Surname1

Name
Institution
Course
Tutor
Date
Rejecting the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill
I would vote against the passage of the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill first because the

Federal courts' conditions are not convincing that they could merit such bone-crushing

legislation. The legislation does not sound constitutional; therefore, I have thoughtful doubts

about the commission's capacity to practice fairness and whether it would be able to stop

imposing improper impact upon judges. This is because I believe that a Federal Judge’s duty is

limited to making decisions on controversies and cases but not meddling in other people’s duties.

Since the bill is of questionable constitutionality, I would not vote for it to pass. The bill

does not clearly establish its intentions, and it would be disastrous if it would have adverse

spillover effects. It sounds as though it is an attempt by the president to stack the court and

establish a baneful precedent. With all the powers vested upon him by the law, he would

occasionally dismiss those judges who tend to disregard the new law, with an intention that they

should make rulings based on his decisions. Appointing a new judge to the federal court simply

because the current judge has hit the retirement age, with the desire of having younger and new

blood into the system, may not be as efficient as thought. This is because, even at an old age,

judges can as well have the potential to deliver quality services regardless of their age because of

the long-term practical experience. The definitions of the procedures, disability and misconduct

set forth do not provide an assurance to the accused procedural and substantive due process.
 Surname2

I would also vote against the passing of the bill because it constitutes a threat to the

federal judges' freedom. The account is likely to be an attack on the courts; therefore, it will not

succeed in restoring the court to its initial historical position. The proposal would infringe upon

the religious and civil liberties held in high regard by America's citizens. There would be a

possibility of using the commission as an instrument to eliminate some judges for personal

political desires based on judicial philosophy, especially during a time of national crisis.