Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
catarrhalis
Rachel Balder1 and Eric R. Lafontaine1
1
University of Georgia, Department of Infectious Diseases, Athens, Georgia
ABSTRACT
Moraxella catarrhalis is a Gram-negative bacterium that has recently emerged as the third
leading cause of bacterial ear infections in children. This organism is also responsible
for a variety of upper respiratory tract illnesses in adults, including ∼10% of all cases of
respiratory exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
There is interest in studying M. catarrhalis for vaccine development, and this unit
provides guidelines for the laboratory maintenance of the organism. The three Basic
Protocols presented in this unit describe how to culture and prepare M. catarrhalis
cells for use in experiments pertaining to various biological aspects of this important
respiratory pathogen. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 11:6B.1.1-6B.1.11. C 2008 by John Wiley
INTRODUCTION
This unit describes methods, reagents, and equipment commonly used to grow the Gram-
negative bacterium, Moraxella catarrhalis, in the laboratory. Basic Protocol 1 describes
the preparation of a working stock, which is used for culturing M. catarrhalis on solid
(Basic Protocol 2) or liquid (Basic Protocol 3) medium. Conditions for inoculation,
incubation, passage, and storage are discussed. Antibiotic concentrations used to grow
genetically engineered mutant strains, as well as optical densities of M. catarrhalis
liquid suspensions and their corresponding bacterial concentrations, are presented in
Basic Protocol 1 and 2, respectively. Together, these simple guidelines will facilitate the
use of low-passage M. catarrhalis cells in biological assays, which will improve the
reproducibility of experimental outcomes. With a few exceptions (e.g., media), these
protocols are appropriate for the laboratory maintenance of other bacterial species as
well.
NOTE: All solutions and equipment that come in contact with M. catarrhalis must be
sterile and aseptic technique must be used to avoid contamination. Refer to APPENDIX 4
for more details.
Materials
Moraxella catarrhalis frozen stock vial (see Support Protocol)
Todd Hewitt agar plates (see recipe)
Wire inoculating loop (see APPENDIX 4A)
37◦ C, 7.5% CO2 incubator
Additional reagents and equipment for aseptic technique and streaking bacteria
(APPENDIX 4A)
1. Thaw a frozen stock vial of M. catarrhalis at room temperature for 10 min.
The entire vial is thawed to reduce the possibility of contamination associated with
scraping or chipping off frozen pieces of the sample.
5. Label the agar side of the Petri dish with the date and the name of the strain. Also,
indicate that this culture corresponds to bacteria “revived” from a frozen stock vial.
6. Incubate for 16 to 20 hr at 37◦ C in the presence of 7.5% CO2 .
If a CO2 incubator is not available, place the agar plate inside a desiccator containing
a lit candle. Seal the jar and allow the candle to go out. This will produce enough CO2
to support the overnight growth of M. catarrhalis. Place the sealed desiccator in an
incubator or a warm room set at 37◦ C.
Table 6B.1.1 Antibiotic Stock Solutions for Use with M. catarrhalis Cultures
Stock Working
Antibiotic Solvent Storage
concentration concentration
6B.1.2
Supplement 11 Current Protocols in Microbiology
Figure 6B.1.1 Moraxella catarrhalis strain O35E grown on a Todd Hewitt agar plate for 20 hr at
37◦ C.
7. Ascertain that the “revived” bacteria are not contaminated with organisms other than
M. catarrhalis by inspecting the appearance of isolated colonies on the agar plate.
Following a 16- to 20-hr incubation, M. catarrhalis colonies are 1 to 2 mm in diameter,
round, opaque, and convex, with a yellow-tan color (Fig. 6B.1.1). Another useful charac-
teristic of these colonies is that they remain intact while being pushed across the surface
of the agar plate.
If contamination is observed, find an area that is not contaminated and use a wire
inoculating loop and aseptic technique to scrape several M. catarrhalis colonies and
streak them onto a new Todd Hewitt agar plate.
8. Store this agar plate with “revived” cells, which corresponds to the working
M. catarrhalis stock, at 4◦ C for up to 5 days.
This working stock should always be used to start cultures (liquid and solid media) for
biological assays (refer to Basic Protocols 2 and 3). This practice reduces the number of
passages of the strain in the laboratory and will increase the reproducibility of results.
Moraxella catarrhalis does not survive well when stored at 4◦ C for extended periods of
time. After 5 days, the “revived” bacteria should therefore be discarded according to
appropriate institutional biosafety protocols. A fresh working stock should be prepared
as needed.
6B.1.3
Current Protocols in Microbiology Supplement 11
suspension can minimize the risk of contamination. Although the authors’ laboratory
routinely grows M. catarrhalis on Todd Hewitt agar plates, other media are commonly
used, including Brain Heart Infusion, Mueller Hinton, chocolate agar, and blood agar
plates. With the exception of transposon mutagenesis, where the authors have found Todd
Hewitt broth to increase efficiency (see Basic Protocol 3), there is no specific advantage
or disadvantage to use one medium over another when growing M. catarrhalis.
Materials
Moraxella catarrhalis working stock (see Basic Protocol 1)
Todd Hewitt agar plates (see recipe)
PBSG (see recipe)
Wire inoculating loop (see APPENDIX 4A)
37◦ C, 7.5% CO2 incubator
12 × 75–mm snap-cap polypropylene tubes, sterile
Disposable inoculating loops, 10 μl (BD or equivalent)
Klett 802 calibrated test tubes (Scienceware/Bel-Art Products) or
spectrophotometer and appropriate cuvettes
Klett colorimeter with Klett color filter KS-54
Additional reagents and equipment for aseptic technique and streaking bacteria
(APPENDIX 4A)
1. Using a wire inoculating loop and aseptic technique (APPENDIX 4A), transfer a loopful
of bacteria from the working M. catarrhalis stock (i.e., the plate prepared in Basic
Protocol 1) to an area near one side of a Todd Hewitt agar plate. Streak to obtain
isolated colonies as illustrated in Figure A.4A.3.
It is not recommended to use only a single colony to propagate M. catarrhalis. This
bacterium expresses several molecules subject to phase variation, and the use of a single
colony for propagation increases the risk of studying a population of cells expressing
reduced levels of one or more of these antigens. The use of a loopful of bacteria will best
facilitate an unbiased approach to the study of M. catarrhalis.
Materials
M. catarrhalis working stock (see Basic Protocol 1)
Todd Hewitt agar plates (see recipe)
PBSG (see recipe)
Todd Hewitt broth (see recipe)
Wire inoculating loop (see APPENDIX 4A)
37◦ C incubator (no CO2 added) with shaker
37◦ C, 7.5% CO2 incubator
12 × 75–mm snap-cap polypropylene tubes, sterile
300- to 500-ml Nephelo culture flask, with 14 × 130–mm sidearm (Bellco
Biotechnology or equivalent)
Klett colorimeter with Klett color filter KS-54
Additional reagents and equipment for aseptic technique and streaking plates
(APPENDIX 4A)
1. Using a wire inoculating loop and aseptic technique (APPENDIX 4A), transfer a loopful
of bacteria from the working M. catarrhalis stock (i.e., the plate prepared in Basic
Protocol 1) to an area near one side of a Todd Hewitt agar plate. Streak to obtain
isolated colonies as illustrated in Figure A.4A.3.
As an alternative, M. catarrhalis can be grown in Todd Hewitt broth for 16 to 20 hr. This
overnight culture can then be diluted into fresh medium as described in step 5. However,
we recommend using plate-grown bacteria, as visual inspection of the agar plate prior to
setting up the broth culture will help reduce the risk of contamination.
6B.1.5
Current Protocols in Microbiology Supplement 11
Discard the agar plate with unused freshly grown bacteria according to appropriate
institutional biosafety protocols.
4. Add desired volume of Todd Hewitt broth (15 to 30 ml) to a sterile Nephelo culture
flask (300 to 500 ml size) with a 14 × 130–mm sidearm.
The Nephelo flask is a specialized flask with a built-in sidearm that makes it easy to assess
the culture density during growth without exposing the culture to potential contaminants
outside the flask.
5. Carefully tilt the flask to fill the sidearm with broth. Place the sidearm in the Klett
colorimeter to zero. Tilt the flask back to return the broth to the bottom of the culture
flask.
When appropriate, supplement the Todd Hewitt broth with the indicated antibiotic con-
centration (Table 6B.1.1).
6. To this flask, aseptically add 25 μl of the concentrated bacterial suspension (step 3).
Mix by gently swirling the flask.
7. Fill the sidearm with broth as described in the annotation to step 4, then measure the
optical density. Repeat until the density reaches 35 to 50 Klett units.
8. Place the sidearm flask in a shaking incubator set at 37◦ C (CO2 not used) and a speed
of 200 rpm. Incubate until the desired bacterial cell concentration (Table 6B.1.2) or
growth phase is attained.
A spectrophotometer can be used in place of a Klett colorimeter. Refer to Table 6B.1.2
for optical densities and corresponding bacterial concentrations.
Under the conditions stated above, an optical density of 125 to 150 Klett units should
be reached within 3 to 3.5 hr of incubation, and will correspond to the mid–log phase
of growth; M. catarrhalis cells will enter stationary phase after ∼6 hr (300 to 350
Klett units). These values will need to be empirically determined when modifying culture
conditions (e.g., using a different culture medium or growth temperature) or studying
genetically engineered mutant strains that may have slower growth rates.
COMMENTARY
Background Information the interpretation of experimental outcomes.
This issue is discussed further under Critical
Maintenance of M. catarrhalis Parameters and Troubleshooting.
The protocols described in this unit pro-
Common applications utilizing M.
vide the necessary information to culture
catarrhalis grown on solid medium include
M. catarrhalis in the laboratory. Specifically,
isolation of chromosomal DNA (Balder
they describe how to prepare frozen stocks for
et al., 2007), whole-cell protein preparations
long-term storage of the organism (Support
(Bullard et al., 2005), and removal of loosely
Protocol) and how to revive bacteria from this
associated outer membrane proteins by
frozen state (Basic Protocol 1), as well as how
mechanical shearing (Luke et al., 2004). In
to culture M. catarrhalis using solid (Basic
addition, several functional assays can be per-
Protocol 2) and liquid (Basic Protocol 3) me-
formed using M. catarrhalis cells cultured on
dia. Basic Protocol 1 describes how to revive
agar plates. This list includes, but is not limited
bacteria stored at −80◦ C and how to pre-
to, assessing attachment of the organism to
pare a working stock for the propagation of
eukaryotic cells (Holm et al., 2003), analyzing
M. catarrhalis. The use of this working stock
the binding of antibodies to bacteria by flow
to inoculate cultures limits the number of pas-
cytometry (Lipski et al., 2007), measuring Nonenteric
sages that occur prior to using the organism
cell-associated enzymatic activity (Timpe Gamma
in experiments, which in turn reduces the Proteobacteria
et al., 2003), and determining the organism’s
likeliness of phase variability, complicating
6B.1.7
Current Protocols in Microbiology Supplement 11
ability to use different iron sources (Bonnah 2007), and is the basis of several tests
et al., 1999). Basic Protocol 2 describes how that are commercially available for rapidly
to grow and prepare M. catarrhalis cells to identifying the organism, such as Gibson
perform these experiments. There are also ID- M. CAT (Gibson http://www.gibsonlabs.
several applications in which broth-grown com/) and BactiCard Neisseria (Remel).
bacteria can be used, such as isolation of outer Moraxella catarrhalis contributes to ∼15%
membrane vesicles (Murphy and Loeb, 1989), of all cases of bacterial ear infections (Cripps
bactericidal assays (Attia et al., 2005), growth et al., 2005, Giebink et al., 2005) and ∼10%
curves (Furano and Campagnari, 2003; Holm of respiratory tract exacerbations in patients
et al., 2004), biofilm assays (Pearson et al., with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
2006), iron-uptake studies (Aebi et al., 1996), (COPD; Murphy et al., 2005). These ail-
and electroporation (Holm et al., 2003; ments impose a significant financial burden
Pearson and Hansen, 2007). The information on the U.S. healthcare system, amounting
required to propagate M. catarrhalis for to ∼$5 and ∼$18 billion a year for treat-
setting up these assays is presented in Basic ment of ear infections and COPD exacer-
Protocol 3. bations, respectively (Murphy, 1996; Karalus
and Campagnari, 2000; Klein, 2000; Sethi and
Significance of M. catarrhalis Murphy, 2001; Murphy et al., 2005). Otitis me-
Moraxella catarrhalis is a Gram-negative, dia is primarily a disease of early childhood.
unencapsulated diplococcus that causes oti- Patients commonly experience persistent pain
tis media (middle ear infections) in children and upper respiratory symptoms. Other indi-
and respiratory tract diseases in adults. Orig- cators may include fever, nausea, and vom-
inally described in 1896, this bacterium was iting. The tympanic membrane of patients is
long considered a commensal of the upper often red, thickened, and bulging. Addition-
respiratory tract and referred to as Neisseria ally, a purulent exudate can also be observed in
catarrhalis. This classification was in part due some instances. Recurrence of ear infections is
to difficulties differentiating M. catarrhalis a problem and can have serious consequences
from other nonpathogenic Neisseria species including hearing loss and delays in the devel-
such as Neisseria cinerea, and it was not opment of communication skills (Klein, 2000;
until the later part of the 20th century that Cripps et al., 2005; Giebink et al., 2005).
the organism emerged as an important hu- Moraxella catarrhalis is also a significant
man pathogen. Based on DNA hybridization cause of respiratory tract infections in
studies, M. catarrhalis was temporarily clas- patients with COPD. This obstructive disorder
sified in the 1970s to a new genus and called severely impairs airflow and is experienced
Branhamella catarrhalis. However, the organ- by patients with chronic bronchitis and/or
ism was reassigned to the Moraxella genus in emphysema. COPD is most commonly
1984, and DNA sequence analyses have thus diagnosed in elderly smokers or individu-
far validated this classification (Catlin, 1990; als with other chronic lung problems. M.
Murphy, 1996; Christensen, 1999; Karalus and catarrhalis generally causes tracheobronchitis
Campagnari, 2000; Verduin et al., 2002). or pneumonia in these patients, and symptoms
Several criteria are used to identify M. include coughing, purulent sputum, and, in
catarrhalis in clinical specimens from the the case of pneumonia, infiltrates in the lower
respiratory tract, including Gram stain, lobes that are observable by X ray. These
colony morphology, oxidase production, infections have been shown to contribute to
and lack of glucose, maltose, sucrose, the progression of COPD, which is one of
lactose, or fructose fermentation, as well the leading causes of death worldwide (Sethi
as a lack of pigmentation (i.e., gray-white and Murphy, 2001; Sethi et al. 2002; Murphy
colonies) on blood agar. Additional tests et al., 2005). M. catarrhalis is highly resistant
are necessary to distinguish M. catarrhalis to penicillin-based antimicrobials, as >90%
from commensal Neisseria species, and of clinical isolates produce β-lactamases, and
those include the reduction of nitrate and antibiotics suggested for treatment include
nitrite, DNase production, and tributyrin second- and third-generation cephalosporins,
hydrolysis (Doern and Morse, 1980; Catlin, erythromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate,
1990; Singh et al., 1997; Christensen, 1999; fluoroquinolones, and trimethroprim-
Verduin et al., 2002). The latter is mediated sulfamethoxazole (Klugman, 1996; Manninen
Laboratory by the M. catarrhalis esterase/phospholipase et al., 1997; Jacobs et al., 2004; Murray et al.,
Maintenance of B McaP (Timpe et al., 2003; Lipski et al., 2005).
M. catarrhalis
6B.1.8
Supplement 11 Current Protocols in Microbiology
Critical Parameters and the viability of the organism greatly decreases
Troubleshooting after refreezing. The use of a working stock
(Basic Protocol 1) allows for the propagation
Phase variation in M. catarrhalis
of cultures from revived bacteria for several
Moraxella catarrhalis possesses several
consecutive days without having to repeatedly
molecules that may spontaneously undergo
revive and restock the organism. However, M.
phase variation such that their expression is
catarrhalis does not survive as well, or for
abolished or substantially diminished (i.e.,
as long, as some other bacteria (e.g., E. coli)
phase-variant molecules). These antigens,
when stored at 4◦ C for extended periods. Thus,
which include Hag (Pearson et al., 2002;
after 5 days of storage under these conditions,
Mollenkvist et al., 2003), UspA1 (Lafontaine
the working stock should be disposed of ac-
et al., 2001), UspA2 (Attia and Hansen, 2006),
cording to institutional guidelines and a new
and UspA2H (Wang et al., 2007), are impor-
working stock of revived M. catarrhalis cells
tant for several biological functions associated
should be prepared as needed.
with bacterial pathogenesis, such as adher-
Another variation of common laboratory
ence to epithelial cells, biofilm formation, and
practices to improve the viability of M.
serum resistance. Additional measures must
catarrhalis is supplementing PBS-based so-
therefore be taken when handling the organ-
lutions with gelatin (see Reagents and Solu-
ism in order to avoid studying pure cultures
tions). Phosphate-buffered saline is used as a
of M. catarrhalis phase variants. One of these
basic buffer to suspend bacteria for a variety
is to limit the passage of strains in the labo-
of biological protocols and cell preparations.
ratory by utilizing a working stock (described
M. catarrhalis does not survive well in PBS,
in Basic Protocol 1). This practice allows ver-
but the addition of 0.15% (w/v) gelatin in-
ification that revived bacteria are not contami-
creases the organism’s viability (Aebi et al.,
nated, ensures that M. catarrhalis is minimally
1998). Despite the addition of gelatin, it is
passaged prior to performing experiments, and
still important to work in an efficient manner.
has been determined by the authors to increase
Specifically, do not let more than 30 min elapse
the reproducibility of biological assay results.
between suspension of M. catarrhalis in PBSG
Another important precaution to avoid the
and the use of these cells in experiments for
study of a phase-variant population is to re-
which the viability of the organism is impor-
frain from using a single colony to propagate
tant (e.g., adherence and bactericidal assays).
M. catarrhalis. Although not in conformity
with common microbiological practices, this Autoagglutination
will reduce the risk of inadvertently selecting Moraxella catarrhalis cells autoaggluti-
a variant on the agar plate that is not expressing nate, which makes homogeneous suspension
wild-type levels of phase-variable molecules. of the organism in liquid crucial to obtain-
Propagating a single colony is often difficult ing consistent results (see Basic Protocols 2
to circumvent in some experiments, such as and 3). For instance, a freshly-prepared sus-
the construction of isogenic mutant strains or pension in PBSG can go from turbid to clear
transposon mutagenesis of M. catarrhalis. In if allowed to stand undisturbed for ∼20 min,
cases where a single colony must be passaged, with all bacteria settled at the bottom of the
it is recommended to verify that phase-variable tube. It is therefore important to vortex sus-
proteins are expressed at wild-type levels by pensions just prior to starting experiments in
western blotting. This practice will ascertain order to obtain the intended number of bacte-
that a particular phenotypic trait is associated rial cells.
with the gene under study, as opposed to be-
ing the consequence of phase variation in a Anticipated Results
different gene product. Basic Protocols 1 and 2 describe cultur-
ing M. catarrhalis on solid medium. Follow-
Viability of M. catarrhalis ing a 16- to 20-hr incubation, colonies will be
The viability of M. catarrhalis becomes 1 to 2 mm in diameter, opaque, round, con-
an issue with respect to several common lab- vex, and yellow-tan in color, and will remain
oratory procedures. For example, there are intact when pushed across the surface of the
many bacteria for which a frozen stock can agar plate (Fig. 6B.1.1). Basic Protocol 3 de-
be thawed and the necessary amount removed scribes the growth of M. catarrhalis in liquid
and streaked onto an agar plate; following this, medium. Table 6B.1.2 lists optical densities
the vial is refrozen for later use. This is not and provides the bacterial concentrations cor- Nonenteric
Gamma
an option when handling M. catarrhalis, as responding to these values. Proteobacteria
6B.1.9
Current Protocols in Microbiology Supplement 11
Time Considerations proteins that mediate adherence to human ep-
Basic Protocol 1 requires the use of Todd ithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 75:2765-2775.
Hewitt agar plates and a frozen M. catarrhalis Bonnah, R.A., Wong, H., Loosmore, S.M., and
stock, which are usually made in advance. The Schryvers, A.B. 1999. Characterization of
specific steps described in the protocol should Moraxella (Branhamella) catarrhalis lbpB,
lbpA, and lactoferrin receptor orf3 isogenic
take ∼15 min. mutants. Infect. Immun. 67:1517-1520.
The first two steps of Basic Protocols 2
Bullard, B., Lipski, S.L., and Lafontaine, E.R.
and 3 are the same, and consist of streaking 2005. Hag directly mediates the adherence of
M. catarrhalis on solid medium from the Moraxella catarrhalis to human middle ear
working stock, which should take ∼5 min, and cells. Infect. Immun. 73:5127-5136.
incubating this agar plate for 16 to 20 hr at Catlin, B.W. 1990. Branhamella catarrhalis: An
37◦ C. In Basic Protocol 2, these freshly grown organism gaining respect as a pathogen. Clin.
M. catarrhalis cells are suspended in PBSG, Microbiol. Rev. 3:293-320.
and this part of the experiment (i.e., steps 3 Christensen, J.J. 1999. Moraxella (Branhamella)
and 4) should take 10 to 20 min, depending catarrhalis: Clinical, microbiological and im-
on the number of suspensions to be prepared. munological features in lower respiratory tract
infections. APMIS 88:1-36.
In Basic Protocol 3, plate-grown bacteria are
first suspended in PBSG and then diluted to a Cripps, A.W., Otczyk, D.C., and Kyd, J.M. 2005.
Bacterial otitis media: A vaccine preventable
low optical density in broth. This part of Ba- disease? Vaccine 23:2304-2310.
sic Protocol 3 (i.e., steps 3 to 5) can also be
Doern, G.V. and Morse, S.A. 1980. Branhamella
accomplished within 10 to 20 min, depend- (Neisseria) catarrhalis: Criteria for laboratory
ing on the number of cultures to be set up. It identification. J. Clin. Microbiol. 11:193-195.
should be noted that Basic Protocols 2 and 3 Furano, K. and Campagnari, A.A. 2003. Inacti-
only describe the preparation of M. catarrhalis vation of the Moraxella catarrhalis 7169 fer-
cells to be subsequently used in various types ric uptake regulator increases susceptibility to
of assays. Thus, the time necessary to com- the bactericidal activity of normal human sera.
plete an entire experiment will depend on Infect. Immun. 71:1843-1848.
the specific type of assay that is to be per- Giebink, G.S., Kurono, Y., Bakaletz, L.O., Kyd,
formed with these cells. For example, prepara- J.M., Barenkamp, S.J., Murphy, T.F., Green, B.,
Ogra, P.L., Gu, X.X., Patel, J.A., Heikkinen, T.,
tion of electrocompetent bacteria will typically Pelton, S.I., Hotomi, M., and Karma, P. 2005.
take less time than performing a growth-curve Recent advances in otitis media. 6. Vaccine. Ann.
experiment. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 194:86-103.
Holm, M.M., Vanlerberg, S.L., Sledjeski, D.D.,
Literature Cited and Lafontaine, E.R. 2003. The Hag protein of
Aebi, C., Stone, B., Beucher, M., Cope, L.D., Moraxella catarrhalis strain O35E is associated
Maciver, I., Thomas, S.E., McCracken, G.H. with adherence to human lung and middle ear
Jr., Sparling, P.F., and Hansen, E.J. 1996. Ex- cells. Infect. Immun. 71:4977-4984.
pression of the CopB outer membrane protein Holm, M.M., Vanlerberg, S.L., Foley, I.M.,
by Moraxella catarrhalis is regulated by iron Sledjeski, D.D., and Lafontaine, E.R. 2004. The
and affects iron acquisition from transferrin and Moraxella catarrhalis porin-like outer mem-
lactoferrin. Infect. Immun. 64:2024-2030. brane protein CD is an adhesin for human lung
Aebi, C., Lafontaine, E.R., Cope, L.D., Latimer, cells. Infect. Immun. 72:1906-1913.
J.L., Lumbley, S.L., McCracken, G.H., Jr., and Jacobs, M.R., Bajaksouzian, S., Windau, A.,
Hansen, E.J. 1998. Phenotypic effect of iso- Good, C.E., Lin, G., Pankuch, G.A., and
genic uspA1 and uspA2 mutations on Moraxella Appelbaum, P.C. 2004. Susceptibility of Strep-
catarrhalis 035E. Infect. Immun. 66:3113- tococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae,
3119. and Moraxella catarrhalis to 17 oral antimicro-
Attia, A.S. and Hansen, E.J. 2006. A conserved bial agents based on pharmacodynamic param-
tetranucleotide repeat is necessary for wild-type eters: 1998-2001 U.S. Surveillance Study. Clin.
expression of the Moraxella catarrhalis UspA2 Lab. Med. 24:503-530.
protein. J. Bacteriol. 188:7840-7852. Karalus, R. and Campagnari, A. 2000. Moraxella
Attia, A.S., Lafontaine, E.R., Latimer, J.L., Aebi, catarrhalis: A review of an important hu-
C., Syrogiannopoulos, G.A., and Hansen, man mucosal pathogen. Microbes Infect. 2:547-
E.J. 2005. The UspA2 protein of Moraxella 559.
catarrhalis is directly involved in the expression Klein, J.O. 2000. The burden of otitis media.
of serum resistance. Infect. Immun. 73:2400- Vaccine 19:S2-8.
2410. Klugman, K.P. 1996. The clinical relevance of in-
Balder, R., Hassel, J., Lipski, S., and Lafontaine, vitro resistance to penicillin, ampicillin, amoxy-
Laboratory
Maintenance of E.R. 2007. Moraxella catarrhalis strain O35E cillin and alternative agents, for the treatment
M. catarrhalis expresses two filamentous hemagglutinin-like of community-acquired pneumonia caused by
6B.1.10
Supplement 11 Current Protocols in Microbiology
Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus in- microsphere formulation versus 10 days of lev-
fluenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis. J. Antimi- ofloxacin for the treatment of acute bacterial si-
crob. Chemother. 38:133-140. nusitis in adults. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg.
Lafontaine, E.R., Wagner, N.J., and Hansen, E.J. 133:194-200.
2001. Expression of the Moraxella catarrhalis Pearson, M.M. and Hansen, E.J. 2007. Identifica-
UspA1 protein undergoes phase variation and is tion of gene products involved in biofilm produc-
regulated at the transcriptional level. J. Bacte- tion by Moraxella catarrhalis ETSU-9 in vitro.
riol. 183:1540-1551. Infect. Immun. 75:4316-4325.
Lipski, S.L., Akimana, C., Timpe, J.M., Wooten, Pearson, M.M., Lafontaine, E.R., Wagner, N.J., St.
R.M., and Lafontaine, E.R. 2007. The Moraxella Geme, J.W. 3rd, and Hansen, E.J. 2002. A hag
catarrhalis autotransporter McaP is a conserved mutant of Moraxella catarrhalis strain O35E
surface protein that mediates adherence to hu- is deficient in hemagglutination, autoagglutina-
man epithelial cells through its N-terminal tion, and immunoglobulin D-binding activities.
passenger domain. Infect. Immun. 75:314- Infect. Immun. 70:4523-4533.
324. Pearson, M.M., Laurence, C.A., Guinn, S.E.,
Luke, N.R., Howlett, A.J., Shao, J., and and Hansen, E.J. 2006. Biofilm formation by
Campagnari, A.A. 2004. Expression of type IV Moraxella catarrhalis in vitro: Roles of the
pili by Moraxella catarrhalis is essential for nat- UspA1 adhesin and the Hag hemagglutinin.
ural competence and is affected by iron limita- Infect. Immun. 74:1588-1596.
tion. Infect. Immun. 72:6262-6270. Sethi, S. and Murphy, T.F. 2001. Bacterial infec-
Manninen, R., Huovinen, P., and Nissinen, A. 1997. tion in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in
Increasing antimicrobial resistance in Strepto- 2000: A state-of-the-art review. Clin. Microbiol.
coccus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae Rev. 14:336-363.
and Moraxella catarrhalis in Finland. J. Antimi- Sethi, S., Evans, N., Grant, B.J., and Murphy, T.F.
crob. Chemother. 40:387-392. 2002. New strains of bacteria and exacerbations
Mollenkvist, A., Nordstrom, T., Hallden, C., of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N.
Christensen, J.J., Forsgren, A., and Riesbeck, K. Engl. J. Med. 347:465-471.
2003. The Moraxella catarrhalis immunoglob- Singh, S., Cisera, K.M., Turnidge, J.D., and
ulin D-binding protein MID has conserved se- Russell, E.G. 1997. Selection of optimum lab-
quences and is regulated by a mechanism cor- oratory tests for the identification of Moraxella
responding to phase variation. J. Bacteriol. catarrhalis. Pathology 29:206-208.
185:2285-2295.
Timpe, J.M., Holm, M.M., Vanlerberg, S.L., Basrur,
Murphy, T.F. 1996. Branhamella catarrhalis: V., and Lafontaine, E.R. 2003. Identification of a
Epidemiology, surface antigenic structure, and Moraxella catarrhalis outer membrane protein
immune response. Microbiol. Rev. 60:267-279. exhibiting both adhesin and lipolytic activities.
Murphy, T.F. and Loeb, M.R. 1989. Isolation of Infect. Immun. 71:4341-4350.
the outer membrane of Branhamella catarrhalis. Verduin, C.M., Hol, C., Fleer, A., van Dijk, H., and
Microb. Pathog. 6:159-174. van Belkum, A. 2002. Moraxella catarrhalis:
Murphy, T.F., Brauer, A.L., Grant, B.J., and Sethi, From emerging to established pathogen. Clin.
S. 2005. Moraxella catarrhalis in chronic ob- Microbiol. Rev. 15:125-144.
structive pulmonary disease: Burden of disease Wang, W., Pearson, M.M., Attia, A.S., Blick,
and immune response. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care R.J., and Hansen, E.J. 2007. A UspA2H-
Med. 172:195-199. negative variant of Moraxella catarrhalis strain
Murray, J.J., Emparanza, P., Lesinskas, E., O46E has a deletion in a homopolymeric nu-
Tawadrous, M., and Breen, J.D. 2005. Efficacy cleotide repeat common to uspA2H genes.
and safety of a novel, single-dose azithromycin Infect. Immun. 75:2035-2045.
Nonenteric
Gamma
Proteobacteria
6B.1.11
Current Protocols in Microbiology Supplement 11