Essay:

There is a huge number of workers who choose to work abroad in developed

countries despite contributing to their nations. This essay will look at some
primary causes and suggest several possible solutions to the problem.
There are a number of reasons explaining why many people move to rich
countries to work. The first reason is that in wealthy countries, the dramatically
increasing of companies especially in specific majors such as computing,
engineering, and medicine offer people more job opportunities with higher
salaries and high compensation for not only workers but also their family benefits
which could improve their quality life. Another reason is those types of
international companies have modern infrastructures and facilities with a
professional environment which make workers satisfied. Therefore, many
workers move to developed countries to approach the advances and try to devote
themselves to the companies.
There are several actions that could be taken to mitigate the arising problem
above. Firstly, the companies should have different attractive compensations to
draw the attention of talented workers who can help to promote productivity and
help companies develop more and more. These types of policies might are
increasing salary, financial compensation, and career progression which
encourage people to stay with the company in the long term. In addition, the
government should invest money in infrastructure improvement, encourage
international companies to invest in their countries which would create more job
opportunities, and help countries keep their human resources.
In conclusion, there are various factors leading to the brain-drain, and measures
can be implemented to tackle this issue.
Task 1:
The chart illustrates the amount of polluting emissions in different four cities Los
Angeles, Calcutta, Beijing and Mexico City in 2000.
Overall, Mexico City was the city that had the most polluted air due to the high
levels of SO2 and N2O, while Los Angeles witnessed the smallest level of SO2.
In Beijing, the maximum level of SO2 was nearly fivefold the minimum ones, at
130m3 and 25m3 respectively. The figure for N2O was lower, 14m3 for minimum
level and 54m3 for maximum level. In Mexico City, the amount of two types of
emissions had no big differences with the minimum level of SO2 was 80m3 and
that one of N2O was 113m3 and the maximum levels for both emissions
significantly increased to approximately 203m3.
In Calcutta, the gap between minimum and maximum levels was slightly different.
The minimum levels of SO2 and NO2 were 47m3 and 30m3 respectively and
there was a minimal rise by around 20m3 for maximum levels of each one. In
addition, Los Angeles saw a higher amount of N2O. While the amount of SO2 was
approximately 6m3 in an average of minimum and maximum levels, the figure for
N20 was dramatically higher, stood at 70m3, was ten times higher than that of
SO2.