Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20.matsota PK
20.matsota PK
2019
DOI:10.6859/aja.201909_57(3).0002
Review Article
Shivering is a common postoperative complication that occurs after both general and regional anesthesia
even in the cases when hypothermia during surgery has been averted. Patients describe it as a highly
unpleasant experience, while clinicians are concerned due to its adverse effects such as increased oxygen
consumption. In this article, we present a summary of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in
postoperative shivering (POS), risk factors, and inadvertent effects. The major objective of this article was to
review the existing literature on the efficiency of various drug interventions as a prophylactic measure against
POS. Since α2-adrenergic, opioid, anticholinergic, and serotonergic pathways are thought to play a role in the
pathogenesis of POS, a wide variety of drugs has been investigated in this regard. Although the methodological
diversity of the study designs and regimens does not support drawing definite conclusions, there is evidence
indicating a beneficial effect of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, tramadol, meperidine, dexamethasone, nefopam,
granisetron, and ondansetron in the prevention of POS. The purpose of this review is to provide a thorough
insight on various drug options and to serve as an aid for clinicians for careful analysis of the advantages and
disadvantages of each regimen to decide which regimen will be ideally suited for the medical profile of each
patient.
Keywords: drugs, preventing, postoperative shivering
Received: 29 May 2019; Received in revised form 7 June 2019; Accepted: 2 July 2019.
Corresponding Author: Paraskevi K. Matsota, MD, PhD, 2nd Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian
University of Athens, “Attikon” University Hospital, Rimini 1 Str, Chaidari, Postal Code 12462, Athens, Greece. E-mail: matsota@yahoo.gr
to be as efficacious against POS as meperidine (0.5 et al. compared three different dosages of dexmedeto-
mg/kg),19,22,24 but is inferior to tramadol (1 mg/kg),20 midine (0.50, 0.75, and 1.00 mcg/kg) to placebo and
when administered at the end of surgery. In contrast, found that dexmedetomidine at 0.75 or 1.00 mcg/kg
Alvarez Corredor reported that 0.4 mg/kg meperidine is an effective prophylactic measure against shivering
performed better than 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine.19 when administered 30 min before the completion of
However, one must also consider that 70% of the surgery.21 Furthermore, dexmedetomidine infusion
patients in the dexmedetomidine group reported se- has been successfully used in a placebo-controlled
vere postoperative pain, while most of the patients in study.23 Sedation, prolonged extubation time, and a
the other groups reported mild to no pain. Since the tendency of lower mean arterial pressure and heart
presence of postoperative pain can facilitate non-ther- rate, all of which are dose-dependent adverse effects,
moregulatory tremors,4 coupled with the fact that the were observed in most of the aforementioned studies,
mean duration of anesthesia and surgery, volume of without compromising the outcomes of anesthesia.
intraoperative IV fluids and blood loss were greater
Regional Anesthesia—Table 2
in the dexmedetomidine group, the result may be
considerably biased against dexmedetomidine. Kim Only two published studies have investigated
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Table 1. Randomized controlled trials investigating drugs to prevent postoperative shivering in patients who received general anesthesia (continued)
All drugs were given 20 min before the end of 18–68 years anesthesia anticipated to last
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Table 1. Randomized controlled trials investigating drugs to prevent postoperative shivering in patients who received general anesthesia (continued)
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Table 1. Randomized controlled trials investigating drugs to prevent postoperative shivering in patients who received general anesthesia (continued)
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Table 1. Randomized controlled trials investigating drugs to prevent postoperative shivering in patients who received general anesthesia (continued)
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Table 2. Randomized controlled trials investigating drugs to prevent postoperative shivering in patients who received regional anesthesia
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Table 2. Randomized controlled trials investigating drugs to prevent postoperative shivering in patients who received regional anesthesia (continued)
Misiran and 1. Midazolam 0.02 mg/kg plus ketamine 0.25 mg/ 90 patients, Emergency lower limb Both regimens of midazolam 80%
Aziz54 kg iv ASA I–II, surgery, combined with ketamine
2. Midazolam 0.04 mg/kg plus ketamine 18–60 years spinal anesthesia were equally effective in
0.25 mg/kg iv preventing POS.
3. Placebo iv (0.9% saline solution)
All drugs were given after administration
of spinal anesthesia.
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Table 2. Randomized controlled trials investigating drugs to prevent postoperative shivering in patients who received regional anesthesia (continued)
2019/12/19 下午 01:46:05
Drugs Used to Prevent Postoperative Shivering
the use of dexmedetomidine in the setting of regional as effective as 30 mg meperidine in preventing POS,
anesthesia. The low dose of dexmedetomidine (0.5 without significant side effects.28,30,31 This inconsisten-
mcg/kg), which did not seem to offer significant re- cy might be attributed to the lower dose of meperidine
lief against POS after general anesthesia,21 was found employed in the previous studies.
to be similarly effective in preventing POS as 100 Ogawa conducted a study to investigate whether
mg tramadol, in patients under spinal anesthesia, 44 shivering associated with remifentanil-based anesthe-
although it was associated with a higher level of se- sia could be prevented by the concomitant use of low-
dation. A possible explanation for this discrepancy dose ketamine infusion, reaching favorable results.32
may be the fact that under general anesthesia, there is However, the low number of patients recruited reduc-
a greater suppression of the sympathetic nervous sys- es the credibility of the conclusion.
tem activity compared to spinal blockade reaching the Regional Anesthesia—Table 2
T8–10 dermatome. Also, continuous infusion of dex-
Two studies on adults undergoing elective sur-
medetomidine was found to be effective in preventing
gery demonstrated that 0.25 mg/kg ketamine was
POS resulting from spinal anesthesia.45 In this case,
more effective than placebo in the prevention of POS
patients are also sedated, but in cases of regional an-
after spinal anesthesia.48,51 Kose et al. also studied
esthesia, sedation is many times desirable for patients’
the effects of ketamine on parturients undergoing
comfort.
cesarean section and showed that the prophylactic
IV administration of 0.25 mg/kg ketamine was as
N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antagonists
effective as 0.5 mg/kg ketamine in the prevention of
Research has revealed that N-methyl-D-aspartate shivering.46 The drug was administered immediately
(NMDA) receptor antagonists interfere with thermo- after intrathecal injection and did not exhibit serious
regulation at various locations within the central ner- maternal or neonatal adverse effects. Xue et al. re-
vous system.28 vealed that prophylactic epidural administration of 0.5
General Anesthesia—Table 1 mg/kg ketamine reduced the incidence and severity
of shivering in patients undergoing cesarean section
Ketamine, a non-competitive NMDA receptor
under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.53
antagonist, administered 20 min before the com-
The combination of ketamine with midazolam
pletion of surgery has been investigated at different has also been investigated using the rationale that
dosages in the prevention of POS after general anes- vasoconstriction induced by ketamine is opposed by
thesia. Ketamine (0.100 mg/kg or 0.125 mg/kg) does the effect of midazolam, which impedes tonic thermo-
not appear to offer any advantage in the prevention of regulatory vasoconstriction.58 The study by Savafi et
POS.27,30 Norouzi et al. demonstrated that high doses al. yielded positive results regarding the combination
of ketamine (0.25 mg/kg or 0.50 mg/kg) had similar of 0.25 mg/kg ketamine plus 37.5 mcg/kg midazolam,
efficacy in preventing shivering, but the higher dose for the prevention of POS after spinal anesthesia.50
of ketamine was correlated with an increase in hal- Another study confirmed this finding and even found
lucinations and delay in extubation.27 Petskul et al. the aforementioned combination of ketamine plus
disagree with this finding, as the dose of 0.25 mg/kg midazolam to be more effective than monotherapy
ketamine used in their study failed to prevent POS.26 using either 0.5 mg/kg ketamine or 75.0 mcg/kg mid-
However, in the aforementioned study, the reported azolam.52 The same combination was also tested in
overall incidence of shivering was possibly too low to another study, wherein although it was effective in the
detect a statistically significant difference. prevention of POS, it was found to be inferior to the
The efficacy of late administration of ketamine combination of 0.2 mg/kg meperidine plus 0.1 mg/kg
in patients under general anesthesia has also been dexamethasone in doing so.49
compared with meperidine, with conflicting results. Misiran and Aziz compared the combination
Ketamine at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg performed better of 0.25 mg/kg ketamine with two different doses of
than placebo, but was not as effective as meperidine at midazolam (0.02 mg/kg vs. 0.04 mg/kg), and con-
doses of 0.4 mg/kg19 or 0.5 mg/kg.29 On the contrary, cluded that the two regimens were equally effective.54
three studies concluded that 0.5 mg/kg ketamine is One peculiarity of this study was that the test group
consisted of emergency cases, some of which were and Isazadehfar compared the efficacy of 25 mg me-
trauma cases that were resuscitated in the emergency peridine with 0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone, both given
department prior to surgery. Thus, the pathophysiolo- immediately after the induction of anesthesia. The
gy of these patients is distinctive, due to which the re- researchers observed that the incidence of POS was
sults of this study cannot be compared with the results 10% in the dexamethasone group, 37.5% in the me-
of other studies. peridine group, and 47.5% in the control group.42 The
A different regimen consisting of ketamine and findings of Iqbal et al. also support the prophylactic
granisetron (a serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonist) administration of meperidine before the induction of
has been studied by Sagir et al., who observed that 0.5 anesthesia.40 In contrast, Bhukal et al. have disputed
mg/kg ketamine was more effective than the combi- the pre-induction efficacy of meperidine.39 This incon-
nation of a lower dose of ketamine (0.25 mg/kg) plus sistency may be attributed to the fact that they studied
1.5 mg granisetron, in the prevention of shivering as- only female patients, and intravenous fluids adminis-
sociated with regional anesthesia.47 tered were heated to 37°C.39
The study by Parsa et al. is unique in that it com-
Opioids and Tramadol pared the efficacy of buprenorphine to meperidine in
It is hypothesized that the anti-shivering effect of a group of parturients undergoing cesarean section
opioids is associated with their μ-receptor agonist ac- under general anesthesia.41 The researchers valued bu-
tivity.59,60 It seems more probable that the anti-shiver- prenorphine for being a partial μ-receptor agonist and
ing action of meperidine involves its μ- and κ-receptor a betaine derivative that is attached to κ- and σ-recep-
agonist activity, in addition to its α2-adrenoreceptor tors, and observed that although both drugs decreased
agonist properties and anticholinergic properties.14 postoperative pain equally, meperidine performed
The fact that the anti-shivering effect of meperidine is better as an anti-shivering agent.41
inhibited by high-dose naloxone but not by low-dose Tramadol acts centrally on μ-opioid receptors,
naloxone indicates that both μ- and κ-receptors play a inhibits the reuptake of 5-hydroxytryptamine and
major role.61 norepinephrine, and facilitates the release of 5-hy-
droxytryptamine. In 2017, a meta-analysis by Li et al.
General Anesthesia—Table 1 showed that tramadol was an effective cure against
Most published studies on this topic have inves- POS by significantly reducing the severity of shiv-
tigated the prophylactic effect of meperidine admin- ering and the need for a rescue agent.62 No adverse
istered at the end of surgery. As mentioned before, events were associated with its use, even when doses
meperidine at a dose of 20 mg, administered 20 min as high as 3 mg/kg were employed. In any case, au-
before the completion of surgery, is as effective as 0.5 thors of this meta-analysis recommended the dose of
mg/kg ketamine in preventing POS,28,30,31 while higher 1 mg/kg, in order to avoid the possibility of adverse
doses of meperidine (0.4 mg/kg and 0.5 mg/kg) ap- effects.
peared to perform better than 0.5 mg/kg ketamine.19,29 Mohta et al. compared different doses of trama-
The highest dose of meperidine (0.5 mg/kg) was ob- dol (1, 2, and 3 mg/kg) for their anti-shivering and
served to be as effective as dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/ analgesic effects.34 Tramadol at a dose of 2 mg/kg,
kg.22 Abdollahi et al. compared 0.4 mg/kg meperidine administered at the time of wound closure, appeared
with 8 mg ondansetron in patients undergoing off- to have the best anti-shivering and analgesic effect,
pump coronary artery bypass graft who, after the end without any undesirable adverse effects. It is worth
of surgery, were transferred to intensive care unit noting that all patients received prophylaxis for post-
(ICU) and remained intubated.38 The shivering scores operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) using 10 mg
recorded at the time of ICU admission were in favor metoclopramide. The three groups of tramadol were
of 0.4 mg/kg meperidine and 8 mg ondansetron, com- found to be as efficient as 0.5 mg/kg meperidine in
pared to placebo. terms of POS prevention. Findings of few studies
Three other studies had tested the prophylactic confirm that 1 mg/kg tramadol administered at the
administration of meperidine given before or right end of surgery prevents POS after general anesthesia33
after the induction of anesthesia. 39,40,42 Entezariasl and is equally effective to 0.4 mg/kg meperidine.37
Furthermore, 1 mg/kg tramadol is more efficient than such as bradycardia, convulsion, rash, and myoclonus
α2-agonists.20 Notably, the higher dose of 2 mg/kg between groups.38
was even found to be effective in remifentanil-iso-
Regional Anesthesia—Table 2
flurane-based general anesthesia, which is associated
with a particularly high incidence of POS.35 Serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have been
Angral et al. studied the usage of 1 mg/kg tra- studied for the prophylaxis of POS-related to regional
madol, administered at the time of wound closure, anesthesia and compared to various regimens. Sagir
in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 36 The et al. commented that 3 mg granisetron alone or a
incidence of POS was similarly low in the treat- combination of 0.25 mg/kg ketamine plus 1.5 mg
ment groups, but significantly higher in the control granisetron were inferior to 0.5 mg/kg ketamine in
groups.36 preventing shivering related to regional anesthesia.47
Savafi et al. reported that although 8 mg ondansetron
Regional Anesthesia—Table 2
was effective in controlling POS, a combination of
Even though meperidine is highly valued as an 0.25 mg/kg ketamine plus 37.5 mcg/kg midazolam
anti-shivering agent, our search revealed only one performed better.50 Ondansetron at a lower dose (4
study that had employed meperidine as anti-shivering mg) still appears to be effective but is inferior to
prophylaxis for regional anesthesia. According to this 0.25 mg/kg ketamine.51 On the contrary, Lakhe et al.
study, a combination of 0.2 mg/kg meperidine plus showed that 4 mg ondansetron is as effective as 0.25
0.1 mg/kg dexamethasone was more effective than mg/kg ketamine or 0.5 mg/kg tramadol.48
0.4 mg/kg meperidine alone or combination of 0.25
mg/kg ketamine plus 37.5 mcg/kg midazolam, in the Dexamethasone
prevention of shivering resulting from spinal anesthe-
The available data on dexamethasone efficacy
sia.49
are rare. It has been proposed that dexamethasone de-
Tramadol at doses of 0.5 mg/kg has been found
creases the gradient between core and skin tempera-
to be as effective in preventing POS as 0.5 mg/kg me-
ture and inhibits the release of vasoconstrictors and
peridine, with negligible side effects.48 Bozgeyik et al.
pyrogenic cytokines released during surgery, through
claim that 100 mg tramadol acts as effectively as 0.5
its action on the immune system.63
mcg/kg dexmedetomidine.44
General Anesthesia—Table 1
Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
As mentioned earlier, Entezariasl and Isazade-
The mechanism of action of serotonin 5-HT3 re- hfar showed that dexamethasone surpassed meperi-
ceptor antagonists could be related to the inhibition of dine’s efficacy in preventing POS, when administered
serotonin reuptake on the preoptic anterior hypotha- after induction of anesthesia.42
lamic region. The 5-HT3 receptors may also influence
both heat production and heat loss pathways. Regional Anesthesia—Table 2
Solhpour et al. observed that the combination of
General Anesthesia—Table 1
meperidine and dexamethasone is superior to meperi-
Iqbal et al. have shown that the prophylactic dine alone, in preventing POS in patients subjected to
use of 40 mcg/kg granisetron is as effective as 25 spinal anesthesia.49
mg meperidine in preventing POS.40 It is worth men-
tioning that this dose was found to be even equally Nefopam
effective to a higher dose of meperidine (0.4 mg/kg)
Nefopam is a non-opioid, non-steroidal, central-
or to tramadol (1 mg/kg) without prolonging the time
ly acting analgesic drug that increases the activity of
of emergence from anesthesia or affecting the respira-
serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine. Further-
tory or cardiovascular system.37 Likewise, Abdollahi
more, it acts on the sodium and calcium channels,
et al. have compared the efficacy of ondansetron (8
inhibiting the release of glutamate64 and it seems to
mg) to meperidine (0.4 mg/kg) on a population more
have a promising role in the prevention of POS.
prone to cardiovascular side effects, and observed no
significant difference in the incidence of side effects Conscious Sedation—Table 1
We opted for including in our review a random- Regarding NMDA antagonists, 0.25 mg/kg ket-
ized control trial that compared the efficacy of nefopam amine has questionable efficacy in preventing POS af-
and clonidine on patients undergoing interventional ter general anesthesia, while lower doses do not seem
neuroradiological procedures under conscious sedation to confer any advantage at all. Ketamine at a dose of
with midazolam infusion. In such cases, prevention 0.5 mg/kg performs better than placebo and possibly,
of shivering is essential, as any movement can cause is even equally effective to meperidine. Despite the
technical difficulties or even complications, such as number of studies concerning regional anesthesia, the
vessel perforation.43 Authors concluded that although diverse regimens used in each study makes it infeasi-
both drugs are effective in preventing POS, nefopam is ble to draw safe conclusions. In general, the rationale
more potent than clonidine. In addition, patients receiv- for the use of ketamine in the setting of POS is that
ing nefopam were more hemodynamically stable than it could serve as an alternative drug for patients with
patients in clonidine and placebo groups. bradycardia, hypotension, respiratory depression, nau-
sea, vomiting, or allergic reactions to pethidine. Still,
Regional Anesthesia—Table 2
adverse effects (hallucination, nystagmus, sedation,
According to Hong et al., 0.15 mg/kg nefopam etc.) should always be borne in mind.
was efficient in preventing POS after spinal anesthe- As far as opioids are concerned, 0.4–0.5 mg/kg
sia, but nausea and injection pain were observed.55 meperidine is effective in the prevention of POS after
Nefopam even surpassed tramadol’s efficacy in lower- general anesthesia, when administered at the end of
ing the rate and severity of intraoperative shivering in surgery, and possibly, even when administered at the
patients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia for orthope- beginning. It appears to be effective in patients with
dic surgery, according to Bilotta et al.56 However, the different ASA classifications and undergoing different
dose of tramadol (0.5 mg/kg) studied was possible too procedures. There are not enough data available to
low to evaluate its full effect in preventing shivering. comment on the efficacy of meperidine after regional
anesthesia.
Conclusion As for tramadol, the dose of 1–2 mg/kg appeared
to be effective as anti-shivering prophylaxis after
Although the published studies on this topic are general anesthesia, without adverse effects includ-
greatly heterogeneous in factors such as temperature ing PONV. However, most of the studies involved
of the OR, type and duration of surgery, anesthetic patients that had been administered metoclopramide
drugs used, intraoperative fluid replacement, use of in advance. Tramadol was found to be effective as a
active warming measures, as well as the scales used to preventive measure for shivering under regional anes-
evaluate shivering, there is evidence that some drugs thesia, but the ideal dose is not established yet.
can effectively prevent POS. However, dose-response Additionally, the use of serotonin 5-HT3 recep-
studies are required to determine the most appropriate tor antagonists, such as ondansetron or granisetron,
dosing regimen of each drug for the optimal preven- seems promising as a preventive measure against
tion of POS. Studies of cost-effectiveness are also POS. The main advantage of this class of drugs is
essential. that they prevent PONV and do not prolong the emer-
Regarding α2-agonists, intravenous dexmedeto- gence time from anesthesia or significantly affect the
midine was found to be promising. It appears to have respiratory or cardiovascular system.
a dose-dependent preventive effect on patients sub- Finally, as for dexamethasone, data are limited
jected to general anesthesia. Notably, meperidine and on reaching definite conclusions. On the contrary, ne-
tramadol surpass its efficacy in most studies, and the fopam seems to play an important role in the preven-
expected side effects associated with α2-agonists, in- tion of POS, since it has been found to surpass trama-
cluding bradycardia, sedation in the immediate post- dol and clonidine’s efficacy and to possess a favorable
operative period, and prolonged extubation time, are hemodynamic profile.
observed. Although limited data are available regard- In conclusion, even though an association be-
ing regional anesthesia, it appears that the continuous tween the occurrence of shivering and an increase
infusion of dexmedetomidine, or even the low dose of in cardiac morbidity has not yet been established,
0.5 mcg/kg, is effective in preventing POS. POS should be avoided because it raises the oxygen
demand. Consequently, as with all other preventive the anaesthetic nurses’ role. Br J Nurs 1999;8:17–25.
measures, the prophylactic administration of the doi:10.12968/bjon.1999.8.1.17
aforementioned drugs should also be considered in 10. Torossian A, Bräuer A, Höcker J, Bein B, Wulf
patients at a high risk of developing POS. However, H, Horn EP. Preventing inadvertent perioperative
clinicians should carefully weigh the advantages of hypothermia. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2015;112:166–172.
preventing shivering against the risk of inadvertent doi:10.3238/arztebl.2015.0166
drug reactions. Thus, a personalized approach should 11. Sessler DI. Perioperative heat balance. Anesthesiology
be applied and the regimen best suited to the medical 2000;92:578–596. doi:10.1097/00000542-200002000-
profile of each patient should be selected. In this re- 00042
gard, this review contributes to a rational framework 12. De Witte J, Sessler DI. Perioperative shivering:
for daily clinical practice. physiology and pharmacology. Anesthesiology
2002;96:467–484. doi:10.1097/00000542-200202000-
00036
Conflicts of Interest 13. El-Gamal N, Elkassabany N, Frank SM, et al. Age-
None. related thermoregulatory differences in a warm
operating room environment (approximately
References 26 degrees C). Anesth Analg 2000;90:694–698.
doi:10.1097/00000539-200003000-00034
1. Buggy DJ, Crossley AWA. Thermoregulation, mild 14. Alfonsi P. Postanaesthetic shivering. Epidemiology,
perioperative hypothermia and post-anaesthetic pathophysiology and approaches. Minerva Anestesiol
shivering. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:615–628. 2003;69:438–442. doi:10.2165/00003495-200161150-
doi:10.1093/bja/84.5.615 00004
2. Crossley AWA. Peri-operative shivering. Anesthesia 15. Mahajan RP, Grover VK, Sharma SL, Singh H.
1992;47:193–195. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992. Intraocular pressure changes during muscular
tb02114.x hyperactivity after general anesthesia. Anesthesiology
3. Sessler DI, Rubinstein EH, Moayeri A. Physiologic 1987;66:419–421. doi:10.1097/00000542-198703000-
responses to mild perianesthetic hypothermia 00030
in humans. Anesthesiology 1991;75:594–610. 16. Rosa G, Pinto G, Orsi P, et al. Control of post
doi:10.1097/00000542-199110000-00009 anaesthetic shivering with nefopam hydrochloride in
4. H o r n E P, S c h r o e d e r F, W i l h e l m S , e t a l . mildly hypothermic patients after neurosurgery. Acta
Postoperative pain facilitates nonthermoregulatory Anaesthesiol Scand 1995;39:90–95. doi:10.1111/
t r e m o r. A n e s t h e s i o l o g y 1 9 9 9 ; 9 1 : 9 7 9 – 9 8 4 . j.1399-6576.1995.tb05598.x
doi:10.1097/00000542-199910000-00017 17. Sessler DI, Olofsson CI, Rubinstein EH. The
5. Panzer O, Ghazanfari N, Sessler DI, et al. Shivering thermoregulatory threshold in humans during
and shivering-like tremor during labor with nitrous oxide-fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology
and without epidural analgesia. Anesthesiology 1988;69:357–364. doi:10.1097/00000542-198809000-
1999;90:1609–1616. doi:10.1097/00000542- 00012
199906000-00017 18. Sheffield CW, Sessler DI, Hopf HW, et al. Centrally
6. Eberhart LH, Döderlein F, Eisenhardt G, et al. and locally mediated thermoregulatory responses
Independent risk factors for postoperative shivering. alter subcutaneous oxygen tension. Wound Repair
Anesth Analg 2005;101:1849–1857. doi:10.1213/01. Regen 1996;4:339–345. doi:10.1046/j.1524-
ANE.0000184128.41795.FE 475X.1996.40310.x
7. Crossley AW. Six months of shivering in a district 19. Alvarez Corredor FA. Comparison of the effectiveness
general hospital. Anesthesia. 1992;47:845–848. of dexmedetomidine, meperidine and ketamine in
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb03143.x the prevention of postoperative shivering. Rev Esp
8. Kongsayreepong S, Chaibundit C, Chadpaibool J, Anestesiol Reanim 2016;63:505–512. doi:10.1016/
et al. Predictor of core hypothermia and the surgical j.redar.2016.02.006
intensive care unit. Anesth Analg 2003;96:826–833. 20. Sahi S, Singh MR, Katyal S. Comparative efficacy
doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000048822.27698.28 of intravenous dexmedetomidine, clonidine, and
9. Bernthal EM. Inadvertent hypothermia prevention: tramadol in postanesthesia shivering. J Anaesthesiol