Date PEOPLE vs. GACOTT on Feoruary 2, 1944, & complzint for yiolation of the Anti- Dumy Law was filed by Asui: City Praseauter Perfecto E Pe again cerpondeats sivom and Reyes. the Bcowrd filed a Hoyer 42 Quarh! Dismiss tne criminal case contending +het vines the power 4° prosecute ig verted exclusively in the Rati-cummy Board under Re No-igo, the City proreuter OF Puerto Drinces® has no power or guthenity to file the veme- The prafeation filed an oper 00 pan ye Lerter of Imptementston rel'ed upon by #ne city the YIBU" contemplated in tne Ried orden of autnority to file end prascoute the cbse Prd ordered that the ewe be quashed. Whether oF not respondent judge A granting He Motion to Gash gravely Phused LN discretion ay ty wernt tHe imu ane of ® weit of certior?: Yes. The o#9r committed by Felpoadent judge in gli¢miaing tne care guile ebviow 19 fhe Light of PD No.l LOE No:2 and PP wo 1275 aforementiened. the Inno 49 aboiisn the Fii~ Dunmy Beard could not hove been Expressed mere dleaely thant eforequied Uw. Even @eruming that jhe City Pisezl of Puerto Pincus feled te Even @euming 4 cite PP NOt in hiv oppocition to #ne Motion to Quavny 8 Mere penal yt the text of Ler Me. 2. Vaca