Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSUE: W/N CA has jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus in cases involving
custody of minors in light of the provision in RA 8369 giving family courts exclusive
jurisdiction over such petitions.
HELD: Petition granted. CA should take cognizance of the case because nothing in RA
8369 revoked its jurisdiction to issue writs of habeas corpus involving custody of minors.
The reasoning of CA cant be affirmed because it will result to iniquitous, leaving
petitioners without legal course in obtaining custody. The minor could be transferred
from one place to another and habeas corpus case will be left without legal remedy since
family courts take cognizance only cases within their jurisdiction. Literal interpretation
would render it meaningless, lead to absurdity, injustice, and contradiction. The literal
interpretation of “exclusive” will result in grave injustice and negate the policy to protect
the rights and promote welfare of children.