Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Student Sample)
English 9-2
5 November 2021
In the article “The Hero’s Journey: Using an Ancient Framework on Modern Stories” by
Matt Ragland, he illustrates how we are heroes even though we are trapped in our boring
mundane lives. A way that we live in a hero's journey is that we are stuck in conventional
slumber. We remain on the same safe route everyday. “The hero feels comfortable going through
motions even if they are good and admirable!” A further example of how we are living our own
hero’s journey is we eventually fall into the abyss. This is where we are overcome with worry,
regret and frustration. We are at the end of our rope and need to climb out. “Abyss brings us face
to face with the realization that we can’t bring everything with us on the journey. Something
must be left behind to die.” Ultimately we reach our turn and contribution. We come back into
the world enlightened. We have become a mentor and guide for others on their own journey.
In the article “Not Everything Is A Hero’s Journey”, author Jim Hull details how not
every story should be considered a “hero’s journey” and how more often than not it's overused
and bland. Forcing the trope of the hero's journey onto every story erases the author's original
intention of the story. “One doesn’t need much more than a simple observation of the mental
gymnastics that aboud when a classic story doesn’t quite fit the paradigm.” Rather than the
unoriginal and cliche hero's journey, there's a main character and an impact character. When
these are present they fulfill the narrative that the need for a hero's journey is nonexistant.
“Stories are about solving problems, not mythical journeys of spiritual transendancts.”
Analysis Paragraph
Hull’s article is stronger because it has a more grounded temporal view as opposed to
Raglands unrealistic, washed out opinion. Ragland's article is weak since not everything is a
hero's journey. Making a claim that everything can be a hero's journey completely eradicates the
author's original intent for the story. This happy go lucky ideology is false and rarely if ever
exists in the real world. “In truth, lifes feels very meaningful and comfortable.” Life doesn't
always fit into the framework of “meaningful and comfortable.” In some cases the hero's journey
even ends in despair. For example, in the movie “Saving Private Ryan” the main character
Captain Miller goes on his own hero's journey to safely acquire private Ryan. However instead
of going back home to his “comfortable and meaningful life”, Miller dies in an attempt to be a
hero. Jim Hulls article has a strong argument since he writes from an average person's
perspective. Ragland almost seems like he's never stepped foot in the real world from how he
wrote his article. It seems as though he is living in a borderline child-like fantasy. Hull shows us
how realistically the hero's journey is an overused juvenile idea. “When it comes to constructing
a story, the specifics of the hero's journey are open to interpretation. This is not a plus. This does
not make the hero's journey more human. Instead it simply adds confusion and noise to the
author's original intent.” The way this quote supports the argument is due to the fact that it
discusses how the hero's journey is just a confusing dull trope. By the standard Ragland sets up,
anything can be a hero's journey. Would Hannibal Lector be a hero in his own story simply
trying to eat? No, stapling the label of heroes' journey onto everything creates a mess of what the
original intent for the story was. In the long run, we see how the hero's journey does nothing
more than act as the basis for a child's favorite movie and rarely exists in the real world and
modern literature.