You are on page 1of 8

J Appl Physiol

90: 1334–1341, 2001.

Relationship between fat-to-fat-free mass ratio and


decrements in leg strength after downhill running
R. C. HICKNER, P. M. MEHTA, D. DYCK, P. DEVITA,
J. A. HOUMARD, T. KOVES, AND P. BYRD
Human Performance Laboratory, Department of Exercise and Sports Science,
East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina 27858
Received 29 August 2000; accepted in final form 17 November 2000

Hickner, R. C., P. M. Mehta, D. Dyck, P. Devita, J. A. bout of similar eccentric exercise (6). Thus training
Houmard, T. Koves, and P. Byrd. Relationship between status, which is reflected in maximal aerobic capac-
fat-to-fat-free mass ratio and decrements in leg strength ity [maximal O2 consumption (V̇O2 max)] and miles
after downhill running. J Appl Physiol 90: 1334–1341, run per week in runners, may influence changes in
2001.—The purpose of this study was to determine whether strength after eccentric exercise. The development of
greater body fat mass (FM) relative to lean mass would result
in more severe muscle damage and greater decrements in leg
muscle stress beyond that which the muscles and
strength after downhill running. The relationship between tendons can accommodate has been a common hy-
the FM-to-fat-free mass ratio (FM/FFM) and the strength pothesis for the cause of soft tissue damage resulting
decline resulting from downhill running (⫺11% grade) was from eccentric muscle contraction (8, 17). Inherent in
investigated in 24 male runners [age 23.4 ⫾ 0.7 (SE) yr]. The this hypothesis is that all factors that increase mus-
runners were divided into two groups on the basis of FM/ cle strain would increase muscle damage.
FFM: low fat (FM/FFM ⫽ 0.100 ⫾ 0.008, body mass ⫽ 68.4 ⫾ Increases in vertical impulse, loading rate, braking
1.3 kg) and normal fat (FM/FFM ⫽ 0.233 ⫾ 0.020, body forces, and ground reaction forces have been shown to
mass ⫽ 76.5 ⫾ 3.3 kg, P ⬍ 0.05). Leg strength was reduced increase muscle strain and to positively correlate with
less in the low-fat (⫺0.7 ⫾ 1.3%) than in the normal-fat body mass index (23). Excess body fat in the absence of
individuals (⫺10.3 ⫾ 1.5%) 48 h after, compared with before, a concomitant increase in cross-sectional area of
downhill running (P ⬍ 0.01). Multiple linear regression anal-
weight-bearing muscles would likely increase the me-
ysis revealed that the decline in strength could be predicted
best by FM/FFM (r2 ⫽ 0.44, P ⬍ 0.05) and FM-to-thigh lean chanical load on the muscle. The increased adipose
tissue cross-sectional area ratio (r2 ⫽ 0.53, P ⬍ 0.05), with no mass would be expected to place additional mechanical
additional variables enhancing the prediction equation. and metabolic strain on the muscle, possibly resulting
There were no differences in muscle glycogen, creatine phos- in an exacerbation of exercise-induced muscle damage
phate, ATP, or total creatine 48 h after, compared with during bouts of unfamiliar eccentric muscle contrac-
before, downhill running; however, the change in muscle tion and a reduction in muscle strength in the lower
glycogen after downhill running was associated with a higher extremities. If this exercise-induced muscle damage
FM/FFM (r ⫽ ⫺0.56, P ⬍ 0.05). These data suggest that results in reduced muscle strength, functional limita-
FM/FFM is a major determinant of losses in muscle strength tions after bouts of eccentric exercise may be more
after downhill running. prevalent in individuals with a high fat mass-to-fat-
adiposity; eccentric contractions; exercise; isokinetic strength; free mass ratio (FM/FFM).
muscle soreness The purpose of this study was to determine whether
the added mechanical load of body fat would result in
greater decrements in leg strength after downhill run-
THE PERFORMANCE OF NOVEL EXERCISE tasks, particularly ning in nonobese men. Muscle metabolite data were
those involving eccentric contractions, typically pro- also obtained using the muscle biopsy procedure to
duces delayed-onset muscle soreness and muscle determine whether reductions in muscle high-energy
damage (6, 15, 24). Although muscle soreness, mus- phosphates or muscle glycogen are related to a reduc-
cle damage, and muscle weakness are common con- tion in strength after eccentric exercise, as has been
sequences of eccentric contractions, the extent of suggested previously (3, 28). A new paradigm for stud-
these responses varies widely between individuals ies of loading is put forth, in that FM/FFM, rather than
(15). Part of this variation may be due to prior the absolute mass of the individual, is the most rele-
exposure, in that prior performance of eccentric con- vant parameter to be considered when the mechanical
tractions can decrease the development of soreness and physiological consequences of loading during
and minimizes the loss in muscle strength after a weight-bearing activities are investigated.

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. C. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
Hickner, 371 Ward Sports Medicine Bldg., Human Performance payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby
Laboratory, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858 (E-mail: marked ‘‘advertisement’’ in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734
Hicknerr@mail.ecu.edu). solely to indicate this fact.

1334 8750-7587/01 $5.00 Copyright © 2001 the American Physiological Society http://www.jap.org
DOWNHILL RUNNING: BODY COMPOSITION AND STRENGTH LOSS 1335

METHODS cise intensity, 2) respiratory exchange ratio ⬎1.1, and 3)


heart rate greater than age-predicted maximal heart rate.
Subjects. Subjects participating in the study were 24 nono- Isokinetic strength testing. Isokinetic eccentric and concen-
bese, healthy recreational or competitive runners. The run- tric strength of the leg was tested at 1.0 and 3.1 rad/s on an
ners were divided into two groups on the basis of FM/FFM: isokinetic dynamometer. Subjects were seated on the dyna-
low fat (LF, FM/FFM ⬍ 0.14) and normal fat (NF, FM/FFM ⱖ mometer with straps placed around the waist and crossed
0.14). Subjects participated in the study after giving in- over the shoulders and chest to minimize extraneous upper
formed consent according to the East Carolina University body movements. Subjects were instructed to fold their arms
Policy and Review Committee on Human Research. over their chest to minimize upper body contributions to force
Protocol. The relationship between body composition and production. Subjects were familiarized with the strength
strength decline was investigated before and 48 h after down- tests on a previous visit to the laboratory, during which time
hill running in 24 male runners (age 23.4 ⫾ 0.7 yr, body fat they performed each of the tests. On the strength testing day,
13.8 ⫾ 1.2%). Subjects reported to the laboratory 4 h after a subjects performed 5 min of cycle ergometry exercise at
meal at ⬃1200. A resting blood sample was drawn from an ⬃40% V̇O2 max for warm-up exercise. Gravity correction of the
antecubital vein. Subjects then ran at 60% V̇O2 max relative to dynamometer was performed to account for the weight of the
body mass, or 8.9–11.6 km/h, downhill (⫺11% grade) on a leg. Leg strength was then tested during concentric knee
motorized treadmill for 30 min. Blood samples were drawn at extension and flexion exercise. Leg strength was determined
0, 24, and 48 h after downhill running for determination of over 1.4 rad of motion at 1.0 and 3.1 rad/s, as well as during
creatine kinase (CK). Muscle biopsies were taken from the eccentric knee extension and flexion exercise at ⫺1.0 and
vastus lateralis of the quadriceps femoris muscle group at ⫺3.1 rad/s. Total leg strength was calculated as the mean
rest before and 48 h after the downhill run for determination force production over all tests. Day-to-day variability of the
of muscle glycogen, ATP, creatine phosphate (CP), and free isokinetic strength tests has been determined in this labora-
creatine (Cr). After assessment of muscle soreness, muscle tory, in a group of individuals similar to those in the present
strength of the right leg was tested in each subject on an study, to be 3–5% for the tests and protocols employed.
isokinetic dynamometer (Kin-Com, Chattecx, Chattanooga, Blood sampling and analyses. Blood was drawn between
TN) before and 48 h after the downhill run. Subjects were 0900 and 1100 from an antecubital vein of subjects in a
asked not to ingest medication or undergo massage, icing, or standing position 4 h after their most recent meal. Blood was
other procedures that may alter muscle damage or percep- also collected from subjects immediately after exercise, as
tions of muscle soreness. Subjects were also asked not to well as at 24 and 48 h after the downhill run. Blood (10 ml)
perform structured exercise or to perform novel physical was collected in an untreated tube. For the samples obtained
activity in the 48 h between the first and second testing before and at the end of exercise, 0.5 ml of whole blood was
sessions. Subjects completed a questionnaire to determine pipetted into 1.0 ml of 3 N perchloric acid, thoroughly mixed,
their average weekly running distance over the 2 mo before and centrifuged at 3,000 g. The supernatant was pipetted
the investigation. Subjects were aware that the effect of into a polyethylene storage vial for later analysis of blood
downhill running on muscle soreness was being investigated lactate. The remaining whole blood was allowed to clot for 20
but were not aware that data would be analyzed on the basis min and centrifuged at 3,000 g. The supernatant was pipet-
of two groups of subjects, i.e., those who were low fat and ted into a polyethylene storage vial for later analysis of
those who were not. serum CK (samples before exercise, as well as 24 and 48 h
Body composition and anthropometric determinations. Re- after exercise) using a diagnostic kit from Sigma Chemical
sidual volume was determined by the O2 dilution method, as (St. Louis, MO).
described by Wilmore (32). Body density was determined by Muscle biopsy. Muscle biopsies (⬃100 mg) were obtained
hydrostatic weighing, with percent body fat calculated using percutaneously under local anesthesia (2–3 ml of 1% lido-
residual volume and body density calculated using the equa- caine) from the vastus lateralis of the quadriceps femoris
tions of Brozek et al. (5). Circumferences of the waist (umbi- muscle group at rest before and 48 h after the downhill run.
licus) and the hip (greater trochanter) were determined for The muscle sample was immediately (⬍2 s) frozen in liquid
calculation of waist-to-hip ratio. Circumferences were mea- nitrogen and stored under liquid nitrogen until subsequently
sured at the end of a normal expiration with the subject in a lyophilized overnight. Samples were then dissected free of
standing position. Circumference and skinfold thickness at blood and connective tissue and partitioned for analysis of
midthigh were also measured and used to calculate total lean ATP, CP, Cr, and glycogen concentration using spectropho-
tissue cross-sectional area (both thighs) at midthigh with the tometric methods as previously described (16).
assumption that the thighs were cylinders with lean tissue Muscle soreness. Muscle soreness was determined by the
area ⫽ ␲ ⫻ radius2. The radius of the lean tissue per thigh same technician in all subjects immediately before and 48 h
was calculated from total thigh radius ⫺ one-half skinfold after downhill running. Muscle soreness was indicated by the
thickness at midthigh. subjects on a digital scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no
V̇O2 max. V̇O2 max was determined on a motorized treadmill soreness and 10 indicating extremely painful soreness. The
7 days before downhill running for calculation of the relative technician applied enough force over the belly of the muscle
intensity of downhill running (60% V̇O2 max). After a 5-min with the thumb to initiate blanching under the thumbnail.
warm-up at a self-selected pace, subjects ran at 7, 8, and 9 The subject, on palpation, verbally expressed ratings of sore-
miles/h for 3 min per exercise intensity. Subjects continued ness from 0 to 10. This procedure was conducted to determine
at 9 miles/h treadmill speed for the remainder of the test, soreness of the quadriceps femoris muscle group, hamstrings
which consisted of increasing treadmill grade by 2% every 2 muscle group, and gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior mus-
min. Respiratory gases were analyzed continuously and av- cles.
eraged over 20-s intervals using a metabolic measurement Statistics. Multiple linear regression analysis was per-
cart (model 2900, Sensormedics, Anaheim, CA). The subjects formed to determine the relationship between FM/FFM,
exercised to volitional exhaustion, with achievement of changes in soreness, body mass, V̇O2 max, weekly running
V̇O2 max determined by attainment of two of the following distance, and the change in strength after downhill running.
criteria: 1) plateau in O2 consumption with increased exer- Potential differences between groups were determined using
1336 DOWNHILL RUNNING: BODY COMPOSITION AND STRENGTH LOSS

two-way (group ⫻ time) repeated-measures ANOVA with


Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis. All statistical
analyses were performed using SigmaStat software (Jandel
Scientific, La Jolla, CA).

RESULTS

Subject characteristics and weekly running distance.


Subject characteristics (age, height, weight, body com-
position, waist-to-hip ratio, and aerobic capacity per
kilogram FFM) are presented in Table 1. Subjects were
assigned to two groups [low fat (LF) and normal fat
(NF)] on the basis of FM/FFM values, which were
matched for age, FFM, and V̇O2 max per kilogram of
FFM. Body mass, FM, percent body fat, and FM/FFM
were lower in the LF than in the NF group (P ⬍ 0.05).
LF and NF groups were not different [P ⫽ not signifi-
cant (NS)] with respect to FFM, body mass, or FM per
square centimeter of midthigh lean tissue area. LF and
NF groups were also not different (P ⫽ NS) with
respect to aerobic capacity in absolute terms or in
relation to FFM or midthigh lean tissue cross-sectional
area.
Leg strength. Leg strength data are presented in
Figs. 1–3. The only difference in leg strength between
groups before downhill running was a higher 1.0 rad/s
concentric quadriceps strength in the NF than in the
LF group (P ⬍ 0.05). Hamstring strength was not
significantly affected by downhill running as measured
48 h after the downhill run when data are expressed as
absolute strength (Fig. 1) or as a percent decrease from
before to after downhill running (Fig. 3). Concentric
quadriceps strength at 1.0 rad/s was lower in the NF Fig. 1. Hamstring concentric and eccentric strength before (Pre) and
group 48 h after than before downhill running (Fig. 2; 48 h after (Post) 30 min of downhill running (⫺11% grade) in 12
P ⬍ 0.05). Eccentric quadriceps strength at 3.1 rad/s low-fat (LF) and 12 normal-fat (NF) recreational or competitive
was lower in the NF group 48 h after than before runners. Runners were tested at 1.0 and 3.1 rad/s on an isokinetic
testing device (Kin-Com). Values are means ⫾ SE. *Significantly
downhill running (Fig. 2; P ⬍ 0.05). The change in different from Pre (P ⬍ 0.05).
quadriceps strength from before to 48 h after downhill
running was larger in the NF than in the LF group at
1.0 and 3.1 rad/s during concentric and eccentric test-
ing (Fig. 3; P ⬍ 0.05). When expressed as a mean of the
Table 1. Subject characteristics and training history individual percent declines in strength, mean leg
strength (mean of all strength measures) was reduced
LF NF ⫺0.7 ⫾ 1.3 and ⫺10.3 ⫾ 1.5% in the NF and LF groups,
Age, yr 23.4 ⫾ 1.1 23.2 ⫾ 1.0 respectively, after downhill running (P ⬍ 0.01). The
Height, cm 177.8 ⫾ 1.5 176.7 ⫾ 1.8 decrement in strength after downhill running was pos-
BMI, kg/m2 21.7 ⫾ 0.4 24.4 ⫾ 0.8* itively correlated with FM/FFM (r ⫽ 0.66, P ⬍ 0.001)
Body mass, kg 68.4 ⫾ 1.3 76.5 ⫾ 3.3*
Body fat, % 9.0 ⫾ 0.7 18.7 ⫾ 0.3*
and FM-to-midthigh lean tissue area ratio (r ⫽ 0.73,
FM, kg 6.2 ⫾ 0.5 14.4 ⫾ 1.4* P ⬍ 0.001; Fig. 4). There were no correlations between
FFM, kg 62.3 ⫾ 1.4 62.1 ⫾ 2.6 mean leg strength changes and body mass or FFM.
FM/FFM 0.100 ⫾ .008 0.233 ⫾ 0.020* Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to
W/H 0.83 ⫾ 0.02 0.85 ⫾ 0.02 determine the relationship between the loss of leg
Midthigh lean area, cm2 384.0 ⫾ 17.0 396.0 ⫾ 16.8
Body mass/thigh lean area, g/cm2 181.1 ⫾ 6.2 195.0 ⫾ 8.4 strength and the following variables: weekly running
FM/thigh lean area, g FM/cm2 16.1 ⫾ 1.2 36.6 ⫾ 3.3* distance, FM/FFM, body mass, V̇O2 max, and the change
Training volume, km/wk 34.9 ⫾ 6.2 22.9 ⫾ 4.4 in mean muscle soreness from before to 48 h after a
V̇O2max, l/min 4.2 ⫾ 0.1 4.2 ⫾ 0.2 downhill run. The multiple regression analysis indi-
V̇O2max/kg FFM, ml 䡠 kg⫺1 䡠 min⫺1 67.2 ⫾ 2.0 67.1 ⫾ 2.3
cated that weekly running distance, V̇O2 max, body
Values are means ⫾ SE; n ⫽ 12 subjects in each group. LF, mass, and the change in mean muscle soreness from
low-fat group; NF, normal-fat group; BMI, body mass index; V̇O2max, before to 48 h after a downhill run were not correlated
maximal aerobic capacity; FM, total body fat mass; FFM, total body
fat-free mass; W/H, waist-to-hip ratio; midthigh lean area, lean
with the decrement in strength. FM/FFM was the only
tissue cross-sectional area at midthigh (total for both thighs). * Sig- significant predictor of the decrement in strength after
nificantly different from LF (P ⬍ 0.05). downhill running, explaining 44% of the variance in
DOWNHILL RUNNING: BODY COMPOSITION AND STRENGTH LOSS 1337

mean leg strength decrement after downhill running.


When FM/FFM was replaced by FM-to-thigh lean tis-
sue cross-sectional area ratio in the multiple regres-
sion analysis, FM-to-thigh lean tissue area ratio ex-
plained 53% of the variance in mean leg strength
decrement after downhill running.
Muscle soreness. Peak muscle soreness of the leg
musculature (peak score registered in the quadriceps,
hamstring, gastrocnemius, or anterior tibialis muscles)
was increased to the same extent at 48 h after downhill
running in the NF and LF groups (4.3 ⫾ 0.8 and 4.2 ⫾
0.5 arbitrary units, respectively) compared with no
soreness before the run (P ⬍ 0.05, 0 vs. 48 h). Mean
muscle soreness of the leg musculature (mean of quad-
riceps, hamstrings, gastrocnemius, and anterior tibia-
lis muscle soreness scores) was also increased signifi-
cantly and similarly 48 h after downhill running in the
NF and LF groups (2.7 ⫾ 0.7 and 2.2 ⫾ 0.5 arbitrary
units, respectively). Quadriceps muscles were rated
significantly more sore than all other muscles tested
(P ⬍ 0.05).
Serum CK and blood lactate. Serum CK was 87.6 ⫾
9.5 and 62.1 ⫾ 9.2 IU in the LF and NF groups,

Fig. 3. Change in hamstring and quadriceps concentric (con) and


eccentric (ecc) strength from before to 48 h after 30 min of downhill
running (⫺11% grade) in 12 LF and 12 NF recreational or competi-
tive runners. Runners were tested at 1.0 and 3.1 rad/s on an isoki-
netic testing device. Values are means ⫾ SE. *Significantly different
from LF (P ⬍ 0.05).

respectively, before downhill running (P ⫽ NS). Serum


CK increased (P ⬍ 0.05) to 329.9 ⫾ 50.0 and 333.2 ⫾
39.9 IU in the LF and NF groups, respectively, 24 h
after downhill running (P ⫽ NS). Serum CK 48 h after
the downhill run (213.8 ⫾ 31.3 and 193.4 ⫾ 36.4 in LF
and NF groups, respectively, P ⫽ NS) was also in-
creased relative to CK before the downhill run (P ⬍
0.05). There was no relationship between the increase
in serum CK and the increase in muscle soreness or the
decrease in muscle strength after downhill running.
Blood lactate was 1.6 ⫾ 0.1 and 1.7 ⫾ 0.2 mM in the LF
and NF groups, respectively, before downhill running
(P ⫽ NS). Blood lactate increased in the LF and NF
groups to 6.1 and 6.7 mM, respectively, by the end of
exercise.
Muscle ATP, PCr, Cr, and glycogen. There were no
differences in muscle ATP, PCr, and Cr before, com-
pared with 48 h after, downhill running. Muscle ATP
was 27.5 ⫾ 0.3 and 26.3 ⫾ 0.4 mmol/kg dry wt in the
Fig. 2. Quadriceps concentric and eccentric strength before and 48 h LF and NF groups, respectively, before downhill
after 30 min of downhill running (⫺11% grade) in 12 LF and 12 NF running (P ⫽ NS) and was not different 48 h after,
recreational or competitive runners. Runners were tested at 1.0 and
3.1 rad/s on an isokinetic testing device. Values are means ⫾ SE.
compared with before, downhill running in either
*Significantly different from NF Pre (P ⬍ 0.05). **Significantly group. Muscle PCr was 85.2 ⫾ 1.8 and 85.2 ⫾ 3.2
different from LF Pre (P ⬍ 0.05). mmol/kg dry wt in the LF and NF groups, respec-
1338 DOWNHILL RUNNING: BODY COMPOSITION AND STRENGTH LOSS

tively, before downhill running (P ⫽ NS) and was not


different 48 h after, compared with before, downhill
running in either group. Muscle Cr was 47.9 ⫾ 2.0
and 52.0 ⫾ 3.2 mmol/kg dry wt in the LF and NF
groups, respectively, before downhill running (P ⫽
NS) and was not different 48 h after, compared with
before, downhill running in either group. Data for
muscle glycogen stores are presented in Fig. 5. There
was an interaction (group ⫻ time, P ⬍ 0.05) for
muscle glycogen, in that muscle glycogen increased
slightly in the LF group but decreased in the NF
group from before the downhill run to 48 h after the
run. Muscle glycogen was lower 48 h after the down-
hill run in the NF group than in the LF group (Fig. 5; Fig. 5. Muscle glycogen content. Muscle biopsies were obtained from
P ⬍ 0.05). The change in muscle glycogen from before the vastus lateralis of the quadriceps femoris muscle before and 48 h
to 48 h after downhill running was correlated with after 30 min of downhill running (⫺11% grade) in 12 LF and 12 NF
FM/FFM (r ⫽ ⫺0.56, P ⬍ 0.05). The change in muscle recreational or competitive runners. dw, Dry wt. Values are means ⫾
SE. *Significantly different from 0 h (P ⬍ 0.05).
glycogen from before to 48 h after downhill running
was correlated with body mass, FM, FM/FFM, and
FM-to-thigh lean tissue area ratio (r ⫽ ⫺0.43, ⫺0.58, DISCUSSION
⫺0.57, and ⫺0.58, respectively, P ⬍ 0.05).
Data from the present study support the hypothesis
that there is a direct relationship between body com-
position and strength decline after downhill running.
There was a range of 15 kg of body fat between indi-
viduals in the present study: individuals with the high-
est percentage of body fat exhibited the greatest loss in
muscle strength. FM/FFM may therefore be a determi-
nant of losses in muscle strength. In the present study,
leg strength was reduced an average of 10% in the
group of individuals with the higher body fat content
(the NF group) 48 h after downhill running, whereas
individuals in the LF group suffered no significant loss
of strength. FM/FFM accounted for ⬃45% of the reduc-
tion in strength after downhill running. The increased
FM/FFM may thus place an increased load on the
lower extremities during downhill running, potentially
resulting in increased muscle damage as a result of
this activity.
The data in the present study may have been influ-
enced by the higher body mass in the NF group than in
the LF group. However, the finding of a greater decre-
ment in leg strength after downhill running in the NF
group than in the LF group is further supported by
data obtained when the subjects in this study were
divided post hoc in a different manner, i.e., one group
with high body mass but low FM/FFM and another
with low body mass but high FM/FFM. It was possible
to create these two groups using 16 of our 24 subjects (8
subjects/group), resulting in one group with 68.2 ⫾ 2.2
kg body mass and 0.22 ⫾ 0.02 FM/FFM and one group
with 4.5 kg more body mass (72.7 ⫾ 1.9 kg) yet a lower
FM/FFM (0.12 ⫾ 0.01, P ⬍ 0.01). The mean leg
strength data are very similar to the data presented for
Fig. 4. Correlation between mean leg strength and fat mass-to-fat-
free mass ratio (FM/FFM) and mean leg strength and FM-to-thigh the two original groups, in that there was a greater
lean tissue cross-sectional area ratio in 24 recreational or competi- (P ⬍ 0.01) loss of mean leg strength after downhill
tive runners. Runners were tested for quadriceps and hamstring running in the group with lower body mass and high
concentric and eccentric strength at 1.0 and 3.1 rad/s on an isokinetic FM/FFM (⫺10.7 ⫾ 1.8% mean leg strength change)
testing device. Mean percent change in strength from before to 48 h
after 30 min of downhill running is presented as the leg strength
than in the group with higher body mass and low
change. The regression line is presented for the given relationships FM/FFM (⫺0.13 ⫾ 2.0% mean leg strength change).
with y-intercept ⫽ b[0] and slope ⫽ b[1]. This clearly demonstrates that body mass is not re-
DOWNHILL RUNNING: BODY COMPOSITION AND STRENGTH LOSS 1339

lated to reductions in strength after downhill running. bone, and connective tissue in the lower extremities.
FM/FFM is the major determinant of strength loss 48 h There is an increased prevalence of degenerative knee
after this downhill running protocol. Although 10% joint disorders in obese individuals, indicating that
strength loss may not be noticeable to an individual increased FM may place an increased load on the knee
when performing common activities on level ground, joints (27). Toda et al. (27) demonstrated that reduc-
this extent of strength loss may affect performance of tions in body fat, but not reductions in body weight, are
tasks such as climbing stairs and heavy lifting. related to symptomatic relief from osteoarthritis. Al-
Past investigations have focused on muscle damage though metabolic factors may also play a role in the
and soreness after the various modes of muscle activ- pathogenesis of osteoarthritis, these data provide ad-
ity, e.g., eccentric, concentric, and isometric contrac- ditional support for the hypothesis that increased FM
tion, and have suggested that muscle damage may places additional load on the lower extremities. No
result from the high muscle strain resulting from load- investigations have been conducted to determine
ing of the muscle during eccentric contractions (13, 24). whether increased FM has a detrimental effect on
The intensity of exercise may play the dominant role in muscle tissue. The results from the present study in-
determining the degree of muscle damage and muscle dicate that an increased load due to higher body fat
soreness (8, 26). Fitzgerald et al. (12) demonstrated during eccentric muscle contraction in weight-bearing
that when forces generated during eccentric and con- activities results in increased acute (48-h) reductions
centric contractions were kept constant, there was no in muscle strength. The weight an individual carries
difference in muscle soreness between subjects per- should therefore not be the main focus of investigations
forming eccentric contractions and those performing of loading on lower extremities during weight-bearing
concentric contractions. Muscle soreness was, however, activities. The more relevant parameter to consider
much greater after eccentric than after concentric con- during these investigations is the ratio of FM to muscle
tractions when subjects performed the contractions at mass. Although we have not used sophisticated tech-
maximal intensity: forces generated were higher dur- niques to measure thigh muscle mass or cross-sectional
ing eccentric than during concentric contractions in area, the present data indicate that it may be the ratio
this case. Numerous authors have reported ⬃20% re- of total body FM to thigh lean tissue cross-sectional
ductions in muscle strength after isokinetic eccentric area that is most relevant. Results of the present study
exercise of the knee extensors and flexors (3, 10, 29). and those of Toda et al. support the use of this para-
On the contrary, there are very few data on loss of digm for investigations of loading on muscle and other
muscle strength after downhill running. Eston et al. supportive tissues during weight-bearing activities.
(11) reported a reduction in concentric leg strength The greater loss of strength in the subjects with
(peak torque) of approximately ⫺18% 2 days after higher FM/FFM was also not due to a potential rela-
downhill running (40 min at ⫺10% grade) in a group of tionship between aerobic capacity and muscle damage.
10 men unaccustomed to eccentric exercise. The Numerous studies have demonstrated a protective ef-
greater reduction of strength in the study by Eston et fect of a single bout of novel eccentric muscle contrac-
al. than in the present study (⫺0.7% in the LF group tion on subsequent bouts of the same activity (6, 7, 14,
and ⫺10% in the NF group) may be due to the longer 22). However, in the present study, multiple regression
running time (40 min) and higher exercise intensity analysis revealed that aerobic capacity and weekly
(80% of maximal heart rate) than in the present study running mileage did not improve the prediction of
(30 min at 60% V̇O2 max). Differences could also be due decrements in leg strength, despite the wide range of
in part to the subjects’ training status, inasmuch as V̇O2 max and weekly running mileage of the subjects.
subjects in the present study were recreational or com- The training (preconditioning) effect therefore had lit-
petitive runners. The reduction in strength in the tle influence in the present study, probably because all
study by Eston et al. was in fact not as great (⫺7% the subjects were at least recreational runners and had
reduction in peak torque) in subjects who were precon- already become partially accustomed to downhill run-
ditioned to eccentric exercise with a prior bout of ec- ning. There was also no relationship between the in-
centric knee extension exercise. crease in serum CK at 24 and 48 h after downhill
The increased loss of strength in the subjects with running and the increase in muscle soreness or the
greater FM/FFM was not due to an increase in body decrease in muscle strength after downhill running,
mass, inasmuch as there was no correlation between although differences at time points other than those
body mass or FFM and the decrease in muscle strength measured cannot be ruled out. Whether there was
after the downhill run. Although increased mass itself some other difference in muscle quality between the
places additional load on the lower extremities during two groups, perhaps increased intramuscular fat con-
weight-bearing activities, any increase in nonfat tissue tent and a concomitant lower myofibrillar protein con-
is often in the form of muscle. This increased mass may tent per unit thigh cross-sectional area in the group
assist in supporting the additional body mass. In- with higher FM/FFM, requires further investigation.
creases in nonmuscle mass, however, are most often Previous investigations have demonstrated a reduc-
due to fat deposited in the upper body in men (20). tion in muscle high-energy phosphate stores after ec-
Increases in FM due to overeating or inactivity easily centric muscle contractions (3, 28). Reductions in CP
outpace increases in lean mass. This FM is therefore could result in decrements in strength; however, there
an additional load that must be supported by muscle, was no difference in muscle stores of high-energy phos-
1340 DOWNHILL RUNNING: BODY COMPOSITION AND STRENGTH LOSS

phates 48 h after and before downhill running. The body fat should therefore avoid exercise-training pro-
cause of the reduction in strength after eccentric mus- grams with a high weight-bearing, eccentric compo-
cle contraction is still under investigation and may not nent. This study also underscores the importance of
be directly related to the degree of histologically deter- considering body composition, rather than body mass,
mined muscle damage (17, 18). The processes of exci- in studies of loading and the physiological conse-
tation-contraction coupling, calcium release and re- quences of loading during weight-bearing activities.
uptake, and mechanical trauma to the actin and
myosin contractile elements have been proposed as We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Josh Van
Epps and Tanya Pehleman.
partial causes of the reduction in strength (1, 2, 30).
This study was supported by a grant from Experimental and
Recent animal studies suggest that reductions in Applied Sciences (Golden, CO).
strength after eccentric contractions are due to some
defect before calcium release yet are not due to impair-
REFERENCES
ment of action potential conduction along the sarco-
lemma (30). The extent to which these processes are 1. Armstrong RB. Muscle damage and endurance events. Sports
affected by eccentric exercise in humans, and in hu- Med 3: 370–381, 1986.
2. Armstrong RB. Mechanisms of exercise-induced muscle fibre
mans with a high FM-to-muscle mass ratio in particu- injury. Sports Med 12: 184–207, 1991.
lar, remains to be investigated. 3. Asp S, Daugaard JR, Kristiansen S, Kiens B, and Richter
Numerous investigators have reported a reduction in EA. Exercise metabolism in human skeletal muscle exposed to
muscle glycogen after eccentric muscle contractions (9, prior eccentric exercise. J Physiol (Lond) 509: 305–313, 1998.
19, 25, 28, 31), suggesting that muscle damage results 4. Bastard J-P, Jardel C, Bruckert E, Blondy P, Capeau J,
Laville M, Vidal H, and Hainque B. Elevated levels of inter-
in delayed glycogen resynthesis. In the present study, leukin 6 are reduced in serum and subcutaneous adipose tissue
there was no statistically significant reduction in mus- of obese women after weight loss. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:
cle glycogen 48 h after, compared with before, downhill 3338–3342, 2000.
running. There was, however, a negative correlation 5. Brozek J, Grande F, Anderson JT, and Keys A. Densitomet-
between the change in muscle glycogen and both the ric analysis of body composition: revision of some quantitative
FM/FFM and the ratio of FM to midthigh lean tissue assumptions. Ann NY Acad Sci 110: 113–140, 1963.
6. Byrnes WC and Clarkson PM. Delayed onset muscle soreness
cross-sectional area. This may indicate that muscle and training. Clin Sports Med 5: 605–614, 1986.
damage was greater in individuals with high FM/FFM, 7. Byrnes WC, Clarkson PM, White JS, Hsieh SS, Frykman
resulting in greater strength decrements in those indi- PN, and Maughan RJ. Delayed-onset muscle soreness follow-
viduals. This hypothesis is not supported by CK data, ing repeated bouts of downhill running. J Appl Physiol 59:
although this marker is not always well associated 710–715, 1985.
8. Clarkson PM and Newham DJ. Association between muscle
with muscle damage (18). The muscle glycogen data soreness, damage, and fatigue. Adv Exp Med Biol 384: 457–469,
must also be interpreted with caution, inasmuch as 1995.
diet was not controlled in this study. 9. Costill DL, Pascoe DD, Fink WJ, Robergs RA, Barr SI, and
Further investigation is needed to determine why 1 Pearson D. Impaired muscle glycogen resynthesis after eccen-
kg of fat is not the same as 1 kg of lean mass in relation tric exercise. J Appl Physiol 69: 46–50, 1990.
10. Croisier JL, Camus G, Deby-Dupont G, Bertrand F,
to strength decrements after downhill running. The Lhermerout C, Crielaard JM, Juchmes-Ferir A, Deby C,
influence of some factor associated with adipose tissue Albert A, and Lamy M. Myocellular enzyme leakage, polymor-
other than the mass of adipose tissue itself in causing phonuclear neutrophil activation and delayed-onset muscle sore-
the decrement in muscle strength after eccentric exer- ness induced by isokinetic eccentric exercise. Arch Physiol Bio-
cise cannot be ruled out. Adipose tissue has been chem 104: 322–329, 1996.
shown to be a significant paracrine organ, secreting 11. Eston RG, Finney S, Baker S, and Baltzopoulos V. Muscle
tenderness and peak torque changes after downhill running
leptin, interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor-␣ (4, following a prior bout of isokinetic eccentric exercise. J Sports
21). These cytokines have been reported to be in- Sci 14: 291–299, 1996.
creased in overweight individuals and related to the 12. Fitzgerald GK, Rothstein JM, Mayhew TP, and Lamb RL.
degree of insulin resistance (4); furthermore, it has Exercise-induced muscle soreness after concentric and eccentric
previously been demonstrated that downhill running isokinetic contractions. Phys Ther 71: 505–513, 1999.
13. Frayn K. Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from
results in insulin resistance (19). It is therefore possi- gaseous exchange. J Appl Physiol 55: 628–634, 1983.
ble that a cytokine or some other unknown factor 14. Friden J, Seger J, Sjostrom M, and Ekblom B. Adaptive
released from fat contributes to not only insulin resis- response in human skeletal muscle subjected to prolonged eccen-
tance, but also the loss of muscle strength after eccen- tric training. Int J Sports Med 4: 177–183, 1983.
tric exercise. Individuals with higher FM/FFM may 15. Friden J, Sjöström M, and Ekblom B. Myofibrillar damage
following intense eccentric exercise in man. Int J Sports Med 4:
have a correspondingly greater release of this factor 170–176, 1983.
during or after downhill running. 16. Harris RC, Hultman E, and Nordesjö L-O. Glycogen, glyco-
It can be concluded that increased body FM relative lytic intermediates and high-energy phosphates determined in
to FFM is associated with a greater loss of leg strength biopsy samples of musculus quadriceps femoris of man at rest.
48 h after a bout of downhill running in young, non- Methods and variance of values. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 33:
109–120, 1974.
obese male runners. Individuals with excess body fat
17. Hesselink MK, Kuipers H, Geurten P, and Van Straaten H.
may therefore be at greater risk of developing muscle Structural muscle damage and muscle strength after incremen-
weakness, and potentially muscle injury, after eccen- tal number of isometric and forced lengthening contractions.
tric weight-bearing activities. Individuals with excess J Muscle Res Cell Motil 17: 335–341, 1996.
DOWNHILL RUNNING: BODY COMPOSITION AND STRENGTH LOSS 1341

18. Hortobagyi T, Houmard J, Fraser D, Dudek R, Lambert J, 26. Tiidus PM and Ianuzzo CD. Effects of intensity and duration
and Tracy J. Normal forces and myofibrillar disruption after of muscular exercise on delayed soreness and serum enzyme
repeated eccentric exercise. J Appl Physiol 84: 492–498, 1998. activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15: 461–465, 1983.
19. Kirwan JP, Hickner RC, Yarasheski KE, Kohrt WM, 27. Toda Y, Toda T, Takemura S, Wada T, Morimoto T, and
Wiethop BV, and Holloszy JO. Eccentric exercise induces Ogawa R. Change in body fat, but not body weight or metabolic
transient insulin resistance in healthy individuals. J Appl correlates of obesity, is related to symptomatic relief of obese
Physiol 72: 2197–2202, 1992. patients with knee osteoarthritis after a weight control program.
20. Krotkiewski M, Björntorp P, Sjöström L, and Smith U. Impact J Rheumatol 25: 2181–2186, 1999.
of obesity on metabolism in men and women. Importance of regional 28. Van der Meulen JH, Kuipers H, Stassen FR, Keizer HA,
adipose tissue distribution. J Clin Invest 72: 1150–1162, 1983. and van der Vusse GJ. High-energy phosphates and related
21. MacDougald OA, Hwang CS, Fan H, and Lane MD. Regu- compounds, glycogen levels and histology in the rat tibialis
lated expression of the obese gene product (leptin) in white anterior muscle after forced lengthening and isometric exercise.
adipose tissue and 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Pflügers Arch 420: 354–358, 1992.
92: 9034–9037, 1995.
29. Vincent HK and Vincent KR. The effect of training status on
22. Mair J, Mayr M, Muller E, Koller A, Haid C, Artner-Dwor-
the serum creatine kinase response, soreness and muscle func-
zak E, Calzolari C, Larue C, and Puschendorf B. Rapid
adaptation to eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Int tion following resistance exercise. Int J Sports Med 18: 431–437,
J Sports Med 16: 352–356, 1995. 1997.
23. Messier SP, Ettinger WH, Doyle TE, Morgan T, James MK, 30. Warren GL, Lowe DA, Hayes DA, Karwoski CJ, Prior BM,
O’Toole M, and Burns R. Obesity: effects on gait in an osteo- and Armstrong RB. Excitation failure in eccentric contraction-
arthritic population. J Appl Biomech 12: 161–172, 1996. induced injury of mouse soleus muscle. J Physiol (Lond) 468:
24. Newham DJ, Mills KR, Quigley BM, and Edwards RH. Pain 487–499, 1993.
and fatigue after concentric and eccentric muscle contractions. 31. Widrick JJ, Costill DL, McConnell GK, Anderson DE,
Clin Sci (Colch) 64: 55–62, 1983. Pearson DR, and Zachwieja JJ. Time course of glycogen
25. O’Reilly KP, Warhol MJ, Fielding RA, Frontera WR, accumulation after eccentric exercise. J Appl Physiol 72: 1999–
Meredith CN, and Evans WJ. Eccentric exercise-induced mus- 2004, 1992.
cle damage impairs muscle glycogen repletion. J Appl Physiol 63: 32. Wilmore JH. A simplified technique for determination of resid-
252–256, 1987. ual lung volumes. J Biol Chem 27: 96–100, 1969.

You might also like