Professional Documents
Culture Documents
NIM : 180403006
ASSIGNMENT 1
ASSESMENT :
1. HOLISTIC RUBRIC
A (90 - 100) The “A” argument essay is exceptional in every way. The essay is
well organized and all claims are supported. It begins with a solid
introduction that contains a clear thesis, is followed by body
paragraphs that contain clear topic sentences with clear and detailed
support, and ends with an effective conclusion. Content is thorough
and lacking in no area. There are no (or few) errors in tone, format,
mechanics, grammar, and content.
B (80-89) The “B” essay is above adequate in most areas. In the areas where it
is not above adequate, it is still entirely acceptable. The majority of
the essay is clear, focused, and well detailed, but there may be a few
areas requiring further development. While it may contain a few
errors with tone, mechanics, grammar, and/or content, these errors
are not egregious enough to detract from the overall point being
made.
C (70-79) The “C” essay is adequate in most areas, but exceptional in none.
The thesis is clear although probably lacking in both control and
command. Organization may be a slight problem but can be fixed.
The paragraphs provide support but are generally underdeveloped.
There may be multiple errors in tone, format, mechanics, grammar,
and content, but these errors do not, for the most part, detract from
the overall writing.
D (60-69) The “D” essay is lacking in a majority of areas. It is generally
unorganized and unfocused. The thesis is neither clear nor controls
the entire essay. Most of the essay is underdeveloped. There are
frequent errors in tone, format, mechanics, grammar, and/or content
that distract from the content being provided. Its only saving grace
is that, despite all of the errors, there appears to be a legitimate
effort put forth by the writer.
E (59-0) The “F” essay generally needs little explanation. There are
significant problems throughout. The thesis is often lacking, and the
argument, if there is one, wanders and is unorganized. The essay
shows no understanding of basic essay structure, and there are
significant errors in tone, format, mechanics, grammar, and/or
content. The effort on the part of the writer is questionable, at best.
Source :
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://calt.umbc.edu/files/2013/01/S
AMPLE-HOLISTIC-RUBRIC-FOR-
ESSAYS.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiM6JCAvNPxAhUuq0sFHQASBn84ChAWegQIAhAC&usg=AO
vVaw18yKFVZVoeJc9YRYO9zg1k
2. ANALYTICAL RUBRIC
ASSESMENT =
By Annisatul Fadlilah
CHAPTER I.
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
Assessment is one of the main elements of education. This helps determine whether the
students learned or acquired language elements from the instructor of a foreign language in
students whose language abilities are limited and can interact with them. That means the
teacher's assessment that the students' capacity needs to be known. That ensures the appraisal the
instructor needs to know the magnitude of the abilities of the students. It is also necessary to
assess the process of teaching and learning depending on the ability level of students.
Recently, a reform took place in the field of evaluation in terms of a paradigm shift from
traditional testing to assessment . In education field, innovations have been witnessed in
procedures to assess students’ performance where summative assessment is gradually changing
to formative assessment (alternative assessment).
Thus, it is important for teachers to know that alternative assessments are very important in
teaching English especially in all english skills and to find out with the existence of assessment
alternatives whether there is a positive effect that can be helpful and useful for assessing student
competence in all English skills in class or not.
B. Problem
C. Purpose
The author's purpose in writing this paper is to knowing the definition , the characteristics
and the effects of alternative assesments based on English language learning.
CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION
According to Brown and Hudson (1998), alternative assessment has attained a larger degree
of importance and acceptance in EFL/ESL field of instruction. It is due to the fact that the
practices of language-testing connected with language learning are inevitably different from
testing practices prevalent in other fields. In fact, both the process of English language learning
and its assessment are very nature complex, and in order to deal with such complexities English
language teachers and administrators have used various assessment techniques (Al-Mahrooqi &
Denman, 2018).
Alternative assessment is also known as formative assessment and portfolio assessment. The
characteristics of alternative assessment may include:
• Takes into account the individual background and needs of every unique learner.
• Considers the big picture of individual student progress over an extended period of time.
• Allows language learners to demonstrate content knowledge and skills mastery without
language barrier difficulties.
• Highly effective for use with students who are entitled to accommodations and/or
modifications.
• Normally documented with qualitative data, such as performance descriptors, comparisons with
previous work, and skills demonstration.
Based on the some journal that I have been read , The concept of assessment in EFL is
discussed extensively in international literature. However, methods of assessment in EFL field,
especially of alternative assessment, is the major topic explored by researchers in current study .
The methods or tools of alternative assessment in language classroom are called alternatives in
assessment by Brown and Hudson (1998). More specifically, personal-response assessment is
used as a category term to include various methods used in alternative assessment. This type of
assessment is an individualized assessment where learners are allowed to produce what they
want in their own language that provide teachers with an on-going manner of assessing learners’
performance throughout instruction (Brown & Hudson, 1998) . All methods mentioned in the
reviewed studies were considered more beneficial in enhancing students’ development in foreign
language learning.
The results of the studies indicated that all basic language learning skills have been
significantly developed by implementing alternative assessment methods. A total of 7 studies
(Yurdabakan and Erdogan, 2009; Kalra, Sundrarajun and Komintaracat, 2017; Cuesta, Mayorga,
Padilla and Mayorga, 2019; Iraji, Enayat and Momeni, 2016; Moradan and Hedayati, 2012;
Javaherbakhsh, 2010) reported the positive influence of alternative assessment strategies on
students’ writing skills ranging from simple writing to argumentative writing skill. Based on the
findings of the reviewed studies, portfolio and self-assessment were found the most used
strategies to enhance writing skill among other strategies such as peer-assessment, conferencing,
etc. Moreover, the implementation of these strategies positively influence learners’ writing
competence and were considered more practical than traditional methods. Not only students were
motivated by producing and assessing their own compositions but also their responsibility of
learning was increased.
Not only that , Three studies (Aliasin and Amanlu, 2017; Ardianti and Mauludin, 2017;
Yurdabakan and Erdogan, 2009) also investigated the effects of alternative assessment on
reading skill both at tertiary and secondary level. The results of the mentioned studies indicated a
substantial improvement in students’ reading comprehension skills. The results of students’
performance revealed that implementing methods of alternative assessment such as portfolio, self
assessment and performance assessment prepared the students enough to get high scores on
reading comprehension tests.
CONLUSION
Actually all of the methods of alternative assessment based on some journal that I have
been read there were deemed helpful in enhancing students’ development in foreign language
learning. The findings indicated significant improvement in the basic language learning skills
(reading, writing, listening and speaking) of the students. There are focused on portfolio,
self/peer assessment contributing much to learners’ performance and achievements. In terms of
methodology, the result of the systematic review showed that the dominant method employed in
the articles was quantitative, and students were the main focal point involved in the research as
their participants.
Logically, this research can be seen as a guide for English teachers to improve their
alternatives professional appraisal approach to improve student enthusiasm for learning. It may
also increase knowledge of how important alternative assessment is in teaching English in
various skills such as reading, writing, listening, and speaking.
REFERENCES
Nodousan , Mohammad Ali. (2014). Assesing Writing : A Review of the Main Trends.
Journal of Studies In English Language and Education. 1 , 128-138.
https://ctl.byu.edu/using-alternative-assessments
https://study.com/academy/lesson/alternative-assessment-definition-examples.html
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.formpl.us/blog/amp/alternative-assessment