Professional Documents
Culture Documents
case study to determine her reading level. The QRI yields information for three
selections starting at an easy level until the student comes to material that has
become too difficult. To determine a students’ placement level, a student will read
from word lists, then the percentage of oral-reading errors are calculated. An
level would be 70-85% or 14-17 words correct. The frustration level would be
below 70% or below 14 words correct. Once the student reads a word list
resulting at the frustration level, I have the student stop reading. Next the student
will read passages on the grade levels deciphered from the reading word list
results. I choose 6 passages, two on her independent reading level, two on her
instructional reading level, and two her frustration reading level. The student will
the QRI results. During this process, I continue to evaluate her on word
comprehension questions can give insight on the cause of the student difficulty.
To begin the QRI, I asked student A to read word lists. The word-list tests
Student A started reading at the “pre-primer” word list and scored 100% until she
read from the “second” word list. Student A had one unidentified word on the
“second” word list. The results showed 95% accuracy. Student A was still found
to be independent at this point. Student A continued to read the “third” word list,
and had three unidentified words resulting in an 85%. At this point Student A was
reading at an instructional level. The student continued to read the word lists
until reaching the frustration level. At the “fourth” word list, Student A read 13 out
of 20 words correctly. Student A read with 65% accuracy. Now Student A was at a
frustration level. Student A finished reading the word list that contained the fifth
grade word list. Student A read 13 out of 20 words correctly, with 65 %accuracy
on the fifth grade word list. Student A became frustrated at the fourth and fifth
word list. At this point I knew I was able to use fourth and fifth grade passages to
instruct her.
The next step using the QRI was to have Student A read expository and
fourth grade reading level, 2 reading passages from a fifth grade reading level. I
passages based on her interests in history and science. While Student A read I
took notes on where she miscued. I took notice of the miscues that changed the
meaning of the text and miscues that did not change the meaning of the text.
During this evaluation I took notes where she corrected herself. When Student A
miscued the same word throughout the text, I only counted it as one. After each
Student A could not answer the question from her memory she looked back in the
passage.
Each passage had a set of concept questions that are to be asked before
she reads the passage. Student A would answer these questions before reading
the passage, this assessed her background knowledge on the subject. I took note
that when Student A had more background knowledge on the subject of the
passage, she scored higher on the reading fluency and comprehension. Student
A was encouraged to read beyond her instruction level and asked to read higher
levels. I allowed Student A to read up her grade level, at an upper middle school
level. Student A most enjoyed reading the passages about science and history.
After evaluating Student A’s QRI results, I discovered her instructional reading