You are on page 1of 2

EDITORIAL

John H. Rodriguez, MD, FACS


Assistant Professor of Surgery, Director of Surgical
Endoscopy, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute,
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Median arcuate ligament syndrome:


A clinical dilemma
ompression of the celiac artery was first not always result in symptom resolution, with
C described in 1917 by Lipshutz, but it
took almost 50 years to understand any clini-
1
most series reporting between 75% and 85%
clinical success.3
cal implication.
The triad of epigastric abdominal pain exac- Recognizing clues
erbated by eating, weight loss, and celiac artery The first suspicion of MALS usually arises when
compression was initially described in 1963 by imaging studies reveal stenosis of the celiac ar-
Harjola,2 leading to the first description of me- tery. Typically, most patients had computed to-
dian arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS). mography as part of their evaluation for chronic
To this day, controversy persists around abdominal pain. Cross-sectional imaging can
the pathology of this syndrome, with some show narrowing of the celiac artery and exclude
groups labeling it a vascular disease, while atherosclerotic disease as a possible etiology.
others consider it a neurogenic disease. But a static image is usually not entirely
diagnostic. Variation of flow during inspira-
See related article, page 140 tion and expiration has proven to be one of
the most reliable modalities to document
Patients with
Initial treatment was through an open chronic
true compression with hemodynamic conse-
surgical approach, in which the main objec-
quences. Peak systolic velocities of more than abdominal
tive was celiac artery revascularization. The
249 cm/sec in the expiratory phase with nor-
inevitable consequence of this operation was
malization during inspiration are considered pain can
a complete neurolysis performed during ex-
posure of the vessels. This neurolysis is now
pathognomonic for celiac artery compression. benefit from
But this finding only proves that there is com- a multi-
believed to be the main technical aspect that
pression of the celiac trunk; it does not imply
results in symptom improvement, rather than disciplinary
clinical correlation with symptoms.
revascularization. Over the last decade, expe-
rience with minimally invasive approaches Excluding other foregut conditions
evaluation
has grown, and our understanding of the MALS is considered a diagnosis of exclusion, and
disease has highlighted the role of the celiac therefore, testing to exclude other foregut pa-
plexus nerve fibers as the most relevant ana- thology should be considered. This may include
tomic structure related to this syndrome. endoscopy, abdominal imaging (ultrasonography
or computed tomography), and functional gas-
■ A CHALLENGING DIAGNOSIS trointestinal studies. Epigastric pain and weight
Diagnosis remains the most challenging step loss can be a manifestation of other disease pro-
in treating patients with MALS. Despite cesses such as biliary colic, gastroparesis, and
growing clinical experience, most published peptic ulcer disease that should be excluded.
data are limited to case reports and small case-
series with limited follow-up. There is no con- ■ SURGERY DOES NOT ALWAYS CURE
sensus on diagnostic criteria, and surgery does At my institution, we have strongly advocat-
doi:10.3949/ccjm.88a.21001 ed for celiac plexus blockade as a diagnostic
CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 88 • NUMBER 3 MARCH 2021 143

Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on December 3, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission.
MEDIAN ARCUATE LIGAMENT SYNDROME

modality and predictor of success. It is a very ■ KEY CONSIDERATIONS


important tool that can help the patient and IN THE EVALUATION
clinician make a decision toward proceeding It is important for clinicians evaluating pa-
with surgical intervention. Nonresponders tients with abdominal pain to understand that
tend to have a lower likelihood of clinical suc- an imaging finding of celiac artery compres-
cess after surgery.4 sion is not diagnostic of MALS. This syn-
It is very important for physicians to have drome requires careful and meticulous evalua-
proper conversations with patients and ex- tion to rule out more common pathology.
plain the potential risks of the operation, as Patients suffering from chronic abdomi-
well as the anticipated outcome. Technical nal pain are often exposed to a long course of
success does not always correlate with clinical nondiagnostic testing and missed diagnosis,
success, and 15% to 25% of patients can have which typically results in extreme frustration
persistent symptoms despite complete release and a sense of hopelessness. As in many cases
and neurolysis.4 of chronic illness, these patients benefit from
Bleeding during surgery from injury to a a multidisciplinary evaluation that typically
major vessel is the most feared complication, includes a medical specialist, chronic pain spe-
cialist, psychologist, and, ultimately, a surgeon
and it can be very difficult to manage during
with expertise in the field. ■
minimally invasive approaches. It is the most
common reason for conversion to open sur- ■ DISCLOSURES
gery and can ultimately result in major mor- The author reports no relevant financial relationships which, in the context
bidity and, potentially, death. of his contributions, could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.

■ REFERENCES Coll Surg 2013; 216(2):272–279. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.004


4. Weber J, Boules M, Fong K, et al. Median arcuate ligament syndrome
1. Lipshutz B. A composite study of the coeliac axis artery. Ann Surg is not a vascular disease. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 30:22–27.
1917; 65(2):159–169. doi:10.1097/00000658-191702000-00006 doi:10.1016/j.avsg.2015.07.013
2. Harjola PT. A rare obstruction of the coeliac artery: Report of a case.
Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn 1963; 52:547–550. pmid:14083857 Address: John H. Rodriguez, MD, FACS, Director of Surgical Endoscopy, Di-
3. El-Hayek KM, Titus J, Bui A, Mastracci T, Kroh M. Laparoscopic gestive Disease and Surgery Institute, A100, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid
median arcuate ligament release: are we improving symptoms? J Am Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195; rodrigj3@ccf.org

144 CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE VOLUME 88 • NUMBER 3 MARCH 2021

Downloaded from www.ccjm.org on December 3, 2021. For personal use only. All other uses require permission.

You might also like