Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
The Mediterranean Sea is home to over 2/3 of the world’s charter boat traffic
and hosts an estimated 1.5 million recreational boats. Studies elsewhere have
demonstrated marinas as important hubs for the stepping-stone transfer of
non-indigenous species (NIS), but these unique anthropogenic, and typically
artificial habitats have largely gone overlooked in the Mediterranean as sources of
NIS hot-spots. From April 2015 to November 2016, 34 marinas were sampled
Submitted 9 August 2017 across the following Mediterranean countries: Spain, France, Italy, Malta, Greece,
Accepted 3 October 2017 Turkey and Cyprus to investigate the NIS presence and richness in the specialized
Published 24 October 2017 hard substrate material of these marina habitats. All macroinvertebrate taxa were
Corresponding author collected and identified. Additionally, fouling samples were collected from
Aylin Ulman, aylinh.ulman@unipv.it approximately 600 boat-hulls from 25 of these marinas to determine if boats host
Academic editor diverse NIS not present in the marina. Here, we present data revealing that
Mark Costello
Mediterranean marinas indeed act as major hubs for the transfer of marine NIS,
Additional Information and and we also provide evidence that recreational boats act as effective vectors of
Declarations can be found on
page 38
spread. From this wide-ranging geographical study, we report here numerous new
NIS records at the basin, subregional, country and locality level. At the basin level,
DOI 10.7717/peerj.3954
we report three NIS new to the Mediterranean Sea (Achelia sawayai sensu lato,
Copyright
Aorides longimerus, Cymodoce aff. fuscina), and the re-appearance of two NIS
2017 Ulman et al.
previously known but currently considered extinct in the Mediterranean (Bemlos
Distributed under
Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0
leptocheirus, Saccostrea glomerata). We also compellingly update the distributions
of many NIS in the Mediterranean Sea showing some recent spreading; we provide
details for 11 new subregional records for NIS (Watersipora arcuata, Hydroides
How to cite this article Ulman et al. (2017), A massive update of non-indigenous species records in Mediterranean marinas. PeerJ 5:
e3954; DOI 10.7717/peerj.3954
brachyacantha sensu lato and Saccostrea glomerata now present in the Western
Mediterranean; Symplegma brakenhielmi, Stenothoe georgiana, Spirobranchus
tertaceros sensu lato, Dendostrea folium sensu lato and Parasmittina egyptiaca now
present in the Central Mediterranean, and W. arcuata, Bemlos leptocheirus and
Dyspanopeus sayi in the Eastern Mediterranean). We also report 51 new NIS
country records from recreational marinas: 12 for Malta, 10 for Cyprus, nine
for Greece, six for Spain and France, five for Turkey and three for Italy,
representing 32 species. Finally, we report 20 new NIS records (representing
17 species) found on recreational boat-hulls (mobile habitats), not yet found in
the same marina, or in most cases, even the country. For each new NIS record, their
native origin and global and Mediterranean distributions are provided, along
with details of the new record. Additionally, taxonomic characters used for
identification and photos of the specimens are also provided. These new NIS
records should now be added to the relevant NIS databases compiled by several
entities. Records of uncertain identity are also discussed, to assess the probability
of valid non-indigenous status.
INTRODUCTION
The seas are being rapidly being tainted by many harmful stressors such as climate
change, overfishing, pollution and non-indigenous species (NIS) (Occhipinti-Ambrogi,
2007). The Mediterranean recreational boating fleet is estimated to contain approximately
1.5 million vessels and hosts over 70% of global charter boating traffic (Cappato, 2011).
It is also the world’s most invaded sea, hosting over 700 NIS (Galil et al., 2017), over
half of which have Indo-Pacific origins and have probably arrived via the Suez Canal
(Galil, Marchini & Occhipinti-Ambrogi, in press). The human-mediated transport of
species across boundaries is dramatically altering the natural distribution of marine
biota, impacting biodiversity as well as human well-being (Carlton, 1989;
Occhipinti-Ambrogi, 2007).
Biological invasions are not only important to understand due to their associated
ecological and economic impacts; but they also provide an opportunity to understand
other important biogeographic processes such as long-distance dispersal, rapid
adaptation and range-expansion processes (Viard, David & Darling, 2016). To properly
assess the bioinvasion process and understand the scale of the associated threats, it is first
necessary to have the most up-to-date information regarding species distributions, which
are used to feed the many databases such as the European Alien Species Information
Network (Katsanevakis et al., 2015), the World Register of Introduced Alien Species
(Pagad et al., 2017) and AquaNIS-Information system on aquatic NIS and cryptogenic
species (Olenin et al., 2014). These databases are highly utilized by scientists and legislators
wishing to assess the breadth of the ecological and socio-economic consequences of
Boat-hull sampling
A preliminary screening was first completed with boat captains/owners before selection to
ensure that their boat had travelled outside the marina in the past 12 months for a
minimum of one night, so that the vessel posed some risk of spreading NIS. Next, and
only with permission from the boat owners/captains, fouling samples were collected from
the boat-hulls and a short survey was completed with the boat owners/captains on the
vessel’s characteristics, hull-cleaning and painting details, and recent 12 months of travel
history. The fouling samples were collected from the boat-hulls using one of three
approaches (which were dependent on authorizations and feasibility): The first approach
involved inspecting the boat-hulls immediately as they were hoisted from the water at the
carénage (haul-out station) for their maintenance routines (cleaning/painting/repairs).
This approach was mainly used in France: Cannes, Antibes, Marines de Cogolin, Saint
Maxime, Saint Tropez and Cap d’Agde as the sampling season provided the optimal
opportunity to use this approach as these routine maintenance procedures normally occur
before the onset of the tourist season, and was used sporadically in other marinas only
when the opportunity presented itself. The boat-hull including niche areas such as the
propeller, propeller shaft, water vents, rudders and ladders were closely inspected and
fouling samples were collected using a paint scraper and aquarium fishing net wherever
fouling biota were found, and quickly transferred to a bottle containing 90% ethanol.
Photographs were also taken from each boat-hull to crosscheck the results and reduce
likelihood of mistakes. The remaining boat-hulls were sampled via snorkeling or, on a
few occasions, by scuba diving but using the same methods as described above. Care was
taken to ensure the sampling strategy did not release NIS propagules into the marina’s
waters by scraping the samples collected in-water directly into small, finely meshed
Taxonomic identification
This study focused on fouling invertebrates; plants and algae were not examined. All
macronivertebrate taxa were collected for identification, and samples requiring expert
identification were sent to appropriate experts.
The preserved specimens were observed under a dissecting microscope and, where
needed, taxonomic slides were prepared and analyzed under an optical microscope.
Photographs of magnified specimens or morphological parts were taken directly from the
microscopes using the Olympus TG-4 camera (i.e., for serpulids and crustaceans), or with
the Tescan Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope series Mira 3XMU for SEM
pictures, with increasing magnification, at 6–19 mm working distance, using an
accelerating voltage of 10 kV, with graphite metallization and detection by secondary
electrons (i.e., for bryozoans). Bryozoan specimens used for SEM pictures were cleaned
beforehand using a combination of bleach and hydrogen peroxide to remove organic
residues. Ascidians were stained with Masson’s haemalum for dissection.
Some of our records refer to species completely new to the Mediterranean Sea, whose
taxonomic identity has been verified morphologically, but still requiring further genetic
confirmation, since they pertain to taxonomically challenging taxa which have often
revealed complexes of cryptic species. Moreover, a couple of our findings include species
not yet properly described scientifically; thus it is not possible to assign a certain
identification until formal descriptions are completed. These records are discussed in
detail to verify the likeliness of representing introduced populations of NIS. To assign
a NIS status for such species, the Chapman & Carlton (1991) criteria were followed
taking into account factors such as: “appearance in local regions where not found
previously;” “association with human mechanisms of dispersal;” “prevalence or
restrictions to artificial environments;” “insufficient active or passive dispersal capability”
and “exotic evolutionary origin.” Records of species found only on boat-hulls but not
in marinas should only be considered as new NIS country records if certain that the boat
did not leave that country’s waters, since boats represent mobile habitats and are hence
affected by an “uncertain occurrence” (see Marchini, Galil & Occhipinti, 2015).
Non-indigenous species status is dependent on their establishment success in a new
locality, and can be defined as either: not established (a single specimen reported in one or
two localities, rare, uncommon), or established (evidence of a reproducing population in
one or more localities, common or abundant). Additionally, a couple of cases are
presented here for “pseudoindigenous species” (see definitions).
RESULTS
Within the framework of this study, a total of 76 NIS were collectively identified from
34 marinas from the seven countries; however, only new country records and interesting
new locality records are presented here. First, we present the number of new NIS found in
this study per country and by taxa (Fig. 2).
This study revealed three species new to the Mediterranean basin (Achelia sawayai
sensu lato, Aoroides longimerus, and Cymodoce aff. fuscina), 11 new subregional records
(W. arcuata, H. brachyacantha sensu lato and Saccostrea glomerata now present in the
Western Mediterranean; Symplegma brakenhielmi, Stenothoe georgiana, Spirobranchus
tertaceros sensu lato, Dendostrea folium sensu lato and Parasmittina egyptiaca now
present in the Central Mediterranean, and W. arcuata, Bemlos leptocheirus and
Dyspanopeus sayi in the Eastern Mediterranean), for an overall number of 51 new country
records and a few new locality records exhibiting distribution expansions. These new
Mediterranean basin and country records are presented (Table 2) with the corresponding
marina numbers in which they were found from Table 1. Additionally, NIS found on
boat-hulls but not in the respective marina, locality or country, are presented as a warning
signal for future monitoring (Table 3). The numbers of new NIS found per marina are
shown (Table 4), and also the new NIS records are presented by country, specifically
12 for Malta, 10 for Cyprus, nine for Greece, six for Spain and France, five for Turkey
and three for Italy (Table 5). Subsequently, all new NIS records are discussed by species
(first ordered by class and family, and then alphabetically by species, see “New NIS
records: notes on individual species” below). The key taxonomic characters used to
identify these species are accompanied as “Supplementary Data,” along with identification
photos taken of our specimens. Comprehensive reviews of global and Mediterranean
distributions for all NIS listed in Tables 2 and 3 are presented below, along with details on
the new record type and if they were found in the marina, on a boat-hull or both.
Note:
Record type: *New country record, **New Mediterranean record; Letters indicate a new subregional record (WM,
Western Med.; CM, Central Med.; EM, Eastern Med.).
Class: Ascidiacea
Some ascidians whose likely origin is the Northeast Atlantic (i.e., Clavelina
lepadiformis, Ciona intestinalis, Ascidella aspersa and Botryllus schlosseri) have been
excluded from this study which focuses exclusively on NIS. Genetic studies have shown
that these species include different clades in the Mediterranean, some which can be
considered non-native, and in some cases native (Turon et al., 2003; Perez-Portela et al.,
2013; Bouchemousse, Bishop & Viard, 2016; Nydam, Giesbrecht & Stephenson, 2017). These
cryptogenic species (Carlton, 1996), their origins and status require additional genetic
analyses, which exceeds the breadth of the present study, which is based on morphological
characters.
Family: Ascidiidae
Phallusia nigra Savigny, 1816
Potential native origin: Uncertain, could be from the Red Sea, Indo-Pacific, or Western
Atlantic Ocean.
Distribution: First recorded and described from the Red Sea (Savigny, 1816), then in the
Gulf of Guinea and Angola (Millar, 1965), the Arabian Gulf (Monniot & Monniot, 1997),
the Pacific Ocean (Lambert, 2003), Indian Ocean (Abdul Jaffar, Sivakumar & Tamilselvi,
2009), and the Western Atlantic and Caribbean (Van Name, 1945; Bonnet & Rocha, 2011;
Vandepas et al., 2015).
In the Mediterranean, it has only been reported in the Eastern Mediterranean from
Israel, Lebanon and the Turkish Levantine coast (Çinar et al., 2006; Shenkar, 2008;
Izquierdo-Muñoz, Dı́az-Valdés & Ramos-Esplá, 2009), and most recently from Greece,
Note:
L = Not previously known from the locality, * = Not previously known from the country. Letters indicate a new
subregional record (WM, Western Med.; CM, Central Med.; EM, Eastern Med.).
Family: Clavelinidae
Clavelina oblonga Herdman, 1880
Distribution: Its initial record is from Bermuda (Van Name, 1945). It is hypothesized to
be an introduced species to Brazil, first sighted there in 1925 (Rocha, Kremer & Fehlauer-
Ale, 2012). In the Eastern Atlantic, it has been reported as NIS in Cape Verde (Hartmeyer,
1912), Senegal (Pérès, 1951), and the Azores (Monniot & Monniot, 1994). It was described
in the Mediterranean half a century after its initial record as Clavelina phlegraea from
southern Italy and Corsica (Salfi, 1929). It was also found in natural habitats on the
Iberian Coast, about 100 km west of Gibraltar (Ordóñez et al., 2016).
New records: This finding represents a first country record for Turkey (Marina #29) and
Cyprus (#34: Fig. S1B), and two new locality records for mainland France (#5, #7).
Boat-hull records: Found on boat-hulls moored in Cyprus (#33 and #34).
Notes: The species identified earlier as Clavelina phlegraea (Salfi, 1929) in the
Mediterranean was thought to be a native species, but recent genetic analysis confirmed it
as the introduced Clavelina oblonga (Ordóñez et al., 2016). In France, it had only
previously been reported in Corsica, so these new records from the French mainland
indicate its possible expansion along the coast.
Family: Didemnidae
Diplosoma listerianum (Milne-Edwards 1841)
2013). In the Mediterranean, its first record was from Italy in 1975 (Lafargue, 1975),
and is now widespread throughout European and Mediterranean waters (Millar, 1969;
Ramos-Esplá, 1988; Koukouras et al., 1995; Çinar, 2014).
New records: This study presents a new locality record for the Turkish Levantine
Sea/Mediterranean coast (#31, #32). During this study, it was also found in France (#5),
Malta (#23: Fig. S1C), Turkey (#28) and Greece (#24 and #26).
Family: Pyuridae
Microcosmus exasperatus Heller 1878
Family: Styelidae
Styela plicata (Lesueur, 1823)
Bryozoa
Family: Candidae
Tricellaria inopinata D’Hondt & Occhipinti-Ambrogi, 1985
Family: Hippopodinidae
Hippopodina sp. A
Family: Lepraliellidae
Celleporaria brunnea (Hincks, 1884)
Family: Lepraliellidae
Celleporaria vermiformis (Waters, 1909)
Family: Smittinidae
Parasmittina egyptiaca (Waters, 1909)
Family: Vesiculariidae
Amathia verticillata (Delle Chiaje, 1822)
Family: Watersiporidae
Watersipora arcuata Banta, 1969
Decapoda
Family: Portunidae
Charybdis (Gonioinfradens) paucidentatus (A. Milne-Edwards, 1861)
Peracarida—Amphipoda
Family: Ampithoidae
Ampithoe bizseli Özaydinli & Coleman, 2012
Family: Aoridae
Aoroides longimerus Ren & Zheng, 1996
Family: Ischyroceridae
Ericthonius cf. pugnax (Dana 1852)
1. Ericthonius pugnax has a notably wide distribution in the Indo-Pacific region, which
supports a human-mediated dispersal hypothesis, and is already known as a NIS from
New Zealand (and possibly, South Africa);
2. In the Lagoon of Venice, it has developed populations with high densities (A. Marchini,
personal observation), which is consistent with “invasive” behaviour; and
3. The Lagoon of Venice is a well-known hotspot of introductions, where over 70 NIS have
already been recorded, many with Pacific/Indo-Pacific origins, which were introduced
to Venice via oyster imports (Marchini, Galil & Occhipinti, 2015). The present records
from Cap d’Agde and Port Camargue are both nearby another popular hotspot for
oyster introductions, the Thau lagoon (Boudouresque et al., 2011). This further
supports the hypothesis of introduction from the Indo-Pacific region, with aquaculture
being the main pathway of primary introduction.
Family: Stenothoidae
Stenothoe georgiana Bynum & Fox 1977
Peracarida—Isopoda
Family: Anthuridae
Mesanthura cf. romulea Poore & Lew-Ton, 1986
Family: Janiridae
Ianiropsis serricaudis Gurjanova, 1936
Family: Paranthuridae
Paranthura japonica Richardson 1909
Family: Sphaeromatidae
Cymodoce aff. fuscina Schotte & Kensley, 2005
Mollusca
Family: Chamidae
Pseudochama cf. corbierei (Jonas 1846)
Family: Mytilidae
Arcuatula senhousia (Benson 1842)
Family: Ostreidae
Dendostrea folium sensu lato (Linneaus 1758)
Polychaeta
Family: Serpulidae
H. brachyacantha sensu lato Rioja 1941
Porifera
Family: Amphoriscidae
Paraleucilla magna Klautau, Monteiro & Borojevic, 2004
Pycnogonida
Family: Ammotheidae
Achelia sawayai sensu lato Marcus, 1940
DISCUSSION
This wide-scale study spanning the Mediterranean Sea provides a massive update of new
NIS records, and in many cases their regional or local expansions, providing a warning for
subsequent spreading. The 51 new country records presented in this study clearly indicate
how inadequate our knowledge on Mediterranean marine NIS still is. There was a
prevalence of new findings for bryozoans and crustaceans in almost all countries (Fig. 2).
This is because these are both poorly studied taxa in the Mediterranean owing to a lack of
taxonomic expertise/focused studies. Additionally, typical rapid assessment surveys or
citizen science initiatives searching for NIS usually target larger and eye-catching taxa
(Zenetos et al., 2013; Mannino et al., 2017), so these minuscule or less charismatic
components of fouling biota may have gone previously overlooked or not have had the
applicable expertise available.
It is not uncommon for marine NIS to go overlooked for long periods of time
(Carlton, 2009), as in the case of Paraleucilla magna in the Mediterranean
(Longo, Mastrototaro & Corriero, 2007). Actually, for most “first country records”
documented in this study, the year of first introduction may have been much earlier than
the first year of discovery presented here, as these NIS may have gone unnoticed due to a
lack of taxonomic expertise or lack of focused study. Some probable examples of this
include: Paranthura japonica, Watersipora arcuata and Celleporaria brunnea, whose
current widespread Mediterranean distributions indicate they have likely been hitching
rides around the basin for quite some time. Another example of this is the sea spider
Achelia sawayai sensu lato, first reported here for the Mediterranean basin, and specimens
were already found in three marinas: two in Sicily and one in Malta. An exception to this is
our finding of Microcosmus exasperatus in Karpaz Gate Marina, Cyprus, as this species was
specifically sought two years prior to our sampling of the same marina, but was not found
then (Gewing et al., 2016). Also, Celleporaria brunnea was not found to be present in
Grand-Motte, France in 2014 (Marchini, Ferrario & Minchin, 2015), but was present
there when we sampled in 2016.
In addition to the records presented here, Percnon gibbesi (H. Milne Edwards, 1853)
was sighted in Port Vauban, France, presenting a new country record for this species of
western Atlantic origin, and already known from several other Mediterranean countries as
a very successful invader (Katsanevakis et al., 2010, 2011). The non-indigenous status of
Percnon gibbesi in the Mediterranean Sea is uncertain, because its long-lived planktonic
larvae could have entered the Gibraltar Strait facilitated by natural means, i.e. the Atlantic
Current, rather than human vectors, such as ballast water (Mannino et al., 2017 and
references therein). Due to its questionable status regarding its mode of introduction, we
have cautiously separated this species from the other NIS records. However, it is
noteworthy that Percnon gibbesi was sighted feasting on a fouling community on a
DEFINITIONS
Non-indigenous species An organism introduced outside its natural past or present
distribution range by human agency, either directly or
indirectly (European Environment Agency, 2012).
Polyvectic species May have been introduced by a certain combination of
vectors and pathways (Carlton & Ruiz, 2005).
Pseudoindigenous species A species described as new to an area where it was in fact
introduced by human action (Carlton, 2009).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank all the marina personnel for granting permission for this study; please see
Supplementary Material for a detailed list of those who facilitated this study. We are also
incredibly indebted to the boat owners/captains for their cooperation. For helping to
obtain marina permissions we thank Giulio Franzitta, Paola Gianguzza and Stefanos
Kalogirou. For collection of samples, we thank Alessandro Bolis, Gina Donnarumma, Ali
Murat Elagoz, Andres Izquierdo-Muñoz, Alberto Orengo, Francesco Saracino, the late
Arif Sipahi and Tevfik Yilmaz. For taxonomic advice, we would like to thank (in
alphabetical order) Michel Bariche, Ferdinando Boero, Şermin Açik Çinar, Melih Ertan
Çinar, Victoria Fernandez-Gonzalez, Bella S. Galil, Jean-Georges Harmelin, Valiallah
Khalaji- Pirbalouty, Traudl Krapp-Schickel, Elena Kupriyanova, Gretchen Lambert, Carlos
Navarro-Barranco, Gary Poore, Rosanna Rocha, Jean-Claude Sorbe, Yanan Sun and Kevin
J. Tilbrook. We are also grateful to Francis Kerckhof and Giuseppe de Paolis for their help
in obtaining copies of publications of difficult access.
Funding
This work was funded by a PhD Scholarship awarded to Aylin Ulman from the MARES-
Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctoral Fellowship Program in Marine Ecosystem Health and
Conservation. A COST Action #1209 grant was provided to Aylin Ulman to facilitate
ascidian taxonomic identification in the University of Alicante, Spain. MARES is a Joint
Doctorate programme selected under Erasmus Mundus coordinated by Ghent University
(FPA 2011-0016). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis,
decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Aylin Ulman conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments,
analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper,
prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Jasmine Ferrario performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/
materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts
of the paper.
Anna Occhpinti-Ambrogi conceived and designed the experiments, contributed
reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Christos Arvanitidis performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed
reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Ada Bandi performed the experiments, analyzed the data.
Marco Bertolino analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote
the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Cesare Bogi analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the
paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Giorgos Chatzigeorgiou analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis
tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Burak Ali Çiçek contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the
paper, helped with logistics and permissions.
Alan Deidun contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper,
helped with logistics and permissions.
Alfonso Ramos-Esplà analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools,
wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Cengiz Koçak analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the
paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Maurizio Lorenti analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote
the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Gemma Martinez-Laiz performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures
and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Guenda Merlo performed the experiments, analyzed the data.
Elisa Princisgh performed the experiments, analyzed the data.
Giovanni Scribano performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures
and/or tables.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The data that this output produced is all detailed in Tables 2, 3 and 5, with details of each
species in the Results.
Supplemental Information
Supplemental information for this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/
10.7717/peerj.3954#supplemental-information.
REFERENCES
Abdul Jaffar A, Sivakumar V, Tamilselvi M. 2009. Distribution of alien and cryptogenic ascidians
along the Southern Coasts of Indian Peninsula. World Journal of Fish and Marine Science
1:305–312.
Acosta H, Forrest B. 2009. The spread of marine non-indigenous species via recreational boating:
a conceptual model for risk assessment based on fault tree analysis. Ecological Modelling
220(13–14):1586–1598 DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.03.026.
Ahyong ST, Wilkens SL. 2011. Aliens in the Antipodes: non-indigenous marine crustaceans of
New Zealand and Australia. In: Galil BS, ed. In the Wrong Place–Alien Marine Crustaceans:
Distribution, Biology and Impacts. Invading Nature, Springer Series in Invasion Ecology. Vol. 6.
Netherlands: Springer, 451–485.
Albayrak S. 2011. Alien marine bivalve species reported from Turkish seas. Cahiers de Biologie
Marine 52:107–118.
Amat JN, Tempera F. 2009. Zoobotryon verticillatum Delle Chiaje, 1822 (Bryozoa), a new
occurrence in the archipelago of the Azores (North-eastern Atlantic). Marine Pollution Bulletin
58(5):761–764 DOI 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.02.019.
Antoniadou C, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N. 2016. Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an
updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 4:e9273.
Apel M. 2001. Taxonomie und Zoogeographie der Brachyura, Paguridea und Porcellanidae
(Crustacea: Decapoda) des Persisch-Arabischen Golfes. PhD thesis, Frankfurt, Germany:
Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität, 68.