INMOTIONARM ™

INTERACTIVE THERAPY SYSTEM

INMOTION
HAND™

The InMotion HAND™ Robot senses

patient forces and assists the patient as
needed, continuously adapting to each
Inmotion ARM™
patient’s abilities allowing the clinician to
deliver optimum intensive sensorimotor
The InMotion ARM™ Robot is evidence based, intelligent interactive
grasp and release hand therapy.
technology that is capable of continuously adapting to and challeng-
ing each patient’s ability. This allows the clinician to efficiently deliver The InMotion HAND™ is an “add-on”
optional module that attaches to the
optimum intensive sensorimotor therapy to neurologic patients. InMotion ARM™ Robot.

Robotic arm with two active degrees of freedom

hh Elbow flexion/extension hh Shoulder flexion/extension
hh Shoulder protraction/retraction hh Shoulder abduction/adduction Clinical research
hh Shoulder internal/external rotation
has shown improved
patient outcomes
The most thoroughly researched device for
upper extremity neurorehabilitation
hh 800+ patients
hh Large multi-site randomized controlled clinical trials
Stroke
hh Easy to use technology allows for high repetition Cerebral Palsy
400-1000 reps/session
hh Task specific to reduce impairments Traumatic
in the affected limb(s) focusing on improving patient’s:
hh Range of Motion
Brain Injury
hh Coordination
hh Strength
hh Movement Speed Today the American Heart Associa-
hh Movement Smoothness tion, American Stroke Association
hh Easy-to-use, grab and go set up and the Department of Veterans
hh Direct wheel chair access Affairs include robot-assisted
hh Print patient progress reports directly from the robot therapy in their stroke rehabilitation
guidelines for moderate to severe
Broad clinical application shown to improve functional patients with upper extremity
outcomes across the continuum of care.1 disability.
 INMOTIONARM™ Evidence-based neurorehabilitation technology
INTERACTIVE THERAPY SYSTEM

system components

InMotion ARM™ software

Intensive — 1024 movements per therapy session
Evidence-based treatment protocols.
Therapy protocols allowing clinicians to
customize treatment.
Therapeutic exercise Games for:
hh Motor planning
hh Eye-hand coordination
hh Attention, visual field
deficits/neglect
hh Massed practice
Performance feedback metrics

InMotion eval™
Quantifies upper extremity motor control and movement recovery
allowing clinicians to distinguish true recovery from compensation
Establishes a baseline and measures progress to:
Sample Circle Plots for a stroke patient at admission and
hh Determine medical necessity discharge following six weeks of InMotion robotic therapy
hh Justify continuation of treatment based upon
measurable gains
Quantifiable measures for:
hh Shoulder stabilization
hh Smoothness of Arm movement
hh Arms ability to move against resistance
hh Mean and Maximum arm speed
hh Arm Reaching error
hh Joint independence
Correlated with traditional assessment scales: Fugl-meyer,
Motor-Power and NIH stroke scale performance*

MAXIMUM SHOULDER FORCE admission plot discharge plot

Optional InMotion Eval module.
Allows clinicians to measure a patient’s ability to generate
maximum shoulder flexion/extension, adduction/abduction force.

InMotion ARM™ Dimensions

Custom Designed Technology
Workstation: 51”(1.4m)(W) x 76” (2.0m)(D) x 45” (1.2m)(H) at lowest position
6 degree-of-freedom force-torque sensor monolithic aluminum Chair: 27.5”(.7m)(W) x 24” (.61m)(D)
device containing analog and digital electronics systems. Weight
Module attaches to the InMotion ARM™ Robot.
598 lbs. (271kg)
Electrical Requirements
To see how Interactive Motion Technologies is redefining recovery™ 100 – 240VAC, 50/60Hz, automatic <1250VA.
visit www.interactive-motion.com or call 617.926.4800

* Bosecker Caittlyn MS, Dipietro Laura, Volpe BT, Krebs HI “Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure
Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 24(1) 62-69 , 2010. USA MADE
1 Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. Volpe BT, Krebs HI,
Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. 1999;53:1874 –1876.
175. Does shorter rehabilitation limit potential recovery poststroke? Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Ferraro M,
Hogan N, Volpe BT. 2004;18:88 –94.
176. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurology Aisen ML,
INTERACTIVE MOTION
Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT.1997;54:443 TECHNOLOGIES
Neurorehabil Neural Repair Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, Ferraro M, Galgano M, Hogan N, Krebs HI. Neurorehabil Neural Repair.
Redefining Recovery™
2008;22:305–310.

80 Coolidge Hill Road Watertown, MA 02472 • P 617.926.4800 • F 617.926.4808 • info@interactive-motion.com • www.interactive-motion.com