Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a) Background of CIMB................................................................................................................................3
b) Horizontal analysis of CIMB financial statements....................................................................................3
c) Financial ratios with calculations.............................................................................................................6
References.................................................................................................................................................10
a) Background of CIMB
CIMB is a Malaysian Investment bank, whose full name is Commerce International Merchant
Bankers. It was founded in January 1974 and its headquarters are in Kuala Lumpur. CIMB was
formerly known as Bumiputra Commerce Holdings before it changed to its current name CIMB
in 1986. CIMB is also an expert services provider in Islamic finance. CIMB offers a wide array
of financial services which include consumer, commercial and investment banking.
Over the years, CIMB had acquired several banks and financial services companies to add to its
conglomerate. This includes the acquisition of GK Goh Securities in 2005 and PT Bank Niaga in
2004. CIMB listed on Bursa Malaysia in 1987, with RM35,1 billion as its market capitalization
as at 30 June 2020. Its listings are profitable and the bank delivers high returns which amount up
to 340%. CIMB is involved in investment banking within the ASEAN region, and it is a major
stakeholder of cash equities and investments within the ASEAN region. The operations of CIMB
are across national frontiers, with its branches in India, Korea, Taiwan, Melbourne, Sydney,
London, Hong Kong and New York. It also engages in digital retail banker, being the forefront
service provider in the ten ASEAN countries. CIMB continues to innovate and upgrade its
products and services, and serves as an effective universal banker with a growing franchise. It
serves as a seasoned corporate adviser in the financial services industry. It also engages in asset
management programmes for its clients. (CIMB Website, 2020)
Liabilities
Current 210,000 243,000 (33,000) (13.6)
Liabilities
Long Term 100,000 200,000 (100,000) (50.0)
Liabilities
Total Liabilities 310,000 443,000 (133,000) (30.0)
Stockholder’s
Equity
Preferred 6% 150,000 150,000 -- --
stock, RM 100
par
Common Stock, 500,000 500,000 -- --
RM10 par
Retained 179,500 137,500 42,000 30.5
Earnings
Total Stock 829,500 787,500 42,000 5.3
Holder’s equity
Total Liabilities 1,139,500 1,230,500 (91,000) (7.4)
and
Stockholder’s
equity
Comparative schedule of Current Assets
Non-interest income refers to the revenue which a bank earns outside its primary activity of
lending to its customers. This is bank and creditor income derived from other fees such as
insufficient fund fees, annual fees, deposit slip fees and other related fees incurred when the
customers of the bank are making their transactions. (Brunnermeier, M.K., Dong, G.N. and Palia,
D., 2020)
Non−interest Income−Non−Interest Expenses
=
Total Earning Assets
RM 600000−RM 400,000
RM 200,000
=1
Cost-to-income ratio
This is a ratio which shows the proportion of costs compared to the income which the company
is earning. This ratio is an indicator of profitability because the objective is to minimize costs
while inflating the income of the bank. (Pradhan, R.S. and Parajuli, P., 2017)
OperatingCosts
C/I ratio =
Operating Income
RM 180,000
=
RM 395,000
=45.56%
Return on Assets
This ratio indicates the percentage of profit which the bank earns in relation to its overall assets.
(Atmoko, Y., Defung, F. and Tricahyadinata, I., 2018)
Net Income
=
Total Assets
RM 91,000
=
RM 1,139,500
=7.9%
Return on Equity
This ratio indicates the profit which one can earn from their own money invested into the
company. In essence, this indicates how much money the bank would earn per ringgit invested.
(Atmoko, Y., Defung, F. and Tricahyadinata, I., 2018)
Net Income
=
Shareholder ' s Equity
RM 91,000
=
RM 829,500
=10.97%
Loan-to-assets ratio
This ratio measures the total outstanding loan in relation to the total assets of the bank. This ratio
indicates the liquidity of the company and when the ratio is high, it means that the organization
has much liabilities and its overall liquidity is low. It is calculated by dividing the Debt/Assets.
Ideally, if it is 80-90% it would be profitable. (Riadi, 2018)
RM 310,000
=
RM 1,139,500
=27.20%
Loan-to-deposits ratio
This ratio is used to measure the ability of the bank to cover the withdrawals of its customers. It
is calculated by dividing the total amount of loans by the total amount of deposits within that
fiscal year. (Riadi, 2018)
Total Loans
=
Total Deposits
RM 3,500,000
=
RM 2,800,000
=1.25
Impaired loan ratio
According to FAS 114, an impaired loan refers to the incident where the lender is uncertain that
they will be able to collect the amount due as originally agreed in the lending contract. (Riadi,
2018)
Amount outstanding of impaired loans
=
T otal outstanding loan portfolio
4 million
= = o.8
5 million
= 80%
This ratio serves as a measure the capacity of the bank to be protected in the event of losses in
future. The bank anticipates default payments on its loans and therefore it allocates a percentage
of its loan income to cater for the anticipated losses. The higher the rate is, the stronger its
capacity is to shield from potential loan payment defaults. (Musa, M. M., & Nasieku, D. T. 2015)
(Pret ax income + Loanloss provision)
=
Net ChargesOffs
= ¿¿
=3.4
This is a measure of the bank’s financial leverage. It indicates the measure of the bank’s total
assets which have been financed by creditors. It is calculated by dividing Total Liabilities/Total
Assets. (Pinto, P., & Joseph, N. R. (2017).
RM 310,000
=
RM 1,139,500
=27.20%
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
This ratio is used to calculate the financial leverage of the bank, measuring the amount of
shareholder’s equity and debt which have been used to finance the company’s assets. It is
calculated by dividing Total liabilities/Shareholder equity. (Rahmantio, I., Saifi, M. and
Nurlaily, F., 2018)
Net Income−Preferred Dividends
=
Weighted Average shares outstanding
310,000
=
150,000
=2.06
References
Almeida, H., 2019. Is it time to get rid of earnings-per-share (EPS)?. Review of Corporate Finance
Studies, 8(1), pp.174-206.
Atmoko, Y., Defung, F. and Tricahyadinata, I., 2018. The effect of return on assets, debt to equity ratio,
and firm size on dividend payout ratio. PERFORMANCE , 14 (2), pp. 103-109.
Aziz, M.R.A. and Nooh, M.M.A.N., 2014. Design Analysis of CIMB Bank’s Website. Jurnal
Teknologi, 66(1).
Brunnermeier, M.K., Dong, G.N. and Palia, D., 2020. Banks’ noninterest income and systemic risk. The
Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(2), pp.229-255.
MUSA, M. M., & NASIEKU, D. T. 2015 EFFECTS OF CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT ON LOAN
PERFORMANCE OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN KENYA: A CASE OF LISTED COMMERCIAL BANKS IN
KENYA.
Pinto, P., & Joseph, N. R. (2017). Capital structure and financial performance of banks. International
Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 15(23), 303-312.
Pradhan, R.S. and Parajuli, P., 2017. Impact of capital adequacy and cost income ratio on performance of
Nepalese commercial banks. International Journal of Management Research, 8(1), pp.6-18.
Rahmantio, I., Saifi, M. and Nurlaily, F., 2018. Effect of Debt to Equity Ratio, Return on Equity, Return on
Assets and Company Size on Firm Value (Study of Mining Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock
Exchange 2012- 2016). Journal of Business Administration , 57 (1), pp. 151-159.
Riadi, S., 2018, March. The effect of Third Parties Fund, Non Performing Loan, Capital Adequacy Ratio,
Loan to Deposit Ratio, Return On Assets, Net Interest Margin and Operating Expenses Operating Income
on Lending (Study in Regional Development Banks in Indonesia). In Proceedings of the International
Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Bandung, Indonesia.
Sharker, M.R., 2017. Internship Report on Financial Statement Analysis of First Security Islami Bank
Limited (Doctoral dissertation, Daffodil International University).
Suu, N.D., Luu, T.Q., Pho, K.H. and McAleer, M., 2020. Net Interest Margin of Commercial Banks in
Vietnam. Advances in Decision Sciences, 24(1), pp.1-27.