Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2-AIM-SCP22-Competitor Review-Ms Thảo
2-AIM-SCP22-Competitor Review-Ms Thảo
COMPETITOR REVIEW
SESSION 1: THEORY
TABLE OF CONTENT
1. What and why we do it?
2. Basic principles and crucial steps to do competitor review
3. Types of competitor review and suggested structures
4. Your homework
1. What and why we do it?
This is how people in agency see it. How about you?
CATEGORY
CATEGORY
UNDERSTANDING
BRAND
REVIEW COMPETITOR BY
PLATFORMS (ONAIR, ON
GROUND AND ONLINE)
CAMPAIGN
REVIEW COMPETITOR BY
CAMPAIGNS
Type 1: CATEGORY UNDERSTANDING
+ Market size
+ Market share
+ Growth Rate
+ Key drivers of category (based on the latest innovation and
evaluation of expert, research agencies)
+ Category product portfolio
+ Price mapping
+ Distribution
+ Communication activities by campaigns or always-on content
Type 1: CATEGORY UNDERSTANDING
Type 1: CATEGORY UNDERSTANDING
Type 2: REVIEW COMPETITOR BY PLATFORMS
Type 2: REVIEW COMPETITOR BY PLATFORMS
Type 2: REVIEW COMPETITOR BY PLATFORMS
Type 3: REVIEW COMPETITORS BY CAMPAIGNS
Part 1: Campaign timelines (provide quick information of campaign types, key message, products,
time or campaign duration)
Part 2: Review each campaign in detail. You need to cover at least those information
+ Campaign context
+ Objectives
+ Campaign tagline
+ Communication strategy (Do what/ Say what - To whom - By how)
+ Creative assets
+ Activities by campaign objective (Reach, Educate, Convert) / forms of communication (PR,
social, promotion, event ...)/ by medium (ATL/ BTL/ Social and Digital)
NOTE: It is nice to break competitor campaign to phases if the signal is clear
Part 3: Evaluate the impact/ engagement/ brand distinctive (requires moderate brand knowledge)
of each campaign
Part 4: Communication convention/ key taken points/ implication about communication strategy
or approach
Type 3: REVIEW COMPETITORS BY CAMPAIGNS
PART 1
This is how
campaign timeline in
reality looks like!
Type 3: REVIEW COMPETITORS BY CAMPAIGNS
PART 2
Campaign activities
are classified by
objectives
Type 3: REVIEW COMPETITORS BY CAMPAIGNS
PART 3
Criteria to evaluate a
campaign
EXERCISE 3:
Evaluate those campaign by impact/ engagement/ brand distinctive by scoring
from 1 to 5. 1 is the lowest score and 5 is the highest. Explain your choice
IMPACT: …./5
ENGAGEMENT: .../5
IMPACT: …./5
ENGAGEMENT: .../5
IMPACT: …./5
ENGAGEMENT: .../5
PART 4
Communication Convention
1. Task:
a. Define key competitors in bouillon category
b. Conduct a competitor review within 1 or 2 years by campaigns
2. Deliverable: PPT format
3. Deadline: 03 Dec 2019
4. Time for presentation: 30 minutes per team
GIFT FOR YOU: Brand communication structure or
territory of two key competitors
THANK YOU
Contact
Telephone: +84 (28) 3911 5506
Website: http://aimacademy.vn
Facebook: facebook.com/AIMACADEMY.VN
Address: 146Bis Nguyễn Văn Thủ, Đa Kao Ward, District 1, HCMC, Việt Nam.