Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T he preoperative comprehensive examination of aging Asian The inclusion criteria to undergo ISE associated with UB were
patients seeking upper facial rejuvenation is essential. Due to moderate and severe upper eyelid dermatochalasis in patients with high
inherent anatomical characteristics typically present in patients of eyebrows (defined as distance from the ciliary margin to the eyebrow,
Asian ancestry, such as thicker eyelid skin, eyebrows in a higher in the midpupillary line, of at least 28 mm) and lateral hooding; residual
position, and variable presence of an eyelid crease (absent in lateral hooding following previous blepharoplasty. Figure 1A, B shows
the features of patients who underwent the combined procedure.
The Strasser grading system7 was used to evaluate the surgical
Accepted for publication December 12, 2015. results. According to this objective grading system, 5 parameters (malpo-
This paper was presented in part at the ASOPRS Fall Meeting, Las Vegas, sition, distortion, asymmetry, contour deformity, and scar) were assessed
NV, 2015.
The authors have no financial or conflicts of interest to disclose. and classified according to severity: perfect (zero points), noticeable
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Midori Hentona Osaki, (1 point), obvious (5 points), and obvious and deforming (15 points). An
M.D., M.B.A., Division of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, excellent result is assigned a score of zero. Scores of 1 to 4 indicate good
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of
São Paulo, Rua Botucatu, 821, 2o. andar, São Paulo, SP 04023-062, Brazil.
results, 5 to 14 are mediocre, and 15 or greater are poor.
E-mail: midori_osaki@yahoo.com.br Aesthetic improvement was assessed by 3 blinded oculoplastic
DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000000644 surgeons, who judged preoperative and 6-month-postoperative digital
Upper Blepharoplasty
An adequate amount of excess skin to be resected was pinched
FIG. 1. Female patients of Asian ancestry who underwent using forceps. After confirming that there would be no excess skin re-
infrabrow skin excision associated with upper blepharoplasty pro- moval leading to lagophthalmos, marking of the superior eyelid incision
cedure. A, A 76-year-old female patient with single eyelid, thick line was completed. A #15 blade was used to incise the skin, and only
skin, and high eyebrow presenting with severe dermatochalasis
skin was excised.
and prominent lateral hooding. B, A 68-year-old female patient
with a more arched eyebrow laterally, thinned, high located and Redundant preaponeurotic fat was removed after opening the or-
tattooed eyebrow, presenting with moderate dermatochalasis bicularis and septum using a Colorado needle. To avoid the appearance
and lateral hooding. C, Marking of the infrabrow and upper of an upper eyelid depression postoperatively, the authors do not remove
eyelid excision area. Initially, the eyelid crease is marked at a dis- fat in excess. An eyelid crease (double eyelid was desired by most of
tance of 5 mm to 7 mm from the ciliary margin and the medial the patients) was created by fixing the pretarsal orbicularis oculi to the
third of the superior limit is also marked. Marking of the remain- levator aponeurosis using 6-0 white polyglycolic acid sutures (Vicryl;
ing superior excision area is only completed after finalizing the Ethicon) and the skin was closed using 6-0 nylon (Ethicon) interrupted
ISE procedure. Preoperative distance from the ciliary margin to sutures. Skin sutures were removed on the seventh postoperative day.
the eyebrow varied from 28 mm to 35 mm, in the midpupillary
line, among patients who underwent this procedure. D, Beveled
infrabrow incision to prevent damage to hair follicles. RESULTS
Thirty-two eyelids of 16 female Japanese Brazilian pa-
photographs. Photographs were rated using a 5-point Likert-type scale, tients underwent ISE associated with UB. The mean age was 68.87 ±
where 1 indicated much worse than preoperative and 5 indicated much 7.88 years (57–82 years). Mean follow up was 37.25 ± 18.96 months
better than preoperative for preoperative versus postoperative aesthetic (9–72 months).
improvement analysis, and 1 indicated poor aesthetic appearance and Sutures were removed 7 days after surgery and patients were
5 excellent aesthetic appearance for pre- and post-operative appearance. evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months (at least). One month postoperatively,
Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed to assess for statistically sig- 6 patients still experienced slight redness in the infrabrow region, but in
nificant differences in the scores returned by the independent blinded ob- all cases, the infrabrow scarring faded markedly within 3 months after
servers. p values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. surgery and was almost unnoticeable by 6 months without the use of
makeup. Figure 2 shows pre- and post-operative photographs.
Surgical Technique The Strasser objective system7 for evaluation of surgical results
All procedures were performed under local anesthesia with was applied at 3 months. All patients had scores between 0 and 1 point
sedation. Initially, the infrabrow excision area and eyelid crease were (Table 1), indicating good results (0–4 points) and were satisfied with the
marked. During preoperative evaluation, the infrabrow skin was pinched cosmetic outcome and improvement of visual field after surgery. No com-
using bayonet forceps with the patient in a sitting position and eyes plications related to wound dehiscence, lagophthalmos, sensory changes,
open. While pinching, the surgeon observed the appearance of the eye- hematoma, infection, or hypertrophic scars were observed. Eyebrow mal-
lids while open and closed. position or eyelid crease discrepancy requiring additional surgery was
not observed. Table 1 summarizes patients’ data and the Strasser grading
Infrabrow Skin Excision Marking system scores. Table 2 shows the scores of the Likert type scale analysis.
A line following the lower margin of the eyebrow was drawn. Significant narrowing between eyelid margin and eyebrow was not
Using forceps, the amount of excess skin to be resected was pinched clinically observed, since only patients with anatomically high eyebrows
in the infrabrow region, and then the inferior limit of the elliptical skin (preoperative distances from the eyelid ciliary margin to the eyebrow in
excision area was determined accordingly. The widest skin excision area the midpupillary vertical line ranged from 28 mm to 35 mm) have under-
should be enough to correct lateral drooping of the skin. Extension of gone the combined procedure. Postoperatively, all patients presented with
eyebrows located above the supraorbital rim and a minimal distance of
the skin ellipse varied medially according to the severity of each pa-
20 mm from the ciliary margin to the eyebrow, in the midpupillary line,
tient’s dermatochalasis, while laterally, it extended to the lateral end of
was kept in all patients to avoid lagophthalmos and to preserve harmonic
the eyebrow. In most patients, a greater amount of skin was marked and
proportions between the upper eyelid and the eyebrow.
excised from the infrabrow lateral region (Fig. 1C), where it is thicker.
2 © 2016 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, Vol. XX, No. XX, 2016 Infrabrow Skin Excision Associated with Upper Blepharoplasty
TABLE 1. Summary of patients’ data and surgical results according to the Strasser objective system
Follow up Contour
Patient Age Procedure (month) Malposition Distortion Asymmetry deformity Scar
1 67 UB + ISE* 72 0 0 0 0 0
2 69 UB + ISE* 60 0 0 0 0 0
3 74 UB + ISE* 54 0 0 0 0 0
4 58 UB + ISE* 52 0 0 0 0 0
5 65 UB + ISE* 48 0 0 0 0 0
6 82 UB + ISE* 48 0 0 0 0 0
7 59 UB + ISE* 45 0 0 0 0 0
8 57 UB + ISE* 42 0 0 0 0 1
9 73 UB + ISE* 36 0 0 0 0 0
10 71 UB + ISE* 36 0 0 0 0 0
11 68 UB + ISE* 30 0 0 0 0 0
12 59 UB + ISE* 28 0 0 0 0 1
13 79 UB + ISE 14 0 0 0 0 0
14 76 UB + ISE* 12 0 0 0 0 0
15 78 UB + ISE 10 0 0 0 0 0
16 67 UB + ISE* 9 0 0 0 0 0
Strasser objective system for evaluating sugical results: perfect = 0 points; noticeable = 1 point; obvious = 5 points; deforming = 15 points.
*Underwent double eyelid creation.
ISE, infrabrow skin excision; UB, upper blepharoplasty.
© 2016 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc. 3
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
Osaki et al. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, Vol. XX, No. XX, 2016
TABLE 2. Blinded Likert type-scale analysis: before and a larger amount of infrabrow skin is excised from the lateral
6-month-postoperative photographs region (Fig. 1C), which is more arched in many Asian patients
(Fig. 1B). Furthermore, the procedure is usually performed
Preoperative vs. Preoperative Postoperative bilaterally, so that a possible eyebrow descent does not usually
postoperative aesthetic aesthetic
cause cosmetic problems.13
appearance appearance appearance p
In summary, ISE associated with UB has been found to
Observer 1 4.88 ± 0.34 1.88 ± 0.81 4.81 ± 0.40 0.0002 be a good option for addressing moderate and severe derma-
Observer 2 4.75 ± 0.45 1.63 ± 0.50 4.63 ± 0.50 0.0004 tochalasis with lateral hooding in elderly Japanese Brazilian
Observer 3 4.81 ± 0.40 1.63 ± 0.62 4.75 ± 0.45 0.0004 patients. The advantages of these combined procedures include
removal of redundant lateral thick skin in the upper eyelid and
Likert type-scale analysis: preoperative vs. postoperative appearance:1 = much
worse than preoperative; 3 = same as preoperative; 5 = much better than preoperative; inconspicuous scarring in the infrabrow region, resulting in
aesthetic appearance: 1 = poor; 5 = excellent. p values: calculated by comparing a rejuvenated and harmonic upper eyelid area in these select
pre- and post-operative scores. patients.
4 © 2016 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.