Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rs337.00 - BUY
CLSA and CL Securities Taiwan Co., Ltd. (“CLST”) do and seek to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As such,
investors should be aware that there may be conflicts of interest which could affect the objectivity of the report. Investors should consider
this report as only a single factor in making their investment decisions. For important disclosures please refer to page 59.
Zee Entertainment - BUY
We would like to thank Evalueserve for its help in preparing our research reports. Akshay Chandak (Strategy and Oil & Gas), Ayush Gandhi (Strategy), Dhaval
Parekh (Materials), Keshub Bhat (IT), Pratik Jain (Auto) and Zen Javeri (Power, Infra and Capital Goods) provide research support services to CLSA.
What is the Our Rs415 target is based on 18x Dec 23CL PE and factors in a 33% discount for
market missing? risks of delays to the merger with Sony. However, should the deal go through, we
expect its PE to return to pre-pledging crisis/Covid-19 levels of 30x, hence a higher
valuation of Rs690, but the market has not priced that in yet.
Devil’s advocate: After Zee’s promoter share pledging crisis, family ownership is at a low level of
Where could we be wrong? about 4%, and the company is at risk of hostile takeover. Also, the proposed merger
with Sony will need several approvals including 75% of shareholder. If the deal is
put off, we expect its PE to derate to 12x and stock to Rs250.
Valuation history
PE bands PB bands
850 log (Rs) 43.9x 900 log (Rs) 6.9x Zee’s PE derated with the
35.6x 5.4x
promoter share pledging crisis in
2019, followed by a fall in
500 27.2x 510 3.9x business cash conversion and
Covid-19 disruption. The
18.4x pandemic caused unprecedented
2.5x
300 290
7-20% YoY drop in ad revenue
in FY20/21. With ad revenue
entering an upcycle as network
9.5x viewership recovers, the stock is
170 160 1.2x rerating. Also on the potential
merger with Sony, the stock
could trade at the upper end of
100 90 the PE band.
Dec 16 Dec 17 Dec 18 Dec 19 Dec 20 Dec 21 Dec 16 Dec 17 Dec 18 Dec 19 Dec 20 Dec 21
Target-price sensitivity
750 (Rs) Share price Target price Our blue-sky value of Rs690
Blue sky Rainy day assumes the Zee-Sony merger is
690 sealed, and stock valuation is
650 then likely to go back to historical
highs of c.30x PE.
Our base-case target price of
550 Rs415 assumes a 16% ad revenue
Cagr over FY21-24, driving
profits and cash to double by
450 FY24CL. We apply an 18x
415 multiple to Dec 23CL earnings,
factoring in a 33% discount for
350 risks of delays to the Sony
merger deal.
Our rainy-day valuation of Rs250
250 250 assumes the Zee-Sony merger is
set aside, and Zee’s stock
valuation derates to c.12x PE.
150
50
Dec 18 Jun 19 Dec 19 Jun 20 Dec 20 Jun 21 Dec 21 Jun 22 Dec 22
Source: CLSA
Find CLSA research on Bloomberg, Thomson Reuters, FactSet and CapitalIQ - and profit from our evalu@tor proprietary database at clsa.com
India ad spend growth versus nominal GDP growth India TV individual reach
About 90m of India’s
25 (% YoY) (m)
300m households don’t Nominal GDP growth Ad spend growth
920
20 892
own a TV 900
15
880
10
860
5 836
840
0
820
(5)
(10) 800
780
(15) 780
(20) 760
(25) 740
FY00
FY02
FY04
FY06
FY08
FY10
FY12
FY14
FY16
FY18
FY20
FY22CL
FY24CL
720
FY17 FY19 FY21
Source: CLSA, GroupM, Federation of Indian Chambers of Source: Broadcast Audience Research Council India (BARC)
Commerce & Industry (FICCI), Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
20 36 37 37
Independent
platforms
0
FY08 FY20 FY24CL
Sony parent company is in pole position with US$79bn revenues in FY21 and current
Zee-Sony merged co
can benefit from Sony’s
US$154bn market cap. Also, Sony’s entertainment assets include music (ranked among
international presence global top two), TV production (global top five), cable networks (large emerging market
exposure), motion pictures (global top five) and gaming. Zee Sony merged company can
benefit from Sony parent’s international presence and leverage with global players.
Key risks to the big upside of potential Zee-Sony merger include extended
delays and the merger being set aside and this is reflected in our rainy-day
valuation on page 2.
Financials at a glance
Year to 31 March 2020A 2021A 2022CL (% YoY) 2023CL 2024CL
Zee’s advertising revenue India’s No.2 TV network with 21% market share, Zee’s viewership has risen 330bps
growth can surprise on the to close to pre-pandemic levels from lows in May 2020. In FY15-19, Zee delivered
upside against our 16% a 17% Cagr in ad revenues, about 4% higher than the industry growth. With Covid-
FY21-24 Cagr estimate
19 disruption, Zee’s ad revenue saw 7-20% YoY decline in FY20/21. However,
thanks to sharp recovery, its ad growth picked up to 52% in 1HFY22. Also with
Zee’s network strength and viewership performance improving, company
advertising revenue growth can surprise on the upside against our estimate of 16%
Cagr over FY21-24.
Figure 1
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
FY99 FY01 FY03 FY05 FY07 FY09 FY11 FY13 FY15 FY17 FY19 FY21CL
Source: CLSA, GroupM, FICCI, RBI
India’s GDP growth has Prior to the Covid first wave in March 2020, advertising growth has already been
started recovering sluggish due to slowing economy. Ad growth’s beta to nominal GDP fell to 0.8x over
FY11-14 post the Global Financial Crisis, versus 1.2x over the 10-year period of
FY00-09. However, with the government’s initiatives to revive the economy, India’s
GDP growth has started recovering and achieved 23.9% growth in 1HFY22. Thus,
we forecast ad growth beta to nominal GDP to rise to 1.3x over FY22-24CL. Our
economics team forecasts Indian nominal GDP growth to improve sharply from -3%
in FY21 to strong growth of 10-15% by FY24CL.
Figure 2
With GDP growth set to India adspend growth versus nominal GDP growth
revive, increase in adspend 25 (% YoY)
should also accelerate Nominal GDP growth Ad spend growth
20
15
10
5
0
(5)
(10)
(15)
(20)
(25)
FY00
FY01
FY02
FY03
FY04
FY05
FY06
FY07
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22CL
FY23CL
FY24CL
Source: CLSA, GroupM, FICCI, RBI
Figure 3
FY08
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21CL
FY22CL
FY23CL
FY24CL
Figure 4 Figure 5
205 880
190 820
183
185 800
780
180 780
175 760
170 740
165 720
FY17 FY19 FY21 FY17 FY19 FY21
Source: BARC Source: BARC
The risk of TV losing share In India rising digital adspend has come largely at the cost of print media, which has
to digital advertising is lost a 23% market share since FY08, with digital rising by 26% and TV largely stable
limited in India at 37%. With print still running 28% in terms of market share, we believe TV runs
limited risk of losing share to digital advertising. Note that TV still benefits from rising
penetration, as about 90m of India’s 300m households still do not own a TV. Over
21-24CL, we expect TV advertising revenue to grow at 15% Cagr to US$4.3bn
driven by its unparalleled reach of nearly 892m viewers and as a result, TV’s share
to total ad-spend in India is likely remain steady at 37% over CY21-24.
Figure 6 Figure 7
TV 199
600 60 51
500 28
18
400 160
40
198
300
196
200 4 20 36 37 37
321
100 262
100
71
0 0
FY08 FY20 FY24CL FY08 FY20 FY24CL
Source: FICCI, CLSA Source: FICCI, CLSA
Figure 8 Figure 9
Digital advertising spending by segment Online video’s share of overall digital ad revenue
140 (Rsbn) Online video ad revenue (% digital ad spends) 40
Share in digital ad spends (RHS)
Other
4% 118
120 35
30
Search 100
23% 88
Online Video 25
22%
80
63 20
60
45 15
Display 40 36
Social 24% 10
24
27%
17
20 5
0 0
FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: Dentsu Aegis Network Source: Magna Global, FICCI, CLSA
Figure 10
0
Apr 20
Sep 20
Dec 20
Apr 21
Sep 21
Aug 20
Aug 21
Jul 20
Oct 20
Nov 20
Jul 21
Feb 20
Mar 20
Feb 21
Mar 21
May 20
May 21
Jan 20
Jun 20
Jan 21
Jun 21
Figure 11
Sep 20
Dec 20
Apr 21
Sep 21
Aug 20
Aug 21
Jul 20
Oct 20
Nov 20
Jul 21
Feb 20
Mar 20
Feb 21
Mar 21
Jan 20
May 20
Jan 21
May 21
Jun 20
Jun 21
Source: BARC India, CLSA
Figure 12
50
10
40
0
30
(10)
20
10 (20)
0 (30)
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: Company, CLSA
Ad revenue growth can With Zee’s network viewership performance improving, company ad growth can
surprise on the upside surprise on the upside against our 16% FY21-24 Cagr. We estimate that a 3-5%
higher growth in advertising revenues lifts Zee’s FY24CL EPS by 5-9%.
Figure 13
ZEE5 has seen MAU rise Meanwhile, digital ramp-up increasingly sees media buyers choosing traditional TV
70% YoY to 93m in 1HFY22 and OTT platforms. Thanks to its content edge, Zee is set for success in digital with
its own ZEE5 seeing monthly active users (MAU) increase 70%YoY to 93m in
1HFY22, ranking among the top five OTT platforms. ZEE5’s content is unmatched
by competitors, with 3,500 largely-exclusive movies, 100 movie digital premieres
and more than 90 original shows. ZEE5 is also seeing strong response to new pricing
of Rs499/year, which is competitive versus other OTT operators. If ZEE5 surprises
on the upside and OTT loss drops by 10%, it will lift Zee’s FY24CL EPS by c.1%.
Figure 14 Figure 15
100 5
0
FY22CL
FY23CL
FY24CL
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
0
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 1QFY22
Source: Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), CLSA Source: Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), CLSA
Figure 16 Figure 17
Print media readership by language Daily Hindi and English newspapers circulation (CY09-19)
24 (m copies)
Hindi circulation English circulation
18.6
19
13.4
14
Regional Hindi 11.2
10.5
languages 44%
49% 9
English (1)
7% 2009 2019
Source: IRS 1Q 2019, CLSA Source: Audit Bureau of Circulation
Figure 18
FY09
FY10
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21CL
FY22CL
FY23CL
FY24CL
Digital viewership is This is in line with the market like Japan and Indonesia where TV ad-spend have
primarily on mobile devices seen limited impact of digital. In India more so we expect digital/OTT to continue
to have limited impact on TV given that digital viewership will remain primarily on
the mobile devices which has not only added to total video viewership in India but
also limit the scope of cord cutting among Indian households.
Figure 19
40
52 54 51
44
20 40 41 39
33 33 33
25 23
0
2012 2017 2020 2012 2017 2020 2012 2017 2020 2012 2017 2020
US Japan Korea Indonesia
Source: Magna Global, CLSA
Figure 20
Broadcaster led
OTT platforms
Independent
platforms
Source: CLSA
Netflix’s subscription is While Netflix’s subscription pricing at Rs199/month is at the top end of the
priced at the top end of the subscription spectrum, Amazon Prime Video comes bundled with Amazon Prime
subscription spectrum membership of Rs999/year, which also offers preferential access to discounts,
terms of delivery on Amazon’s retail website as well as access to Amazon Music, its
music streaming platform.
Figure 21 Figure 22
OTT app interfaces are Netflix app interface Amazon Prime Video interface
highly user-friendly
Telco-led platforms do not Besides international OTT’s there are telco-led platforms which are yet to build own
have content creation content expertise, although they are playing a crucial role in content aggregation.
expertise yet Currently telco-led platforms, such as JioTV, Airtel Xstream and Vodafone Movies &
TV, are aggregating live and catch-up TV content, movies, as well as aggregating
content from OTT platforms. Telco’s main aim is to ensure that mobile subscriber
churn remains low hence and given the high competition in the sector, it is unlikely
these platforms will have a focused content subscription model at least by FY24CL.
Figure 23 Figure 24
Telco-led platforms are Vodafone Play app interface Airtel Xstream app interface
aggregating live TV content,
movies and content from
OTT platforms
Figure 25
Source: CLSA
Disney+ Hotstar is the Among broadcaster-led platforms, Star India’s Disney+ Hotstar is the leading OTT
leading OTT platform in platform with reportedly over 45m subscribers, largely due to sports content and
India its vast content library. It has kept its premium sports content (live cricket, premier
league), English-language shows (HBO, Fox, Disney and Showtime content) behind
paywall. ZEE5, too is among the top five OTT’s and aims to leverage its local
language content edge, extensive movie library and new movies premier’s, original
series created in local languages to grow in digital.
Figure 26
ZEE5 7%
Disney+ Hotstar
26%
Netflix
9%
MX Player
Amazon Prime 34%
11%
Figure 27
Star India’s Hotstar is the Mobile app interface of broadcasters’ OTT Platforms
leading OTT platform in
India
Source: CLSA
Figure 28
Distribution
Own platform
Content
production/ Viewer
aggregation
Distribution
3rd party
platform
Source: CLSA
Individuals are unlikely to Given the plethora of OTT platforms available, subscribers are likely to have
subscriber to more than multiple OTT subscriptions. However, individuals are unlikely to subscribe to more
three to four OTT services than three to four services primarily because it becomes difficult to manage
multiple subscriptions beyond a certain limit. Similar trends are seen in the USA
where less than 10% of households have subscribed to more than five OTT services.
Figure 29 Figure 30
80
33
25
54
70
60 20
50
15
31 12
40
20 9
10
30
6
5 5
20 14 5
27
10
12
0
0 >25% 10-20% 5-10% 2-5% 1-2% 0-1%
Total households TV owning households % of OTT streaming households in the USA
Source: BARC India, CLSA Source: ComScore, CLSA
OTT video subscription While the viewership of an individual subscriber is likely to be concentrated among
market having different two/three/four platforms, we see the digital video subscription market having
winners across different different winners across different customer segments. The top 60-70m urban elite
customer segments
audience that demands English-language content and sports will largely be
captured by Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Disney+ Hotstar. The next 100m
mass-premium audience that may want to watch some English-language content
but is primarily looking to see high quality local language content, will opt for
broadcaster-led platforms like ZEE5, SonyLiv and Voot. Given smartphone reach of
668m - about 50% of the population by FY24CL - digital reach will also extend to
NCCS-B and C audiences. These will largely be TV audiences that will also watch
local and regional language content available on OTT platforms.
Figure 31
SVOD scope
Source: CLSA
Figure 32
Expect OTT video OTT video subscription market size and number of OTT subscriptions
subscription market size to 140 (Rsbn) OTT subscription revenues (m) 120
rise to US$1.6bn by FY24 OTT subscriptions (RHS)
120 100
100
80
80
60
60 121,887
103,702
40
40 80,306
55,806
20 40,665 20
11,996 15,784
0 0
FY18CL FY19CL FY20CL FY21CL FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: CLSA
Some 60% of our survey In fact, to assess OTT impact on television in India we did a pilot survey and targeted
respondents saw an 1,000 respondents (Details on page 20). Of our respondents, 55% increased mobile
increase in television spend post Covid 19 and OTT was the dominant usage for 40% followed by social
viewership media and gaming. We noted that 71% of the respondents had paid OTT subscription,
yet 60% have seen TV viewership increase post pandemic.
Only 8% of India’s 300m Besides having the infrastructure in place, TV bundles in US at US$80-90/month
households have broadband are much more expensive than opting for a streaming service which along with
connection broadband connection would cost US$20-30 less. This price arbitrage is the key
reason for nearly 1/3rd of OTT streaming households cutting their Pay TV
connections in the US. As against US, currently, only 8% of India’s 300m households
have wireline broadband and even at current data prices, streaming digital content
is still 45% more expensive than comparable TV subscription bundle average
revenue per unit (Arpu).
Figure 33 Figure 34
OTT streaming cost versus TV cost in the USA OTT streaming cost versus TV cost in India
90 (US$/month) 600 (Rs/month)
Broadband cost Subscription cost Broadband cost Subscription cost
80
500
70
60 400
283
50 15
300
40 80
30 200
343
20 40
100 213
10
0 0
TV subscription OTT streaming TV subscription OTT streaming
Source: CLSA Note: Broadband cost is 1.5GB/ day pack Rs199 for 28 days, OTT subscription cost
is avg monthly cost for ZEE5, SonyLIV, Disney Hotstar+ and Voot., TV subscription
includes base packs of Sony, Zee, Star & Viacom + capacity charge. Source: CLSA
Wireline broadband market We believe that the wireline broadband market by FY24CL will largely be limited to
will largely be limited to the the top-40 cities in India which have ~30m households. Assuming that 80% of these
top-40 cities in India households have a wireline broadband connection with another 80% having means
to stream digital video content, the potential market of OTT on large screens will
be limited to 19m households (9% of TV households in FY24CL). Assuming that
33% of these households (6.3m) cut the cord with an Arpu of Rs500 (2x of industry
Arpu), then the maximum potential impact of cord cutting will be Rs38bn i.e. about
7% of estimated TV subscription revenues in FY24.
Figure 35
Figure 36
200
140
100 120
0 100
FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21CL FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: KPMG, CLSA
Bharti Airtel data usage per subscriber How has your monthly spending on mobile data changed since the
Covid outbreak?
25 (GB/month)
19.5
20 16.9
18.8 Lower 10
16.2 16.4 16.7
14.1 15.0
13.2
15 11.1 11.9
10.5
9.2
10 Same as last year 35
5
0 Increased 55
2QFY19
3QFY19
4QFY19
1QFY20
2QFY20
3QFY20
4QFY20
1QFY21
2QFY21
3QFY21
4QFY21
1QFY22
2QFY22
(%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Source: Company, CLSA Source: CLSA
What is your top mobile data usage since the Covid outbreak? How has your TV viewership changed since the Covid outbreak?
Payments, Remained
14 17
shopping etc. the same
Gaming 17 Decreased 16
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Source: CLSA Source: CLSA
Have you subscribed to any paid mobile video streaming? Would you watch movies in multiplexes?
No 21 No 27
Yes 71 Yes 59
(%) (%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Source: CLSA Source: CLSA
Top broadcasters have The key change in broadcasting and distribution tariffs of NTO 2 is reduced cap on
complied with part of NTO maximum retail price (MRP) of individual pay channels which are part of any
2.0 regulations bouquet to Rs12per month from Rs19. Only channels with an MRP of Rs12 or less
are permitted to be in a bouquet and also the sum of MRP of all channels in a
bouquet cannot exceed 1.5x price of bouquet. The Bombay High Court in end June
had upheld the constitutional validity of NTO 2 but had struck down the second
provision of twin conditions as arbitrary. As per same a la carte MRP of each channel
forming part of bouquet shall not exceed three times the average rate of a pay
channel of the bouquet of which such pay channel is a part. Top distributors, under
NTO 2 have already lowered network capacity fee (NCF) to Rs130-160 (excluding
taxes) and charges for multi TV homes to ~ 40% of declared NCF.
Figure 37
Figure 38
New tariff regime has Comparison of current subscriber out-go versus pre-NTO
increased cost of TV (Rs/month)
350
subscriptions
300
Subscribers have to pay
15-20% more to get
masic package of top 250
four broadcasters 130
200
150 291
241
100
161
50
0
Average Content cost Capacity charge Subscriber outgo in new Pre-NTO
regime
Note: All costs are ex-GST and SD channel feeds. Capacity charge is of Tata Sky. Source: Companies, CLSA
Ahead of final verdict on NTO had been implemented after much chaos and prolonged litigation, with
NTO 2.0, top broadcasters migration driven by TRAI directing distributors to move undecided subscribers to
have released new pricing ‘best fit plan’ and broadcasters offering 30-50% discounts on bouquets. On
effective 1 December 21
implementation NTO‘s rise in content and distribution cost had made all-in-one
bouquets expensive, thus subscribers are still opting for bouquets, albeit with
limited pay channel choices which still boosted subscription revenues for top
broadcasters. TRAI’s NTO 2 was likely triggered by over 20% increase in cost of pay
TV subscriptions and that even now ~85% of subscribers continue to opt for
“bouquets” and amongst distributors DTH gained versus cable with competitive
bouquets. Now ahead of final verdict on NTO 2 top broadcasters have released new
pricing to meet the 1 December 21 deadline by TRAI although the implementation
of same has been delayed to April 22.
Figure 39
NTO 2.0 will see an Bouquet discounts offered by broadcasters pre and post NTO 2 pricing
increase in cost for
subscribers 250 (Rs/month) Sum of Price of individual channels in bouquet
Current Price of bouquet
Similar Bouquet in NTO 2.0 (incl individual channels)
214
210
198
200
177
157
150
135
110
100
100
85 85
72
50
50
0
Zee All in one pack Hindi Star Hindi HD Colors Wala Hindi Happy India All Platinum
HD Premium Family Plus HD HD
MRP of popular channels A chart in Figure 39 of broadcaster’s new NTO 2 pricing versus current shows that
has been kept higher than maximum retail price (MRP) of popular channels has been kept higher than the old
the cap and hence will not cap of Rs 19. Zee has kept MRP of its top channels like Zee TV, Zee Telugu, and Zee
be part of the bouquet
Kannada at Rs22 each while Zee Marathi and Zee Bangla have an MRP of Rs 25 and
accordingly, these channels will not be available in bouquets. Zee has also created
26 SD and HD bouquets namely Zee Family Pack SD/HD and Zee Prime Pack
SD/HD across English, Hindi, Marathi, Bangla, Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and
Malayalam,Hence even if NTO 2 is implemented, subscriptions will still grow for top
broadcasters like Zee with strong channels although realignment of bouquets will
hit tail channels and there could be delays and disruptions during implementation.
Figure 40
Source: Company
ZEE5 follows freemium Also ZEE5 is seeing an encouraging response post pricing change to Rs499/year
model with premium which is compelling versus competing OTT’s. ZEE5 follows freemium model with
content accessible behind a premium content accessible behind a paywall at a price of ~Rs42/monthly. Premium
paywall
content will remain pay but ZEE5 is also monetising rising digital viewership with
ad revenues. However given content investments on ZEE5, margins/profitability
will strongly depend on how Zee monetises the OTT. ZEE5 has also been expanding
its presence outside India over the past year, and it has recently launched services
in the US, one of the largest market for South Asian population outside India.
Figure 41
Figure 42 Figure 43
Over the next few years, With India’s TV penetration still low at ~70%, ZEE5’s digital ramp-up is parallel with
ZEE5 will start contributing TV and in medium term is unlikely to affect the core broadcasting business. Zee’s
materially to revenues distribution of content through ZEE5 is not only providing broadcaster with an
addition revenue stream to monetise content, it will also over time reduce Zee’s
reliance on distributors particularly cable operators, which could help them gain a
higher share of TV subscription revenue. Over the next couple of years, ZEE5 will
start contributing materially to broadcasters’ revenues. Given ZEE5 ramp-up and
that the MAU have increased 70%YoY to 93m and that digital video market
(advertising + subscription) could potentially grow to US$3.2bn by FY24CL our
ZEE5 revenue forecasts of Rs9.7bn/ US$130m may well be conservative. We
forecast Zee (TV and ZEE5) subscription revenues to grow from Rs32bn to Rs37bn
by FY24CL. If ZEE5 performance surprises on the upside against our 32% Cagr in
revenues to Rs9.7bn by FY24CL it will boost Zee growth and profitability. If ZEE5
Ebitda loss is lower by 10% it will lift Zee’s FY24CL EPS by over 1%.
Figure 44
Rs37bn by FY24CL 29
30
25 23 23
20
20
15
10
0
FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: Company, CLSA
Figure 45
Zee-Sony merged entity can Sony’s parent company is in pole position with US$79bn revenues in FY21 and US$154bn
benefit from Sony’s current market capitalisation. Sony parent’s entertainment assets include music (ranked
international presence among global top two), TV production (global top five), cable networks with large emerging
market exposure, motion pictures (global top five) and one of the largest game platforms.
The Zee-Sony merged co can benefit from Sony’s international presence and have higher
chance to partner with global players. Zee’s proposed merger with Sony will require several
approvals from regulatory bodies and from 75% of Zee’s voting shareholders. Zee is
currently in litigation with an 18% minority shareholder which poses risks to the merger.
Also, final deal terms will need clarification on the non-compete clause, as well as a
pathway for the promoters to raise stake from 4% to 20% in the merged co.
On existing equity value Zee Entertainment and Sony India proposed merger terms
basis, indicative merger US$m
ratio would have been Market cap of Zee on merger announcement date 3,319
61.25% for Zee Without cash infusion Zee's indicative merger ratio (%) 61.25
Implied equity value of Sony India 2,100
With Sony’s infusion of Cash infusion by Sony India 1,575
US$1.6bn, the merger ratio Implied value of Sony India post-cash infusion 3,675
is likely to be 47.07% of the Equity value of Zee 3,319
merged co to be held by Zee Value of combined entity 6,994
shareholders and balance Sony India shareholding in the combined entity (%) 53
52.93% by Sony Zee shareholding in the combined entity (%) 47
Note: Zee equity value as of 21 September 2021. Source: CLSA
Figure 47
Zee’s has 58-54% share of Comparison of key financials of Zee and Sony India (FY20)
revenues and profit in the FY20 (Rsm) Zee Sony India Zee + Sony India Zee share (%)
merged co Revenues 81,299 59,076 140,375 58
Ebitda 16,345¹ 13,714 30,060 54
PAT (Normalised) 10,705 8,955 19,660 54
¹ FY20 Ebitda is after deducting Rs6bn of exceptional costs. Source: Zee, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, CLSA
Figure 48 Figure 49
Zee and Sony India revenues Zee and Sony India Ebitda
90 (Rsbn) 30 (Rsbn)
Zee Sony 79
81 Zee Sony
26
80
67
25
70 64 65 63 21
58 59 19
60 20
50 16
50 15
14
40 15
40
30 10 8 8
7
6
20
5
10
0 0
FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20
Source: Zee, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, CLSA Source: Zee, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, CLSA
Sony will appoint majority Post-merger, Sony will appoint majority directors on the board while Zee’s Punit
directors on the board while Goenka will remain the merged co’s managing director and CEO for five years. Also,
Zee’s Punit Goenka will with Zee promoters agreeing not to compete with the merged co on terms to be agreed
continue as MD/CEO for by both parties, Sony India’s parent will transfer 2% of its own stake in the merged co
five years to the promoters, keeping 51%, so that Subash Chandra will continue to own about 4%
of the merged co. Sony will not only allow Zee’s promoters to maintain their holding in
the merged entity at 4%, but will also allow Zee’s promoters to increase holding from
4% to up to 20%, subject to the laws. Zee’s board has provided in-principle approval
for the merger, subject to due diligence, which is ongoing, agreement execution and
requisite approvals, including that from shareholders.
Zee-Sony merged company On merger with leading channels combined taking up top spots across the biggest
will have 33% market share genres the network position will get stronger Zee Sony merged company will have 33%
ahead of current leader Star market share (Zee 21%, Sony 12%) in the India TV viewership ahead of current leader
Star 29%. Even in financial terms as detailed in Figure 53, the merger will not only be
near Rs140bn (US$2bn) in revenues, comparable to sector leader but will also be highly
profitable with over Rs30bn (US$400m) in Ebitda and Rs20bn (US$266m) in profits pre
any synergies versus sector leader Star which is incurring losses.
Figure 52
35 33
29 29
30
25 24
21
19
20
15
15 13 13 12 12
12
10
0
Star Zee TV18 Ent Sony
Source: BARC, CLSA
Figure 53
Zee-Sony merged co will Comparison of key financials of proposed merged co (Zee + Sony India) with Star TV
have close to Rs140bn FY20 (Rsm) Zee + Sony India STAR
(US$2bn) in revenues Revenues 140,375 143,375
Ebitda 30,060 (4,154)
PAT (Normalised) 19,660 (4,889)
Source: Zee, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, CLSA
Figure 54
In Hindi GEC, Zee-Sony Zee and Sony’s flagship entertainment channels, Zee TV, and Sony have done well
combined will have 60%. in the core Hindi GEC segment as detailed in Figure 57 and combined will have 60%
higher viewership share higher viewership share versus sector leader Star. Zee and Sony have also been able
versus Star
to capture a similar strong market share in movies genre as detailed in Figure 58
and combined will control over 50% viewership which will be over 2.5x of Star.
Zee is large in regional- Besides as detailed in Figure 55 Zee in particular is large in regional-language GEC
language GEC offerings with nine channels versus two for Sony. Hence combined Zee-Sony
dominance in entertainment and movies channels will make the merged co even
more compelling to advertisers and will help support Zee-Sony merged advertising
and subscription revenues.
Figure 55 Figure 56
11
10 6
9
9 9 8
3 3
3
2
5 3
5 5 5 5
0 0
Jun 21 Jul 21 Aug 21 Sep 21 Jun 21 Jul 21 Aug 21 Sep 21
Source: BARC, CLSA Source: BARC, CLSA
Figure 57 Figure 58
Hindi GEC viewership share (September 2021) Hindi Movies viewership share (September 2021)
Others
8%
Zee
17%
Others Zee
TV18 35%
27%
19%
TV18
Star
0%
Sony 28% Sony
28% 18% Star
20%
Sony has a wide bouquet of Sony currently holds rights for cricket matches that are played in four cricketing
sports rights nations besides domestic T-20 tournaments in three counties. Apart from these Sony
also has a wide bouquet of sports rights, including, soccer leagues (including UEFA
Champions League & UEFA Europa League), tennis (Australian Open & Laver Cup) and
World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE). Among these, WWE is quite popular among
younger demographics and boosts stickiness for Sony’s sports channels.
Figure 59
60
50
40
27
30 26 25
20
10
2 1
0
0
Star Sony DD Sports/ Eurosport
Note: Sony telecasted the England versus India series in Jul/Aug-21. Star telecasted the Indian Premier League (IPL) in
Sep-21. Source: BARC, CLSA
Sports content will India’s rising digitisation on TV with channel wise subscription revenues and OTT
increasingly be structurally ramp-ups will mean that sports content will increasingly be structurally better
better monetised monetised. In OTT Zee with own platform ZEE5 is one of the largest with 93m
MAUs, while Sony has been growing SonyLiv. Hence sports channels as part of
overall network salience and digital strategy would actually be a long-term positive.
Besides that Zee Sony merged will start with zero debt and over US$1.8bn cash
could increase participation in sports content, ie, may bid for the India domestic
cricket rights, including the Indian Premier League (IPL).
Figure 60
Figure 61 Figure 62
Music
Publishing Games Recorded Games
4% Recorded Games (network Music (network
Games
Music (others) services) 17% services)
(others)
12% 4% 9% 16%
1%
Source: CLSA Source: CLSA
Figure 63
6,000
4,000
1,642 1,751
2,000 1,262 1,363 1,488
0
FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: Company, CLSA
Zee-Sony will have Sony has an independent status as a producer of scale with almost no digital
momentum for content IP distribution exposure in pictures and music and large international presence, makes
creation and monetisation it a compelling partner for global established players and new entrants looking to
of old and new IPs get access for premium exclusive content and hence present a huge opportunity for
Sony group to monetise its extensive premium IP. This leads to increase momentum
for content IP creation and monetisation of old and new IP. This will be an
opportunity for Zee Sony merged co to leverage besides benefiting from Sony’s own
differentiated technology assets including imaging, sound, communications and
AR/VR to also support top creators.
Figure 64
High content exposure for Breakdown of content and distribution for major studios (2019)
Sony in pictures (%) Distribution Content Others
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Disney NBCUniversal ViacomCBS Warner Bros. Sony
Note: the major studios also ‘develop content’ for their own linear cable networks and DTC channels (and partly for
others) which is included in the distribution revenues given lack of available details. Source: Companies, CLSA
About 60% of SPT’s 127 SPT has a sizable presence in overseas market, with about 60% of its 127 shows
shows are international being international properties and it operates 24 wholly-owned or joint venture
properties production companies in 12 countries, along with linear and digital channels
around the world and three are US-based. Zee Sony merged co can benefit from
Sony’s large international presence leveraging to partner with global players for
their own content.
Figure 65
Asia Pacafic
ex India
10%
na
25%
India
Europe 45%
10%
Latin America
10%
Source: CLSA
Company cashflow
Operating profit and cashflow
Op profit Op cashflow While Zee has strong positive operating cashflow, its
30,000 (Rsm) cash conversion dipped in FY19-20, driven by expansion
of working capital in each of the two years, as Zee
25,000 continued to invest in content and OTT platform ZEE5,
despite advertising revenue fall with Covid-19 disruption.
However, FY21 operating cashflow of Rs15.5bn was at
20,000
86% of Ebitda, and free cashflow was Rs13.4bn as
working capital expansion peaked. We expect
15,000 investment in content to continue in FY22, and project
the firm’s cash conversion ratio to be between 41-56%
10,000 over FY22-24CL.
5,000
0
2019A 2020A 2021A 22CL 23CL 24CL
5,000
(5,000)
2019A 2020A 2021A 22CL 23CL 24CL
15
10
0
2019A 2020A 2021A 22CL 23CL 24CL
20
10
(10)
(20)
(30)
(40)
Discipline Transparency Independence Responsibility Fairness E&S Wtd ESG score
Criteria Score (%) Country avg (%) Country rank Sector avg (%) Sector rank
Discipline 83 62 3 56 7
Transparency 95 86 35 70 7
Independence 50 47 59 44 16
Responsibility 47 62 64 79 17
Fairness 55 92 157 69 27
E&S 71 69 70 65 7
Wtd ESG score 66 70 101/177 64 21/37
Zee-Sony merged entity will Zee Sony merged company will have 33% market share (Zee 21%, Sony 12%) in the
have US$2bn in annual India TV viewership ahead of current leader Star (29%). The new entity will have
revenue and US$0.4bn ~US$2bn in annual revenue and US$0.4bn Ebitda (Sony existing sales of US$0.8bn
Ebitda
and Ebitda of US$0.19bn). Zee apart from being No 2 network is particularly strong
presence in regional TV market (nine channels versus only two for Sony) and in
digital, Zee’s OTT ZEE5 is one of largest with 93m MAUs.
Figure 66
Sony’s statement on merger Sony Group Corporation statement on merger with Zee
with Zee
Sony Pictures Networks India announces Signing of Exclusive Non-Binding Term Sheet
with respect to a Merger of Sony Pictures Networks India and Zee Entertainment
Enterprises Ltd
September 22, 2021, - Sony Pictures Networks India (“SPNI”), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of Sony Group Corporation, announced today that it has signed an exclusive, non-binding
Term Sheet with respect to a proposed merger of SPNI and Zee Entertainment Enterprises
Ltd., a publicly listed Indian media and content company.
Sony Pictures Networks India (SPNI) and Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. (ZEEL) today
announced that they have entered into an exclusive, non-binding Term Sheet to combine
both companies’ linear networks, digital assets, production operations and program
libraries. The non-binding Term Sheet provides an exclusive negotiation period of 90 days
during which ZEEL and SPNI will conduct mutual diligence and negotiate definitive, binding
agreements. The combined company would be a publicly listed company in India and be
better positioned to lead the consumer transition from traditional pay TV into the digital
future.
The merger of ZEEL and SPNI would bring together two leading Indian media network
businesses, benefitting consumers throughout India across content genres, from film to
sports. The combined company is expected to benefit all stakeholders given strong
synergies between ZEEL and SPNI.
Under the terms of the non-binding Term Sheet, Sony Pictures Entertainment, the parent
company of SPNI, would invest growth capital so that SPNI has a cash balance of
approximately USD $1.575 billion at closing for use to enhance the combined company’s
digital platforms across technology and content, ability to bid for broadcasting rights in the
fast-growing sports landscape and pursue other growth opportunities. Sony Pictures
Entertainment would hold a majority stake in the combined company. Current ZEEL
Managing Director & CEO Punit Goenka is to lead the combined company. The combined
company’s board of directors would include directors nominated by Sony Group and result
in Sony Group having the right to nominate the majority of the board members.
Figure 67 Figure 68
Global recording music - market share (2018) Global music publishing - market share (2018)
Sony
Universal 26%
Independent
30%
labels Independents
33% 42%
Universal
BMG Sony 20%
Warner
0% 21%
EMI 16% Warner
0% BMG 12%
0% EMI
0%
Source: CLSA, companies, Music & Copyright Source: CLSA, companies, Music & Copyright
Figure 69 Figure 70
Pictures
Pictures 16%
26%
Game & Game &
Network Network
Services Music Services
Music 52% 31% 53%
22%
NOW service, which already has over 1m subscribers. In mobile games, Sony
presence is limited but has seen tremendous success with one key title, Fate/Grand
Order (FGO) - the mobile game released by Sony Music’s subsidiary Aniplex which
has remained in top 10 since the launch in 2015. The franchise which has massive
following in Asia was still the highest grossing mobile game of 2019 globally.
Figure 71
Fate/Grand Order was the Global mobile app rankings: consumer spend (2019)
highest-grossing mobile Game Developer
game of 2019 globally Fate/Frand Order Sony
Honour of Kings Tencent
Candy Crush Saga Activision Blizzard
Monster Strike Mixi
Pokemon Go Niantic
Lineage M Ncsoft
Fantasy Westward Journey NetEase
Clash of Clans Supercell
PUBG Mobile Tencent
Dragon Ball Z Dokkan battle Bandai Namco
Source: CLSA, App Annie
Sony dominates in the Unlike pictures and music, Sony is actively involved in content distribution in games,
console game ecosystem along with content creation. While the independent status in music and pictures
and network platform puts Sony at an advantage, it is its platform ownership (distribution network) that
globally with over 100m helps in the games market. Unlike relatively low entry barriers for video and music
MAU’s platforms, the core gaming platforms have fairly high level of barriers and displacing
the incumbents is very difficult and Sony dominates in the console game ecosystem
and network platform globally with over 100m MAUs.
This is due to high switching costs for core gamers, gamers brand loyalty and
existing online community of friends for socialisation and collaboration, platform
maker’s huge investments and long experience to cultivate players’ loyalty and
platform makers’ solid relationships with third party developers, who already have
high marginal profitability (over 80%). That said, the technology will gradually
enable the shift to cloud game streaming in long-term.
India gaming is an attractive Interestingly, in India gaming is an attractive new growth opportunity given the
new growth opportunity ideal demographics and interactive experience and socialising platform ideal for
monetisation and marketing. Gaming in India is akin to OTT opportunity which Zee
and Sony are already capitalising on.
Figure 72 Figure 73
Population mix: India, China and the USA Gaming revenue in India by device type
100 (%) 4.0 (US$bn)
PC Console Mobile
3.5
90 3.5
35
80
49 3.0 2.7
70 64
60 2.5
Others 2.0
50 30 Millennials 2.0 3.1
1.5
40 Gen Z
25 1.5 1.2
2.3
30 0.9 1.7
25 1.0 0.7 1.2
20 35
0.5 0.8
0.6
10
26 0.5 0.3 0.4
11 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3
0.2
0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
India China USA CY16 CY17 CY18 CY19 CY20 CY21E CY22E CY23E
Source: Frost & Sullivan, Nazara Tech DRHP Source: Euromonitor, Nazara Tech DRHP
Figure 74
Merged co will be zero debt Also in Figure 75, we show key balance sheet comparisons of Zee Sony show Zee’s
and start with cash of FY20 working capital had increased by 66 days to 258 days of revenues led by 39%
US$1.8bn rise in content inventories following the acquisition of movie rights, launch of new
channels and ZEE5 ramp-up. However Sony working capital was lower at 139 days.
While comparison of debt and cash of Zee and Sony show both were net cash. Zee
had net cash of Rs9.9bn and Sony had 7.8bn of net cash. On likely Zee Sony merger
and Sony’s US$1.6bn cash infusion merged co will be zero debt and start with cash
of ~US$1.8bn which will be a boost for huge opportunity to invest in linear, online,
movies and sports businesses.
Figure 75
Both Zee and Sony are in Zee and Sony India key balance sheet comparison
net cash position FY20 (Rsm) Zee Sony
Gross Debt 526 0
Cash 10,396 7,754
Net debt (9,870) (7,754)
Net working capital 57,518 22,480
NWC days of sales 258 139
Source: Companies, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, CLSA
While likely there will not be significant deviation from current proposed merger
terms the deal includes in the merger Sony parent will allocate 2% equity from its
53% ownership in merged co to Zee founding family in lieu of a non-compete
clause. Also Zee Sony merger terms may provide a pathway for the Zee promoters
to raise stake from 4% to up to 20% subject to various regulatory requirements. The
final merger deal terms will need clarity on the non-compete as well the pathway
for promoters to raise stake.
Figure 76
13th Sep 2021 Zee informs that large minority shareholder has requisitioned for an EGM asking for resignation of directors and inclusion
of six additional directors besides removal of CEO & MD Mr Punit Goenka from the board.
13th Sep 2021 Two independent directors resign from the board of Zee.
22 nd Sep 2021 Zee board provided an in-principle approval for merger between Sony India and Zee. Zee announces a non-binding Term Sheet
which provides an exclusive negotiation period of 90 days for the proposed merger.
29th Sep 2021 Large minority shareholder approaches NCLT against Zee for failing to announce a date for the EGM.
30 Sep 2021
th
NCLT begins hearing the case on request of the large minority shareholder.
1 st Oct 2021 Zee board inform the large minority shareholder that it cannot hold the EGM due to multiple legal Infirmities with respect
to the requisition notice.
2 nd Oct 2021 Zee moves Bombay High Court against large minority shareholder’s demand for EGM.
7 th Oct 2021 Zee appeals in NCLAT and asks for stay on all proceedings. NCLAT orders that Zee should be given reasonable time to
reply to large minority shareholder's plea to hold the EGM, NCLT gives Zee two weeks to reply to the plea.
11th Oct 2021 Large minority shareholder writes an open letter to Zee shareholders.
12/13 th Oct 2021 Zee board discloses a letter by CEO & MD Mr Punit Goenka highlighting various events which transpired between
representatives of the large minority shareholder and him including another proposed deal. Large minority shareholder
releases a statement rejecting claims made by Mr Punit Goenka relating to events. Indian group discloses large
shareholder assisted in holding discussion with Mr Punit Goenka on a proposed transaction in which MD & CEO was to
continue but deal did not proceed further.
26th Oct 2021 Bombay High Court order grants an injunction to Zee against the large minority shareholder's call for EGM.
29th Oct 2021 Large minority shareholder appeals the Bombay High Court decision and division bench at Bombay High Court adjourns
the hearing which is currently ongoing.
Source: CLSA
Proposed merger with Sony Zee’s proposed merger with Sony will require several approvals including regulatory
will require several and that of 75% of Zee’s voting shareholders. Meanwhile, Zee is in litigation with a
approvals; also of 75% of large minority shareholder which poses some risks to the merger. Also, although it
Zee’s voting shareholders is likely there will not be significant deviation from the proposed merger terms, the
parties still need to finalise the non-compete clause and the pathway for Zee’s
promoters to raise stake from 4% to 20%. If the merger is put off, our valuation
would fall to Rs250 as in the rainy-day scenario.
Figure 77
Revenue breakdown
(Rsm) FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL FY21-24 Cagr (%)
Advertising 50,367 46,811 37,488 46,743 52,132 57,922 16
(% YoY) 20 (7) (20) 25 12 11
Domestic subscription 19,233 25,623 29,137 31,048 32,808 35,164 6
(% YoY) 17 33 14 7 6 7
International subscription 3,872 3,251 3,293 2,303 2,210 2,120 (14)
(% YoY) (1) (16) 1 (30) (4) (4)
Movies/ Events & Others 5,867 5,614 7,381¹ 2,903 4,639 5,805 (8)
Total revenue 79,339 81,299 77,299 82,997 91,788 101,011 9
¹ FY21 Others includes revenue from one-off content syndication deal of Rs5,512m. Source: Company, CLSA
Domestic subscription We forecast Zee domestic subscription revenue growth to remain subdued at 6%
revenue to deliver 6% Cagr Cagr with ongoing litigation and risk of disruption during NTO 2 implementation
over FY21-24CL from April 22 (Figure 77). Although we forecast shrinkage in international
subscriptions with consolidation of operations, we believe Zee should still see a 9%
Cagr in consolidated revenue over FY21-24CL. The company’s FY21 other revenues
included Rs5.5bn from a one-off content syndication deal, and we expect a pick-up
in its events and movies revenue in FY23/24CL with the fading of pandemic in India.
Figure 78
Detailed P&L
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Ad-Revenues 50,367 46,811 37,488 46,743 52,132 57,922
% growth 19.8 (7.1) (19.9) 24.7 11.5 11.1
Domestic subscriptions 19,233 25,623 29,137 31,048 32,808 35,164
International subscription 3,872 3,251 3,293 2,303 2,210 2,120
Total pay revenues 23,105 28,874 32,430 33,351 35,017 37,284
Movies/ Events & Others 5,867 5,614 7,381 2,903 4,639 5,805
Total Revenues 79,339 81,299 77,299 82,997 91,788 101,010
% growth 18.7 2.5 (4.9) 7.4 10.6 10.0
Costs
Programming cost 28,651 36,068 34,629 35,372 38,365 43,227
% of revenues 36 44 45 43 42 43
Personnel cost 7,249 7,805 8,183 8,503 8,835 9,180
Transmission cost 2,107 2,217 2,876 3,106 3,355 3,623
Administrative & other expenses 6,282 10,251 5,919 6,320 6,780 7,303
Selling and distribution expenses 9,411 8,612 7,791 7,979 8,110 8,307
Costs 53,700 64,953 59,398 61,279 65,444 71,640
% growth 16.5 21.0 (8.6) 3.2 6.8 9.5
Ebitda 25,639 16,345 17,901 21,718 26,344 29,371
Ebitda Margin (%) 32.3 20.1 23.2 26.2 28.7 29.1
% growth 23.5 (36.2) 9.5 21.3 21.3 11.5
Interest (1,304) (1,449) (571) (476) (93) (67)
Depreciation (2,347) (2,706) (2,649) (2,760) (2,854) (2,894)
Other Income 2,340 2,836 1,104 1,947 3,175 3,869
PBT 24,327 15,027 15,785 20,430 26,572 30,278
Tax (8,673) (4,317) (4,625) (5,142) (6,688) (7,621)
Tax Rate (%) 35.7 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2 25.2
Minority interest 23 (5) 69 73 116 122
Normalised PAT 15,677 10,705 11,229 15,360 20,000 22,779
Exceptional Items (7) (5,440) (3,229)
Reported earnings available to 15,671 5,265 8,000 15,360 20,000 22,779
common equity shareholders
Normalised earnings available to 15,677 10,705 11,229 15,360 20,000 22,779
common equity shareholders
EPS to equity shareholders 16.32 5.48 8.33 15.99 20.82 23.71
Source: Company, CLSA
Content costs to rise at 8% Also overall, we expect programming costs to stay high at 43% of revenue over
Cagr over FY21-24CL FY22-24, versus an average of 42% over FY19-21, but we forecast total costs to
rise at 6% Cagr over FY21-24. This factors in continued investments in content and
marketing as management intends to improve content quality, add programme
hours and add new channels to improve Zee’s network market share and visibility
of ZEE5. The non-programming costs are where we expect scale benefits and cost
controls to show. Part of this reflects the higher advertising and marketing
expenditure for ZEE5 in FY22CL. Also, it partly reflects the faster growth in wider-
margin subscription revenue, which is better monetisation of its existing network.
Figure 79
0.25 5
0.20 0
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: Company, CLSA
Figure 80
40
35
30
30
25 22
20
19
20
15
10
10
0
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Source: Company, CLSA
FY21 operating cashflow of FY19-20 saw a dip in Zee’s cash conversion ratio to 5-15% of Ebitda, driven by
Rs15.5bn was at 86% of expansion in working capital of Rs17bn in each of the two years, as Zee continued to
Ebitda invest in new content. Also, Covid-19 has caused Zee’s FY21 Ebitda to decline 20%
YoY (net of FY20 exceptional and FY21 one-time syndication deal), versus reported
10% YoY growth with 12% YoY fall in revenues (reported decline 5%) in FY21.
However, FY21 operating cashflow of Rs15.5bn was at 86% of Ebitda and free
cashflow was Rs13.4bn also as working capital expansion peaked. While investments
in content have continued in FY22, we project the cash conversion ratio to be
between 41-56% over FY22-24CL.
Figure 81
Figure 82
50
200
40
150
30
100
20
10 50
0 0
Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 Mar 16 Mar 17 Mar 18 Mar 19 Mar 20 Mar 21
Source: Company, CLSA
Figure 83
50
50
41
40
30
20 15
10 5
0
FY19 FY20 FY21 FY22CL FY23CL FY24CL
Note: FY21 OpCF adjusted for Rs5.5bn received from content syndication deal. Source: Company, CLSA
Figure 84
Figure 85
Net cash of Rs16bn Zee’s balance sheet has no debt and a net cash balance of Rs16.2bn as of 1HFY22.
on balance sheet With low capex and increasing cash conversion we expect Zee’s cash balance to
strengthen to Rs44bn by FY24CL. However, with growth in revenue, we expect
receivables to grow to Rs28bn by FY24CL although at 100 days of revenues these
will remain well below industry norms. Also, Zee will continue to invest in content
inventories, mainly led by movie rights acquisitions, and this is expected to reach
Rs67bn by FY24CL (from Rs56bn in 1HFY22).
Figure 86
Balance sheet
(Rsm) Mar 19 Mar-20 Mar-21 Mar22CL Mar23CL Mar24CL
Net worth 89,239 93,439 100,945 113,904 129,581 148,037
Share Capital 961 961 961 961 961 961
Reserves & Surplus 88,279 92,479 99,985 112,943 128,620 147,077
Preference capital 11,113 5,950 3,832 - - -
Minority interest 143 110 129 202 318 440
Borrowings 20 526 195 195 195 195
Current Liability 28,814 20,970 19,935 19,853 21,456 23,299
Creditors 14,897 16,803 13,982 14,019 15,240 16,683
Other current liabilities 12,467 2,640 4,244 4,559 4,891 5,238
Provision 1,451 1,526 1,709 1,275 1,325 1,377
Total liabilities & equity 129,330 120,995 125,036 134,155 151,551 171,971
Fixed assets 7,342 8,281 7,588 7,463 6,956 6,525
CWIP 1,561 832 755 355 355 355
Goodwill 5,252 4,070 3,804 3,804 3,804 3,804
Investments 13,858 5,860 8,925 9,371 9,840 10,332
Inventories 38,505 53,475 54,030 58,145 63,067 66,913
Debtors 18,274 20,847 19,452 22,739 25,147 27,674
Cash 9,677 5,529 10,485 11,679 21,155 34,479
Loans and advances 34,861 22,102 19,998 20,598 21,228 21,890
Total Assets 129,330 120,995 125,036 134,154 151,551 171,971
Source: Company, CLSA
Figure 87
0
FY11
FY12
FY13
FY14
FY15
FY16
FY17
FY18
FY19
FY20
FY21
FY22CL
FY23CL
FY24CL
Note: Dividends are based on the year they were paid out and include dividend tax paid by Zee. The buyback amount
is based on what was actually incurred during the year. Source: Company, CLSA
The promoter share pledging crisis turned out to be of a larger extent than
expected, as in October 2019, the promoter made a new disclosure that a 10.7%
stake held through Essel Media Ventures was also indirectly charged to VTB Bank.
This encumbrance was created in September 2017, but was disclosed only in later
months due to the change in definition of pledges by the regulator Securities and
Exchange Board of India (SEBI).
Figure 88
A dip in Zee’s cash Thereafter, Zee saw a dip in cash conversion ratio to 5-15% of Ebitda in FY19-20,
conversion ratio to 5-15% especially led by working capital expansions which included increase in
in FY19-20 receivables from group company Dish TV, which are now down by 50% to
Rs3.7bn. In FY20, Zee also reported Rs6bn of exceptional items above Ebitda and
R5.4bn below Ebitda. However, thereafter, Zee’s cash conversion jumped in FY21
(as detailed in Figure 83). Focus is still on corporate governance as Zee is in
litigation with a large minority shareholder.
The promoter share pledging crisis, fall in cash conversion, write-offs and
litigations with large minority shareholder will keep Zee’s corporate governance
in focus. However, upon completion of the Zee-Sony merger, Sony will appoint
majority of the directors and Punit Goenka will continue to be managing director
and CEO for five years.
Given our projected 16% advertising revenue Cagr over FY21-24CL, which should
help double profits and cash by FY24CL, we expect Zee to trade at 18x one-year
forward PE even if there is reasonable delay to the Zee-Sony merger, which will
likely take six months given the due process and requirement of multiple approvals.
Our Zee’s Rs415 target, is based on 18x PE on Dec 23CL earnings and implies 23%
upside, factoring in a 33% discount versus five-year average multiple for the risk of
delays to the merger. Our base case PE assumes a 13% higher multiple than current
stock valuation, as higher (33%) rerating has been underway since Zee’s growth
resumed in 4QFY21. We believe if the merger is sealed, Zee’s valuation will likely
return to the historical highs of c.30x PE, implying Rs690.
Figure 89 Figure 90
20 400
sdd 18.43x
-1sd 16.39x
15 300
10 200
min 9.5x
5 100
Nov 16 Nov 17 Nov 18 Nov 19 Nov 20 Nov 21 Nov 16 Nov 17 Nov 18 Nov 19 Nov 20 Nov 21
Source: CLSA Source: CLSA
Figure 91
Source: Bloomberg
Our target multiple is at a Our 18x PE multiple for Zee is still at ~70% discount to the 56x average for India’s
discount to the average for fast-moving-consumer-goods (FMCG) firms. We compare Zee with these names
Indian FMCG firms . . . because the FMCG sector has companies with comparable profiles in terms of
cash generation, ROE and Indian-consumer-linked growth. We forecast Zee’s
earnings would grow at 27% Cagr over FY21-24CL, higher than the 22% for the
FMCG sector.
Figure 92
Zee likely to sustain Our media sector coverage universe includes Nazara Tech which is in esports and
higher PE premium than mobile gaming, and PVR and Inox Leisure which are multiplexes companies. While our
the media sector entire media coverage universe is poised for strong growth ahead, Zee is our top sector
pick with most favourable risk reward, as we not only see Zee sustaining but also
potentially expanding valuation multiples. Meanwhile, within the media space,
distribution company Dish TV’s valuation is tough to gauge in context of their promoter
share pledging crisis (Dish TV has its own promoter share pledging crisis and is part of
Essel group). While valuations of print companies Jagran and DB Corp will remain
constrained by the inherent risks of rising digital media taking share from print
companies and earnings volatility due to potential raw-material price swings.
Figure 93
Figure 94
350
300
250
200
150
100
FY12 FY14 FY16 FY18 FY20 FY22CL FY24CL
Source: Sun TV, Zee, CLSA
Figure 95
60
32
50
40
32
30 1
3
20 37 17
10
11
0
Zee Sun TV
Note: IPL = Indian Premier League. Source: Companies, CLSA
Both Zee and Sun TV are Meanwhile, Zee and Sun TV are both ramping up their own OTT platforms: ZEE5
set for success in TV and and Sun NXT. India is seeing explosive growth in OTT service and media buyers are
OTT businesses increasingly choosing TV and OTT. Both Zee and Sun TV are set for success in TV
and OTT with content edge and both have strong content franchises, net cash
balance sheets and compelling stock valuations at 12-16x FY23CL PE, 30-40%
discount to last five-years average. While we rate Sun TV a BUY too, our top sector
pick is Zee, for its higher growth potential and with the potential Zee-Sony merger
which could be a significant rerating catalyst.
Figure 96 Figure 97
We prefer Zee over Sun TV With the return of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), ie, a political party, in Tamil
Nadu, Sun TV faces improved business conditions. Also, its promoter family Maran
owns 75% in Sun TV which contrast with the mere 4% promoter holding in Zee. Zee
has highest free float in CLSA coverage and is currently in the midst of potential
merger deal with Sony. Considering Sun’s lower ad growth, we project 10% earnings
Cagr, versus a 27% Cagr for Zee. Also driving our preference on Zee is that Sun TV
now trades at 20% discount to Zee on PE, versus 40% discount in the last five years.
Figure 98
Stock valuations are Sun TV versus Zee: 1-year forward PE valuation range
compelling at 12-16 (x)
45
FY23CL PE, a 30-40% Zee PE
discount to last five-years 40 Zee 5Y avg PE
average Sun TV PE
35 Sun TV 5Y avg PE
30
27.4
25
20
17.2
15
10
5
Nov 16 Nov 17 Nov 18 Nov 19 Nov 20 Nov 21
Source: CLSA
Figure 99
Figure 100
Figure 101
Figure 102
A 4.5% terminal-growth DCF valuation sensitivity to discount rate and terminal growth rate
rate (same as India’s CPI Terminal growth rate (%)
inflation) in our FY30 base 3.5% 4.0% 4.5% 5.0% 5.5%
case gives us a value of
10.75% 466 490 519 552 592
Rs444/share
11.25% 434 455 478 506 539
WACC
Figure 103
In a blue sky scenario of Zee Sony merger and the stock’s valuation rerating the
merged co market cap could even reach US$19bn. Our analysis in Figure 74 of
merged co financials mainly assumes revenue synergies of the combined Zee Sony
operations which highlights combined profits could jump 2.5x to US$680m with
higher EPS of Rs25 for the combined entity. However in a pessimistic case of the
Zee-Sony merger being put off and Zee’s stock valuation slumping back to pre-Sony
merger deal announcement and valuations seen amid the Covid-19 second wave, it
could fall to Rs250.
Figure 104
NTO 2 litigation could delay NTO 2 litigation and disruption. Ongoing NTO 2 litigation and implementation
growth delays to April 2022 has already curtained broadcasters subscription revenue
growth. Also implementation across the country remains a challenge and could
continue to drag Zee’s subscription revenue growth. Ahead of final verdict on NTO
2 top broadcasters have released new pricing which was supposed to be effective
1 December 21 (details of Zee pricing are shown in Figure 105. However, regulator
has recently delayed implementation to April 22. Even under NTO 2, subscriptions
will still grow for top broadcasters with strong channels but realignment of
bouquets will hit tail channels and also there could be delays and disruptions during
implementation. A 1ppt reduction in Zee’s subscription revenue growth, and
FY23/24CL profit after tax would be some 1% below our current estimate.
Figure 105
Ongoing litigations with Risks to potential Zee-Sony merger. Zee’s proposed merger with Sony will require
leading shareholder may approvals from regulatory bodies such as from the Securities and Exchange Board of
delay or cause hurdles to India (SEBI) and National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) among others, as well as
merger with Sony
approval of 75% of Zee’s voting shareholders. Zee is in litigation with large minority
shareholder which carries associated risks. In the case of Zee-Sony merger being put
off, valuation could fall to Rs250.
Also while likely there will not be significant deviation from current proposed
merger terms the deal includes in the merger Sony parent will allocate 2% equity
from its 53% ownership in merged co to Zee founding family in lieu of a non-
compete clause. Also Zee Sony merger terms may provide a pathway for the Zee
promoters to raise stake from 4% to up to 20% subject to various regulatory
requirements. The final deal terms will need clarity on the non-compete as well the
pathway for promoters to raise stake.
Figure 106
Figure 107
Valuation details
We derive our target price by applying an 18x PE multiple to our one-year forward
earnings estimate, factoring in a 33% discount for risks of delays to the merger. In
our view, earnings growth, cash-flow conversion improvement and Sony merger
deal will be key to rerating.
Investment risks
Zee operates in a highly competitive TV broadcasting space; hence, continued
popularity as reflected in good TV ratings is important. A pickup in advertising
growth rate depends on a broader economic upturn along with network
performance versus competitors. Prolonged extension of Covid-19 could hinder
economic and advertising-revenue growth. Content investment in movies and
digital should spur revenue growth, but a faster-than-expected rise in content costs
could hinder earnings. Also Zee’s proposed merger with Sony will require several
approvals including regulatory and from 75% of Zee’s voting shareholders. Zee is in
litigation with large minority shareholder which carries associated risks.
Cashflow (Rsm)
Year to 31 March 2018A 2019A 2020A 2021A 2022CL 2023CL 2024CL
Operating profit 18,940 23,292 13,639 15,252 18,958 23,490 26,476
Operating adjustments - - - - - - -
Depreciation/amortisation 1,821 2,347 2,706 2,649 2,760 2,854 2,894
Working capital changes (8,550) (17,151) (16,758) 809 (7,365) (6,108) (4,930)
Interest paid / other financial expenses (101) (54) (67) (43) (185) (93) (67)
Tax paid (8,295) (9,299) (3,114) (5,011) (5,142) (6,688) (7,621)
Other non-cash operating items 1,629 2,163 6,026 1,778 (285) (299) (314)
Net operating cashflow 5,443 1,298 2,432 15,434 8,741 13,156 16,438
Capital expenditure (2,590) (2,823) (1,818) (2,060) (2,235) (2,347) (2,464)
Free cashflow 2,853 (1,525) 614 13,374 6,506 10,809 13,974
Acq/inv/disposals (171) (10) (15) (213) (446) (469) (492)
Int, invt & associate div (7,736) 11,496 5,721 (2,789) 1,947 3,175 3,869
Net investing cashflow (10,497) 8,663 3,888 (5,062) (734) 360 913
Increase in loans (2,937) 15 (12) 4 - - -
Dividends (3,834) (4,734) (5,227) (1,118) (2,692) (4,323) (4,323)
Net equity raised/others (4,030) (4,891) (5,229) (4,302) (4,120) 282 295
Net financing cashflow (10,801) (9,610) (10,468) (5,416) (6,812) (4,041) (4,028)
Incr/(decr) in net cash (15,855) 351 (4,148) 4,956 1,195 9,475 13,324
Exch rate movements 84 (19) 0 0 0 0 0
Opening cash 25,116 9,345 9,677 5,529 10,485 11,679 21,155
Closing cash 9,345 9,677 5,529 10,485 11,680 21,154 34,478
OCF PS (Rs) 5.7 1.4 2.5 16.1 9.1 13.7 17.1
FCF PS (Rs) 3.0 (1.6) 0.6 13.9 6.8 11.3 14.5
DuPont analysis
Year to 31 March 2018A 2019A 2020A 2021A 2022CL 2023CL 2024CL
Ebit margin (%) 28.3 29.4 16.8 19.7 22.8 25.6 26.2
Asset turnover (x) 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
Interest burden (x) 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1
Tax burden (x) 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Return on assets (%) 10.6 12.8 7.8 8.6 10.8 12.1 12.1
Leverage (x) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
ROE (%) 16.7 19.0 11.7 11.6 14.3 16.4 16.4
EVA® analysis
Year to 31 March 2018A 2019A 2020A 2021A 2022CL 2023CL 2024CL
Ebit adj for tax 11,089 14,988 9,721 10,783 14,186 17,577 19,812
Average invested capital 53,138 67,517 82,809 87,164 89,471 96,175 101,481
ROIC (%) 20.9 22.2 11.7 12.4 15.9 18.3 19.5
Cost of equity (%) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
Cost of debt (adj for tax) 6.4 7.1 7.8 7.8 8.2 8.2 8.2
Weighted average cost of capital (%) 12.5 12.6 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8 12.8
EVA/IC (%) 8.4 9.6 (1.0) (0.4) 3.0 5.4 6.7
EVA (Rsm) 4,453 6,470 (852) (335) 2,693 5,222 6,776
Source: www.clsa.com
These views are based on technical analysis and may or may not be in agreement with the ‘fundamental’ view.
Price Action
Global technical research
For more technical analysis from Laurence Balanco,
check out his regular Price Action notes.
Important notices
Companies mentioned
Activision (N-R)
Aditya Birla F&R (ABFRL IN - RS255.1 - BUY)
Airtel Xstream (N-R)
Airtel Xstream (N-R)
Alphabet (N-R)
Alt Balaji (N-R)
ALTBalaji (N-R)
Amazon (N-R)
Amazon Prime Video (N-R)
Animax (N-R)
Aniplex (N-R)
Apple (N-R)
Asian Paints (APNT IS - RS3,143.7 - O-PF)
AXN (N-R)
Bandai Namco (N-R)
Bharti Airtel (BHARTI IS - RS728.2 - BUY)
BMG (N-R)
Britannia Industries (BRIT IS - RS3,545.5 - O-PF)
Byju (N-R)
Charter (N-R)
Colgate India (CLGT IB - RS1,439.1 - O-PF)
ComScore (N-R)
Crackle (N-R)
Dabur (DABUR IS - RS595.0 - O-PF)
DB Corp (DBCL IB - RS91.6 - BUY)
DD Sports (N-R)
Dentsu (4324 JP - ¥3,610 - O-PF)
Dentsu Aegis Network (N-R)
Dish TV (DITV IB - RS17.0 - O-PF)
Dish TVAirtel Xstream (N-R)
Disney (N-R)
Disney+ Hotstar (N-R)
Emami (HMN IS - RS527.0 - O-PF)
Ernst & Young (N-R)
Eros Now (N-R)
Essel Group (N-R)
Essel Media Ventures (N-R)
Eurosport (N-R)
Facebook (N-R)
Fox (N-R)
Game Show Network (N-R)
Godrej Consumer (GCPL IB - RS924.0 - O-PF)
Google (N-R)
GroupM (N-R)
Hindustan Unilever (HUVR IB - RS2,318.4 - O-PF)
Hoichoi (N-R)
Hulu (N-R)
Hungama (N-R)
Inox Leisure (INOL IS - RS400.2 - BUY)
ITC (ITC IB - RS221.3 - BUY)
Jagran (JAGP IB - RS61.4 - BUY)
Analyst certification
The analyst(s) of this report hereby certify that the views expressed in this research report accurately reflect my/our
own personal views about the securities and/or the issuers and that no part of my/our compensation was, is, or will
be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendation or views contained in this research report.
Important disclosures
Recommendation history of Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd Z IB
Deepti Chaturvedi BUY O-PF
Other analysts U-PF SELL
Stock price (Rs)
500
400
300
200
CLSA (“CLSA”) in this report refers to CLSA Limited, CLSA Americas, http://www.clsa.com/member/research_disclosures/ for details.)
LLC, CLSA Australia Pty Ltd, CLSA India Private Limited, PT CLSA The analysts included herein hereby confirm that they have not
Sekuritas Indonesia, CLSA Securities Japan Co., Ltd., CLSA Securities been placed under any undue influence, intervention or pressure by
Korea Ltd., CLSA Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., CLSA Philippines, Inc, any person/s in compiling this research report. In addition, the
CLSA Singapore Pte Ltd, CLSA Securities (Thailand) Limited, CLSA analysts attest that they were not in possession of any material, non-
(UK), CLSA Europe B.V. and/or their respective affiliates. CLST public information regarding the subject company that has securities
(“CLST”) in this report refers to CL Securities Taiwan Co., Ltd. listed in the relevant jurisdiction(s) at the time of publication of this
The policies of CLSA and CLST are to only publish research that is report. Save from the disclosure below (if any), the analyst(s) is/are
impartial, independent, clear, fair, and not misleading. Regulations or not aware of any material conflict of interest.
market practice of some jurisdictions/markets prescribe certain As analyst(s) of this report, I/we hereby certify that the views
disclosures to be made for certain actual, potential or perceived expressed in this research report accurately reflect my/our own
conflicts of interests relating to a research report as below. This personal views about the securities and/or the issuers and that no
research disclosure should be read in conjunction with the research part of my/our compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly
disclaimer as set out hereof and at www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html, the related to the specific recommendation or views contained in this
Terms and Conditions of Use as set out at report or to any investment banking relationship with the subject
https://www.clsa.com/terms-and-conditions-of-use/ and the company covered in this report (for the past one year) or otherwise
applicable regulation of the concerned market where the analyst is any other relationship with such company which leads to receipt of
stationed and hence subject to. Investors are strongly encouraged to fees from the company except in ordinary course of business of the
review this disclaimer before investing. company. The analyst/s also state/s and confirm/s that he/she/they
Neither analysts nor their household members/associates/may has/have not been placed under any undue influence, intervention or
have a financial interest in, or be an officer, director or advisory board pressure by any person/s in compiling this research report. In
member of companies covered by the analyst unless disclosed herein. addition, the analysts included herein attest that they were not in
In circumstances where an analyst has a pre-existing holding in any possession of any material, nonpublic information regarding the
securities under coverage, those holdings are grandfathered and the subject company that has securities listed in the relevant
analyst is prohibited from trading such securities. jurisdiction(s) at the time of publication of this report. The analysts
(For full disclosure of interest for all companies mention on this further confirm that none of the information used in this report was
report, please refer to received from CLSA's Corporate Finance department or CLSA's
and/or CLST's Sales and Trading business. Save from the disclosure representation or warranty, express or implied, as to and no reliance
below (if any), the analyst(s) is/are not aware of any material conflict should be placed on, the fairness, accuracy, completeness or
of interest. correctness of such data or information contained herein or any
Key to CLSA/CLST investment rankings: BUY: Total stock return statement made in this report. Any opinions or estimates herein
(including dividends) expected to exceed 20%; O-PF (aka reflect the judgment of CLSA and/or CLST at the date of this report
ACCUMULATE): Total expected return below 20% but exceeding and are subject to change at any time without notice. Where any part
market return; U-PF (aka REDUCE): Total expected return positive but of the information, opinions or estimates contained herein reflects the
below market return; SELL: Total return expected to be negative. For views and opinions of a sales person or a non-analyst, such views and
relative performance, we benchmark the 12-month total forecast opinions may not correspond to the published view of CLSA and/or
return (including dividends) for the stock against the 12-month CLST. Any price target given in the report may be projected from one
forecast return (including dividends) for the market on which the or more valuation models and hence any price target may be subject
stock trades. to the inherent risk of the selected model as well as other external
"High Conviction" Ideas are not necessarily stocks with the most risk factors. Where the publication does not contain ratings, the
upside/downside, but those where the Research Head/Strategist material should not be construed as research but is offered as factual
believes there is the highest likelihood of positive/negative returns. commentary. It is not intended to, nor should it be used to form an
The list for each market is monitored weekly. investment opinion about the non-rated companies.
Overall rating distribution for CLSA (exclude CLST) only Universe: This report is for information purposes only and it does not
Overall rating distribution: BUY / Outperform - CLSA: 79.10%, constitute or contain, and should not be considered as an offer or
Underperform / SELL - CLSA: 20.90%, Restricted - CLSA: 0.44%; Data invitation to sell, or any solicitation or invitation of any offer to
as of 1 Oct 2021. Investment banking clients as a % of rating category: subscribe for or purchase any securities in any jurisdiction and
BUY / Outperform - CLSA: 13.23%, Underperform / SELL - CLSA: recipient of this report must make its own independent decisions
1.68%; Restricted - CLSA: 0.44%. Data for 12-month period ending 1 regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein.
Oct 2021. This is not intended to provide professional, investment or any other
Overall rating distribution for CLST only Universe: Overall rating type of advice or recommendation and does not take into account the
distribution: BUY / Outperform - CLST: 93.10%, Underperform / SELL particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of
- CLST: 6.90%, Restricted - CLST: 0.00%. Data as of 1 Oct 2021. individual recipients. Before acting on any information in this report,
Investment banking clients as a % of rating category: BUY / you should consider whether it is suitable for your particular
Outperform - CLST: 0.00%, Underperform / SELL - CLST: 0.00%, circumstances and, if appropriate, seek professional advice, including
Restricted - CLST: 0.00%. Data for 12-month period ending 1 Oct legal or tax advice. Investments involve risks, and investors should
2021. exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment
There are no numbers for Hold/Neutral as CLSA/CLST do not decisions. The value of any investment or income may go down as
have such investment rankings. For a history of the recommendation, well as up, and investors may not get back the full (or any) amount
price targets and disclosure information for companies mentioned in invested. Investments that are denominated in foreign currencies may
this report please write to: CLSA Group Compliance, 18/F, One Pacific fluctuate in value as a result of exposure to movements of exchange
Place, 88 Queensway, Hong Kong and/or; (c) CLST Compliance (27/F, rate. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future
95, Section 2 Dun Hua South Road, Taipei 10682, Taiwan, telephone performance or liquidity. CLSA and/or CLST do/does not accept any
(886) 2 2326 8188). EVA® is a registered trademark of Stern, Stewart responsibility and cannot be held liable for any person’s use of or
& Co. "CL" in charts and tables stands for CLSA estimates, “CT” stands reliance on the information and opinions contained herein. To the
for CLST estimates, "CRR" stands for CRR Research estimates and extent permitted by applicable securities laws and regulations, CLSA
“CS” for Citic Securities estimates unless otherwise noted in the and/or CLST accept(s) no liability whatsoever for any direct or
source. consequential loss arising from the use of this report or its contents.
Charts and tables sourced to CLSA in this report may include data To maintain the independence and integrity of our research, our
extracted from CLSA’s automated databases, which derive their Corporate Finance, Sales Trading, Asset Management and Research
original data from a range of sources. These can include: companies; business lines are distinct from one another. This means that CLSA’s
analyst estimates/calculations; local exchanges and/or third-party Research department is not part of and does not report to CLSA's
data or market pricing providers such as Bloomberg, FactSet or IBES. Corporate Finance department or CLSA’s Sales and Trading business.
Additional information on data sources for specific charts or tables Accordingly, neither the Corporate Finance department nor the Sales
can be obtained by contacting the publishing analysts. and Trading department supervises or controls the activities of CLSA’s
This report is subject to and incorporates the terms and conditions research analysts. CLSA’s research analysts report to the management
of use set out on the www.clsa.com website of the Research department, who in turn report to CLSA’s senior
(https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html and management. CLSA has put in place a number of internal controls
https://www.clsa.com/terms -and-conditions-of use/) and the designed to manage conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of
references to “publication/communication” or “Publications” thereof CLSA engaging in Corporate Finance, Sales and Trading, Asset
shall include this report. Neither this report nor any portion hereof Management and Research activities. Some examples of these
may be reprinted, sold, resold, copied, reproduced, distributed, controls include: the use of information barriers and other controls
redistributed, published, republished, displayed, posted or designed to ensure that confidential information is only shared on a
transmitted in any form or media or by any means without the written “need to know” basis and in compliance with CLSA’s Chinese Wall
consent of CLSA and/or CLST. CLSA and/or CLST has/have produced policies and procedures; measures designed to ensure that
this report for private circulation to professional, institutional and/or interactions that may occur among CLSA’s Research personnel,
wholesale clients only, and may not be distributed to retail investors. Corporate Finance, Asset Management, and Sales and Trading
The information, opinions and estimates herein are not directed at, or personnel, CLSA’s financial product issuers and CLSA’s research
intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity in any analysts do not compromise the integrity and independence of CLSA’s
jurisdiction where doing so would be contrary to law or regulation or research.
which would subject CLSA and/or CLST to any additional registration Subject to any applicable laws and regulations at any given time,
or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. The information and CLSA, CLST, their respective affiliates, officers, directors or
statistical data (for private or public companies) herein have been employees may have used the information contained herein before
obtained from sources we believe to be reliable. Such information has publication and may have positions in, or may from time to time
not been independently verified and CLSA and/or CLST makes no purchase or sell or have a material interest in any of the securities
representation or warranty as to its fairness, adequacy, accuracy, mentioned or related securities, or may currently or in future have or
completeness or correctness. The replication of any third party views have had a business or financial relationship with, or may provide or
in this report should not be treated necessarily as an indication that have provided corporate finance/capital markets and/or other
CLSA and/or CLST agrees with or concurs with such views. None of services to, the entities referred to herein, their advisors and/or any
CLSA and/or CLST, its affiliates and their respective directors, other connected parties. As a result, you should be aware that CLSA
officers, employees, advisers and representatives makes any and/or CLST and/or their respective affiliates, officers, directors or
employees may have one or more conflicts of interest. Regulations or INH000001113) and merchant banking services (SEBI Registration
market practice of some jurisdictions/markets prescribe certain No.INM000010619) to global institutional investors, pension funds
disclosures to be made for certain actual, potential or perceived and corporates. CLSA and its associates may have debt holdings in the
conflicts of interests relating to research reports. Details of the subject company. Further, CLSA and its associates, in the past 12
disclosable interest can be found in certain reports as required by the months, may have received compensation for non-investment
relevant rules and regulation and the full details are available at banking securities and/or non-securities related services from the
http://www.clsa.com/member/research_disclosures/. Disclosures subject company. For further details of “associates” of CLSA India
therein include the position of CLSA and CLST only. Unless specified please contact Compliance-India@clsa.com.
otherwise, CLSA did not receive any compensation or other benefits Singapore: This report is distributed in Singapore by CLSA
from the subject company, covered in this report, or from any third Singapore Pte Ltd to institutional investors, accredited investors or
party. If investors have any difficulty accessing this website, please expert investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers
contact webadmin@clsa.com on +852 2600 8111. If you require Regulations) only. Singapore recipients should contact CLSA
disclosure information on previous dates, please contact Singapore Pte Ltd, 80 Raffles Place, #18-01, UOB Plaza 1, Singapore
compliance_hk@clsa.com. 048624, Tel: +65 6416 7888, in respect of any matters arising from,
Any disputes related to this report shall be governed by the laws or in connection with, the analysis or report. By virtue of your status
of Hong Kong and to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of as an institutional investor, accredited investor or expert investor,
Hong Kong in connection with any suite, action or proceeding arising CLSA Singapore Pte Ltd is exempted from complying with certain
out of or in connection with this material. In the event any of the requirements under the Financial Advisers Act (Chapter 110), the
provisions in these Terms of Use shall be held to be unenforceable, Financial Advisers Regulations and the relevant Notices and
that provision shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible Guidelines issued thereunder (as disclosed in Part C of the Securities
to reflect the intention underlying the unenforceable term, and the Dealing Services – Singapore Annex of the CLSA terms of business),
remainder of these General Disclaimer shall be unimpaired. in respect of any financial advisory services that CLSA Singapore Pte
This report is distributed for and on behalf of CLSA (for research Ltd may provide to you. MCI (P) 085/11/2021
compiled by non-US and non-Taiwan analyst(s)), CLSA Americas, LLC United States of America: Where any section of the research is
(for research compiled by US analyst(s)) and/or CLST (for research compiled by US analyst(s), it is distributed by CLSA Americas, LLC.
compiled by Taiwan analyst(s)) in Australia by CLSA Australia Pty Ltd Where any section is compiled by non-US analyst(s), it is distributed
(ABN 53 139 992 331/AFSL License No: 350159); in Hong Kong by into the United States by CLSA (except CLSA Americas, LLC) solely to
CLSA Limited (Incorporated in Hong Kong with limited liability); in persons who qualify as "Major US Institutional Investors" as defined
India by CLSA India Private Limited, (Address: 8/F, Dalamal House, in Rule 15a-6 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and who
Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021. Tel No: +91-22-66505050. Fax No: deal with CLSA Americas, LLC. However, the delivery of this research
+91-22-22840271; CIN: U67120MH1994PLC083118; SEBI report to any person in the United States shall not be deemed a
Registration No: INZ000001735 as Stock Broker, INM000010619 as recommendation to effect any transactions in the securities discussed
Merchant Banker and INH000001113 as Research Analyst; in herein or an endorsement of any opinion expressed herein. Any
Indonesia by PT CLSA Sekuritas Indonesia; in Japan by CLSA recipient of this research in the United States wishing to effect a
Securities Japan Co., Ltd.; in Korea by CLSA Securities Korea Ltd.; in transaction in any security mentioned herein should do so by
Malaysia by CLSA Securities Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.; in the Philippines by contacting CLSA Americas, LLC.
CLSA Philippines Inc (a member of Philippine Stock Exchange and The European Union (“EU”) and the United Kingdom: In these
Securities Investors Protection Fund); in Singapore by CLSA jurisdictions, this research is a marketing communication. It has not
Singapore Pte Ltd and solely to persons who qualify as an been prepared in accordance with the legal requirements designed to
"Institutional Investor", "Accredited Investor" or "Expert Investor" promote the independence of investment research, and is not subject
MCI (P) 085/11/2021; in Thailand by CLSA Securities (Thailand) to any prohibition on dealing ahead of the dissemination of
Limited; in Taiwan by CLST and in the EU and the United Kingdom by investment research. The research is disseminated in these countries
CLSA Europe BV or CLSA (UK). by either CLSA (UK) or CLSA Europe BV. CLSA (UK) is authorised and
Australia: CLSA Australia Pty Ltd (“CAPL”) (ABN 53 139 992 regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. CLSA Europe BV is
331/AFS License No: 350159) is regulated by ASIC and is a Market authorised and regulated by the Authority for Financial Markets in the
Participant of ASX Limited and CHI-X. This material is issued and Netherlands. This document is directed at persons having
distributed by CAPL in Australia to "wholesale clients" only. This professional experience in matters relating to investments as defined
material does not take into account the specific investment in the relevant applicable local regulations. Any investment activity to
objectives, financial situation or particular needs of the recipient. The which it relates is only available to such persons. If you do not have
recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third party professional experience in matters relating to investments you should
without the prior written consent of CAPL. For the purposes of this not rely on this document. Where the research material is compiled
paragraph the term "wholesale client" has the meaning given in by the UK analyst(s), it is produced and disseminated by CLSA (UK)
section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. CAPL’s research and CLSA Europe BV. For the purposes of the Financial Conduct Rules
coverage universe spans listed securities across the ASX All in the United Kingdom and MIFID II in other European jurisdictions
Ordinaries index, securities listed on offshore markets, unlisted this research is prepared and intended as substantive research
issuers and investment products which Research management deem material.
to be relevant to the investor base from time to time. CAPL seeks to For all other jurisdiction-specific disclaimers please refer to
cover companies of relevance to its domestic and international https://www.clsa.com/disclaimer.html. The analysts/contributors to
investor base across a variety of sectors. this report may be employed by any relevant CLSA entity or CLST,
India: CLSA India Private Limited, incorporated in November 1994 which is different from the entity that distributes the report in the
provides equity brokerage services (SEBI Registration No: respective jurisdictions.© 2021 CLSA and/or CL Securities Taiwan
INZ000001735), research services (SEBI Registration No: Co., Ltd. (“CLST”).
Research subscriptions
To change your report distribution requirements, please contact your CLSA sales representative or email us at cib@clsa.com.
You can also fine-tune your Research Alert email preferences at https://www.clsa.com/member/tools/email_alert/.
© 2021 CLSA Limited (“CLSA”) and/or CL Securities Taiwan Co. Ltd (“CLST”).
Key to CLSA/CLSA Americas/CLST investment rankings: BUY: Total stock return (including dividends) expected to exceed 20%; O-PF (aka ACCUMULATE): Total
expected return below 20% but exceeding market return; U-PF (aka REDUCE): Total expected return positive but below market return; SELL: Total return expected
to be negative. For relative performance, we benchmark the 12-month total forecast return (including dividends) for the stock against the 12-month forecast return
(including dividends) for the market on which the stock trades. • "High Conviction" Ideas are not necessarily stocks with the most upside/downside but those where
the Research Head/Strategist believes there is the highest likelihood of positive/negative returns. The list for each market is monitored weekly. 16/11/2021