An Introduction to
Family Therapy
SYSTEMIC THEORY AND PRACTICE
Third edition
Rudi Dallos and Ros Draper
a
im
BHI Open University Press1
The first phase - 1950s to mid-1970s
Cultural iandseapeIntuential people and ideas.
Seeds of systemic and family therapy
te development af gldance sptems for trstng meses nd rockets A ey ton
These eal das developed along tw cated but dfn pathways, Th
Ue The systemic view of problems was Ubertung not only fr memes es
Who were displaying the roblems bu alto forthe therpsto the prac of fami
therapy promised llr upper and ree! Tooter member, Homers hs evthe por teeter neteioms yn
ep ae Mer ituental autor wos Neral vo in 2812 pteaod Scknee ane
‘ans s Stor trac rte nd Gn Soar, or |
| setter corners
| welere nr inte
crane | | Sos ceceas ea tar a cece
a Ia eareeecrytingy nPrnoceitia ew rmburgary was also researching{he funding for
ieee tes of
Systemic thinking from intrapsyehic to interpersorl
Doe ofthe most enduring contribusions of temic thinking as bes ter view
some extent behavioural theories had implid. Systemic thinking suggest thats fam
snamsics change, 0 nda dentty and experience cn shane slong
The spoof problem explnaion moved fiom the narow beam tt had
soured the quesdon of adv autnony and esponsby32 an wrmoovetion To pam THERAPY
From thet owe conics show conser aver the cui ti process continue fr
oe acme aly migh ome tyin ene," the cid to be il or deviant
aa canna oes or dion the confit aetween the parent (ee coli
Test, pegs 35). Such an ana came wo ply central parti ary systemic
“Stel erapy and became icesengy spicata was eal thatthe
aa cd inuude lof the fara members, fr example funcional
saa Pgh ako suggen tat heeds omplans would every cote some
ower and pefvepes on tbe ld
‘systems theory - bole analogy
Using abiclogial analogy, tems theory propo dat various atte ofthe bey
Cree of ancresemeced but atnctsysems of cemponeats thi perme
TE tation 1973), Phi coordination achieved hough communication betwee
ceeeetate or par ofthe syste. To fake a simple example, te elation
Sar temperature twee an troctonfeten the sweat ands and PEND
Shee Signed ssi, breuing ste and cote echanisms in the brain. Tse
Rap D act ogee {mache a thermostat) 0 mann te temperature ofthe
fouy ain elerabe and tafe’ its
esas stem any uni src on feedback (Bateson 1972). More
‘aay, stem seen ay eat when We cad enya en made wp a set of
ec pure which communicate with ae ielunes eachother ‘The pars are
verted ca tat ch art influences nd ir snuenced by each che arn tun
‘hae Saal neracing parts re connected gether such that hey dapay en
{Guns caerem pater, These overall pater are not simpy reduce tthe
Seah ann ofthe ind pars~a stem is more than simpy the sm
Sf compoxte pars Its the aberved patter hat connect the pars incoherent
‘pera mechanical mols were alo app ofr wit Jaton (19658)
sgn at fry was im cen! eating ste in tat operated on
SaRSS eSccorruca with deviatoos rom tee ules being eit Far examples
Ther gh be pater ofineraction wih eared an excasting ent been
(Rte and dagiver during which the father would withdraw in exasperation.
rently the mother would tar ois in ang, acusing Bin of ot helping oF
cas Ring sme Rosle exchanges becwee hem te mother would Sh C0
Seu her daughter of ac the woke ay
Te fay members would at be nvare of this pattern of behaviours acing
asa le, but eer tei epettve and presale pattern of tteracion would
Sst that sme uch rules were in lace Tis the ea that such groupings of
Emergent properties of@ system
Centra to system theory was the Mes tat asst has arctic that art
sep When ot more pele interact hey aeinolved in a resi processan outsider, ithe Family is lowing et fret which sem be necesiary 1
rina ome frm of eglibrum (Jackson 1957)
‘weve ony inferences inthe minds fu as olerers The examples in Figure Ut
Its te ere ea of costo herent assem thinking
Pertipans inthe relorship ay explain eit ow and etch thers actions inut which in tara Tends to more of the same frm Join Likewise, May
suc Jon's vitor introverted personality Sar’s sependcney. Whether
Mary is more or les insecure than eter peopl ele slant thas the fc
te Join Likewise, Jo's vel of decent nina ty Macy reso
Te revered in some couples, these ate common gendet pate. Ths upge ta
though inerpersonaly mainsned such cycles ate ls shaped by dominant ala
eri ersomis sens continually apg cca conent. Pata fa
ce various and siting demands upon Avanety of actos pe
Brpealexampeie of young couple wth en
fiom th
Bory of nary rcs tna shone
Betdcris compen‘Wads, triangulation and cont detourngsi describe his sytem, fo exarpefcanng on fers rel of amare,
fat MMM erento he Aare eneFeedbackthrough communication
pucrotions of Family coordination throu
er on mae 1 family communication sequences was highlighted
ieee mano res enh pam
er any tad confining communications. pari
fumno caample ced Batson (19722
des te iden of
see nation ‘your man who ba fay wel eave .
ef Trpatsz he aneuted a ie and was put inthe
"508 ene 196738 Pt doy mean?youdontseem 00 Marsimpnone marily
dens and change inthe avin: tne cere
laoshps ae also posible fr example mutual finger ear
Family homeostasis
Sion nance
SS ten
oevetng het
nie, wtescupo th
Sernsiten etd ca pet ecm 36
BBfiocon ss coved sper Th
Benassi, Tnscope naylytfe cleewe 2.8 The end ec: earl ane
Mey propose «two-dimensional model as sown in Figure 1.7. Carter and
‘MeGolise (1980-10) describe their model ow
The eral own x ytem inclads pars of etn
ony aol The horizontal ow inches both he peda
ban, Has fandthose unpredictable evens te ings ad arom
Sern voce and i
Sow soune pool a.
ons of the nl unl fcces were sen s potently orev and ae plicly endorsing
ona nequlis, Mot imporany, twas gue that hstondereybernetes oeKoy texts
Stat guides