Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lec 21

    Uploaded by

    mahdi sardar
    10 views10 pages

    Original Title

    Lec21

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    10 views10 pages

    Lec 21

    Uploaded by

    mahdi sardar

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 10
    SOIL DYNAMICS Pe eee at Maron Cosi (o> 21 eee MODULE - 4 Dynamic Soil Properties ee ee er ation of G,,,.x from CPT result aoe 2af 2 Seu 20 Peal zi | Estimation of Ginax %, from CPT tip 10 OE resistance for 8 uncemented silica : sands (After Baldi 2 et al., 1989) ° . 500 1000 2000 3000 ae/(0%)°> fee ae Effect of environmental loading conditions on Gyrax of normally consolidated and moderately overconsolidated soils sing Factor Elfectve confining presue, 7, Increases wth 0 Void ati, Decreases with ¢ Geologic ae. 1, Increases wih 1, Overconsolidation ao, OCR Increases with OCR Plasticity inde, PL Increases with LiF OCR > 1 soa [Noeffect for nor pls soil: Increases with or plastic ss (Gp to -10% increase pr lg ele snerease ia) Nenber of eedieg orien Decreases aftr Nyces of lage ut cover later with ime i ly increases with for snd ‘Source: Moifed from Doty and Vocetc (1987), ees artmentof Chil Engh See ae Modulus Reduction Curves for Fine Grained Soils +0-— Cyclic shear strain, (94) (After Vucetic and Dobry, 1991) fee ae Effects of effective confining pressures and plasticity index on modulus reduction behavior & ~ KG, Pron hes PD = 051 +n OED i 7 J separ nolan ca [1 CORES (PD) m= 0272{1 tanh | ln ch Theses yy foo forPl= 0 = 3.37x10* PI for Qe PLS 15 17.0% 1077 pre for 15 70. ees ee tumbal, In fics Effect of Mean Confining Pressure on Modulus Reduction Curve 1.00 020 e060 eas 040 0.20 0.00 ‘——= Uc to* 10% 104 10° 107 10 10* 10° 10% 10° 107 10° Cycle shear strain amplitude, oct san ampli, 7 © © (a) Nonplastic (PI=0) soil and (b) Plastic (PI=50) soil (After Ishibashi, 1992) Gee nana Effect of Cyclic Degradation on Modulus Reduction Curve 10 00 O00 001m 1 10 ‘yale shear stan, 76) {After Vucetic and Dobry, 1991) Variation of Damping Ratio _ 1s ee z 0 5 OoR= Te Eis 0 E10 a 200 is sf rare rt a rs) 1 10 Coptc ene ri, v4) Variation of damping ratio of fine grained soils with cyclic shear strain amplitude and plasticity index (After Vucetic and Dobry, 1991) fee ane Damping Ratio (contd.) Expression for Damping Ratio by Ishibashi and Zhang (1993) for fine grained soil: & = 0.333: 1+ exp(-0.0145PI'4) Gal iss eases Te epCOrssrr™ [osto(

    You might also like