This planning was not really easy to find, going into the matter of supporting or not, and what to

add, I will begin.

Reading the introduction, I agree with what it says, not that misplaced, but quite the opposite,
short and very clear.

In the justification I completely agree with this "it will be sought that students enter a learning
process of the English language, which involves the five components (listening, reading, writing,
monologue, conversation) starting from elementary school taking them little by little at a pre-
intermediate level of performance, upon completion of high school. " I believe that this is
fundamental and very important in an area plan, since they are putting teaching as the main point
and where they want to direct the student. Then they say "students will be expected to show good
performance on the State Tests, so in the last grades emphasis will be placed on the part of text
comprehension and training in State Tests." Having a moderate objective something like state
tests is an excellent objective for the student to strive to achieve this objective first by him and
then by the institution in which student.

In the general and specific objectives they continue to defend their point and I do not find
deviations with respect to all the above written in its introduction, justification, etc.

The pedagogical strategies are based on the cooperative and the ludic, I personally agree with
that, the class lessons should not always be structured and less for first grade boys, it is necessary
to implement this.

Entering into matter in the area plan the organization and clear objectives is essential for a clear
and forceful organization.

Everything is on the rise and as far as possible I hope the expectations and performance
achievements have been met in the year this area plan was written.