Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYSIS
(Jindal Steel & Power Ltd)
(SAIL)
Financial Management Research Paper
Shaurya Singru
17089
BMS 2-B
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Introduction
Objectives
Research Methodology
Study Findings
Conclusion
INTRODUCTION:
1. OPERATING LEVERAGE:
The higher the operating leverage a business possesses, the more difficult
it is to forecast the earnings of the business. For example, a relatively
small error in forecasting sales can be magnified into large errors in
earnings projections. If sales decrease by 10 percent, then earnings may
decrease by 30 percent. This means that businesses that have high fixed
costs typically report erratic earnings, which makes them more difficult to
value. In contrast, businesses that have low fixed costs and high variable
costs present lower volatility in earnings and are simpler to value. For
example, a 10 percent growth rate in sales for a variable-cost firm could
translate into 10 percent growth in earnings. The earnings are therefore not
as volatile as a business with high amounts of operating leverage.
2. FINANCIAL LEVERAGE
If you can envision a balance sheet, financial leverage refers to the right-
hand side of the balance sheet. Operating leverage refers to the left-hand
side of the balance sheet - the plant and equipment side. Operating
leverage determines the mix of fixed assets or plant and equipment used
by the business firm. Financial leverage refers to how the firm will pay for
it or how the operation will be financed.
3. COMBINED LEVERAGE
Operating leverage magnifies the returns from our plant and equipment or
fixed assets. Financial leverage magnifies the returns from our debt
financing. Combined leverage is the total of these two types of leverage or
the total magnification of returns. This is looking at leverage from a
balance sheet perspective.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
For the purpose of this study, two companies from the Steel Industry were
chosen: Jindal Steel and Power Limited and Steel Authority of India
Limited, a PSU. The financial statements of the two companies were
analysed. The time period selected consisted of the Financial Years 2017-
18, 2016-17, 2015-16, 2014-15, and 2013-14. The Annual Reports of the
company and Capitaline were used to extract the relevant data.
The data obtained namely the EBIT, PBT, Net Sales and Variable Costs
were further analysed and used to calculate the following Degrees of
Leverage of the two firms:
HYPOTHESIS:
The following hypotheses were set up for the purpose of the study:
RESULTS:
JINDAL STEEL AND POWER LTD.:
From the above information, the Degree of Leverage were calculated and
the following are the results:
It is evident from this table that Jindal Steel and Power Limited has seen a
lot of variation in the Degrees of leverage in the past few years. While the
Degree of Operating Leverage has increased from 1.2 in 2013-14 to 2.2 in
2017-18, the Degree of Financial Leverage has decreased from 1.2 in
2013-14 to -0.6 in 2017-18.
4. On similar lines, DOL, DFL and DCL for Steel Authority of India
Ltd. are though positive are pretty stable. They are neither to high nor
negative. Which clearly indicate that the firm grows less risky and less
volatile across years.
CONCLUSION:
The difference between degrees of operating leverage in Jindal Power and
Steel and SAIL was significant. Similarly, the difference between degree
of combined leverage of the companies Jindal Power and Steel and SAIL
was significant.
Hence, it can be concluded from this study that there was a significant
difference between actual and estimated degree of leverage of the
companies as well as between the degree of leverage of Jindal Power and
Steel and SAIL.