WRICEF JUSTIFICATION FORM

Project Digital - SAP S4/HANA

PROJECT NAME:
Plant Maintenance (PM)
TRACK:
Imad Ahmed Khan (G&T) & Haris Khan (EY)
TRACK LEAD (EY & GT):
Mr. Syed Faraz Haleem, Mr. Nadeem Aziz
PROCESS OWNER:
PM-009 – Workflow creation for notification closure
GAP NO.:
Standard workaround not available, only maintenance planner/engineer will be able to close the notification which
WORK AROUND IN
will create the conflict of interest among the user and service department(s)
STANDARD:
Workflow
TYPE OF WRICEF
To be filled To be filled
CAB NO.: REQUEST DATE:

WRICEF JUSTIFICATION DESCRIPTION

Notification should be closed by the notification originating department (i.e. equipment user department). In this way, we can
keep the endorsement of user department on the completion of job with the actual times of handing over equipment.
DESCRIPTION
OF CHANGES
NEEDED

User department can’t blame the service department for the delay of job as the confirmation time of job will be displayed on
the maintenance order.
REASON FOR
CHANGE

As-Is Issuance of job order to service department

SUPPORT AND To-Be Issuance of notification to service department
JUSTIFICATION
DOCUMENTS

CLASSIFICATION
(Statutory /Non
Statutory)

IMPACT OF
CHANGE

RISK
MANAGEMENT

REPURCUSSIONS
IN CASE OF NON
FULFILMENT
 WRICEF DISCUSSION DOCUMENTATION | WRICEF Has Been Discussed With

S.NO. NAME AND DESIGNATION DATE

10

RECOMMENDED BY APPROVED BY

DATE DATE

ACCEPTED BY REVIEWED BY

DATE DATE