Comanagement Site Description • Sultanpur village, 15 km from Gurgaon • Terrain • Undulating • Railway line at village periphery • Water pressure drops in the water pipeline along village periphery • Section beyond railline resided by low caste group • Take water from handpump installed by upper caste • Internatioanl Development Research Centre • Intervention to improve interface between water-users and service providers • SaciWATERs • communication Problem • Lack of forum to ensure accountability of the sate agency to water users • On one occasion many households received bills for a water connection, while not having any water supply • PHED complains households do not use tap, have multiple (illegal ) connections • Distrust and prisoner’s dilemma between water users and service providers First Stakeholder Meeting • PHED representative – • everyone should install taps on their water connections in order to check water wastage • Legalize water connection • Sarpanch making efforts • Do not pay bill if water not received, complain block PHED • Sarpanch • Highlighted small street having large pipe connection • Reduce water availability and lead to unequal distribution to tail reaches • Many households have multiple illegal water connections • Project team formation • Facilitator and mediator of relationship between water users and service providers • Encouraged communities to ask for change • Contacted PHED if responses slow and lacking • Informed procurement of Ductile Iron Piped made • Mixed community response • Many legalized connection, others did not find PHED reliable Second Stakeholder Meeting • Expediting laying down Ductile Iron pipes • PHED emphasized that they act fast due to pressure from community • Expanding water coverage to the unreached • Approval required from Railway authority • PHED agreed to survey the area in question and said if satisfactory with water quality it would arrange for setting up tube-well • But land needs to be earmarked by Sarpanch • Improving internal water distribution in village • Stand-posts must have taps to regulate the flow • PHED suggested • villagers to inform PHED about illegal connection (but no complain registerd) • Formation of Water Committee to monitor work and maintenance • Registering tubewells with Central Groundwater Commission • Addressing water quality concerns • PHED said they treat and chlorinate water, supply good quality water • Villegers, women Panch members said water not potable • Installation of Ductile Irone Pipes • Immensely improved water supply • Change in attitude of villagers and state agency • As against distrust and blame game (as in first meeting), they calked out future course of action Third Stakeholder meeting • Equitable water supply after installation of new pipes • Not having taps • Motor pumps to extract water • Tussle between low caste and upper caste sharing same water • PHED promised to install tubewells beyond railline • Sarapanch submitted letter requesting area beyond railway lie to be awarded a Dhanni status ((A dhaani is a small settlement away from the main village) • PHED’s argument low pressure due to lack of tap and use of motor pump • Requested to give up these proactices • Not simply augmenting or better water supply, but a reorientation of relationship between water users and state • Development of ‘hydro-culture’ comprising of norms, practices and processes Co-production and Co-management
• Co-management: sharing of power and responsibility between
government and local resource users • Combination of centralised and decentralised state and community institutions • Knowledge partnership: local knowledge is combined with scientific knowledge produced by state scientists • Monitoring and enforcement more possible • Co-production: arrangement where at least in part citizen produce own service • Helps to resolve collective action problems • Credible commitment of the participants to one another • clear and enforceable contracts between government agencies and citizen which enhance credibility