Disney Sued Over

Housing Plan

CARLOS ANTON | FRANCINE CAMERON | MARTIN CASINO | JOEL GO |

MARCO NERI | PETE ANDRE SABORNIDO
CASE NO. 4 | MRKM60 | GROUP B
Definition of the Problem
Disney Development Co. has violated a contractual conflict of
interest. This is an agreement between an employee, employer,
or company aimed at protecting both parties from actions that
could lead to conflict. The essence or problem of a given case
study is a misunderstanding by both parties. To avoid this
breach, conflicts of interest can often be resolved through open
and honest conversations. Do not confuse the Metsä Group
business with the business of family members, close friends, or
other related parties. When it comes to personal close contact,
always stay clear and open from all decisions.
 Objectives
• For Disney to continue its plan and
agreement with Heidrich Project
fairly and without conspiracy.
• To be fair, equal and honest in both
parties of Disney and Heidrich with
regards of their proposed plans and
agreements.
 Areas of Consideration
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES

Disney has the capabilities to Disney violated a contract

undo their violations and do between them and the Heidrichs
better with their agreements

OPPORTUNITIES THREATS

To take things in a fairly manner Heidrich suing Disney, taking $68

for better results on the project million in damages
Alternative Courses of Action
• Alternative No. 1
Disney should discuss matters with the
Heidrichs that are favorable to everyone

• Advantage: This might settle their problem

and understanding would be made
• Disadvantage: If both parties wont agree,
lawsuit would be present.
Alternative Courses of Action
• Alternative No. 2
Disney and Heidrich should be transparent
with each other regarding the operations of
their plans and agreements

• Advantage: Fairness among both parties

could be achieved
• Disadvantage: Disney might spill their other
infos crucial for their company to the other
party that might hinder with their plans.
Alternative Courses of Action
• Alternative No. 3
Disney and Heidrich will still continue in
implementing their planned projects while
settling the current issues at hand.

• Advantage: This could result in resolving their

issues and achieving their goals with their
planned projects at the same time.
• Disadvantage: The issues that the both parties
are currently resolving could lead to a distraction
and could delay their planned projects.
 Recommendation
The group would recommend alternative
#1 by discussing the matters of Disney's
with Heidrichs for everyone's favor.
 Conclusion
• In conclusion, our group chose the first alternative since it
states that they should choose to discuss matters with Heidrichs
that can be favorable to everyone. This could settle their
problem and have an understanding with each other. But even
if both parties do not agree with each other, lawsuit would be
present.