Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Disclosures
• The faculty have been informed of their responsibility to disclose to the audience if
they will be discussing off-label or investigational use(s) of drugs, products, and/or
devices (any use not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration)
– Applicable CME staff have no relationships to disclosure relating to the subject matter of this
activity
– This activity has been independently reviewed for balance
• This continuing medical education activity includes device or medicine brand names
for participant clarity purposes only. No product promotion or recommendation
should be inferred.
Learning Objectives
• Examine case outcomes for the use of NPWT across a variety of wound types
DIME
• Integrates proven concepts to build a platform for the treatment of chronic wounds
• Organizes medical procedures into a holistic approach that can be used to evaluate
and remove barriers to the wound healing process
• Optimal management of a wound in order to accelerate endogenous healing, or to
facilitate the effectiveness of other therapeutic measures
• Aim is the formation of good-quality granulation tissue, leading to complete wound
closure
• Venous
– Compression
• Diabetic
– Offloading
• Pressure
– Pressure redistribution
• Arterial
– Protection from injury
– Possible vascular intervention
• Atypical
– Low threshold for biopsy
– Possible medical intervention
• Intrinsic barriers
– Diseases or conditions that interfere
– with healing
– Increased age
– Obesity
– Edema
– Nutritional status
• Extrinsic barriers
– Smoking
– Mechanical stress/pressure
– Moisture
– Bacteria
– System barriers
Macrodeformation
Drainage of wound
exudate including:
• Excess fluid
• Inflammatory markers
Optimization of
wound bed
Macrodeformation, microdeformation,
fluid removal, and alteration of the
Microdeformation
wound environment
Normal tissue
Microvessel Density
5
Microvessel density (%)
Before 1 2
treatment week weeks
Angiogram
Post-op 1
Post-op 2
Follow-up
Cadaveric allograft
Surgical STSG
• After endovascular
intervention, the patient
required an extensive
debridement
• Due to copious drainage
and a H/O non-
compliance, external
fixation with a foot plate
was utilized for offloading
and NPWT was started
• Patient’s need to
– Work
– Go to school
– Be social
– Ambulate
– Therapy
• Fall risk
• Sleep disturbances
• Mechanical, non-motorized,
ultra portable, disposable
negative pressure wound
therapy device
• Its ability to function without
electricity in an inconspicuous
manner makes it novel in the
wound care space, filling an
unmet medical need
• NPWT delivered under an
There has been a 12%-11% increase in
advanced wound dressing Why
nontraumatic amputations in patients with
now? diabetes since the advent of COVID-19
COVID-19 = coronavirus disease 2019.
Rogers LC, et al. J Am Podiatric Med Assoc. 2020;20-248
• Endovascular intervention
• Extensive debridement in the operating room
• Application of non-adherent silver dressing x 1 week
• NPWT x 2 weeks
• Offloading with CAM walking boot
• NPWT utilized with silicone contact layer
Comprehensive
history & physical
Vascular Neurological
evaluation evaluation VIP Dermatologic
evaluation
Orthopedic
evaluation
Assessment
Treatment
Every Wound-Healing
Problem Will Be a…
Utilizing NPWT
to Meet
Multiple
Needs…
Dot Weir, RN, CWON, CWS
• 71-year-old
• Venous leg ulcer
• S/P fem/pop bypass
• Venous wound: No problem
– Gelling fiber, foam, and 2-
layer wrap
MP = mechanically powered.
Hx = history; DM = diabetes mellitus; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; PD = peritoneal dialysis; HTN = hypertension.
Final View
3 Weeks of Treatment
3 Weeks
Closed at 8 Weeks
3 Weeks
Meeting All Support Needs
6 Years
• 79-year-old female
• PMH: HTN, multiple sclerosis, lower
extremity neuropathy
• Lower extremity edema, pulses present
per palpation and doppler
• Moved from out-of-state to be near
daughter; dropped box on leg during move
• Daughter has original photos; clearly a
hematoma
• Initial measurements: 3.5 x 3.0 x 0.5 cm
– 3.5 cm undermining 8-1 o’clock
• Initial management: PVA gelling fiber,
foam dressing, 2-layer wrap
PMH = past medical history; PVA = polyvinyl alcohol.
• 43-year-old morbidly obese gentleman, works at theme park 1 shift per day, then
works at a convenience store another shift per day
• Deep ulcer to his lower extremity
• Powered NPWT initiated 3/26
– Was not doing well; when questioned, learned that he was removing suction while he worked
because neither employer would allow him to have it showing
– Not working was NOT an option; powered system discontinued 4/6; wound did not progress
Parting Shot…
• 42-year-old male
• Morbidly obese
• Type 2 diabetes, fair control
• CABG 09/2010
– Post-op infection down to
wires
– Revision of wound with
removal of wires 11/30
– Began disposable MP-NPWT
while awaiting charity-
powered system
Summary
Thank You
Q&A
Case Analysis
Now it’s Your Turn to Decide…
Case 1
OR = operating room.
After successful endovascular intervention,
a transmetatarsal amputation was performed; however,
patient had significant tissue loss at the site of the original
surgery, making complete closure challenging
IV antibiotics x
6 weeks
Multidisciplinary
approach
Now
what?
IV = intravenous.
Mechanically
powered NPWT
Case 2
IR = interventional radiology.
Now
what?
Now
what?
What Now?
Moist wound
healing to closure
(eg, hydrogel,
foam)
MP-NPWT?