CONSTI CASES

Section 1

1. Is Sec. 13 of the Cybercrime Law, which requires the service provider to preserve the integrity of
the traffic date and subscriber information for 6 months, a deprivation of the right to property?
Disini vs. Secretary of Justice, G.R. No. 203335, Feb 18, 2014
2. Does the RH Law violate the constitutional right to life of the unborn?
Imbong vs. Ochoa, G.R. No. 204819, April 8, 2014
3. Was the act of Punong Barangay in removing the basketball ring an abatement of nuisance and a
valid exercise of police power?
Cruz vs. Pandacan Hikers’ Club, G.R. No. 188213, Jan 11, 2016
4. Is Davao City Ordinance No. 0309-07 unconstitutional for being unreasonable, oppressive, and
an invalid exercise of police power?
Mosqueda vs. Filipino Banana Exporters, G.R. No. 189185, august 16, 2016
5. Is there a law or ordinance prohibiting the construction of Torre de Manila?
6. Is it a nuisance per se that deserves to be summarily abated sans judicial proceedings?
Knights of Rizal vs. DMCI Homes Inc., G.R. No. 213948, April 25, 2017
7. Was Maula denied of substantive due process and/or procedural due process?
Maula vs. Ximes Express, G.R. No. 207838, Jan. 25, 2017
8. Considering that the parties participated in the public consultation of GSIS’ policy resolution on
PBP, APL and CLIP was it non-publication validly dispensed with?
MPSTA vs. Garcia, G.R. No. 192708, Oct. 2, 2017
9. Is section 11 of R.A. No. 9160 which provides for ex-parte application and inquiry by the AMLC
into certain bank deposits and investment violative of the substantive due process?
Subido vs. CA, G.R. No. 216914, December 6, 2016
10. Was petitioners’ right to administrative due process violated when the Office of the President
did not allegedly consider the evidence they have presented?
Ang-Se vs. OP, G.R. No. 207355, Feb. 2016
11. Did FDA observe the basic tenets of due process when it certified, procured and administered
the contraceptive drugs and devices?
ALFI vs. Garin, G.R. No. 217872, Aug 24, 2016
12. Was the Conti denied of procedural due process?
Office of the Ombudsman vs. Conti, G.R. No. 221296, Feb 22, 2017
13. Is there a need for FDA to conduct a trial-type hearing to comply with the requirements of
procedural due process?
ALFI vs. Garin, G.R. No. 217872, April 26, 2017
14. Was Gutierrez deprived of her to procedural due process in connection with the Formal Charge
issued against her?
LTO Disciplinary Board vs. Gutierrez, G.R. no. 224395, July 3, 2017
15. Are the 14th Amendment Rights of the petitioners same-sex-couples’ violated by the states of
Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee which denies them the right to marry or to have
marriages lawfully performed in another State given full recognition?
Obergefell vs. Hodges, No. 14-556 SCOTUS, June 26, 2015
16. Does the policy of JBC requiring the five years of service as judges of first-level courts before
they can qualify as applicant to second-level courts violate the equal protection clause?
Villanueva vs, JBC, G.R. No. 158464, Aug 2, 2016
17. Is the petitioner entitled to equal protection and treatment accorded to other landowners who
had been given the chance to be heard on their claim for re-evaluation?
Limkaichong vs. Land Bank, G.R. No. 158464, Aug 2, 2016
18. What is the “void-for vagueness” doctrine and where is it applicable?
19. Whether or not Proclamation No. 216 is vague and thus void because of (a) its inclusion of
“other rebel groups”; and (b) the absence of any guideline specifying its actual operational
parameters within the entire Mindanao region?
Lagman vs. Medialdea, G.R. No. 231658, July 4, 2017
20. Are the Curfew Ordinances void-for-being vague?
21. Did the Curfew Ordinances pass the first and second prong of strict scrutiny test?
SPARK vs. Quezon City, etc., G.R. No. 225442, Aug. 8, 2017