A.

a. The dispute is between Vicente and Nelia Cid vs. PHILROCK INC. On September 14, 1992, the Cid spouses,
herein private respondents, filed a Complaint for damages against Philrock and seven of its officers and
engineers with the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City, Branch 82. Petitioner contends that respondent
spouses were negligent in not engaging the services of an engineer or architect who should oversee their
construction, in violation of Section 308 of the National Building Code. It adds that even if the concrete it
delivered was defective, respondent spouses should bear the loss arising from their illegal operation. In short,
it alleges that they had no cause of action against it.

b. The method of resolution that was used is Arbitration.

c. The agreement that was done by the court is monetary awards. The Philrock Inc. Needs to pay the Cid
Siblings for liability.

B . SWOT Analysis

Name of The Case (Year) : PHILROCK Inc. Vs Cid Siblings (1992)

Strength Weaknesses Opportunities Threats