Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Paper
Research Paper
Jon Muir
Mrs. Wilkerson
Honors English 10
24 April 2020
When I bought my first high-quality and valuable bass guitar, I was incredibly happy to
have it and use it. As blemishes began to appear on it from constant use, I was distraught, as I
saw it as ruining my perfect instrument. As time went on, I realized that the individual blemishes
were simply adding character, reminding me of the time and effort spent playing the instrument
and the enjoyable experience I had had making music with my friends. I learned that it was not
about the value or quality of the instrument, but the way it was put to use. Although some may
say that additional wealth would allow them to purchase things that would make them happier,
wealth does not directly correlate with one’s happiness, as seen in many studies and through the
Many studies have been done over the years on the effects of wealth on happiness.
According to Claude S. Fischer in the Journal of Happiness studies article “What Wealth-
Happiness Paradox? A Short Note on the American Case.” statistical graphs show that as median
household income rose in the United States, happiness decreased, causing him to go as far as to
say that “[...] median household income was unrelated to happiness”, suggesting no correlation.
Fischer’s findings clearly establish that the popular notion that money cannot buy happiness is
true. Fischer suggests that the complexity of keeping up with the American standard of living is
one of the key factors that is contributing to this discrepancy between wealth and happiness,
mentioning that “ the task of keeping up with living standards and coping with sagging male
Muir 2
earnings has required much more strenuous efforts by average American families.” This same
discrepancy is seen among the upper class, where Grant E. Donnelly’s article "The amount and
source of millionaires’ wealth (moderately) predict their happiness." in the Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin tells us that “ First, only at high levels of wealth – in excess of $8
million (Study 1) and $10 million (Study 2) – are wealthier millionaires happier than millionaires
with lower levels of wealth,” showing that more factors are at play than pure wealth. Donnelly
also provides evidence that “millionaires who have earned their wealth are moderately happier
than those who inherited it,” showing that the effort is worth more than the payoff. Donnelly’s
findings exemplify that wealth does not contribute directly to happiness, if it did, those
millionaires that inherited the wealth would be incredibly happy. Because increased happiness is
found from earning a large amount of money from work, Donnelly proves that the process of
earning wealth is a much larger factor for happiness than pure wealth itself. Overall, statistical
data shows that increasing wealth, like raising national income or inheriting money, does not
Individual people have different needs, much like how a baseball fanatic would be upset
with a gift that was meant for an environmentalist. Suzanne Degges-White emphasizes in the
Psychology Today article “Will Money Make You Happy?” that it is not the amount of money
one has, but “the ability to afford the things that bring personal satisfaction that really matters,”
whether that is services to free up your time, like lawn care, or things for you to do, like a
vacation. This evidence implies that an individual with an income that is significantly below
average, but primarily enjoys time spent with family can be significantly more content than
someone whose income is slightly above average, yet has incredibly lavish spending habits.
Because the lavish spenders’ happiness is limited by their money, they can only be happy with
Muir 3
the addition of more, whereas the less fortunate person doesn’t need money to spend time with
their loved ones. Degges-White’s findings are paralleled in Michael R. Hagerty and Ruut
Veenhoven’s article “Wealth and happiness revisited–growing national income does go with
greater happiness” in Social Indicators Research, stating “If people’s happiness depends on
income relative to others (social comparisons), or on income relative to their own past income
(adaptive expectations) then raising the incomes of all may not increase average happiness,” also
mentioning that it is more important for people to be able to fill their individual needs. This
suggests that a higher income by itself isn’t enough to make anyone happier, and that fulfilling
one’s needs is significantly more important. If everyone was given a million dollars, one who
takes joy at the thought of being considered “upper-class” would not be satisfied, as they would
still be placed in the exact same social class. Because of the complexity of individual desires, it
is clearly shown that an increase of wealth would not directly contribute to greater happiness, as
Although some, like Michael R. Hagerty and Ruut Veenhoven in the Social Indicators
Research article “Wealth and happiness revisited–growing national income does go with greater
happiness.” state that their results “show that increasing national income does go with increasing
national happiness” and that only one country showed a negative correlation, this is not the only
factor at hand. As a matter of fact, Joop Hartog and Hessel Oosterbeek show in Economics of
Education Review article "Health, wealth and happiness: why pursue a higher education?" that
education plays a large role in happiness, stating that “Women, clearly, make the best of it: their
health status is no different from men’s, their wealth is less, yet still they manage to be happier.”
The happiness of these women directly refute that wealth is the primary factor at play. The
inequality of wealth favors men, but the happiness inequality favors women, which directly
Muir 4
proves that wealth alone is not going to make one happier. This evidence is explained in Degges-
White’s article, suggesting that “It’s a consistent finding that the only lifelong predictor of life
satisfaction is having a strong support network.” These findings prove that wealth is not a
determining factor in happiness, and that good relationships with other people are the most
rewarding aspect of life. Often, wealthy friends are friends for reasons based on class, which fails
Hagerty and Ruut Veenhoven’s findings fall short of proving that everyone would be more
content with more money, as there are many other factors at play between economy and
happiness, and money is not going to buy quality connections with other people.
As a result of these many other factors, statistical trends, coupled with the differences in
individuals, show that increasing wealth does not directly lead to greater happiness or life
satisfaction. Whether one prefers time with family, or being considered elite, giving everyone a
million dollars will not make everyone immediately and permanently more happy. Because
everyone tends to believe that money allows them to do what they enjoy, people tend to find
themselves wishing for more of it, when more money is likely not the answer. Overall, the old
adage “money cannot buy happiness” proves to be true, even in the complex day and age that we
live in today.
Muir 5
Works Cited
Degges-White, Suzanne. “Will Money Make You Happy?” Psychology Today, Sussex
Donnelly, Grant E., et al. "The amount and source of millionaires’ wealth (moderately)
predict their happiness." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 44.5 (2018): 684-
Case.” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, June 2008, pp. 219–226. EBSCOhost,
Hagerty, Michael R., and Ruut Veenhoven. "Wealth and happiness revisited–growing
national income does go with greater happiness." Social indicators research 64.1 (2003):
Hartog, Joop, and Hessel Oosterbeek. "Health, wealth and happiness: why pursue a
March 2020.