Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The homogeneity of the material was studied using provides the most sensitive response for this color channel.
scanning electron microscope Hitachi TM 3000 with reso- The scanner output resolution was set to 75 dpi. Acquisition
lution 30 nm. The preparation of substrate was difficult due and analysis of images were performed using PTW (Frei-
to the plasticity of the material there was not possible to cut a burg, Germany) software. Dose distributions were calculated
thin material slice. Instead, thin material layers were smeared using the obtained optical density—dose calibration curves.
[4]. The composite which showed the best homogeneity was The scattering effect for metal alloy and the composite
used for further radiation absorption property research. material was compared by subtracting one dose distribution
Composite’s absorption was characterized by transmis- from another, using the equation
sion factor. The measurements were performed for electron
Dmetal block Dcomposite block
radiation supplied from a linear accelerator Clinac 2100C/D Scattering effect ¼ ð2Þ
(Varian Medical Systems, USA). The sample was irradiated Dmetal block
with electron energy 9 meV which is usually used to treat
tumors close to skin surface [4]. Delivered dose was 3 Gy to
the depth of the dose maximum. An incident radiation beam 3 Results and Discussion
was perpendicular to the surface of a solid water phantom,
on which the specimens were located. The used radiation Eight different material structures were made: three of them
detector was Scanditronix Wellhöfer plane parallel were made with every fraction size (5 lm, 50 nm, and
ion-chamber type PPC05 with its active volume 0.05 cm3. 500 nm) and micro wax mixed with the ultrasonic processor;
Measurements were repeated five times for each test sample. three mixed with ultrasonic dispergator; two samples were
The transmission factor was calculated using the equation the compound of all three fractions particles and micro wax
mixed either with the ultrasonic processor or ultrasonic
QðpCÞ
TFð%Þ ¼ 100 ð1Þ dispergator.
Qof ðpCÞ
Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were ana-
where Q(pC) is chamber registered charge with the com- lyzed in different magnifications (200, 500 and 1500 times)
posite specimen in the radiation field, Qof (pC)—chamber to get precise homogeneity evaluation. For better image
registered a charge for open field without a specimen. comparison, just images with 500-time magnification were
The planar dose distributions perpendicular to the central analyzed in this paper.
axis were measured by using Gafchromic EBT2 For the material with 5 lm tungsten particles, more
self-developing films in solid water phantom [3]. RGB inhomogeneity was observed in a sample mixed with US
Canon ScanLide100 scanner was used to scan exposed films. processor. No significant difference was observed between
For the film, the optical density reconstruction only red color particle distributions in a material with different mixing
channel was used because for doses up to 3 Gy scanner methods. It is described as fact that particles with big sizes
Fundamental Research and Experimental Work on Properties of … 621
do not tend to make agglomerates, so relatively good For samples with the best homogeneity, radiation
homogeneity can be obtained with both mixing methods [4] absorption properties were analyzed. As it follows the image
(Fig. 2). analysis, the better homogeneity was obtained by means of
For the composite with 500 nm sized particles, the dif- US dispergator. Three different material structures were
ference in homogeneity of the samples, mixed with different made: three of them were made with every fraction size of
methods are well expressed. The material mixed with US particles (5 lm, 50 nm, and 500 nm) mixed with micro wax.
processor had a considerable amount of agglomerates with Two of samples was the compound of all three fraction size
size up to 60 lm. The inhomogeneity change material particles mixed with micro wax. All materials were mixed
absorption properties. For material mixed with US disper- with US dispergator. Transmission factor for all samples is
gator, particles distribution was with better homogeneity. summarized in Table 1.
The homogeneity differences between two material The highest transmission factor was observed for com-
samples with 50 nm particles mixed with different methods posite made of 5 µm particles. Surprisingly, use of the
were observed, as well. Sample mixed with US processor mixture of all three fractions did not reduce transmission
was more non-homogenous, comparing to one mixed with factor, it remains higher for material with smaller particles.
US dispergator. All transmission values are below tolerance value of 5%.
622 G. Boka et al.
Table 1 Transmission factors for samples factor 2.1%). It means, that this material can be used in
Tungsten fraction size in sample Transmission factor (%) electron radiation therapy protection mask manufacturing.
5 lm 3.6
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of
500 nm 2.1
interest.
50 nm 2.1
5 lm + 500 nm + 50 nm first 2.6
5 lm + 500 nm + 50 nm second 2.3 References
First research result 1.5
1. Krumeich F. Properties of Electrons, their Interactions with Matter
and Applications in Electron Microscopy. Switzerland: ETH Zurich,
2010. 24 p.
4 Conclusions 2. Marcos J., Jurado M., Carapelle A., Orava R. Radiation Shielding of
Composite Space Enclosures. Spain: TECNALIA, 2013. 10 p.
3. G. Boka, E. Reine, A. Svarca, M. Kuzminskis, S. Bikova, Y.
This paper introduced a novel material for radiation pro- Bauman, Y. Dekhtyar, “Absorption and scatter properties of
tection mask production for cancer treatment. The new tungsten structured composite material”, ENCY2015, Budapest,
material consists of tungsten micro and nanoparticles and May 28–30, 2015.
4. Svarca A., “Synthesized composite with tungsten nanoparticles for
micro wax base. radiation protection in radiotherapy”, Master’s thesis, Riga Tech-
The best homogeneity of the material could be achieved by nical University, 2014.
mixing of components with US dispergator. US processor 5. Reine E., “Absorption and scattering properties of tungsten
could be used for mixing only for particles, bigger than 5 µm. composite material”, Master’s thesis, Riga Technical University,
2013.
Absorption properties are better for materials manufac-
tured with smaller particles 500 and 50 nm (Transmission