Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 July 2021
Today’s data will
be available on
health.dealroom.co
Table of contents.
3 Investor landscape
1 Healthcare shifting gears
Healthcare is one of the largest spending categories for households. But almost all
spending is indirect (insurance & tax). Consumer influence is limited, but growing.
(1)
Monthly household expenditure in Europe
$300
Consumers:
<20% out-of-pocket payments and
$50 $83 $83 $100 $200 $283 voluntary insurance (growing!)
Page / 5 1. Dealroom analysis of Eurostat and OECD data. Chart Inspired by LocalGlobe presentation.
In healthcare, it’s the insurers and governments (“payers”) that hold the power.
They want to control costs and improve outcomes — an opportunity for tech.
Spending Funding
$8 trillion $8 trillion
Biopharma wants to find
treatments for big markets and
bring down cost of discovering
Biopharma
new drugs. Payers want to control costs
and improve outcomes. In
order to achieve this they need
Payers data transparency to follow the
(insurers, governments) patient journey, have
Providers want to align Reimbursement predictability and be able to
themselves more closely with measure the ROI of
payers. Providers interventions.
(health professionals,
Professionals want to increase hospitals)
their productivity and reduce
burnout due to admin (1).
Consumers want better
healthcare and expect it to be
Consumers more like other consumer
products.
s
nd
▉ Compulsory insurance
y
la
en
an
▉ Government schemes
er
ce
ed
n
m
th
an
ai
A
Sw
UK
Ne
US
Ge
Sp
Fr
$3.9T $0.3T $0.1T $0.4T $0.1T $0.1T $0.3T
Page / 7 Source: Dealroom analysis of data from OECD, Eurostat, CMS, WHO.
More state influence Less state influence
Governments and regulators are
increasingly putting incentives in place to
improve outcomes and reduce costs - State is provider of
healthcare
Private for-profit
providers
Private for-profit
providers
Regulated, private
for profit insurance
a huge opportunity for tech companies. State financed Compulsory
and providers
insurance
Germany Sweden
UK France
Video consultation available through KRY (Livi) and Doctolib market leaders
every doctor’s surgery in French telemedicine
Page / 9
Covid-19 was merely a catalyst for underlying trends that were already long
underway. The more meaningful shift will occur in the next two years and beyond.
Healthtech
impact Industry-wide
shifts
Covid-19 and its Providers need to align with payers more than
second-order effects ever: more focus on value-based care
Regulations around virtual care loosened Consumers expecting increased virtual care
Leading up to 2020 Trust in virtual care increased Large amounts of late-stage venture capital
Payers pushing for value-based care The US finalized new rules around data
interoperability
Growing number of connected devices/IoHT
Tech’s been proven in battle (e.g. mRNA)
Accelerations in AI, NLP, DNA sequencing,
editing, digital therapeutics
Time
30%+
10-20%
10%+
Source: County Health Rankings. Ranges added by Dealroom to reflect other studies.
Page / 11
The holy grail for healthcare = prevention and early detection. This
paradigm shift has been long in the making, now accelerated by tech.
61%
2019 2040E
€4.0B
$600M Series D $525M Series D $312M Series D
▊ Megarounds €100–€250m
€3.0B
Combined enterprise value of European healthtech startups Most valuable European healthtech companies
€49.7B
€50.0B
Nanopore DNA
Drug discovery with AI Drug discovery with AI
sequencer
€40.0B
▊ Unicorn
€800M+
€29.9B
€30.0B
€25.3B
Digital care Digital care Health insurance
▊ Future Unicorn
€20.0B €17.4B €200M-€800M
€12.7B
€10.0B
€9.4B
▊ €0M-€200M
Psilocybin therapy Health insurance Digital care
€3.0B €2.9B
1.4x
€2.6B
▊ Megarounds plus €250M+
▊ Megarounds €100–€250m
$250M Series A €160M Series A $168M Series B
€2.1B
€2.0B
€2.0B
€1.6B
€1.4B
€1.3B ▊ Series C €40–€100m $157M Series D $148M Series C €127M Series B
€1.2B
€1.0B
€0.9B
€0.8B
€0.7B
€231B
Combined enterprise value of European
healthtech & biotech startups created
€166B
since 2000
€181B
▊ Biotech = 78%
€115B €136B
€93B
€68B €90B
€51B €75B
€42B
€55B
€50B ▊ Digital health = 22%
€30B
€17B €25B
€9.4B €13B
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Today
€22B
€13B
€10B
€7.8B €7.3B €7.0B
€4.3B
€2.6B €2.0B
mRNA mRNA Autoimmune Gene editing Endocrinology Drug discovery Hematology Nanomedicine Cell therapies Psychedelic drugs
applications applications diseases diseases medicines
$90B
Digital care incl telemedicine
Professionals
$5B
Practice management
<$10B $25B
Providers Surgical robots Continuous remote monitoring
<$10B <$10B
AI decision support $15B Home tests
Hospital operations
$90B Digital pharmacies
$45B
Biopharma AI-first drug discovery $10B
Digital therapeutics
$10B
Software for clinical trials
$40B
Payers Digital health insurance
Page / 19 Source for valuations: Dealroom.co analysis of private and public valuations.
B2C has been scaling faster. B2B takes longer to unlock, but is at least as big an
opportunity.
Enterprise value
$4.0B
$3.5B
$3.0B
Patient-facing
$2.5B
Monetized via deals
with payers and/or
$2.0B
reimbursement
systems.
$1.5B
$1.0B
$0.5B
Provider-facing
Series B+
Series A
Seed
Page / 22 Source: Dealroom.co. Not exhaustive. Funds selected based on number of investments in Healthtech and (future) unicorns.
US investors account for nearly half of investment in European health & biotech
startups.
Investment in European healthtech startups by source of capital Investment in European biotech startups by source of capital
3% 2% 6% 5% Unknown HQ 2% 7% Unknown HQ
3% 4% 4%
10% 2% 2% RoW 9% 5% 1% RoW
15% 10%
11% 8% 21% 5%
12% Asia 18%
11% Asia
25%
9% 16% 12% 26%
36%
29% 27%
19% USA 42% USA
27%
19% 36%
28%
45%
32% 24%
21% European
24%
cross-border European
23% 15%
cross-border
56% 54% 51% 15%
43% 44%
42%
32% 38%
Domestic 31% Domestic
27% 30%
18%
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021YTD 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021YTD
Investment in European healthtech startups by source of capital Investment in European biotech startups by source of capital
3% 6%
9% 12% 9%
19% 15% 16%
20% 22% Other 22% 22% Other
7% 8%
3% 10% 30% 22%
8% 7%
6%
18%
3% 6% 15% 11% 11% Corporate
14% Corporate 13%
7%
2% 5% 5% Corporate VC
5% Corporate VC 6%
6%
81%
77%
72% 70%
64% 67% 66%
60% 62% 62%
60% 58% Venture Capital
Venture Capital
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021YTD 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021YTD
Healthtech Biopharma
Software Biochemical formulas
Accelerating clinical trials. Establishing efficacy
Digital therapeutics: software is the
earlier (e.g. in phase II with 100-200 patients vs.
treatment, requiring clinical
validation in trial and demonstrating Phase III with 1,000 patients)
cost effectiveness in studies
28%
24%
15% 15%
12% 12%
6% 5% 6%
4%
35
follow-on round over $4M 4
happens 1.5 years after seed
30 round but for biotech and
healthtech, 2.2 and 2.6 years, 5 Biotech
25 respectively. 3
20 4
3 4
15
3 3
10
2 2
2
5 2
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
years years
Years since Seed round (median)
Page / 27 Source: Dealroom.
Convergence of Bio & Healthtech bodes well for hubs that are strong in both.
Biotech clusters
(startups, investors, academia)
Paris, Stockholm,
Berlin, Barcelona,
Zurich
Healthtech
Clusters (startups,
investors, academia)
United Kingdom 7 13 20
France 3 7 10
Germany 1 5 6
Switzerland 1 4 5
Belgium 3 3
Sweden 1 1 2
Ireland 2 2
Netherlands 1 1
Poland 1 1
Russia 1 1
Spain 1 1
Finland 1 1
United Kingdom 8 16 24
France 1 9 10
Germany 4 5 9
Switzerland 5 4 9
Denmark 3 5 8
Netherlands 4 3 7
Belgium 3 4 7
Ireland 3 3
Sweden 2 2
Spain 1 1
Italy 1 1
Iceland 1 1
Access now!
Over 41,000+ healthtech startups & more
Powered by