigid spatial relationship (RSR). An RSR can be thought of as creating an “implicit solid” between two or more constituent Parts separated by empty space. Once in effect, these constituent parts behave as if theyPALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT wre I artifacts used by PACL during the entigren are directly and physically linked, and a them in opposing directions, Only when t n behave as separate objects y inseparable by pulling or pushing Al is deactivated will they once a, As an example, imagine cutting a broomstick into two segment hy one foot in length Once separa' ach segment is its own object, capable of being moved of rotated independently of the other. Under the effect of an RSR, however, the segments migh: bi if they were a three-foot rod consisting af both foot-long broomstick segments separated by an additional foot of empty space. While the two rod segments would stil appear to be separate, to the point that an observer would be able to pass their hance through the space that separates them, they would be unable to move ane of the rod: without the other behaving as if it were directly attached 4.2.4. OVERVIEW OF AL nt cylindrical core, 1 foot, 2.2 inches in length and 8.3 inehe nding from each end. The total length t, 2.4 inches. Both core segments featn of the cor Al consists of a Lwo-seg, in diameter, with needle-like app of the device, with needles included, i lar array of three “arms”, extending 7.6 inches fram the cente nda a triang!PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4.86 RESEARCH REPOR a EPO shot of the beam sexments cach of which end in a circular with a diameter of 2 inches. The device weighs approximately 4 pounds, 3 ounces late in Q4-86, and as such, little Research on the internal functionality of Al beg is currently known, What is ain, however, is that the de contains no moving does not feature any kind of control interface in the form of buttons, switches, or levers, and, apparently, can only be manipulated by the technology contained in 51. According to the limited data to which PACL has been given access in regards to the placement and housing of Al within the original craft, Al was one of a pair of identical generators, together responsible for all antigravity-related functionality, from propulsion ef the craft itself to placement of all components within the craft's internal design. From this information, as well as experiments conducted with SI. it has been discovered that Al operates in one of at least three modes of operation: 1. Field mode, AL generates a that can be expressed as a convex volume. Within this fi redefined with any desired strength and orientation. The including the shape of the field itself, are defined by, Surprisingly, AT does not appe able oF Bencratiny re of concavity, nor can the strength or orientation of the y within the field vary {rom ene point to another. An example of eld of (presumably) arbitrary size and any shape id, gravity is effectively rameters of this mode afield wi artificial grPALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q4-86 RESEARCH REPORT field mode would be creating a controlled gravity environment within an aircraft or spacecraft for passengers and cargo. 2. Component mode, Rather than generating a general-purpose field of constant gravity control, Al will manipulate the gravitational effect on specific objects, allowing them to take any position or orientation relative to its own centroid. Component mode appears to be used commonly for maintaining the physical construction of a craft's design. Rather than attaching a craft's components to ane another by ves, welding or the like, they are simply held in place, quite precisely, by antigravitational means. Unlike field mode, PACL has not yet been success(ul in controlling the parameters or data that drive this mode. 51 does not appear capable of controlling this mode beyond activating or deactivating it. ‘Once in effect, the details of which components are affected, and how, seem to be provided by the components themselves. See the following section for more information. Component mode is responsible for the RSR effect deseribed in the previous section and depicted in figure 3. Mul Al combines the functionality of the field and component modes preducing specific antigravity effects on individual components while also erating any mumber of general-purpose gravity control fields. The same limitations that apply to the field generated in field mode apply to fields generated in this mode as well, but the ability to create multiple fields of differing parameters allows those limitations to be jeved that this mode was used most commonly for managing eds of the original craft. way of rivets, adh fectively circumvented in most pins, It is the antigravitational m situal 4.2.5. OVERVIEW OF A2 AND A3 s of a curved On their own, A2 and A3 appear to be completely non-functional s I-beam (seen in in figure 4.3). However, when AL is swi position and orientation in relation to Al's centroid are precisely enforced with an RSK (seen in figure 4.4) hed into component mode, thei gths, which are 7.2 inches and 9.1 inches, hs, both artifacts weigh A2and A3are primarily differentiated by theit len respectively. Despite the difference in their | 2.6 ounce pproximately While initial e solid mate sed of a consistent, acts are more nd ses perimentation indicated thal the artifacts were comp ial, experiments on Al’s component mode suggest that the ar internally complex, somehow containing inform their position orientation in relation to AL when the mode is in effect. Whether or not they p additional functionality beyond the storage of this information is currently but is considered likely due to their otherwise ambiguous purpose within the craft's tion that describe aknown,24-86 RESEARCH REPORT NT Sinan Figure 4seek TINA NCW to ei ne ea TaREPORT LABORATORY PALO ALTO PALO ATO CARETLABORATORY EEE Figure 49 L-beam segnvents linked to the antiga ator in an RSKPALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER Figure 14.11 Full view of diagram D39-08-117c.PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER ofa three-node AB-type semaphore cascade, extending from an exterior vertex of an octal junction.PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER oD eens 4) Figure 14.13 Rotary junction with orbital sub-junc fo an octal switch 121PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER *K \ / \ aaa stat \ qh . Ws 5 ig (aL “a wrt a \ S é / e51U7A BAY 7 mI W Ono’ 8 14.14 ind junction in a dual-link union with kea ch and diffuserPALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS PRIMER — ety nko S Figure 14.15 Parent junction with three non-orbital child junctions.PALO ALTO CARET LABORATORY Q3-85 INVENTORY REVIEW