Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PT XDT
PT XDT
Accepted Article
This manuscript has been accepted after peer review and appears as an
Accepted Article online prior to editing, proofing, and formal publication
of the final Version of Record (VoR). This work is currently citable by
using the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) given below. The VoR will be
published online in Early View as soon as possible and may be different
to this Accepted Article as a result of editing. Readers should obtain
the VoR from the journal website shown below when it is published
to ensure accuracy of information. The authors are responsible for the
content of this Accepted Article.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Accepted Manuscript
assembling single Pt atoms on defective TiO2 support (Pt1/def-TiO2). materials have been regarded as the benchmark catalysts and
Except as proton reduction sites, single Pt atoms promote the have attracted existence research interests. [2] However, limited
neighboring TiO2 units to generate surface oxygen vacancies and by the low light utilization and rapid photogenerated electron-
form Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic interface. Experimental results and density hole recombination, the catalytic performance of TiO 2-based
functional theory calculations demonstrate that Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic photocatalysts remains far from satisfactory. [3] Engineering
interface effectively facilitates photogenerated electrons to transfer defects can efficiently tune the optical property and energy band
from Ti3+ defective sites to single Pt atoms, thereby enhancing the structure to enhance intrinsic photocatalytic properties of TiO 2
separation of electron-hole pairs. This unique structure makes and improve the light absorption capacity. [4] However, on the
Pt1/def-TiO2 exhibit a recorded-level photocatalytic hydrogen other hand, the induced defects unavoidably lead to new
production performance with an unexpectedly high turnover trapping and recombination centers of photogenerated charge
frequency of 51423 h-1, exceeding the Pt nanoparticles supported carrier, which might result in a decrease of photocatalytic
TiO2 catalyst by a factor of 591. activity.[5] Apparently, it is important and highly desirable to
optimize the defects distribution and structure to promote
intrinsic properties of photocatalysts and inhibit charge carrier
Introduction recombination.[6]
RESEARCH ARTICLE
TiO2 units to generate the surface oxygen vacancies via a atoms. Meanwhile, the darker regions around Pt atoms, marked
hydrogen spillover effect,[11] leading to the formation of atomic by a blue arrow, are clearly observed in Figure 1f, implying the
interface between isolated Pt atom and Ti 3+ defect with the defective structure of TiO2 support. As shown in intensity profiles
atomically dispersed Pt-O-Ti3+ active center. A series of photo- from two different regions (region 1 and 2) in Figure 1f, only one
electrochemical characterizations and density functional theory maximum peak is observed, consistent with the individual Pt
(DFT) calculations reveal that the existence of Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic atoms (Figure 1g).
interface contributes to the enhanced transfer efficiency of the
photogenerated electrons from Ti3+ defective sites to single Pt
atoms, which facilitates the separation of electron-hole pairs and
inhibits their subsequent recombination. The unique construction
of Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic interface endows the Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst
with excellent photo-electrochemical properties and a record-
level photocatalytic hydrogen production performance. The
Accepted Manuscript
remarkably high turnover frequency (TOF) of 51423 h-1 is
observed on the Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst, which is 591 times higher
than that of Pt nanoparticle supported TiO2 catalyst (Pt NPs/f-
TiO2) and surpasses most of known photocatalysts.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Based on the best-fitting EXAFS results, DFT calculations were defects is promoted by single Pt atoms, because single Pt atoms
performed to establish and optimize the atomic structure model are located on the outside surface of TiO2 support. To further
of Pt1/def-TiO2 that displays in the inset of Figure 2c. verify it, the Pt-free TiO2 (f-TiO2) was prepared with the same
synthesis procedure of Pt1/def-TiO2 except that H2PtCl6·6H2O
was not added. For comparison, the f-TiO2 sample was also
tested and observed by ETEM measurement under the identical
condition. The ETEM images show that no obvious changes in
the surface of f-TiO2 are detected even at the high operating
temperature of 200 oC (Figure S8). The in situ observation of
ETEM offers direct and solid evidences to demonstrate the
evolution of single Pt atoms-driven surface defect engineering.
Accepted Manuscript
engineering (Figure 3b and Figure S9). Firstly, hydrogen
molecule adsorbed on the Pt site of Pt1/def-TiO2 with a side-on
adsorption mode. The distances between hydrogen atoms and
Pt are 2.003 and 2.045 Å. The small adsorption energy (-1.48
kcal mol-1) indicates hydrogen molecules undergoes a
physisorption. The H-H bond of active H2* is larger than that in
free molecule (0.781 vs 0.746 Å). One hydrogen atom can
transfer to its neighboring O2c atom on the surface with only a
small barrier (18.9 kcal mol-1). Next, the other hydrogen atom on
Figure 2. (a) XANES spectra of Pt L3-edge over Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst, Pt foil Pt site transfers to the O2c-H specie to form one water molecule.
and PtO2. The area marked by rectangle frame highlights the white line The barrier in this step is 29.3 kcal mol -1. The new formed water
intensity of Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst, Pt foil and PtO2. (b) FT-EXAFS spectra of molecule is not able to desorb from Pt site easily because of a
Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst, Pt foil and PtO2. (c) EXAFS R space fitting curve (blue
line) and the experimental one (circle) of Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst. (d) EXAFS k
desorption energy about 33.0 kcal mol -1. According to the
space fitting curve (blue line) and the experimental one (circle) of Pt1/def-TiO2 previous study, the oxygen vacancies on anatase TiO 2 (101)
catalyst. surface are less stable than them in bulk. Hence, the oxygen
diffusion from subsurface to surface will fill the surface
vacancies, and this process in this model is accompanied by the
Moreover, we discover that single Pt atoms can facilitate the diffusion of water molecule from O2c to Ti5c.[12] According to our
neighboring TiO2 units to generate the surface oxygen vacancies calculation results, the oxygen diffusion from subsurface to
and Ti3+ defects during the low-temperature reduction treatment surface needs to overcome a barrier of 27.2 kcal mol -1. After that,
in the synthesis of Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst via a hydrogen spillover the following oxygen diffusion is believed to conduct from bulk to
effect. To reveal this novel phenomenon, we utilized in situ subsurface to maintain the five-coordinated Pt to trigger the next
environmental transmission electron microscopy (ETEM) to round of reaction (Figure S10). It should be noted that on the
directly observe and record the process of single Pt atoms- top of Ti5c, the desorption energy of water decease to 16.1 kcal
driven defect engineering. The evolution trajectory of defects mol-1, indicating water is easy to desorb.
was tracked in the temperature window from room temperature
to 200 oC under the H2 atmosphere. The captured video (Movie
S1) and the corresponding representative images obtained at
different temperatures (Figure 3a) demonstrate that TiO2
support maintains tubular shape with smooth surface below 160
o
C. As the operation time is prolonged at 160 oC, the outside
surface of TiO2 becomes rough and highly disorder surface
layers gradually emerge, indicating the formation of surface
defects on the outside surface of TiO2. When the temperature is
elevated to 180 oC and 200 oC, the degree of disorder on the
outside surface of TiO2 is obviously strengthened. And more
crystalline TiO2 layers in the outside surface transform into
disorder layers. As highlighted by yellow dot lines, the thickness
of crystalline TiO2 layers gradually decreases along with
increasing surface roughness on outside TiO2 surface,
suggesting crystalline TiO2 layers in the outside surface
gradually transform into disorder and defective layers. However,
negligible variations on inner surface of TiO 2 are observed. The
obvious structural difference between the outside surface and
inner surface of TiO2 well confirm that the formation of surface
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Accepted Manuscript
Pt1/def-TiO2 and f-TiO2 have the similarly strong absorption in
the UV region, their visible light absorption has a large difference.
The f-TiO2 shows a very weak absorption in the range of 400-
430 nm, while the Pt1/def-TiO2 exhibits a much stronger
absorption in the visible light region of 400-800 nm, which is
associated with the abundant surface oxygen vacancies and Ti 3+
defects of the Pt1/def-TiO2. And, the color of the Pt1/def-TiO2
sample is light yellow, while f-TiO2 displays white, which is
consistent with the light absorption property. Furthermore,
photocurrent response measurements were conducted to
investigate the charge-separation efficiency. As shown in Figure
Figure 3. (a) Representative movie images acquired at different temperatures
S16, the photocathode of the Pt 1/def-TiO2 demonstrates a higher
of Pt1/def-TiO2. Frames from Movie S1 acquired at various temperatures of the
heat-treatment of Pt1/def-TiO2 with ETEM under an H2 atmosphere from room photocurrent density compared with f-TiO2, indicating that the
temperature to 200 °C. Scale bar, 10 nm. (b) The optimized structures of unique Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic interface endows Pt1/def-TiO2 with
intermediate states and transition states on Pt1/def-TiO2 surfaces during the better performance on generating photogenerated electron-hole
single Pt atoms-driven surface defect engineering.
pairs and suppressing their subsequent recombination. All
above results confirm that the single Pt atoms can promote the
neighboring TiO2 units to generate the surface oxygen vacancies,
To confirm this unique phenomenon, a series of photo- leading to the formation of atomic interface between isolated Pt
electrochemical experiments are carried out. [13] Firstly, electron- atom and Ti3+ defect with the atomically dispersed Pt-O-Ti3+
paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurement was conducted to active center.
detect the oxygen vacancies, which demonstrates a signal of
oxygen vacancy at the g values of 2.003. As shown in Figure Given the excellent photo-electrochemical properties, the
S11, the signal intensity of oxygen vacancies of Pt 1/def-TiO2 is Pt1/def-TiO2 was applied in photocatalytic hydrogen production
obviously higher than that of f-TiO2, suggesting the existence of reaction. As shown in Figure 4a and 4b, the f-TiO2 catalyst
single Pt atoms promotes the generation of oxygen vacancies. exhibits a poor photocatalytic performance with 672 μmol g-1 h-1,
Secondly, Raman spectra were performed to investigate the which may result from the fast electron-hole recombination. As
surface information. As shown in Figure S12, the peaks of expected, the as-obtained Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst exhibits a
Raman spectra of Pt1/def-TiO2 and f-TiO2 at 145, 197, 396 and remarkably enhanced photocatalytic performance even at a low
515 cm-1 are ascribed to anatase TiO2 phase.[13a] Compared with Pt content of 0.02 wt%. The photocatalytic H2 production rate of
the commercial P25, the peak intensities of Pt1/def-TiO2 and f- Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst reaches up to 52720 μmol g-1 h-1. For
TiO2 are obviously decreased (Figure S12a). And the shift and comparison, the Pt nanoparticles as co-catalysts supported on
broadening of the Eg peaks at ~144 cm-1 in enlarged Raman TiO2, marked with Pt NPs/f-TiO2 catalyst, was prepared and
spectra of Pt1/def-TiO2 are more obvious than that of f-TiO2 characterized (Figure S17). And the photocatalytic activity with
(Figure S12b), indicating Pt1/def-TiO2 possesses more a H2 production rate of 4458 μmol g-1 h-1 is observed on this Pt
disordered phase on the surface and higher oxygen vacancies NPs/f-TiO2 catalyst. The photocatalytic H2 production rate of
concentration. Furthermore, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy Pt1/def-TiO2 is about 78.5 and 11.8 times than those of pure f-
(XPS) analysis was carried out to study the chemical states of TiO2 and Pt NPs/f-TiO2 (Figure 4b). Moreover, the Pt1/def-TiO2
Pt1/def-TiO2 and f-TiO2. The O 1s spectra of Pt1/def-TiO2 exhibits catalyst achieves an unexpectedly great turnover frequency
two peaks at 530 eV and 532.1 eV, which are attributed to lattice (TOF) of 51423 h-1, which is a significant enhancement by a
oxygen (deemed as the oxygen band of Ti-O-Ti) and the oxygen factor of 591 in comparison with Pt NPs/f-TiO2 (TOF, 87 h-1)
atoms near oxygen vacancies, respectively. The peak area at catalyst (Figure 4c). To our best knowledge, the Pt1/def-TiO2
532.1 eV in Pt1/def-TiO2 is much larger than that of f-TiO2 catalyst exhibits a recorded-level photocatalytic H2 production
(Figure S13), suggesting the content of oxygen vacancies in activity, which outperforms most of previously reported
Pt1/def-TiO2 is obviously higher than that of f-TiO2. In Ti 2p photocatalysts (Table S2). These results reveal that maintaining
spectra, the XPS peaks at 458.7 eV and 457.9 eV are ascribed Pt species as isolated atomic sites to form Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic
RESEARCH ARTICLE
interface plays a crucial role in boosting the photocatalytic processes are highly complex as determined by the previously
performance. reported literatures [12,15], therefore, in the HER calculations, the
oxygen vacancies were not introduced.
Accepted Manuscript
reactant initial states, intermediate states, and final states for
Volmer step, Tafel step and Heyrosky step were inset together
with their reaction pathways. In neutral media, water molecules
are the reacting species. Water molecules are inert, therefore,
water activation and dissociation kinetic in Volmer step (water
Figure 4. (a) Hydrogen production monitored over 2h in the presence of dissociation and H* formation) is usually crucial for the entire
CH3OH as sacrificial electron donors. (b,c) The photocatalytic H2 production process [17]. For the considered model, the energy barrier in
activities (b) and TOFs (c) of Pt1/def-TiO2 and references. (d) Cyclic tests of Volmer step is 33.6 kcal/mol. Then both Heyrovsky step and
Pt1/def-TiO2 under UV-visible light. Tafel step were considered and the corresponding energy
barriers were calculated. Obviously, the favorable hydrogen
desorption process is the Tafel step with an energy barrier of
The cyclic tests were performed to assess the photocatalytic 28.2 kcal/mol, being much lower than that of Heyrovsky step
durability. As revealed in Figure 4d, the Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst (96.4 kcal/mol). Furthermore, the barrier of Tafel step is also
shows a negligible decline in continuous H 2 production during lower than that of Volmer step, indicating that the water
the subsequent cyclic runs. Furthermore, we characterized the dissociation is indeed the rate-determining-step.
spent Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst after cyclic durability tests. The
corresponding XRD pattern matches well with the fresh Pt 1/def-
TiO2 catalyst, suggesting its crystallinity and structure are well
retained (Figure S18). Also, TEM images, HRTEM images, EDS
mapping as well as AC HAADF-STEM images together confirm
that no nanoparticles aggregation is detected and Pt species are
existed as isolated atoms (Figures S19 and S20). Furthermore,
the Pt-L3-edge XANES and EXAFS spectra of the spent Pt 1/def-
TiO2 are similar to those of the fresh Pt1/def-TiO2, indicating
atomic dispersion and structural properties of Pt species are still
preserved after cyclic durability tests (Figures S21 and S22).
The above results demonstrate the excellent stability of Pt 1/def-
TiO2.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Conclusion [4] a) X. Chen, L. Liu, F. Huang, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1861-1885; b) F.
Xiao, W. Zhou, B. Sun, H. Li, P. Qiao, L. Ren, X. Zhao, H. Fu, Sci. China
Mater. 2018, 61, 822-830; c) B. H. Lee, S. Park, M. Kim, A. K. Sinha, S. C.
In summary, we fabricate a high-performance photocatalyst
Lee, E. Jung, W. J. Chang, K. S. Lee, J. H. Kim, S. P. Cho, H. Kim, K. T.
by assembling isolated Pt atoms on the defective TiO 2. We Nam, T. Hyeon, Nat. Mater. 2019, 18, 620-626.
discover that the presence of single Pt atoms promotes the [5] a) R. Marschall, Adv. Funct Mater. 2014, 24, 2421-2440; b) H. Zhang, J.
construction of Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic interface. The control Cai, Y. Wang, M. Wu, M. Meng, Y. Tian, X. Li, J. Zhang, L. Zheng, Z.
experiments and various photo-electrochemical characterization Jiang, J. Gong, Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 2018, 220, 126-136.
as well as DFT calculations together well confirm that the [6] a) M. Kong, Y. Li, X. Chen, T. Tian, P. Fang, F. Zheng, X. Zhao, J. Am.
transfer efficiency of photogenerated electron from Ti3+ defective Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16414-16417; b) Y. C. Zhang, N. Afzal, L. Pan, X.
Zhang, J. J. Zou, Adv. Sci. 2019; c) X. Pan, M. Q. Yang, X. Fu, N. Zhang,
sites to single Pt atoms is facilitated via the Pt-O-Ti3+ atomic
Y. J. Xu, Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3601-3614.
interface, which favors the separation of electron-hole pairs and
[7] a) R. Chen, S. Pang, H. An, J. Zhu, S. Ye, Y. Gao, F. Fan, C. Li, Nat.
suppresses the subsequent recombination. Owing to this unique Energy 2018, 3, 655-663; b) J. Huang, Q. Shang, Y. Huang, F. Tang, Q.
atomic interface, the Pt1/def-TiO2 catalyst achieves a recorded- Zhang, Q. Liu, S. Jiang, F. Hu, W. Liu, Y. Luo, T. Yao, Y. Jiang, Z. Pan, Z.
Accepted Manuscript
level photocatalytic H2 production performance, exceeding Sun, S. Wei, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 2137-2141.
almost all of known photocatalysts. This work presents an [8] a) J. Yang, D. Wang, H. Han, C. Li, Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46, 1900-1909;
effective approach to boost catalytic performance via the b) J. Ran, J. Zhang, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, S. Z. Qiao, Chem. Soc. Rev.
construction of atomic interface. We believe this design concept 2014, 43, 7787-7812.
[9] a) X. Li, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2603-2636; b) H. Li,
will be widely applied to develop other highly efficient catalysts.
Y. Zhou, W. Tu, J. Ye, Z. Zou, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 998-1013; d)
Y.-Y. Ma, Z.-L. Lang, L.-K. Yan, Y.-H. Wang, H.-Q. Tan, K. Feng, Y.-J. Xia,
J. Zhong, Y. Liu, Z.-H. Kang, Y.-G. Li, Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 2114-
Acknowledgements 2123.
[10] a) Y. Chen, S. Ji, C. Chen, Q. Peng, D. Wang, Y. Li, Joule 2018, 2, 1242-
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of 1264; b) Y.-X. Zhao, M.-M. Wang, Y. Zhang, X.-L. Ding, S.-G. He, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 8002-8006; c) A. Wang, J. Li, T. Zhang, Nat.
China (2018YFA0702003, 2018YFB0704100), the National
Rev. Chem. 2018, 2, 65-81; d) T. Sun, L. Xu, D. Wang, Y. Li, Nano Res.
Natural Science Foundation of China (21671117, 21871159, 2019, DOI: 10.1007/s12274-019-2345-4; e) T. Li, F. Liu, Y. Tang, L. Li, S.
21890383, 21703219, 51872008), the National Postdoctoral Miao, Y. Su, J. Zhang, J. Huang, H. Sun, M. Haruta, A. Wang, B. Qiao, J.
Program for Innovative Talents (BX20180160), the China Li, T. Zhang, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 130, 7921-7925; f) H. Zhang, J.
Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M640113), and the Wei, J. Dong, G. Liu, L. Shi, P. An, G. Zhao, J. Kong, X. Wang, X. Meng,
Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 1182005). We thank J. Zhang, J. Ye, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 128, 14522-14526.
[11] R. Prins, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2714-2738.
the BL14W1 station in Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility
[12] P. Scheiber, M. Fidler, O. Dulub, M. Schmid, U. Diebold, W. Hou, U.
(SSRF) and the 1W1B station in Beijing Synchrotron Radiation
Aschauer, A. Selloni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109, 136103.
Facility (BSRF) for XAFS measurements. [13] a) J. Li, M. Zhang, Z. Guan, Q. Li, C. He, J. Yang, Appl. Catal. B: Environ.
2017, 206, 300-307; b) G. Ou, Y. Xu, B. Wen, R. Lin, B. Ge, Y. Tang, Y.
Keywords: single Pt atoms • surface defect engineering • Liang, C. Yang, K. Huang, D. Zu, R. Yu, W. Chen, J. Li, H. Wu, L.-M. Liu,
Y. Li, Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1302.
atomic interface • photocatalytic hydrogen production
[14] a) B. J. Morgan, G. W. Watson, J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 2321-2328.
b) U. Aschauer, Y. He, H. Cheng, S.-C. Li, U. Diebold, A. Selloni, J. Phys.
[1] a) A. Kubacka, M. Fernandez-Garcia, G. Colon, Chem. Rev. 2012, 112,
Chem. C 2010, 114, 1278-1284. c) W. E. Kaden, T. Wu, W. A. Kunkel, S.
1555-1614; b) Y. Tachibana, L. Vayssieres, J. R. Durrant, Nat. Photonic
L. Anderson, Science 2009, 326, 826-829.
2012, 6, 511; c) T. Hisatomi, J. Kubota, K. Domen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014,
[15] a) M. Setvin, U. Aschauer, P. Scheiber, Y. F. Li, W. Hou, M. Schmid, A.
43, 7520-7535; d) J. H. Montoya, L. C. Seitz, P. Chakthranont, A.
Selloni, U. Diebold, Science 2013, 341, 988-991. b) X. Q. Gong, A.
Vojvodic, T. F. Jaramillo, J. K. Norskov, Nat. Mater. 2016, 16, 70-81; e) T.-
Selloni, O. Dulub, P. Jacobson, U. Diebold, J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130,
T. Zhuang, Y. Liu, M. Sun, S.-L. Jiang, M.-W. Zhang, X.-C. Wang, Q.
370-381. c) H. Cheng, A. Selloni, Physical Review B 2009, 79, 092101.
Zhang, J. Jiang, S.-H. Yu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 127, 11657-
[16] a) J. K. Nørskov, T. Bligaard, A. Logadottir, J. Kitchin, J. G. Chen, S.
11662. f) R. Chen, Z.-H. Yan, X.-J. Kong, L.-S. Long, L.-S. Zheng, Angew.
Pandelov, U. Stimming, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, J23-J26. b) H.
Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 16796-16800.
Xu, D. Cheng, D. Cao, X. C. Zeng, Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 339-348. c) J.
[2] a) A. Fujishima, K. Honda, Nature 1972, 238, 37-38; b) A. L. Linsebigler, G.
Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Guo, C. Chen, C.-L. Dong, R.-S. Liu, C.-P. Han, Y. Li,
Lu, J. T. Yates, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735-758; c) X. Chen, L. Liu, P. Y. Yu,
Y. Gogotsi, G. Wang, Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 985-992.
S. S. Mao, Science 2011, 331, 746-750; d) H. Hussain, G. Tocci, T.
[17] a) J. Mao, C.-T. He, J. Pei, W. Chen, D. He, Y. He, Z. Zhuang, C. Chen, Q.
Woolcot, X. Torrelles, C. L. Pang, D. S. Humphrey, C. M. Yim, D. C.
Peng, D. Wang, Y. Li, Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4958. b) Y. Zheng, Y. Jiao,
Grinter, G. Cabailh, O. Bikondoa, R. Lindsay, J. Zegenhagen, A.
Y. Zhu, L. H. Li, Y. Han, Y. Chen, M. Jaroniec, S.-Z. Qiao, J. Am. Chem.
Michaelides, G. Thornton, Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 461-466.
Soc. 2016, 138, 16174-16181.
[3] a) Y. Qu, X. Duan, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2568-2580; b) J. Low, J. Yu,
M. Jaroniec, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1601694.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Yuanjun Chen, Shufang Ji, Wenming
Sun, Yongpeng Lei*, Qichen Wang, Ang
Li, Wenxing Chen, Gang Zhou*, Zedong
Zhang, Yu Wang, Lirong Zheng,
Qinghua Zhang, Lin Gu, Xiaodong Han,
Dingsheng Wang*, Yadong Li*
Single Pt atoms assembled on defective TiO2 support (Pt1/def-TiO2) as a highly Page No. – Page No.
efficient photocatalyst not only serve as proton reduction sites, but promote the
Engineering atomic interface by single
neighboring TiO2 units to generate surface oxygen vacancies, leading to the
Pt atoms for enhanced photocatalytic
formation of atomic interface between isolated Pt atom and Ti 3+ defect with the
Accepted Manuscript
hydrogen production
atomically dispersed Pt-O-Ti3+ active center. This unique structure endows Pt1/def-
TiO2 with excellent photocatalytic hydrogen production performance.