Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a v a i l a b l e a t w w w. s c i e n c e d i r e c t . c o m
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / p s y n e u e n
a
Department of Psychology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
b
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, HRIC 1AC68, 3330 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary AB T2N 4N1, Canada
Received 15 December 2009; received in revised form 14 May 2010; accepted 6 July 2010
KEYWORDS Summary This study examined the hypothesis that depressed adolescents with a history of
Cortisol; childhood maltreatment will show greater cortisol reactivity to psychological stress challenge
Depression; than those without, and this relation will be moderated by level of depression severity. Seventy-
Child maltreatment; one adolescents were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test. Salivary cortisol was assessed at
Adolescence; baseline, immediately before the challenge, after the challenge, and during an extended
Trier Social Stress Test; recovery period. Childhood maltreatment was assessed with a rigorous contextual interview
Severity and rating system. Adolescents with a history of maltreatment produced higher and more
prolonged levels of cortisol in response to the challenge than did adolescents with no maltreat-
ment, but only among those with a mild/moderate level of depression severity. Those with
moderate/severe depression exhibited a blunted cortisol response regardless of child maltreat-
ment history. These findings indicate that depression is a heterogeneous syndrome, and that both
depression severity and child maltreatment history should be considered in studies examining
biological stress reactivity.
# 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0306-4530/$ — see front matter # 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.07.006
174 K.L. Harkness et al.
combines elements of uncontrollability and high levels of interaction, to cortisol reactivity and total cortisol expo-
social-evaluative threat. Stress tasks containing these two sure in response to the TSST. We hypothesized that (a)
components are associated with the largest HPA axis stress consistent with the adult literature, adolescents with
responses and the longest recovery times (Dickerson and MDD will show blunted cortisol reactivity and lower total
Kemeny, 2004). cortisol output in response to the TSST than non-depressed
Meta-analytic results in adults have indicated that controls, particularly among those with a severe depres-
depressed individuals show blunted cortisol reactivity in sion; (b) again, consistent with previous literature, adoles-
response to psychological challenge, particularly in older cents with a history of childhood maltreatment will show
and more severely depressed individuals (Burke et al., greater cortisol reactivity and total cortisol exposure in
2005). Only one study to our knowledge has compared response to the TSST than those without; and (c) depression
depressed versus non-depressed adolescents using the TSST severity will fully moderate the relation of childhood
(Rao et al., 2008), and it found elevated and prolonged cortisol maltreatment to cortisol reactivity: heightened cortisol
secretion in response to the TSST in depressed adolescents. In reactivity to the TSST in those with a history of child
younger children, studies have found blunted cortisol reactiv- maltreatment will only be seen in the less severely
ity in depressed children relative to controls (Luby et al., 2003, depressed adolescents, whereas blunted cortisol reactivity
2004). Several investigators have argued, however, that a will be seen in those with a history of child maltreatment in
distinction needs to be made between child and adolescent the context of severe depression. The latter hypothesis is
MDD, particularly with respect to HPA axis function (Kaufman tentative given the lack of previous research examining the
and Charney, 2003; Kaufman et al., 2001). Therefore, results relation of childhood maltreatment to HPA axis function
across these two sets of studies may not be comparable. moderated by depression severity.
Nevertheless, what is consistent across most studies using
challenge paradigms in adult and pediatric MDD is a much 2. Methods and materials
larger variability in cortisol response within the depressed
group versus the non-depressed individuals (Lopez-Duran
2.1. Participants
et al., 2009). It is this heterogeneity within MDD that may
help to account for inconsistencies in results across studies.
Participants were 71 individuals (48 females) ages 12—21
Two important sources of individual variability that have
years (M = 15.39, SD = 2.11) recruited from a mid-sized com-
consequences for the HPA axis system are (a) a history of
munity in Ontario, Canada. The ethnic diversity of our sample
childhood maltreatment, and (b) individual differences in
was consistent with that of the community (89% European
depression severity. On the one hand, research in both adult
ancestry). Our depressed sample was drawn from community
and child/adolescent samples has found that childhood mal-
mental health agencies and community advertisements seek-
treatment is associated with increased cortisol reactivity in
ing adolescents with depression. Our non-depressed sample
response to biological (e.g., corticotropin-releasing hormone
was recruited from local high schools and community adver-
[CRH]) and psychological stress challenge (De Bellis et al.,
tisements seeking healthy adolescents. Adolescents whom
1994; Heim et al., 2000, 2001, 2002; Kaufman et al., 1997;
we identified as depressed from the self-referrals were
Rao et al., 2008;). On the other hand, there is a literature in
referred for mental health treatment.
adults linking severe depression to blunted cortisol reactivity
The depressed adolescents all met Diagnostic and Statis-
response to stress challenge (Burke et al., 2005). Severe
tical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) (American Psychia-
melancholic depression, in particular, has been linked to
tric Association, 1994) criteria for a current non-bipolar, non-
biological markers in the HPA axis (e.g., nonsuppression on
psychotic mood disorder. Exclusion criteria included the
the DST), and HPA axis parameters appear to be among the
presence of a psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, substance
strongest discriminators of melancholic versus non-melan-
dependence, conduct disorder, developmental disability, or
cholic depression (Akil et al., 1993; Carroll et al., 1980; Dinan
medical disorder that could cause depression. Adolescents in
and Scott, 2005; Tsigos and Chrousos, 2002; Zimmerman
the non-depressed group were free of all current or past
et al., 1985).
psychiatric diagnosis.
It is noteworthy that these two lines of research reveal an
Our initial sample included 92 adolescents. Of this group,
opposing pattern of HPA function; that is, childhood mal-
12 were excluded because they met criteria for one of the
treatment is associated with heightened reactivity, and high
exclusionary diagnoses, and 9 either did not complete the
depression severity is associated with blunted reactivity.
childhood maltreatment interview, or were missing more
Childhood maltreatment and depression severity are, them-
than one cortisol sample. The resulting sample of 71 did
selves, highly correlated (Harkness and Monroe, 2002).
not differ from excluded participants in terms of age, sex,
Therefore, it is possible that failure to take both of these
ethnicity, or parental occupation status (all ps > .44). Of the
sources of heterogeneity into account in research on the HPA
21 adolescents who were excluded, 52% (n = 11) had been
axis in MDD may at least in part explain inconsistencies in
recruited from community mental health sites, and 48%
findings across studies. To date, however, there have been no
(n = 10) were from advertisements or local high schools
studies examining the relation of individual differences in
( p > .90).
depression severity to cortisol reactivity in adolescents, nor
have there been any studies in either adults or adolescents
examining the interaction of childhood maltreatment and 2.2. Assessment measures
depression severity on HPA axis function.
The goal of the present study was to examine the relation The present study was conducted in compliance with
of childhood maltreatment, depression severity, and their our University’s Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.
Cortisol reactivity to social stress in adolescents: Role of depression severity and child maltreatment 175
Written informed consent was obtained from all adoles- (BDI-II 26—49; n = 25). The group labels are consistent with
cents, and from a parent or guardian for adolescents under those employed by Beck et al. (1996).3
18. Interviews and questionnaires were administered by
one of three graduate students in clinical psychology. 2.2.3. Purbertal status
Adolescents participated in two sessions separated by Pubertal status was assessed using the Tanner stages of sexual
one week to reduce participant burden. Both sessions were maturation (Tanner, 1962). Self-report was based on a choice
conducted at the same time of day. Session 1 included the between five illustrations of breast (females) and pubic hair
diagnostic interview and questionnaires. Session 2 included (males and females) development, as validated against phy-
the TSST and childhood maltreatment interview. The child- sician assessment for this age group (Taylor et al., 2001).
hood maltreatment interview was conducted a full 2 h Scores could range from 1 to 5, with higher scores represent-
following the TSST. ing later stages. It should be noted that none of the adoles-
cent girls were pregnant at the time of the study.
2.2.1. Diagnostic measure
All adolescents received the full child and adolescent 2.2.4. Childhood maltreatment
version of the Schedule of Affective Disorders and Schizo- Participants were interviewed using the Childhood Experi-
phrenia (K-SADS) (Kaufman et al., 2000) to evaluate the ence of Care and Abuse contextual semi-structured interview
presence of current and/or past DSM-IV Axis I diagnoses. and rating system (CECA) (Bifulco et al., 1994). The CECA
Interviews were conducted by senior graduate students in interviews were conducted 2 h following the TSST, thus
clinical psychology who were trained to gold-standard allowing for full recovery of cortisol function before querying
reliability status (Grove et al., 1981). This interview began about this emotionally charged information. The following
with the collection of basic demographic information, scales were assessed: (1) antipathy — hostility or coldness
including parental occupation. Occupations were subse- toward the child (e.g., harsh criticism or name-calling); (2)
quently rated by two independent judges on a 1- to 7- indifference — neglect of the child’s physical and/or emo-
point scale according to the Hollingshead Index of Social tional needs (e.g., not providing adequate food or clothing;
Position (Hollingshead, 1975). Discrepancies between not comforting the child when upset); (3) physical abuse —
raters were resolved by consensus, and the consensus violence toward the child (e.g., punching, hitting with an
rating was used in analyses. Parent report of adolescent object, or threatening with a knife); and (4) sexual abuse —
symptoms was not gathered based on evidence document- non-consensual sexual contact by any perpetrator (e.g.,
ing that parent reports of adolescent internalizing disor- fondling, oral sex, and/or penetration). All interviews were
ders produce a high level of false negatives (Klein et al., audiotaped.
2005). The above scales were rated for severity (1-marked, 2-
Thirty-eight (54%) adolescents met criteria for a moderate, 3-some, 4-little/none) by raters who were una-
current depressive disorder (n = 24 major depressive ware of the participants’ depression status. Ratings were
disorder, n = 10 depressive disorder not otherwise speci- anchored to the CECA manual, which includes hundreds of
fied, n = 4 dysthymia). Of these, 20 (53%) adolescents met examples and rating rules. CECA interviewers and raters
criteria for at least one comorbid Axis I disorder (see received extensive training and ongoing supervision in the
Table 1).
3
2.2.2. Depression symptoms Beck et al. (1996) suggest the following cutoffs: 0—13: minimal
depression; 14—19: mild depression; 20—28: moderate depression;
Participants completed the BDI-II (Beck et al., 1996), a 21-
and 29—63: severe depression. We did not use the exact same
item questionnaire assessing the severity of depressive symp-
groupings as Beck et al. because we did not have sufficient sample
toms over the past two weeks. We compared three depres- size to divide our sample into four groupings. Therefore, we chose
sion severity groups based on BDI-II scores: minimal three groupings that cut the moderate group in half, putting the
depression (BDI-II 0—13; n = 30), mild/moderate depression lower half with the mild/moderate group and the upper half with the
(BDI-II 14—25; n = 16), and moderate/severe depression moderate/severe group.
176 K.L. Harkness et al.
Bedford College procedures for rating the CECA by the first 2.3.1. Hormone determinations
author. Inter-rater reliabilities ranged from k = .86—1.0 All saliva samples were immediately placed in a freezer for
(Harkness et al., 2006). The severity ratings of maltreatment short-term storage and eventually transported, on ice, to a
using the CECA were very negatively skewed (i.e., the major- secure frozen storage ( 20 8C). Resulting supernatant were
ity of participants had ratings of 4-little/none). Therefore, assayed for cortisol using an enzyme-linked immunoassay
we created a composite variable — ‘‘childhood maltreat- designed specifically for saliva (1-0102/1-0112; Salimetrics
ment,’’ representing the presence versus absence of at least LLC, State College, PA). All samples from one individual were
some (level ‘3’) antipathy and/or indifference and/or phy- placed on the same plate so that inter-assay variability did
sical abuse and/or sexual abuse. not contribute to quantification error. Each sample was
quantified in duplicate at 25 ml, and triplicate high and
2.3. Cortisol collection and Trier Social Stress low controls (4-COO1) were distributed across each plate
Task to track precision and accuracy. Samples that had a coeffi-
cient of variation 15% were repeated on another plate (Berg
Participants were asked to refrain from eating and drinking and Wynne-Edwards, 2001). Repetition was used to reject
for 1 h prior to their arrival at the lab. All saliva was one of the original duplicates but was not used in analyses.
collected in previously labeled 5 ml polypropylene vials Salivary cortisol measured by this method is highly correlated
(PGC Scientifics Corporation, MD) by passive drool (Shirt- with serum cortisol (r = .96; Salimetrics validation). In all, 24
cliff et al., 2001) between the hours of 3 pm and 5 pm assay runs, in four batches, were conducted. The high con-
because this is a period of low cortisol relative to the trol, measured at 1.1 mg/dL, had an intra-assay coefficient of
morning (Groschl et al., 2003). All participants were medi- variation of 4.2% and an inter-assay coefficient of variation of
cally healthy and had not experienced an acute injury in the 5.8%. The low control, measured at .1 mg/dL had an intra-
preceding 24 h.4 assay coefficient of variation of 6.9% and an inter-assay
We followed precisely the procedure outlined by Krisch- coefficient of variation of 11.1%.
baum, Pirke, and Hellhammer (1993) in defining the time
points for salivary sample collection during the TSST. The 2.3.2. Cortisol parameters for analyses
TSST protocol began with a 10-min rest period to allow the We used sample a (‘‘rest phase’’) as participants’ baseline
participant to adjust to the research setting. Participants against which to gauge differences across depression severity
then provided a baseline saliva sample (sample a). They were and history of childhood maltreatment in: (a) raw baseline
then led into the experimental room and introduced to two cortisol concentration in mg/dL (M = .12, SD = .08,
research assistants who the participants were told were range = .04—.49, Skew = 2.20), (b) ‘cortisol reactivity,’
members of a selection committee from a human resources defined as peak cortisol concentration (sample c) minus
department. Participants were told that they were to pre- baseline (sample a) divided by baseline (M = .27, SD = .71,
pare a 5-min speech that would serve as a ‘‘job interview,’’ range = .68—3.44, Skew = 2.14), and (c) area under the
and that they would give their speech to the selection curve (AUC) relative to self (M = .07, SD = 8.65,
committee. They were told that their speech would be range = 24.25—25.63, Skew = .26). AUC is a measure of
videotaped. This point in time served as the onset of the the total cortisol output over the TSST calculated as the
stressor. Participants were then led back into the experi- sum of the area of the four trapezoids bounded by the
mental room and given 10 min to prepare, after which we baseline value and framed by the cortisol concentration in
collected a second sample (sample b). Participants were then the five saliva samples from the session. Square-root trans-
led back into the experimental room where they delivered formations were applied to baseline cortisol and cortisol
their speech and performed an arithmetic test, which con- reactivity to normalize these variables (transformed skew
sisted of serially subtracting by 13, starting from 1022, as values < 1.5). The untransformed estimated marginal means
quickly as possible without making any mistakes. This phase are presented in the figures for ease of interpretability.
of the TSST took approximately 20 min, after which we
collected a third sample (sample c). Therefore, sample c 3. Results
was collected 30 min after the onset of the stressor, the time
point of peak cortisol reactivity. A fourth sample was col-
3.1. Participant characteristics
lected 1 h later (sample d), and a fifth and final sample was
collected another hour later (sample e). Following the TSST,
participants were fully debriefed regarding the purpose of Demographic and clinical characteristics of the three depres-
the TSST and the nature of the deception. sion severity groups are presented in Table 1. There were no
significant relations of depression severity group to sex
( p = .42) or Tanner score ( p = .19). However, groups differed
in age, at a trend, F(2, 68) = 2.80, p = .07, h2 = .08, and
4
parental Hollingshead index, F(2, 68) = 7.00, p < .005,
As would be expected, 25/41 (61%) of the depressed adolescents h2 = .17. Among those with a diagnosis of a depressive dis-
in our sample were experiencing sleep disturbance (i.e., insomnia or
order, there were no significant differences between those of
hypersomnia). These adolescents were not differentially distributed
across the mild/moderate (56%) and moderate/severe (64%) de-
moderate and severe BDI-II scores in percentage of those on a
pressed groups, x2(1) = .25, p = .62, or across those with (61%) versus recurrence, age at first onset, percentage of those with a
without (61%) childhood maltreatment, x2(1) < .001, p = .99. There- comorbid disorder, or percentage of those receiving treat-
fore, sleep disturbance cannot better account for our pattern of ment (all ps > .15). Of those receiving treatment, 8 were on
results. an antidepressant medication. These 8 adolescents were not
Cortisol reactivity to social stress in adolescents: Role of depression severity and child maltreatment 177
differentially distributed between the mild/moderate (depression group: minimal depression, mild/moderate
and moderate/severe depression groups (25% vs. 12%; depression, moderate/severe depression) 2 (childhood mal-
x2[1] = 1.16, p = .28) or between the groups with versus treatment: presence versus absence) repeated-measures Ana-
without a history of maltreatment (12% vs. 11%; x2[1] = lysis of Covariance (RMANCOVA) controlling for age and
.003, p = .96).5 parental occupation status. There was a 2-way interaction
Twenty-six adolescents reported a history of childhood of time by depressed group, Wilks’ l = .72, F(8, 120) = 2.66,
maltreatment (37%). Therefore, the present sample con- p < .01, h2 = .16. This was qualified by a significant 3-way
sisted of the following groups: (a) no/minimal depression interaction of time by depressed group by childhood maltreat-
with no maltreatment (n = 27); (b) no/minimal depression ment in the quadratic trend, F(2, 63) = 3.39, p < .05, h2 = .10.
with a history of maltreatment (n = 3); (c) mild/moderate Among those with no history of maltreatment, the three
depression with no maltreatment (n = 8); (d) mild/moderate depression groups did not differ in terms of the shape of their
depression with a history of maltreatment (n = 8); (e) mod- cortisol curves over time, F(2, 40) = 1.18, p = .32, h2 = .06 (see
erate/severe depression with no maltreatment (n = 10); and Fig. 1a). In contrast, among those with a history of maltreat-
(f) moderate/severe depression with a history of maltreat- ment, there remained a significant time by depression group
ment (n = 15). interaction, F(2, 21) = 3.72, p < .05, h2 = .26 (see Fig. 1b). As
Participants with versus without a history of childhood hypothesized, the mild/moderate depressed group with mal-
maltreatment did not differ significantly in terms of sex, age, treatment showed the strongest reactivity to the stressor,
Tanner score, or parental Hollingshead index (all ps > .15). demonstrating a significant quadratic trend in the curve over
Among the clinically depressed adolescents, there were no time, F(1, 7) = 8.50, p < .05, h2 = .57. In contrast, and also as
significant relations of childhood maltreatment to depression hypothesized, the moderate/severe depressed group with
history status, age at first onset, or treatment status (all maltreatment showed no reactivity to the stressor, demon-
ps > .35). However, those with a history of maltreatment strating a significant downward linear trend in the curve over
were significantly more likely to have a comorbid diagnosis time, F(1, 14) = 24.67, p < .001, h2 = .64.
(61% vs. 28%; x2[1] = 4.45, p < .05).6
The specific types of maltreatment assessed in our sample 3.3. Between-group cortisol parameters
included physical abuse (n = 7), sexual abuse (n = 6), and
emotional maltreatment (n = 24). As is typical in maltreated As displayed in Table 2, baseline cortisol concentration was
samples, most adolescents reported more than one form of significantly positively correlated with age, and cortisol
maltreatment. We found no evidence for a differential dis- reactivity was significantly positively correlated with paren-
tribution across mild/moderate and moderate/severe tal Hollingshead scores (i.e., related to lower parental occu-
depression of physical abuse (19% vs. 8%, x2[1] = 1.05,
p = .30), sexual abuse (19% vs. 12%, x2[1] = .36, p = .55), or
emotional abuse (50% vs. 56%, x2[1] = .14, p = .71). The
average age at start of maltreatment was 7.96 (SD = 4.89)
and at end was 14.81 (SD = 2.40), with an average duration of
11.58 years (SD = 5.46). The presence versus absence of
current maltreatment was not differentially distributed
across the mild/moderate and moderate/severe depression
groups (x2[1] = .17, p = .68).
5
None of the adolescents in our sample were on an anxiolytic
medication. In analyses including only the depressed adolescents,
results we report below were all robust when we controlled for
antidepressant medication usage. Results are available from the
authors.
6
In analyses including only the depressed adolescents, all effects
were robust when controlling for the presence versus absence of a
comorbid diagnosis. In terms of the specific comorbidities, all effects
were robust when controlling for the presence versus absence of
social phobia and alcohol/substance abuse, in separate models. The
frequencies of the remaining comorbidities were too small to merit
including these comorbidities as covariates. However, all results
were robust in separate models in which the individuals with each
of these comorbidities were excluded. Therefore, there is no evi-
dence that our pattern of results is driven by the individuals with any Figure 1 Cortisol concentrations (in mg/dL) across time strati-
of these comorbidities. Results are available from the authors. fied by childhood maltreatment history and depression severity.
178 K.L. Harkness et al.
Figure 2 Mean cortisol baseline (in mg/dL) by childhood mal- Figure 4 Total cortisol exposure (in mg/dL) by childhood mal-
treatment history and depression severity. treatment history and depression severity.
Cortisol reactivity to social stress in adolescents: Role of depression severity and child maltreatment 179
cannot be better accounted for by a differential distribution the diagnostic and childhood maltreatment interviews and
of maltreatment type across mild/moderate and moderate/ undertook the statistical analyses. Dr. Wynne-Edwards wrote
severe depression. Nevertheless, this is an important area for the study protocol and supervised the cortisol assays.
future research as different types of abuse may have differ-
ent neurobiological consequences. Acknowledgements
Second, our definition of the depression groups was based
on self-report. Nevertheless, all adolescents in our mild/
We gratefully acknowledge the technical of Lea Bond in
moderate and moderate/severe depression groups met DSM-
performing the cortisol assays. We would also like to
IV criteria for a unipolar mood disorder based on the K-SADS
acknowledge Eric Bulmash, Alexandra Sutherland, and Naza-
interview. Further, the BDI is a highly reliable measure
nin Alavi who performed the diagnostic and maltreatment
(a = .95 in the present sample) that correlates significantly
interviews, and Shannon Coyle, Lindsey Lytle, Emma Dargie,
with clinician-rated severity scales (Steer et al., 1987).
and Lindsay Delima for their help with data coding and data
Third, our study relied on retrospective self-reports of child-
management.
hood maltreatment, which may be subject to bias. However,
it is unclear how differential biases to recall childhood mal-
treatment would lead to the specific pattern of results seen References
here given that the mild/moderate and moderate/severe
depressed groups did not differ significantly in the proportion Akil, H., Haskett, R.F., Young, E.A., Grunhaus, L., Kotun, J., Wein-
who reported this history (50% vs. 60%; x2[1] = .40, p = .53). berg, V., et al., 1993. Multiple HPA profiles in endogenous
Further, recent reports have confirmed the validity of retro- depression: effect of age and sex on cortisol and beta-endorphin.
Biol. Psychiatry 33, 73—85.
spective reports of maltreatment using the CECA in the study
American Psychiatric Association, 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical
of depression (Brown et al., 2007). Fourth, in the present Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Author, Washington, DC.
study we did not collect data regarding non-psychotropic Beck, A.T., Brown, G., Steer, R.A., 1996. Beck Depression Inventory II
medications that may have affected cortisol function, nor did Manual. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX.
we provide urine screenings for substance use. However, we Berg, S.J., Wynne-Edwards, K.E., 2001. Changes in testosterone,
do note that our results were robust when controlling for self- cortisol and estradiol levels in men becoming fathers. Mayo Clin.
reported alcohol/substance abuse. Finally, future research Proc. 76, 582—592.
should employ more frequent cortisol assessment points to Bifulco, A., Brown, G., Harris, T., 1994. Childhood Experience of Care
provide a more fine-grained analysis of cortisol recovery. and Abuse (CECA): a retrospective interview measure. J. Child
The present study also had a number of strengths, includ- Psychol. Psychiatry 31, 1419—1435.
Brown, G.W., Craig, T.K.J., Harris, T.O., Handley, R.V., Harvey, A.L.,
ing the use of an ecologically valid challenge paradigm and
2007. Validity of retrospective measures of maltreatment and
the use of rigorous, structured interviews to determine depressive episodes using the Childhood Experience of Care and
clinical diagnoses and childhood maltreatment history. In Abuse (CECA) instrument — a life course study of adult chronic
summary, the present findings suggest that HPA axis dysre- depression — 2. J. Affect. Dis. 103, 217—224.
gulation in adolescent MDD is specific to those with a history Burke, H.M., Davis, S.C., Otte, C., Mohr, D.C., 2005. Depression and
of maltreatment, and shows an opposing pattern of response psychological response to stress: a meta-analysis. Psychoneur-
based on the severity of depression. These results have oendocrinology 30, 846—856.
significant implications for our understanding of the neu- Carpenter, L.L., Carvalho, J.P., Tyrka, A.R., Wier, L.M., Mello, A.F.,
roendocrinological pathology of MDD, and suggest that indi- Mello, M., et al., 2007. Decreased adrenocorticotropic hormone
vidual differences in both depression severity and and cortisol responses to stress in healthy adults reporting signif-
icant childhood maltreatment. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 1080—1087.
maltreatment history should be considered in all future
Carroll, B.J., Feinberg, M., Greden, J.F., Haskett, R.F., Steiner, J.M.,
studies examining HPA axis reactivity in MDD. Tarika, J., 1980. Diagnosis of endogenous depression. J. Affect.
Dis. 2, 177—194.
Role of funding sources Carroll, B.J., Feinberg, M., Greden, J.F., Tarika, J., Albala, A.A.,
Haskett, R.F., et al., 1981. A specific laboratory test for diagnosis
of melancholia — standardization, validation, and clinical utility.
Funding for this study was provided by a grant from the Ontario
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 38, 15—22.
Mental Health Foundation (Harkness, Wynne-Edwards). The Catalán, R., Gallart, J.M., Castellanos, J.M., Galard, R., 1998.
OMHF had no further role in study design; in the collection, Plasma corticotropin-releasing factor in depressive disorders.
analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the Biol. Psychiatry 44, 15—20.
report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. Checkley, S., 1996. The neuroendocrinology of depression and chron-
ic stress. Br. Med. Bull. 52, 597—617.
Chopra, K.K., Ravindran, A., Kennedy, S.H., Mackenzie, B., Mat-
Conflicts of interest
thews, S., Anisman, H., et al., 2009. Sex differences in hormonal
responses to a social stressor in chronic major depression. Psy-
Dr. Harkness, Mr. Stewart, and Dr. Wynne-Edwards report no choneuroendocrinology 34, 1235—1241.
biomedical financial interests or potential conflicts of interest. De Bellis, M.D., Chrousos, G.P., Dorn, L.D., Burke, L., Helmers, K.,
Kling, M.A., et al., 1994. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis
Contributions dysregulation in sexually abused girls. J. Clin. Endocr. Metab. 78,
249—255.
Dickerson, S.S., Kemeny, M.E., 2004. Acute stressors and cortisol
Dr. Harkness designed the study, supervised data collection, responses: a theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory
and wrote the manuscript. Mr. Stewart aided in conducting research. Psychol. Bull. 130, 355—391.
Cortisol reactivity to social stress in adolescents: Role of depression severity and child maltreatment 181
Dinan, T.G., Scott, L.V., 2005. Anatomy of melancholia: focus on Kaufman, J., Martin, A., King, R.A., Charney, D., 2001. Are child-,
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis overactivity and the role of adolescent-, and adult-onset depression one and the same disor-
vasopressin. J. Anat. 207, 259—264. der. Biol. Psychiatry 49, 980—1001.
Geracioti, T.D., Loosen, P.T., Orth, D.N., 1997. Low cerebrospinal Kelly, M.M., Tyrka, A.R., Anderson, G.M., Price, L.H., Carpenter, L.L.,
fluid corticotropin-releasing hormone concentrations in eucorti- 2008. Sex differences in emotional and physiological responses to
solemic depression. Biol. Psychiatry 42, 165—174. the Trier Social Stress Test. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 39,
Groschl, M., Rauh, M., Dorr, H.G., 2003. Circadian rhythm of salivary 87—98.
cortisol, 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone and progesterone in Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K.M., Hellhammer, D.H., 1993. The Trier
healthy children. Clin. Chem. 49, 1688—1691. Social Stress Test — a tool for investigating psychobiological stress
Grove, W., Andreasen, N., McDonald-Scott, P., Keller, M., Shapiro, R., responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology 28, 76—81.
1981. Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis. Arch. Gen. Klein, D.N., Dougherty, L.R., Olino, T.M., 2005. Toward guidelines for
Psychiatry 38, 408—413. evidence-based assessment of depression in children and adoles-
Gunnar, M.R., Wewerka, S., Frenn, K., Long, J.D., Griggs, C., 2009. cents. JCCAP 34, 412—432.
Developmental changes in hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal activ- Lopez-Duran, N.L., Kovacs, M., George, C.J., 2009. Hypothalamic-
ity over the transition to adolescence: normative changes and pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation in depressed children and
associations with puberty. Dev. Psychopathol. 21, 69—85. adolescents: a meta-analysis. Psychoneuroendocrinology 34,
Harkness, K.L., Bruce, A.E., Lumley, M.N., 2006. Childhood adversity 1272—1283.
and the sensitization to stressful life events in adolescent de- Luby, J.L., Heffelfinger, A., Mrakotsky, C., Brown, K., Hessler, M.,
pression. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 115, 730—741. Spitznagel, E., 2003. Alterations in stress cortisol reactivity in
Harkness, K.L., Monroe, S.M., 2002. Childhood adversity and the depressed preschoolers relative to psychiatric no-disorder com-
endogenous versus nonendogenous distinction in women with parison groups. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 60, 1248—1255.
major depression. Am. J. Psychiatry 159, 387—393. Luby, J.L., Mrakotsky, C., Heffelfinger, A., Brown, K., Spitznagel, E.,
Heim, C., Newport, D.J., Heit, S., Graham, Y.P., Wilcox, M., Bonsall, 2004. Characteristics of depressed preschoolers with and without
R., et al., 2000. Pituitary-adrenal and autonomic responses to anhedonia: evidence for a melancholic depressive subtype in
stress in women after sexual and physical abuse in childhood. young children. Am. J. Psychiatry 168, 1998—2004.
JAMA 284, 592—597. Modell, S., Lauer, C.J., Schreiber, W., Huber, J., Krieg, J.C., Hols-
Heim, C., Newport, D.J., Bonsall, R., Miller, A.H., Nemeroff, C.B., boer, F., 1998. Hormonal response pattern in the combined DEX-
2001. Altered pituitary-adrenal axis responses to provocative CRH test is stable over time in subjects at high familial risk for
challenge tests in adult survivors of childhood abuse. Am. J. affective disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 18, 253—262.
Psychiatry 158, 575—581. Rao, U., Hammen, C., Ortiz, L.R., Chen, L.A., Poland, R.E., 2008.
Heim, C., Newport, D.J., Wagner, D., Wilcox, M.M., Miller, A.H., Effects of early and recent adverse experiences on adrenal
Nemeroff, C.B., 2002. The role of early adverse experience and response to psychosocial stress in depressed adolescents. Biol.
adulthood stress in the prediction of neuroendocrine stress reac- Psychiatry 64, 521—526.
tivity in women: a multiple regression analysis. Depress. Anxiety Shirtcliff, E.A., Granger, D.A., Schwartz, E.B., Curran, M.J., 2001.
15, 117—125. Use of salivary biomarkers in biobehavioral research: cotton-
Hollingshead, A.B., 1975. Four factor index of social position. Un- based sample collection methods can interfere with salivary
published manuscript, Yale University, New Haven, CT immunoassay results. Psychoneuroendocrinology 26, 165—173.
Holsboer, F., 2000. The corticosteroid receptor hypothesis of depres- Steer, R.A., Beck, A.T., Riskind, J.H., Brown, G., 1987. Relationship
sion. Neuropsychopharmacology 23, 477—501. between the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Psychi-
Holsboer, F., Lauer, C.J., Schreiber, W., Krieg, J.C., 1995. Altered atric Rating Scale for Depression in depressed outpatients. J.
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical regulation in healthy sub- Psychopathol. Behav. 9, 327—339.
jects at high familial risk for affective disorders. Neuroendocri- Tanner, J.M., 1962. Growth and Adolescence, 2nd ed. Thomas,
nology 62, 340—347. Springfield, IL.
Kaufman, J., Birmaher, B., Brent, D.A., Ryan, N.D., Rao, U., 2000. K- Taylor, S.J., Whincup, P.H., Hindmarsh, P.C., Lampe, F., Odoki, K.,
SADS-PL. J. Am. Acad. Child Psychiatry 39, 1208—11208. Cook, D.G., 2001. Performance of a new pubertal self-assessment
Kaufman, J., Birmaher, B., Perel, J., Dahl, R.E., Moreci, P., Nelson, questionnaire: a preliminary study. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol.
B., et al., 1997. The corticotropin-releasing hormone challenge 15, 88—94.
in depressed abused, depressed nonabused, and normal control Tsigos, C., Chrousos, G.P., 2002. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal
children. Biol. Psychiatry 42, 669—679. axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. J. Psychosom. Res. 53,
Kaufman, J., Charney, D., 2003. The neurobiology of child and 865—871.
adolescent depression: current knowledge and future directions. Zimmerman, M., Coryell, W., Pfohl, B.M., 1985. Importance of
In: Cicchetti, D., Walker, E.F. (Eds.), Neurodevelopmental diagnostic thresholds in familial classification: dexamethasone
Mechanisms in Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press, suppression test and familial subtypes of depression. Arch. Gen.
Cambridge, UK, pp. 461—490. Psychiatry 42, 300—304.