Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: João Breno Ribeiro-Alvares, Gabriel Santos Oliveira, Felipe Xavier de Lima-
e-Silva & Bruno Manfredini Baroni (2020): Eccentric knee flexor strength of professional football
players with and without hamstring injury in the prior season, European Journal of Sport Science,
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1743766
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1743766
Title:
Eccentric knee flexor strength of professional football players with and without
hamstring injury in the prior season
Running head:
Football players’ knee flexor eccentric strength
Submission Type
Original investigation
Authors:
João Breno Ribeiro-Alvares1, Gabriel Santos Oliveira1,
Felipe Xavier de Lima-e-Silva1, Bruno Manfredini Baroni1
Affiliations:
1
Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre, Brazil
Acknowledgments:
BMB thank CNPq-Brazil for the research productivity fellowship.
Conflict of interest:
Authors declared no conflict of interest.
Corresponding author:
Bruno Manfredini Baroni
Federal University of Health Sciences of Porto Alegre (UFCSPA)
Sarmento Leite St, 245 – zipcode 90050-170
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Phone/fax +55 51 3303-8876
1
Email: bmbaroni@yahoo.com.br
ABSTRACT
Both injury history and eccentric knee flexor strength have been associated with risk of
football players sustaining hamstring strain injury (HSI). However, it remains unclear
whether football players who sustained HSIs in the prior season present themselves for
the next season with persistent eccentric strength deficits. Therefore, the aim of the
present study was to verify the eccentric knee flexor strength of professional male
football players with and without history of HSI in the prior season. This case-control
study assessed 210 professional male football players from 10 Brazilian clubs: 182
included in the control group and 28 in the previously injured group. Players from the
injured group had suffered unilateral HSI in the prior season. We measured the peak
eccentric knee flexors force during the Nordic hamstring exercise and calculated the
between-limb asymmetry. Groups were similar for age, body mass and height (p>0.05).
Control group had similar strength values between left and right limbs (376.29±61.77 N
vs. 380.28±61.77 N; p=0.27; d=0.06), while the previously injured limb was weaker
than the contralateral uninjured limb in the injured group (350.87±60.79 N vs.
and 50% in the injured group presented between-limb asymmetry >10%. This study
demonstrates that players with history of HSI in the prior season present reduced
2
eccentric knee flexor strength in the injured limb, but half of them have between-limb
3
INTRODUCTION
(soccer) 1. Around 22% of players from elite teams suffer HSIs each season, and there is
an increasing HSI rate from the beginning of the century 2. Each HSI leads to an
impact over the club’s finances 4. Therefore, clubs have been making efforts to track
5,6
more vulnerable athletes in time to implement preventive strategies . The screening
tests are mainly performed at preseason and aim to identify potential risk factors for
possibly related to the complex and multifactorial nature of sports injuries 15. However,
findings that football players with weak hamstrings at preseason have up to 4.4 times
greater risk of in-season HSI than stronger players 11 support the importance of strength
5,6
tests performed by most premier league football clubs . Although the isokinetic
dynamometry is considered the gold-standard method and has been largely used among
16
footballers , recent trials have assessed the eccentric knee flexor strength using the
device called Nordbord (Vald Performance, Queensland, Australia) 11,14,17. This portable
18
equipment was designed and validated by Australian researchers and measures knee
flexors force during the execution of the Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE), allowing a
quick and easy-to-perform assessment in a large group of athletes at their own facilities.
The rehabilitation programs for HSIs have evolved a lot in recent years, and
great attention has been recommended to the eccentric-biased strengthening exercises 19.
4
In a decision-based return to sport model, it is recommended that a previously injured
muscle restore its previous strength level or get close to the contralateral uninjured limb
strength level (a between-limb asymmetry <10% has been most commonly adopted by
researchers and clinicians) 20,21. However, two out of three professional football players
have residual strength deficits upon returning to sport following HSI (i.e., between-limb
asymmetry >10%) 20. In contrast to the isometric strength, which appears to be restored
within 20 to 50 days after an HSI, the time required to rebalance the between-limb
22
dynamic strength is inconclusive . Some studies including athletes from different
sports with history of unilateral HSI reported persistent eccentric strength deficits up to
18,23,24
18 months in previously injured limb compared to the contralateral limb . This
was contradicted by other investigations that have not observed any weakness in the
25–27
previously injured limb . Moreover, the conflicting results are also found in studies
that compared the previously injured limb strength values with athletes with no history
11,18
of HSI . Interestingly, only 16 football players with previous HSI were assessed in
A previous HSI is usually considered a strong risk factor for this type of injury
28
. Therefore, it would be plausible to infer that a past HSI concurrent with a residual
eccentric strength deficit should increase the risk of a future HSI. However, the lack of
consensus in the literature and the few data available in footballers prevent us from
drawing a definitive conclusion as to whether players who sustained HSIs in the prior
season present themselves for the next season with persistent eccentric strength deficits.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to verify the eccentric knee flexor strength
of professional male football players with and without history of HSI in the prior
season. Our hypothesis was that players with HSI in the prior season would be weaker
5
in the previously injured limb, leading this group of players to present a higher between-
limbs asymmetry compared to their peers without HSI in the prior season.
METHODS
Study design
to include the knee flexor strength assessment during the NHE in their screening testing
routine. Assessments took place in the facilities of each club, during preseason or early
preference. The club’s medical records and the own players' report were used to identify
those who had sustained HSI along the prior season. Then players were allocated to one
of the two groups: injured group and control group. The study was approved by the
institutional ethics committee. Approvals were obtained from each club in the course of
the study, as player’s assessment data were routinely collected over the season 29.
Participants
A total of 210 professional male football players participated in this study. They played
for clubs engaged in one of Brazil’s major state championships (7 in first division and 3
in second division during the season in which the study was carried out). Two clubs that
played the national premier league and the Libertadores de America Cup chose to
evaluate only their “B teams” due to schedule reasons. All players were free of any
current injury and were fully engaged in the team’s training routine at the time of
testing. Players with bilateral HSI in the prior season were not included in the current
6
study because our aim was to compare the previously injured limb with the uninjured
limb.
Procedures
Injury history
HSI was defined as a sudden pain in the posterior thigh that prevented the player
from continuing the activity and took him for at least one day out of practice or play 28.
Injuries were screened through the participants' report and club medical records. All
injuries were clinically diagnosed by the team’s clinician, and confirmed by imaging
examination. The affected limb (right or left), the injured muscle (semimembranosus,
belly/muscle-tendon junction), the grade of injury, and the time-loss due to injury were
Players allocated in the control group had no history of HSI in the prior season,
while those allocated in the injured group had sustained unilateral HSI in the prior
season (i.e., up to ~12 months before the testing). Considering a hypothetical situation
of a player having suffered the HSI on the last day of the prior season (i.e., in the eve of
the vacation period), at least 30 days would have elapsed between the injury and the
date of the strength assessment. Previously injured players had all returned to preinjury
levels of sport participation and were fully engaged in the team's training routine.
in order not to interfere nor be influenced by the practices and matches. The following
7
the tests; (2) no intake of analgesic and/or anti-inflammatory drugs 48 hours prior to the
tests; and (3) no consumption of stimulants (e.g., caffeine) on the day of the test.
Following the evaluation, comprehensive and accessible reports were delivered to each
All players had experience with the NHE, sparing them from holding any
familiarization session. After a general warm-up structured and guided by the team’s
strength and conditioning coach, the player was positioned on a custom-made device
built by our research group to measure the eccentric knee flexor strength during the
NHE execution (Figure 1). This device was based on the prototype validated by Opar et
18 14,17,30
al. , and increasingly used in previous studies focused on HSI . The player
started the test in kneeling position over a padded board (with the hip neutral and the
torso upright) and progressively moved the torso forward using only the knee joint (i.e.,
maintaining the hips and spine neutral). One of the researchers was responsible for
supervising the correct execution of the NHE, controlling the execution time and
until the end of the exercise. The player should use his upper limbs to absorb the fall
Players performed at least 3 valid repetitions of the NHE, with a minimum 10-
second interval between them. During the testing, the left and right ankles were
individually secured by ankle braces placed superior to the lateral malleolus and fixed to
Esportivas, Brasilia, Brazil) perpendicularly attached to the board. Force data of each
load cell were simultaneously transferred via Bluetooth to a mobile cellphone (sample
rate = 10 Hz). Force values were registered in every repetition, and the peak value
obtained in each limb was used for statistical analysis. Test-retest reliability with 95%
8
confidence intervals of our device was assessed through data from 20 healthy active
Typical Error, 1.89 N (1.42 – 2.79 N); Coefficient of Variation, 5% (3.2 – 6.7%).
Statistical analysis
The characteristics of subjects (age, body mass, and height) allocated to control
No difference was found for hamstring peak force produced by left and right
limbs in the control group, then a between-limb average value of these players was used
for comparison with each limb of the injured group. This analysis was performed with a
minus the weaker limb. The between-limb asymmetry also used the stronger limb as the
reference value (i.e., 100%). The between-limb asymmetry of control and injured
significances were assessed using Cohen’s d with the effect sizes being deemed trivial
RESULTS
sustained unilateral HSI during the prior season limb (goalkeepers, 4%; defenders, 36%;
9
midfielders, 32%, forwards, 28%). Sixteen players of the injured group had sustained
HSI on the left limb and 12 on the right. The players allocated to control and injured
groups presented similar age, body mass and height (p>0.05 for all comparisons; Table
1).
In the control group, peak force values of 33 players with at least one HSI
episode throughout their careers (without HSI in the prior season) were similar to those
found in 149 players free of HSI history; thus, they were analyzed as a single group
(n=182). The control group showed no statistically significant difference between the
left (376.29±61.77 N) and right limb (380.28±61.77 N) in knee flexor peak force during
the NHE [p=0.27; trivial effect size, d=0.06 (-0.14-0.27)]. In contrast, the previously
injured limb (350.87±60.79 N) was weaker than the contralateral uninjured limb
(385.75±63.49 N) in the injured group [p<0.01; medium effect size, d=0.56 (0.02-1.09);
Figure 2]. The previously injured limb also had lower hamstring peak force compared to
the control group [378.28±56.72 N; p=0.03; small effect size, d=0.48 (0.08-0.88);
Figure 2].
values: 35.63±33.64 N vs. 48.89±46.76 N [p=0.16; small effect size, d=0.37 (-0.03 -
0.77)]; 8.77±7.92% vs. 11.91±10.16% [p=0.13; small effect size, d=0.38 (-0.02 – 0.78)].
Thirty-seven percent of players in the control group and 50% in the injured group
presented between-limb asymmetry >10% (Figure 3). Among the 67 players with
between-limb asymmetry >10% in the control group, 41 players (i.e., 61%) presented
deficit in the left limb and 26 (i.e., 39%) in the right limb. Among those with between-
10
limb asymmetry >10% in the injured group, 13 players (i.e., 93%) had strength deficit
DISCUSSION
This study aimed to verify the eccentric knee flexor strength of professional
male football players with and without history of HSI in the prior season. Our main
finding was those previously injured players presented significant strength deficit in
relation both to their contralateral limb and to the uninjured players, but half of them
had between-limb asymmetry within the most commonly adopted benchmark value of
10%20,21.
The athletes assessed in our study presented quite similar force values during
12
NHE than those reported for other football codes, such as rugby union (~368 N) ,
31 17
Gaelic football (~361 N) and Australian football (~371 N) . Studies with
professional football (soccer) players have reported distinct levels of eccentric knee
11
flexor strength, ranging from ~260 N to ~411 N 17. The reason for the discrepancy
familiarization with the testing task plays a crucial role. The NHE is largely used into
the injury prevention routine of Brazilian professional football clubs 6, and all players in
the present study had previous experience with NHE. These facts might explain the
11
force values assessed being closer to footballers playing in France 17 than in Australia 11
or Qatar 14.
player’s body mass. However, body mass seems to be weakly associated with peak
31
force during NHE in adult athletes (r=0.159) . According to the developers of this
18
assessment method , normalization by body mass is unnecessary because of the
nature of the NHE. For instance, when assessing two players with the same knee flexor
strength capacity, but different body masses; the heavier player will reach the critical
point earlier (i.e., smaller range of movement) than the lighter one, but both players will
require maximal force generation of the knee flexors during testing. Moreover, greater
predictability for future HSI in football players has been found with absolute than
11
normalized force values , which supports the absolute peak force as the primary
outcome of the current study. Ultimately, injured and control groups had the same body
mass, which eliminates the influence of this possible confounding factor from our
analysis.
11
The prospective cohort study by Timmins et al. demonstrated that Australian
premier league football players with eccentric knee flexor strength <337 N at preseason
had 4.4 times greater risk of a subsequent HSI than stronger players. Taking this cut-off
point into account, the majority of players in both groups of the current study would be
away from the zone of greatest threat for HSI 11. However, we should be aware that the
previously injured limb was 35 N weaker than the contralateral limb, and multivariate
logistic regression models suggest the risk of sustaining an HSI decreases ~9% at every
11
10 N increase in eccentric knee flexor strength . It means that even if the previously
injured limb is above the cut-off point previously suggested by the literature, the
12
hamstring strengthening to match the contralateral limb strength tends to further reduce
Previous studies have already reported that muscles suffering an HSI remain
18,23,24
weaker than the contralateral limb for several months after return to sport . The
18,24
between-limb strength asymmetry previously reported is ~15% on the NHE testing
23
and ~22-24% on the isokinetic dynamometry . Interestingly, our study adds to the
literature that 50% of players from the injured group would be classified within the
criterion of normality usually adopted for between-limb strength symmetry (i.e., <10%)
20,21
. This reduced level of between-limb asymmetry in half of our sample can be
partially explained by three different but not self-excluding hypotheses: (1) the HSI
19
rehabilitation has been focused on the eccentric strengthening of the injured muscle ;
(2) the return to sport following a HSI have been based on more stringent criteria in
relation to muscle strength recovery 33; and (3) the prevention programs using eccentric-
5,6
biased exercises adopted by clubs have contributed to strengthening of previously
injured muscles when players return to the team routines. However, when we looked
only at cases of between-limb strength asymmetry >10%, call us attention that almost
all athletes (i.e., 93%) had strength deficit in the previously injured limb, suggesting a
(see figure 3) highlights the importance of looking at the individual scores rather than
evaluate all athletes based on group behavior. Surprisingly, even in the absence of
significant between-limb strength asymmetry in the control group, 37% of those athletes
are outside the normality range. This prevalence of strength asymmetry may be related
to the asymmetrical demands of football and/or other previous injuries (not assessed in
13
HSI history, a considerable portion of professional football players start the season with
knee flexor strength asymmetry, thus they should be engaged in some hamstring-
chances of HSI along the season. Interestingly, only ~1% of players from the control
group presented between-limb strength asymmetries >30%, while 11% of the injured
group had that exacerbated strength imbalance level. These findings suggest that
worrying between-limb strength asymmetries, although not exclusive, are much more
prevalent in those players who suffered HSIs in the prior season. Therefore, special
attention for athletes with HSI history in the prior season is recommendable.
Regular football training seems to be unable to increase the eccentric knee flexor
34
strength , thus it is recommended that specific training be implemented to strengthen
NHE currently presents the best evidence in preventing HSI in football and other team
38
sports , it can be recommended as the first choice for preventative programs. As a
whether the strength is equally distributed between limbs during NHE execution.
the quantifying players’ eccentric knee flexor strength to assess each limb training
The authors acknowledge that the current study has limitations. The
knee flexor strength are the cause or the result of previous HSIs. Clubs did not provide
14
detailed information regarding the HSIs (i.e., injured muscle, grade of injury, time-loss,
etc.), which would allow us further analysis. The lack of characterization of injury
severity is an important limitation of the present study, also observed in previous studies
with similar purpose 23,24. We also did not have the opportunity to monitor the hours of
exposure (training and matches) and the HSI incidence throughout the season in which
the data collections were performed, which would allow us to verify the injury rate in
control and injured groups. Despite these limitations, this is one of the few studies with
a large sample of professional football players and our results showing a persistent
deficit of eccentric knee flexor strength in the injured limb during NHE execution serve
In conclusion, professional male football players with history of HSI in the prior
season present a persistent deficit of eccentric knee flexor strength in the injured limb
during NHE execution. Half of them present between-limb strength asymmetry >10%,
and the previously injured limb is the weakest in 93% of cases, suggesting that strength
deficit may be related with the HSI in the prior season. However, 37% of the uninjured
players also have between-limb strength asymmetry being >10%. It means that
eccentric strength deficit is not consistent among players with history of HSI, and many
coaching staffs should focus on individual scores to identify those players with
prevention program.
15
REFERENCES
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-098160
analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury study. Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(12):731-
737. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2015-095359
2013;47(12):738-742. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092215
4. Ekstrand J. Keeping your top players on the pitch: the key to football medicine at
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092771
2014;48(18):1352-1357. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2014-093439
Strain Injury Risk Factors in Professional and Under-20 Male Football (Soccer)
16
8. Croisier J-L, Ganteaume S, Binet J, Genty M, Ferret J-M. Strength imbalances
doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.077560
10. Lee J, Mok K, Chan H, Patrick S, Chan K. Eccentric hamstring strength deficit
and poor hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio are risk factors for hamstring strain injury
2017;21(8):789-793. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2017.11.017
11. Timmins RG, Bourne MN, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Lorenzen C, Opar DA.
Short biceps femoris fascicles and eccentric knee flexor weakness increase the
12. Bourne MN, Opar DA, Williams MD, Shield AJ. Eccentric knee flexor strength
2015;43(11):2663-2670. doi:10.1177/0363546515599633
13. Opar DA, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Hickey J, Duhig SJ, Shield AJ. Eccentric
14. Van Dyk N, Bahr R, Burnett A, et al. A comprehensive strength testing protocol
2017;51(23):1695-1702. doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097754
17
15. Bittencourt NFN, Meeuwisse WH, Mendonça LD, Nettel-Aguirre A, Ocarino
JM, Fonseca ST. Complex systems approach for sports injuries: Moving from
risk factor identification to injury pattern recognition - Narrative review and new
095850
2016;11(6):721-726.
18. Opar DA, Piatkowski T, Williams MD, Shield AJ. A novel device using the
doi:10.2519/jospt.2013.4837
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-092676
play following hamstring injury the majority of professional football players have
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2013-093016
18
injury prevention in elite football: translating research into practice. Br J Sport
22. Maniar N, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Opar DA. Hamstring strength
and flexibility after hamstring strain injury: A systematic review and meta-
095311
24. Timmins RG, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Lorenzen C, Opar DA. Biceps femoris
long head architecture: A reliability and retrospective injury study. Med Sci
25. Silder A, Thelen DG, Heiderscheit BC. Effects of prior hamstring strain injury on
doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.04.015
26. Sanfilippo J, Silder A, Sharry MA, Tuite MJ, Heiderscheit BC. Hamstring
strength and morphology preogression after return to sport from injury. Natl Inst
27. Opar D a, Williams MD, Timmins RG, Hickey J, Duhig SJ, Shield AJ. The
28. Hägglund M, Waldén M, Ekstrand J. Previous injury as a risk factor for injury in
19
29. Winter EM, Maughan RJ. Requirements for ethics approvals. J Sports Sci.
2009;27(10):985-985. doi:10.1080/02640410903178344
30. Timmins RG, Bourne MN, Shield AJ, Williams MD, Lorenzen C, Opar DA.
doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000783
31. Roe M, Malone S, Delahunt E, et al. Eccentric knee flexor strength profiles of
341 elite male academy and senior Gaelic football players: Do body mass and
doi:10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.01.006
strength and anaerobic power of elite, subelite and amateur French soccer
soccer players after preseason strength training with eccentric overload. Scand J
20
doi:10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.00367.x
37. Bourne MN, Duhig SJ, Timmins RG, et al. Impact of the Nordic hamstring and
doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096130
38. Al Attar WSA, Soomro N, Sinclair PJ, Pappas E, Sanders RH. Effect of Injury
21
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1. Assessment of eccentric knee flexors strength during the NHE execution. The
white arrows highlight the two load cells used for data acquisition.
Figure 2. Knee flexor peak force (mean and 95% confidence interval) produced by
players in the control group (average between left and right limb – black bar) and by the
uninjured (grey bar) and injured (white bar) limbs of players in the injured group. * the
Figure 3. Individual analysis of between-limb asymmetry: the black dots are players
allocated in the control (top) and injured (bottom) groups; the grey zone highlights the
asymmetry >10%); the right column presents the gross number and percentage of
22
TABLE
23
24
25
26