Soil Investigation Report BROWN PAPER PM 4 & PM 10 JL. RAYA SURABAYA ~ MOJOKERTO Km, 44 PT. CIPTA USAHA PRATAMA,ere ree eee etal Project name :Solivestgation of BROWN PAPER PM 4 and PM 10| Location “Jalan Raya Surabaya ~ Mojokarto km 44 © Chent PT Cipta Usaha Pratama, no, 138""/SOP/K/l/2038, 29.2208 ¢ Workin period: Field works 2B March 2018-26 Ape 2018, ©. Scope of work :Fild works Number of boreholes. points Boring depth 460m NumbererseT 109 ‘The main purpose of this sol investigation sto obtain parameters of soll tenet for substructure design ofthe plant. ‘Scope of Works Field Condition Soil investigation was conducted inside the factory. Soll surface during the test may be considered fat. sol avestigation was done in wo diferent locations, Le FM (61 ~B3} and PM 10 (8485). Borehole leatons can be sen in igure 1.0 and Figure 1b Zara depth the sting ground surface level during the invetgntion, 22° Feld works 221. Boring “+ Rotary dling method was conducted using YSO-1, Thick slurry war sed to ensure stability of boreholes ‘+ Unilsturbed samples were collected by open deve sampling method wine thin walled sampler @73 mm50 cm with area ratio < 30%, ‘+ Disturbed samples were obtained from STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (PT) with 1.5m intervals SPT was conducted using standard-size automated trp hammer, 1+ Relative density and consistancy of and and slay according to SPT data, canbe found in attachment 1 ‘+ Boring log canbe foundin attachment 2. orig log contain SPT readirgs and water evel incide the borehole 2.2.2. Documentations Documentations of hie oiler canbe found in Attachment 6. DATA PERSADA SS raed23. Laboratory Works 234 232, aa. ‘Test Results and Discussions Prosticty Index and Seve Analyse ‘The plastityndexisa measure ofthe plastic of sl. The plasty indecisthe ste ofthe range of water contents were the sol exhibits plastic properties, The Plis the aiference ‘between the uid mit andthe plastic limit (PI= LLP). sols witha high l tend tobe ly, those with lower Pl tend to be sit, and those witha Plo (non-pastic)nd to have litle ‘ernst ly. From the plasty char, ean be found that the cayey sl samples can be cased as CH (cay of ih plasty). According tothe results of steve ana, the obtained Sandy sll samples were dominated by coarse grained sol (move than SOM retained on of ‘sbove No, 200 (0.075 mm). Te plasticity Index and seve snalis are sum ‘Attachment Shear Strength Tests Shear strength tests conducted in this project consist of unconsolidated undraned trie compression (tiavial UU) test and. deect shear test Unconsolidted andrained tii compression test was conducted to determine the undrained shear strength ofthe clayey ri samples. The sll specimen is subjected to 8 constant confining presse and to strain- controled axial leading in accordance to ASTM 02850-82, when no chan in total moisture contents alowed, The al oad i increased by applying» constant rat of strain until the Specimen fal. For the sandy soil simples, undrsined shear strength was determines sing ficect shea test in accordance to ASTM D3080-79. The results of shear strength tests are summarized in attachment 4 Consolidation Test ‘The deformation characterises ofthe sols were studi in consolidation avai which pots the correlation of void ratio change, eto adeltional stress apple, p Test procedure te _sccordng to ASTM 02435-80 standard. The results ae inthe form af es og pgaph and log ‘vs log paraph, where cis the coefficient of consoldation and sa measure ofthe rate at ‘which the consolidation process proceeds caused by stress p. Based onthe consoldation analysis, the sein pressure the sls inthis project can also be lente. Thegraphs en be observed in attachment. —) ‘+ spt results are summarized in Figure 22 for PM 4 (81 ~ 65) and gure 2 for PMO (84 85). itcanbe concluded that the sl profile fr PMs quite non-uniform, nevertheless ‘Shows senior tend of sll strength. However, the sll profile for PM 10 i quite non ‘uniform and shows diferent trend of soll strength, ‘+ From boring login ttachment2,tcan be observed that PM 4s dominated by clayey soll with fine and coarse sand layers can be found randomly in between. Medium dense to Gense coarse sand layer canbe found in BL and 62 atthe end ofthe boreholes Itcan be ‘ued as bearing layer for deep foundation, However, n 82, this coaee sand layer anak Befound ands eplced by hora sandy sit layer ‘+ For PM 10 the soll profes dominated by fir to ety tif sity lay 84, bet the soil Profle in BS is also dominated by sity ely, ne sand ayers canbe found sandwiched by sity lo. DATA PERSADA General a 2 Nh TTFor PM 4, undisturbed sample taken indieate tat the corresponding fe sand aye has bulk density, y= 20 N/m wth fction angle, = 25" For clayey so, Kean be ndested ‘hat this ayer has bulk deny, y= 7 kin? with undralned shear stergth, c= 42 KPa [As it can be seen in Figure 2, clayey zo layer has rather low compres; with compressibility inden, = 0.42 and with nal vid ato, = 1.42. ‘+ For PM 10, undisturbed sample taken indicted that the coresponding:oetse sand ayer has bulk density, y= 22 laf? with fletion angle, = 39. For clayey so, ean be Indicated that this layer has bulk density, y= 17 Kf with unrained shear strength, = 62HPa. Ast canbe seen in gure 3.2 cay sl layer has rather low compressilty, ith compressibility index, C= 0.43, and with nal void ratio, = 1.45, 3.2. _StatleLoad Test and Safety Factor for Deep Foundation ‘+The hearing capacity ofthe jacked pls imited by the strength ofthe structural material and te strength ofthe olin the form ofthe shaft friction and the tipreistane). Before commencing the instalation of the pile foundations as a whole; to determine winether the estimation of the allowable capacity ism accordance withthe realty nthe file, iis recommended to do the static lsd test(S} onthe preliminary ple. Typically, the SLT implementations done according to the ASTM D1143 guideline. ‘Te acceptable settlement ofthe ple foundation isnot exceeding 10 rm at 1x working load inthe short term and must be verified fist by SLT. A minimum safety factor (SF) of 20's recommended by ACIS43R-12 and ASTM D143. For the calculation ofthe bearing capacity ofthe jacked ple and shallow foundations in this projet, a SFof2and3 wl be used respectively 23. Shallow Foundation Design '+ Inthe design of shalow foundation at 81 and 82, unérined shear strength (c) can be ‘taken as high a 32 Pa ‘+ Allowable bearing capacity of shallow foundation at 3 m depth canbe expressed in ths form eae _ 3266.18) tan = EE 5S kPa 33. Deep Foundation Design ‘+ Matera capacity (Qe) of precast jacked piles largely depend onthe specification from ‘he manufactur, ‘+ Allowable bearing capacity or safe working load (Cu) sutimate beating capacity which iedvided bya safety factor. The formula ved tocompute the allowable bearing capacty, uth G+ Qs _ +O Cain = _ shat tion Send bearing ‘© Comtlation for unt shaft ftlon fis moderately conservative take, Le. 25 x SPT (4?) Guidelines ofthis Formula can be studied is Jackin. Ple Design ~ Moloysion Experience and Design Approach to ECT (ttt://wwr anpzeo com mifdownload/publistion/2008_06 na) + For 83 and Bs, in accordance to unit end bearing as high as 3000 kPa and 3200 ka, respectively at 24 m depth and uit shaft friction whieh work ine tye surface layer, ‘an be estimated that Qu = 305 kV ifjacked ple 25x25 em? were wed, This Guu must. be compared with precast matrial capacity (Oy), Le. 450 kN Tis material capac is DATA PERSADA a SS oy RThigher than Guw. Therefoe, allowable beating capacity (Quy) ix moce eitical in the termination of acked pile capacity the projet. The maximum penstration depth of ‘the jacked piles estimated at around 28 m.Atthat depth, ie = Qu = 801 ‘+ ForB5, inaccordance to unt end bearing a igh as 5400 KPa a¢ 20m deh and ni shaft {ction whichworts since the surface layer itean be estimated that Quy 311 KMijacked pile 25.125 em? were used. Thi Quy must be compared with precast material opacity (a), Le. 450 KN. Ths material opacity is higher than Qua Therefore, dlowable bearing apacty (Quai more eral in the determination of jacked ple capac in thi project. ‘+The capactyof the ple jckng machine ured shoul be greater than theuitimate bering capacity ofthe ple The pile jacking machine specfiations tat are used along withthe pile material andits connections alse determine the maximum depth mit ofthe ple that an bento IV. Suggestions for Foundation’ ‘+f shallow foundation were used at 8 and 82, undrained shear strength (cu) ca be taken as high 3532, Allowable bearing capacity of shallow foundation at 1 m depth willbe around 5 KPa + For 83 and B¢, in accordance to unt end bearing as high 5 3000 KPa and 3200%Pa, respectively ‘at 24m depth and unit shat retion which works since the surface ayer, ican be estimated that (Qu, = 305 kif jacked pile 25x25 cr” ware used. The manimum penetration depth ofthe jacked pile estimated at around 28 m. At that depth, Quy = Qn = 450 1, ‘+ Forls inaccordance to unit end bearing as high 35800 ka st 20m depth anduni sha fietion which works singe the suracs layer, team Be estimated that Qe = 311 KN ished pile 25 x25 can? were ued ‘+ Emironmental problems that may aise from the use offcked ple aren covered inthis report omever, should be considered careful bythe desene. ‘+ Risadvised to put up indeator ples asthe measure ofthe depth that must be ceheved, and also the bearing capacity suggested above. Conducting Static Lod Test (SIT recommended, ‘+ cualty Control (AC or foundation works must be taken care of prope et et i i se i ot pt lm ig he amin ty be sce vl, See Sees se eyo srr pega a ear os ge DATA PERSADA a a a EROGamabarSummary e - log p Brown Paper PM 10 Jl. Raya Surabaya - Mojokerto Km. 44 O04: 790750 ees:s008e7 “ees 8sn800 20 Void ratio, @ 10 os. oa 1 10 100 Consolidation pressure, tim? Figure 3b DATA PERSADA aLampiran 7AND. uny ano ST ee Cay sen seperate aon of ote to ‘Stu een Tet "San Petar tte tee (uowritonm at | sve nesty twonsanonn at | cosisence eta] ect) oe ye @ eset ae cat 0 lowe 10-29 Ns ene os st aed c- 4-0 ey 2 vey dese > oe I Tie OAACTED ROINGS ED NOTE TCTED gM TRG HO PE ROCK WERTHERING CLASSIFICATION GLASSIFIORTION OF ROCK QUALITY I =| es] LATION vOTHEDISCOMTUTES ro aa | si a oxy | sao | are jth eeerarcemameatsrs |" | Jesmem| "x | “wma fers os fo [sss fanmchrescrc waypone | 0-28 | ones eoyisetanrsttoe rami go] toe damaptn to ren ieee, alae ae sasepiammcnceccegere |v pesenlucanatarareets ru fom] a fesereaniene |etceoyed. Tear ia ape cngn i vue co a Sceontarata a tseteat |0-100| testa? C7 Telcos aime dtgatman dere Kooy’ Basten eqcasts aeLampiran 2t PROJECT : Broan Paper PR 10 — — U)) bste at it HIil | wlosle LA aul ns |g + ye | (i i | HIII1) < | | wip) mee el | 4 1 ae + | : | i | | ae { A][inc ee ES So aaa Se ee 3 rete. t | vofaale {HIB ala : mt. t Bt A A Sones _.Lampiran 3Plasticity Chart Brown Paper PM 4 & PM 10 uJ Raya Surabaya - Mojokerto Km, 44 Plasticity Index, Pt Liguid Limit, LL = —= &f cme it Hil HHA i HEH HHH aLampiran 4DIRECT SHEAR TEST jest Bown Paper PM 1 oeaion I RayeSuataya- atom yr eesti I = Le reserTRIAXIAL TEST RESULT = UU Prjest_ Brown Paper PATO Tieton Raa cyto Sino sean Fee a Go Ta aa al oatTRIAXIAL TESTRESULT UU. Pies Bown Paper Pu 10 ‘eeslon it Faya Sunbys teovn 4 “Geuecupion _setio ten, nen Gay apf fElETETRIAXIALTEST RESULT UU. Prod Brown Paper PTO can Ray ua hepa ‘Same coorpon Siow, Oo oarLampiran 5tion test result Brown Paper PM 40 41. Raya Surabaya -Mojokerto Km. 44 ti | | \| o IN i ul | | eae | . eee a coset of constation, rx 10" omiees Consolidation pressure, tertConsolidation test result Brown Paper PM 10 JI. Raya Surabaya -Mojokerto Km. 44 ote void ratio, | LLANE Titi Consoiation pressure, toni? costiclnt consolidator, re 1-4 omensJJ. Raya Surabaya Mojokerto Km. 44 void ato, ¢ Consolation pressure, tnt os : 0 ‘0 ‘Consolidation pressure, toni