Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Broadband Electro Optic Polarization Conversion With Atomically Thin Black Phosphorus
Broadband Electro Optic Polarization Conversion With Atomically Thin Black Phosphorus
Re-use and distribution is strictly not permitted, except for Open Access articles
RESEARC H
A B C
e
abl
Inp
Tun zation
ut
ar i V
pol utput
o
Zigzag
Au
hBN
3L-BP AC ZZ
PMMA
Fig. 1. Schematic of electrically tunable polarization conversion electrode or mirror) for a fixed wavelength. (B) Experimentally
and TLBP birefringence. (A) Schematic of ca vity design and polarization measured polarized absorption f rom a TLBP device ( non-
conversion. TLBP is incorporated in a dielectric e nvironment between cavity-integrated) for different doping densities along the AC
two mirrors [one partially reflective (top) and one highly reflective direction. The ZZ direction rema ins featureless for all conditions.
(bottom)]. The incoming beam is linearly polarized, and the output beam (C and D) Extracted complex refractive index (real and imaginary
can be azimuthally rotated or converted between circular a nd linear part, respectively) for TLBP a s a function of doping density for
polarization with applied voltage (between the TLBP and the back the AC and ZZ directions.
used in Fig . 2, B to D, are not a unique sphere is intimately related to how well the to reduced birefringence. To aid the visualiza-
choice. In fact, the optical anisotropy in TLBP cavity critically couples to the incoming free- tion of covariation in azimuthal and elliptic-
is broadband, enabling operation over the en- space electromagnetic field and is dominated ity spatially, a false-color map of ellipticity
tire wavelength range of the telecommunica- strongly by the top mirror reflectivity. superimposed with measured reflection polar-
tion E, S, and C bands with appropriate changes Planar heterostructure–based optical cav- ization ellipses is shown in Fig. 3E. The white
in the cavity parameters, primarily through ities can act as sensitive probes to any spatially (black) color corresponds to right (left) hand-
adjustment of the thicknesses of the dielec- varying features such as dielectric disorder or edness. Finally, in Fig. 3, F and G, spatial maps
tric medium (hBN or PMMA) and the top Au thickness of BP, which are key to understand- of the maximum achieved ellipticity over a
mirror. Both parameters are important in de- ing polarization conversion dynamics. Spatial bandwidth of 70 nm (1450 to 1520 nm) and
termining the resonance wavelength and the false-color maps of ellipticity (Fig. 3A) and the corresponding resonance wavelength are
reflection extinction ratio [see sections S14 azimuthal angles (Fig. 3B), measured for hete- plotted, respectively. The overall achieved max-
and S15 in the materials and methods (29 )]. rostructure device D4, are shown for four dif- imum ellipticity is relatively homogeneous, al-
To experimentally demonstrate the broad- ferent wavelengths near the cavity resonance, though the spectral distribution is quite broad.
band nature of the TLBP anisotropy, reflection showing that the polarization conversion has The histogram in Fig. 3H (filtered for absolute
intensities were measured from five represen- strong spatial variation. An optical image of ellipticity values >10°) confirms a strong center-
tative heterostructures (Fig. 2E). The PMMA the sample with appropriately outlined bare ing of the ellipticity response around the reso-
thickness was sequentially tuned to redshift cavity (0), three-layer, and six-layer BP regions nance wavelength (~1490 nm). Figure 3I shows
the cavity resonance, spanning ~100 nm across is shown in the inset of Fig. 3E. To gain further the distribution of maximum ellipticity achieved
the E, S, and C telecommunication bands. For insight, spectral scans are shown in Fig. 3, C for all pixels across the entire map presented
each heterostructure device (D1 to D5), a cor- and D, for a select few points (appropriately in Fig. 3F. Two strong peaks are seen near
responding spectral trajectory on the Poincaré labeled) chosen from the aforementioned re- +10° and –35°, corresponding to the peak el-
sphere is shown in Fig. 2, F to J, respectively. gions. Strong polarization conversion is seen lipticity values observed in most of the trilayer
The blue (red) arrows mark the beginning on the trilayer region. For example, a linearly region. Our observation of spatially varying
(end) of the measured spectral trajectory, cor- polarized input (azimuth ~45° to the AC/ZZ complex refractive indices is consistent with
responding to 1410 (1520) nm for D1 to D4 and axes) is converted to nearly circular (42° ellip- dielectric disorder seen in typical 2D hetero-
1500 (1575) nm for D5. Efficient polarization ticity) at the resonance. An associated feature structures (30). We speculate the origin of
conversion can be seen for all the devices, is seen in the azimuth spectrum as well (with a such behavior to be twofold: fabrication-
confirming the broadband nature of the ani- derivate-like line shape), peaking at –37° and induced trapped hydrocarbons and strain
sotropy in TLBP coupled with the cavity mode. +42° around the ellipticity resonance. As ex- between co nstitue nt la yers in the heter o-
The differences in the trajectories arise where pected, very weak (no) polarization conversion structure and different stacking orders in
the cavity resonance wavelength is with re- effects are seen spectrally in the six-layer (bare TLBP (ABA, AAB, and ACA) (31– 33).
spect to the beginning and ending point of cavity) region. The weak effect for the six-layer The key result of this work, the electrical
the spectral scans. In addition, the arc length region presumably originates from the higher tunability of the different polarization param-
subtended by the trajectories on the Poincaré quantum–well subband transitions leading eters, is summarized for device D1 in Fig. 4.
A kout B F G
Ein E out
k in
Au
PMMA
hBN
BP
hBN
Au
C Measurement
window
D H
Exciton
avit
E I J
E-band S-band C-band
D1-4 D5 D1-4 D5
Fig. 2. Example cavity design for polarization conversion and large systematically to change the resonance over 90 nm across the tele-
anisotropy bandwidth experimental demonstratio n. (A) Side view of a communication band (E, S, and C). (F to J ) E xperimentally measured spectral
typical cavity struc ture adopted in t his work. The top and bottom mirrors are trajectories on the normalized Poincaré sphere corresponding to the five
formed by thin and thick Au f ilms, respectively. The cavity is composed of device resonances plotted i n (E). All trajectories show strong spectral
hBN-encapsulated TLBP and PMMA, which act as the tunable part in polarization conversion (either in the azimuthal orientation or the ellipticity
determining the resonance wavel ength. (B to D) Theoretically calculated or both). The differences in the trajectories are intimately related t o the
complex ref lection phasor, reflection amplitude, a nd phase spectrum, critical coupling between the cavity and the incoming polarization. For all
respectively, f or such a typical cavity structure having res onance ~1480 nm, presented trajectories, the azimuthal orientation was aligned nearly 45
showing differences in both parameters along AC and ZZ and thus degrees to the AC and ZZ direction of the TLBP flake. For each normalized
establishing polarization conversion. (E) Summary of reflection amplitude Poincaré sphere, the blue arrows mark the beginning of the s pectral scan
spectra from five repre sentative devices fabricated as part of this study (1410 nm for D1 to D4, 1500 for D5) a nd the red arrows mark the en d
showing tunable cavity resonance. The PMMA t hickness was tuned (1520 nm for D1 to D4, 1575 for D5), also shown as stars in x-axis of (E).
The Stokes intensity (S 0) and the three nor- 4A) with doping indicates that the strongest around the resonance are plotted as functions
malized Stokes parameters (s 1, s2, s 3), which coupling with the cavity was achieved at ~–18V. of gate voltage. Figure 4E shows such traces on
completely characterize the polarization con- Furthermore, in all three s parameters (Fig. 4, the Poincaré sphere for nine different wave-
version induced by the device, are shown as a B to D), a suppression of the overall magni- lengths. The dynamic range corresponds to
function of wavelength and gate voltage in tude of the resonance, which is caused by the nearly half the Poincaré sphere in terms of
the form of false-color maps in Fig. 4, A to D, reduction in excitonic anisotropy, can be seen. solid angle subtended by the voltage-driven
for hole-doping regime. It can be seen that all In addition, the linewidth of the aforemen- arcs. Two interesting traces can be identified.
three s parameters tune efficiently around the tioned features decreases with increasing The first one is at 1442 nm, where the ellipticity
resonance (~1440 nm) with increased hole voltage because of the suppression of the losses changes from 0.3° to 43.7° to 16.8° at 0, –18,
doping because of the strong cavity and TLBP along the AC direction. The polarization rota- and –40 V, respectively, showing tunable quarter-
interaction. Our observations of the electri- tion at the resonance wavelength is primarily wave plate operation. By contrast, at 1444 nm,
cally driven changes in the s parameters are enabled by the higher absorption along the the azimuthal angle is tuned from 24.6° to
consistent with the measured complex re- AC axis compared with the ZZ axis (Fig. 1B), 89.4° between 0 and –40 V with suppressed
fractive indices of TLBP, including a stronger and this is further enhanced by the cavity. ellipticity changes, demonstrating tunable half-
hole-doped response compared with electron To better visualize the changes in the re- wave plate operation. At other wave- lengths,
doping [see section S21 of the materials and flected polarization states, traces on the it is possible to demon strate a wide variety
methods (29)]. Spectral variation of S 0 (Fig. Poincaré sphere for different wavelengths of elliptically polarized states. A 2D map of
A B F G
1485 nm 1490 nm 1485 nm 1490 nm
Max. ellipticity Ellipticity resonance
(1450<λ (nm)<1520) (filtered >10o )
λ (nm)
C E H 1 pixel = 1 sq. µm
λ=1495 nm
D I
3 0
6 ZZ
AC
left right
Fig. 3. Spatial mapping of optical anisotropy probed by polarization reflected polariz ation ellipses at each point, for better visualization of
conversion. (A) Spatial maps of ellipticity angle (in degrees) of device covariation of az imuthal and ellipticity angles. White lines correspond
D4 for four different wavelengths near the resonance (~1490 nm) of the to right handedness and black lines correspond to left handedness.
cavity. Black lines indicate the extent of the tri-layer region [optical image Black scale bar, 5 mm. Inset, Optical image of device D4 outlining the
of D4 is shown in the inset of (E)]. White scale bar, 10 mm. (B) Same three-layer (“3”) region. Also shown is the six-layer region (“6 ”) and the
as (A ) but for azimuthal angle. (C and D) Ellipticity and azimuthal bare cavity (“0 ”). (F) Spatial map of maximum ellipticity f or each point
angle spectral scans for a f ew points [marked with appropriately colored within a spectral window between 1450 and 1520 nm. (G) Spatial map
stars in (A) and (B)], showing spatial variation of the resonance in the of ellipticity resonance wavelength (filtered for |c| > 10° to only highlight
tri-layer region, as well as flat background response from the bare cavity the three-layer region). (H and I) Histograms of ellipticity resonance
and weak polarization conversio n from the six-layer region. (E) Zoom-in wavelength (filtered for |c| > 10°) and maximum ellipticity (in degrees), where
spatial color map of ellipticity at 1495 nm, along with superimposed one pixel on the map corre sponds to 1 mm2.
different polarization ellipses measured as a be collapsed to a point, a manifestation of is of particular interest for polarization conver-
function of nine different wavelengths (same electrically tunable anisotropy suppression. sion at telecommunications wavelengths be-
wavelengths and color code as Fig. 4E) is Thus, the larger the trajectory at nearly charge- cause of its near unity birefringence close to
shown in Fig. 4F for voltages between 0 and neutral doping conditions, the higher the cap- the excitonic resonance. These findings repre-
–40V (hole doping), where the strongest ability to access a wide range of polarization sent a route for active control of optical polar-
changes are noted. This map better illustrates states by applying a voltage. ization at the nanoscale. The high dynamic
the quarter-wave and half-wave plate–like op- Our results demonstrate the versatility of BP range of polarization conversion may open an
eration, as well as other intermediate polar- as an active medium for electronically recon- avenue for the realization of densely integrated
ization conversion configurations. A similarly figurable broadband polarization conversion. arrays of nanoscale BP electro-optic polariza-
high dynamic range for polarization conver- The G-point nature of the direct-band minima tion converters as a fundamental step beyond
sion is also seen for electron doping (fig. S24). enables BP to have pronounced band-edge op- discrete dielectric polarization converters in
A general trend observed in these voltage- tical anisotropy spanning from visible (750 nm) lithium niobate or arrays based on micron-
dependent polarization conversion measure- to the mid-infrared (4 mm) (23, 24), whereas scale liquid crystal spatial light modulators.
ments is that upon doping the TLBP, the free-carrier modulation provides access to mid Previous reports on high-speed BP electro-
spectral trajectory on the Poincaré sphere can to far-infrared wavelengths (>5 mm) (26). TLBP photoresponse (34) and recent advances in
0V
F
P
HW
Wavelength (nm)
P
QW
Voltage (V)
centimeter-scale, layer-controlled growth of 3. S. G. Demos, R. R. Alfano, Appl. Opt. 36, 150–155 (1997). 12. S. Abel et al., Nat. Mater. 18, 42–47 (2019).
thin films (35) suggest that possibilities may 4. M. Schubert, T. E. Tiwald, C. M. Herzinger, Phys. Rev. B 13. R. R. Subkhangulov et al., Nat. Photonics 10, 111–114 (2016).
Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 61, 8187–8201 (2000). 14. Y. Gao et al., Nano Lett. 15, 2001–2005 (2015).
emerge for large-area, broadband polarization- 5. X. Ling et al., Nano Lett. 16, 2260–2267 (2016). 15. Y.-H. Kuo et al., Nature 437, 1334–1336 (2005).
selective sensing, photodetection, and active 6. A. Crespi et al., Nat. Commun. 2, 566 (2011). 16. A. J. Sternbach et al., Science 371, 617–620
electro-optic modulation. 7. Y. Yu et al., Nano Lett. 17, 3613–3618 (2017). (2021).
8. E. Feigenbaum, K. Diest, H. A. Atwater, Nano Lett. 10, 17. A. Chernikov et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126802
2111–2116 (2010). (2015).
REFERENCES AND NOTES 9. S. Niu et al., Nat. Photonics 12, 392–396 (2018). 18. J. S. Ross et al., Nat. Commun. 4, 1474 (2013).
1. S. Fleischer, Y. Zhou, R. W. Field, K. A. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10. L. H. Nicholls et al., Nat. Photonics 11, 628–633 19. S. Gao, Y. Liang, C. D. Spataru, L. Yang, Nano Lett. 16,
107, 163603 (2011). (2017). 5568–5573 (2016).
2. G. P. Crawford, J. N. Eakin, M. D. Radcliffe, A. Callan-Jones, 11. A. H. Dorrah, N. A. Rubin, A. Zaidi, M. Tamagnone, F. Capasso, 20. I. Datta et al., Nat. Photonics 14, 256–262 (2020).
R. A. Pelcovits, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 123102 (2005). Nat. Photonics 15, 287–296 (2021). 21. J. van de Groep et al., Nat. Photonics 14, 426–430 (2020).
22. X. Ling, H. Wang, S. Huang, F. Xia, M. S. Dresselhau s, ACK NOW LE DGM EN TS results. H.A.A. supervised the projec t. K.W. and T.T. provided
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 4523–4530 (2015). We thank W. S. Whitney, M. Z. Alam, J. Wong, and P. C. Wu hBN and BP crystals. S.B. wrote the manuscript with input
23. G. Zhang et al., Nat. Commun. 8, 14071 (2017). for fruitful discussions; G. R. Rossman for access to Raman from M.Y.G and H.A.A. Competing interest s: The authors
24. G. Zhang et al., Sci. Adv. 4, eaap9977 (2018). and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and A. Dutt declare no competing financial interests. Data and
25. W. S. Whitney et al., Nano Lett. 17, 78–84 (2017). for valuable feedback on the work. Funding: The authors materials availability: All data required to evaluate the
26. S. Biswas et al., Sci. Adv. 7, eabd4623 (2021). conclusions in the manuscript are available in t he main text
gratefully acknowledg e support from the Depart ment of
27. C. Chen et al., Sci. Adv. 6, eaay6134 (2020). or the supplementary materials.
Energy Office of Science under grant DE-FG02-07ER46405.
28. Y. Liu et al., Nano Lett. 17, 1970–1977 (2017).
K.W. and T.T. acknowledge support from the Elemental
29. The materials and methods are available as supplementary
Strategy Initiative conducted by Ministry of Education, SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS
materials.
30. A. Raja et al., Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 832 –837 (2019). Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT grant science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abj7053
31. D. Y. Qiu, F. H. da Jornada, S. G. Louie, Nano Lett. 17, JPMXP0112101001), Japan Society for the Promotion of Materials and Methods
4706–4712 (2017). Science (JSPS KAKENHI grant JP20H00354), and Centers Supplementary Text
32. S. Huang et al., Nat. Commun. 10, 2447 (2019). of Research Excellen ce in Scien ce and Te chnolog y (CREST grant Figs. S1 to S36
33. D. Çakır, C. Sevik, F. M. Peeters, Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter JPMJCR15F3), Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). References
Mater. Phys. 92, 165406 (2015). Author contributions: S.B., M.Y.G., and H.A.A conceived Movies S1 to S4
34. N. Youngblood, C. Chen, S. J. Koester, M. Li, Nat. Photonics 9, the project. S.B. fabricated and charac terize d the devices.
247–252 (2015). S.B. and M.Y.G. performed numerical calcu lations and 27 May 2021; accepted 13 September 2021
35. Z. Wu et al., Nat. Mater. 20, 1203–1209 (2021). electrical and optical measu rement s and discussed the 10.1126/science.abj7053