Professional Documents
Culture Documents
mammal evolution
not unique to the Early Cenozoic mammalian radiation, and that
many dead-end Mesozoic mammal clades developed similar eco-
Homoplasies in mammal middle-ear evolution. The postdentary
bones in the posterior part of the mandible make up the jaw hinge
diversification, but newly discovered fossils show that evolution of such key characters as the middle ear and the
M
ammals are an important
Otter group for under- Temporal pattern of early mammal evolution
tribosphenic standing
teeth is life
far and
more labile among Mesozoic mammals. Successive diversifications of Mesozoic mammal groups
its evolution. With some The evolution of early mammals occurred Sugar glider
in successive
multiplied the5,400opportunities for many dead-end
extant species and 4,000 fossil genera, lineages to iteratively evolve developmental homoplasies
Tree shrew and convergent
diversifications or episodes of quick splitting of relatively
Short-tailed ecological specializations,
they developed parallel to those
a spectacular in modern
diversity of mammal groups. short-lived clades. Most order- or family-level clades are
ecomorphological Beaver
opposum specializations, ranging from the Raccoon Armadillo clustered around the several nodes of their evolutionary
1-gram bumblebee bat to the 100-tonne blue whale. tree. Mapped on the geological time scale, successive
M
ammals areofanthe
Basal diversifications important
three extantgroupmammalian
for under- Temporal pattern of early mammal evolution
clusters of emergent clades represent waves of diversifica-
standing (egg-laying
life and its evolution.
mammals),With some The
groups, monotremes marsupials tionevolution of early
(Fig. 1). Clades in amammals
precedingoccurred
episode of indiversifica-
successive
Early Cretaceous
eries of very informative fossils (Box 1), by the increasingly compre- supials and placentals than to monotremes (Fig. 1, node 4), and the
800 g outside mammals—during the
tohensive
science, two-thirdswith
phylogenies of which
whichwere discovered
to infer the pattern in the last 25 years
of diversification Early Cretaceous divergence ofLate Triassic and
the marsupial Early and
lineage Jurassic (Fig. 1,
the placen-
(Box 1).
(Fig. 1), and by a more complex picture of the evolution of key node 1), the Middle Jurassic
tal lineage (Fig. 1, nodes 5 and 6). diversification of docodonts, theriiform
The rise offeatures.
anatomical mammals Thefromnewlypremammaliaform
improved fossil cynodonts
record can is an
recipro- mammals,
Cenozoicand the australosphenidan
placentals and marsupials mammals represent that a newareepisode
basal to of
1,2,6–9
important transition in vertebrate evolution
cally illuminate the molecular evolution of mammals, especially . This already richly monotremes (Fig. 1, node 2), the Late Jurassic diversification
in g diversification in succession to the Cretaceous stem eutherians and within
up to 500
documented
light of the transition
large has
discrepancies been rapidly
between re-written
the molecular by recent
time discov-
estimates the extinct theriiform groups (Fig. 1, node
metatherians.
Fruitafossor Cenozoic marsupials
3) thatasarea closer
are nested, whole,toVolaticotherium
inmar-
the
Morganucodon Haldanodon Sinoconodon Henkelotherium
eries of very informative fossils (Box 1), by the increasingly
and the fossil records for the origins of major marsupial and placental compre- supials and placentals than to monotremes
Cretaceous metatherians, but the emergent Cenozoic marsupial (Fig. 1, node 4), and the
‘Stereotypes’
hensive
super-orderphylogenies with
lineages. which
These new to fossils
infer the and Newly
pattern discovered
of ecomorphological
new Early
diversification
their analyses shed orders diversification
Cretaceous
or families in cannot
Mesozoic
divergence of bemammals
the marsupial lineage and
related directly the placen-
to the known
(Fig. 1), and by a more
light on several controversies: complex picture of the evolution of key tal lineage (Fig. 1, nodes 5 and 6).
Cretaceous metatherian genera by the best available morphological
Figure 2 | Diverse evolutionary
anatomical
. Temporal experiments
features. The newly
evolution: of Mesozoic
improved
is early mammal mammals
fossilevolution
record canbest andchar- (predation
recipro- Cenozoic
data or feeding
sets10–12placentals
. The latestand onmarsupials
analysesother vertebrates)
of all representalso
eutherians in
a newlarge gobiconodontids
episode
strongly favourof
42
and
41
their ecological convergence
acterized by tomajor
cally illuminate modern
the molecular
longmammal
evolution
branches ecomorphotypes.
reaching deep into the large
of mammals, especially in individuals
diversification
placement in succession
of all known eutherians of; d
of Sinoconodon
to the Cretaceous, scratch-digging
the stem eutherians
Cretaceous outside andthe
andfeeding on
metatherians. Cenozoic marsupials 20 are nested, as a whole, in limb
the characteristics
a, Representationlight of the
of the
Mesozoic large
and discrepancies
traditionalby theassumption between
long evolutionary thattheMesozoic
molecular time
fuse that mammals estimates
delayed diver- colonial
Cenozoicinsects
placentalsin 13,14
Fruitafossor
, in contrast ;toe,ascansorial (climbing)
previous analysis 15
. The suc-
were generalizedand smallthe animals
sificationfossilwithin
records
withforgeneralized
long the origins of
branches? major
feeding
Or is this marsupial
and anddominated
terrestrial
evolution placental in Cretaceous metatherians,
basalclusters
cessive eutherians and but
of emergent the and
metatherians,
clades emergent Cenozoic
andturnover
faunal their near marsupial
between the 11,47,48; and
relatives
super-order lineages. These new fossils and their analyses shed new orders or families cannot be related directly to 49the known
lutrasimilis as a swimming and burrow-
ing mammaliaform. Abbreviations: as, as-
tragalus; ca, caudal vertebrae; cn, ento-,
meso-, and ecto-cuneiforms; co, coro-
noid process of dentary; cp, carpals; cs,
calcaneus; ec, ectepicondyle and supi-
nator shelf (humerus); ef, entepicondyle
foramen; ep?, probable epipubis; is,
ischium; J, jugal; L1-6, lumbar ribs 1
to 6; m, molars; mb, manubrium of
malleus; mp, metacarpals; mx, maxilla;
px, premaxilla; ra, radius; rc, radial
condyle; S1-2, sacrals 1 and 2; sp,
extratarsal (‘‘poisonous’’) spur; t4-t14
(preserved ribs through thoracic 17); uc,
ulnar condyle; ul, ulna.
164 m.a.
a eutriconodont) shows the skin membrane (patagium) associated synapsids to mammaliaforms shows incremental acquisition of
with elongate limbs for gliding, convergent to marsupial sugar gli-
ders, and ‘flying’
(Fig. 2f).
squirrels
Vol 450j13 dermopterans among placentals49
and2007jdoi:10.1038/nature06277
December
REVIEWS
mammalian apomorphies8,9,41,50. Stepwise assembly of incremental
precursor conditions towards complex mammal structure is an
evolutionary paradigm of functional adaptation and taxonomic
Treated individually, these curious cases of convergent adapta- diversification of mammals50–52. Some best-documented ‘textbook’
tions in extinct Mesozoic mammals represent many separate evolu-
REVIEWS
Transformation and diversification
tionary experiments20,37–39,49. But taken together (Fig. 2), they
unveiled a new picture in which ecological diversification is
in early
scenarios are acquisitions of key characters along a transformation
series: transformations of the mammalian middle ear and the jaw
hinge (Fig. 3), and evolution of the tribosphenic molars (Fig. 4).
mammal evolution
not unique to the Early Cenozoic mammalian radiation, and that
many dead-end Mesozoic mammal clades developed similar eco-
Homoplasies in mammal middle-ear evolution. The postdentary
bones in the posterior part of the mandible make up the jaw hinge
diversification, but newly discovered fossils show that evolution of such key characters as the middle ear and the
M
ammals are an important
Otter group for under- Temporal pattern of early mammal evolution
tribosphenic standing
teeth is life
far and
more labile among Mesozoic mammals. Successive diversifications of Mesozoic mammal groups
its evolution. With some The evolution of early mammals occurred Sugar glider
in successive
multiplied the5,400opportunities for many dead-end
extant species and 4,000 fossil genera, lineages to iteratively evolve developmental homoplasies
Tree shrew and convergent
diversifications or episodes of quick splitting of relatively
Short-tailed ecological specializations,
they developed parallel to those
a spectacular in modern
diversity of mammal groups. short-lived clades. Most order- or family-level clades are
ecomorphological Beaver
opposum specializations, ranging from the Raccoon Armadillo clustered around the several nodes of their evolutionary
1-gram bumblebee bat to the 100-tonne blue whale. tree. Mapped on the geological time scale, successive
M
ammals areofanthe
Basal diversifications important
three extantgroupmammalian
for under- Temporal pattern of early mammal evolution
clusters of emergent clades represent waves of diversifica-
standing (egg-laying
life and its evolution.
mammals),With some The
groups, monotremes marsupials tionevolution of early
(Fig. 1). Clades in amammals
precedingoccurred
episode of indiversifica-
successive
Early Cretaceous
eries of very informative fossils (Box 1), by the increasingly compre- supials and placentals than to monotremes (Fig. 1, node 4), and the
800 g outside mammals—during the
tohensive
science, two-thirdswith
phylogenies of which
whichwere discovered
to infer the pattern in the last 25 years
of diversification Early Cretaceous divergence ofLate Triassic and
the marsupial Early and
lineage Jurassic (Fig. 1,
the placen-
(Box 1).
(Fig. 1), and by a more complex picture of the evolution of key node 1), the Middle Jurassic
tal lineage (Fig. 1, nodes 5 and 6). diversification of docodonts, theriiform
The rise offeatures.
anatomical mammals Thefromnewlypremammaliaform
improved fossil cynodonts
record can is an
recipro- mammals,
Cenozoicand the australosphenidan
placentals and marsupials mammals represent that a newareepisode
basal to of
1,2,6–9
important transition in vertebrate evolution
cally illuminate the molecular evolution of mammals, especially . This already richly monotremes (Fig. 1, node 2), the Late Jurassic diversification
in g diversification in succession to the Cretaceous stem eutherians and within
up to 500
documented
light of the transition
large has
discrepancies been rapidly
between re-written
the molecular by recent
time discov-
estimates the extinct theriiform groups (Fig. 1, node
metatherians.
Fruitafossor Cenozoic marsupials
3) thatasarea closer
are nested, whole,toVolaticotherium
inmar-
the
Morganucodon Haldanodon Sinoconodon Henkelotherium
eries of very informative fossils (Box 1), by the increasingly
and the fossil records for the origins of major marsupial and placental compre- supials and placentals than to monotremes
Cretaceous metatherians, but the emergent Cenozoic marsupial (Fig. 1, node 4), and the
‘Stereotypes’
hensive
super-orderphylogenies with
lineages. which
These new to fossils
infer the and Newly
pattern discovered
of ecomorphological
new Early
diversification
their analyses shed orders diversification
Cretaceous
or families in cannot
Mesozoic
divergence of bemammals
the marsupial lineage and
related directly the placen-
to the known
(Fig. 1), and by a more
light on several controversies: complex picture of the evolution of key tal lineage (Fig. 1, nodes 5 and 6).
Cretaceous metatherian genera by the best available morphological
Figure 2 | Diverse evolutionary
anatomical
. Temporal experiments
features. The newly
evolution: of Mesozoic
improved
is early mammal mammals
fossilevolution
record canbest andchar- (predation
recipro- Cenozoic
data or feeding
sets10–12placentals
. The latestand onmarsupials
analysesother vertebrates)
of all representalso
eutherians in
a newlarge gobiconodontids
episode
strongly favourof
42
and
41
their ecological convergence
acterized by tomajor
cally illuminate modern
the molecular
longmammal
evolution
branches ecomorphotypes.
reaching deep into the large
of mammals, especially in individuals
diversification
placement in succession
of all known eutherians of; d
of Sinoconodon
to the Cretaceous, scratch-digging
the stem eutherians
Cretaceous outside andthe
andfeeding on
metatherians. Cenozoic marsupials 20 are nested, as a whole, in limb
the characteristics
a, Representationlight of the
of the
Mesozoic large
and discrepancies
traditionalby theassumption between
long evolutionary thattheMesozoic
molecular time
fuse that mammals estimates
delayed diver- colonial
Cenozoicinsects
placentalsin 13,14
Fruitafossor
, in contrast ;toe,ascansorial (climbing)
previous analysis 15
. The suc-
were generalizedand smallthe animals
sificationfossilwithin
records
withforgeneralized
long the origins of
branches? major
feeding
Or is this marsupial
and anddominated
terrestrial
evolution placental in Cretaceous metatherians,
basalclusters
cessive eutherians and but
of emergent the and
metatherians,
clades emergent Cenozoic
andturnover
faunal their near marsupial
between the 11,47,48; and
relatives
super-order lineages. These new fossils and their analyses shed new orders or families cannot be related directly to 49the known
Stiassny & Meyer (1999)
http://nature.ca/puijila/fb_e.cfm
use information from two very different kinds of mammals:
rodents of the mountain beaver family (aplodontoids) and
The Role of Climatic Change Applying those observations to what we might expect in
the future, it seems likely that we will see changes in genotypes
D
ordinary climatic changes at the tectonic scale
espite all the3arguments
(hypothesis in table
hypothesis reaches thea fact.
D espite
is a fact. It is a fact in theissense
over
1).
of
status
for example, “something having real, demonstrable exis-
all the arguments
semantics,
However,
dictionary
It is
ofageneral
evolution
before
definitions—
fact in the accep-
thisover semantics,
the limits of the
porary Thomas
sense of dictionary definitions—
evolution
fossil record in this regard,
Huxley recognized
the limits
its power
and hisof
in the
the fossil record in this regard, and his contem-
contem-
evolu-
porary Thomas Huxley recognized its power in the evolu-
tionary debate when he wrote,“Primary and direct evidence
tance,quality
tence...the it would for
of being
example,
be desirable
real or actual”
“something
to have having
additional
(Soukhanov et al.
real, demonstrable exis- tionary debate when he wrote,“Primary and direct evidence
in favour of evolution can be furnished only by palæontol-
tests
1996). And it is a facttence...the
provided bythe
in robustly
scientific quality
constructed
sense—“an of being andreal
observation cal-or actual” ogy.(Soukhanov
The geological et al. so soon asinitfavour
record, approaches of evolution
com- can be furnished only by palæontol-
thatibrated
has beenphylogenies
repeatedly 1996). And
confirmed”
of it (Kennedy
other is mammal
a fact in et the scientific sense—“an
al.groups.
1998). pleteness, must,observation
when properly questioned, ogy. The yieldgeological
either an record, so soon as it approaches com-
This is a bold statement, but it follows directly from
that has been repeatedly confirmed” (Kennedy et al. 1998). in- affirmative or a negative answer: if evolution has taken
pleteness, must, place,when properly questioned, yield either an
controvertible observations. We know what genes are and how there will its mark be left; if it has not taken place, there will
Global
traits warming
are inherited,
This
and that over thethe
is next
avariation
bold century
statement,
we observe be-
but it follows directly from in-
lie its refutation” (Huxley 1880).
affirmative or a negative answer: if evolution has taken place,
tweenTesting the within
individuals controvertible
previous hypotheses
populations observations.
and yielded
between Weisknow whatAlthough
three
species genes aretheand how
paleontological thereis will
record still its
far mark
from be left; if it has not taken place, there will
underlain by genetictraits
new observations, are inherited,
differences.
which We knowlead,
in turn andthose
how thatge-the variation
through we observe
complete—for the same be-reasons Darwin lie and
its refutation”
Huxley recog-(Huxley 1880).
netic differences arisetween and how they
individuals are maintained:
within through
populations nized some 150
and between species is years ago—it now yields a
Although affir-
resounding the paleontological record is still far from
hypotheses, to informed predictions about what
mutation, recombination, random drift, and selection. We can mative answer about evolution. Fossils demonstrate
(andtodo) expect the underlain
induceinwithin-speciesface of evolution by genetic
current global
in
differences.
domesticwarming.
animal
We know how those ge- complete—for the same reasons Darwin and Huxley recog-
overwhelmingly that geologically older species are replaced
In effect,
breeding netic
we use what
programs—think differences
of dogs,we have
cattle, arise
andlearned and how
racehorses.from And they are maintained: through
by geologically younger descendent species nized somethe
(including 150 years ago—it now yields a resounding affir-
suc-
we the
havefossil
seen natural
record mutation,
selection
to make recombination,
cause evolution in
predictions random
such
about the drift, cession
ex- and selection.
of speciesWe canown human history).
in our mative The answer
younger about evolution. Fossils demonstrate
amples as industrial (and melanism in moths (Cook 2003, Rudge
do) induce within-species evolution in domestic animal species typically share certain traits with the older
overwhelmingly ones, butthat geologically older species are replaced
future.
2005) and the reduction of size in snow lotus plants (Law and
The tests
Salick 2005). breeding
On thediscussed
microbial level, programs—think
above yieldedthe
we recognize theof fol-
dogs, cattle,Anthony
reality and racehorses. And by geologically younger descendent species (including the suc-
D. Barnosky (e-mail: barnosky@berkeley.edu) is a professor of
lowing observations:
of evolution we
by spending money have seen
(a) on The natural
it: different selection
As Palumbitempo- (2005) cause evolution in such ex- cession
integrative biology, curator of paleontology at the Museum of species
of Paleontology, and in our own human history). The younger
pointed
ral andout, consumers
geographic amples as industrial
and taxpayers
scales ofspend melanism
billions
climatic of dol-in mothsa research
change (Cookpaleoecologist
2003, Rudge species
in the Museum of Vertebrate typically
Zoology, University ofshare certain traits with the older ones, but
larsmanifest
to combatatthe ever-escalating
2005) and
different evolutionary
the reduction
evolutionary arms race California, Berkeley, CA 94720. His work focuses on understanding the effects
of size in snow lotus plants (Law and
scales—some
between antibiotics and the new bacterial genomes for which of environmental changes on ecosystems, with a particular emphasis on
theyatselect, and toortrySalick
genetic population
to prevent 2005). such On
levels, theothers
potentially microbial at the
disastrous level, wemammalian
recognize the reality Anthony D. Barnosky (e-mail: barnosky@berkeley.edu) is a professor of
communities. Brian P. Kraatz is a PhD candidate and National
species level;
pandemics as avian flu. (b)of evolution
geologically byrapidspending
or cyclical money cli- on it: As Palumbi (2005)
Science Foundation GK–12 fellow in the same integrative
department biology,
and atcurator
the of paleontology at the Museum of Paleontology, and
silization process requires such a complicated sequence of organized by the American Institute of Biological Sciences, the National
events that only a tiny fraction of all the life forms that have Evolutionary Synthesis Center, and the Biological Sciences Curriculum Study
Deriva Continental y la Historia de los Mamíferos
El Gran Intercambio Americano
Hormigueros
Armadillos
Osos Chiguiros
Camellos Gliptodontos
Gatos Monos
Venados Zarigueyas
Perros Phoruracidos
Elefantes Puercoespines
Caballos Perezosos
Pecaríes Teratomos
Conejos Toxodontos
Mapaches
Zorrillos
Tapires
Musarañas
‘‘ghosts of past mutualisms’’ [7,8]. have serious consequences for plant populations [13–16].
Abstract
Background: Some neotropical, fleshy-fruited plants have fruits structurally similar to paleotropical fruits dispersed by
megafauna (mammals .103 kg), yet these dispersers were extinct in South America 10–15 Kyr BP. Anachronic dispersal
systems are best explained by interactions with extinct animals and show impaired dispersal resulting in altered seed
dispersal dynamics.
Methodology/Principal Findings: We introduce an operational definition of megafaunal fruits and perform a comparative
analysis of 103 Neotropical fruit species fitting this dispersal mode. We define two megafaunal fruit types based on previous
analyses of elephant fruits: fruits 4–10 cm in diameter with up to five large seeds, and fruits .10 cm diameter with
numerous small seeds. Megafaunal fruits are well represented in unrelated families such as Sapotaceae, Fabaceae,
Solanaceae, Apocynaceae, Malvaceae, Caryocaraceae, and Arecaceae and combine an overbuilt design (large fruit mass and
size) with either a single or few (,3 seeds) extremely large seeds or many small seeds (usually .100 seeds). Within-family
and within-genus contrasts between megafaunal and non-megafaunal groups of species indicate a marked difference in
fruit diameter and fruit mass but less so for individual seed mass, with a significant trend for megafaunal fruits to have larger
seeds and seediness.
Conclusions/Significance: Megafaunal fruits allow plants to circumvent the trade-off between seed size and dispersal by
relying on frugivores able to disperse enormous seed loads over long-distances. Present-day seed dispersal by scatter-
hoarding rodents, introduced livestock, runoff, flooding, gravity, and human-mediated dispersal allowed survival of
megafauna-dependent fruit species after extinction of the major seed dispersers. Megafauna extinction had several
potential consequences, such as a scale shift reducing the seed dispersal distances, increasingly clumped spatial patterns,
reduced geographic ranges and limited genetic variation and increased among-population structuring. These effects could
be extended to other plant species dispersed by large vertebrates in present-day, defaunated communities.
Figure 2. Fleshy fruited megafaunal-dependent species illustrating size, shape, and color variation. a, Attalea speciosa, Arecaceae; b,
Citation:
Mouriri elliptica, Guimarães PR Jr, c,Galetti
Melastomataceae; M, Jordano
Hymenaea P (2008) Seed
stigonocarpa, Dispersal
Fabaceae; Anachronisms:
d, Genipa Rethinking
americana, the Fruits
Rubiaceae; Extinctelliptica,
e, Salacia Megafauna Ate. PLoS ONE
Celastraceae; 3(3): e1745.
f, Annona
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001745
dioica, Annonaceae. Black reference line is 2 cm length. Photos from Fazenda Rio Negro, Pantanal, Brazil; by PJ, MG, and Camila I. Donatti.
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001745.g002
Editor: Dennis Marinus Hansen, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Received June 8, 2007; Accepted January 15, 2008; Published March 5, 2008
comparable range !for2008non-megafaunal
Copyright: species
Guimarães et al. This is 0.1%–8.9%.
is an open-access There
article distributed underisthe
alsoterms
a similar
of the trend inCommons
Creative fruit design between
Attribution megafaunal
License, which permits
However,unrestricted
this is theuse,
simple result of increasing total fruit mass, not
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided and non-megafaunal
the original species
author and source when comparing the allocation of
are credited.
increasingFunding:
the relative seedwas
The study load/fruit
supported(Fig. 4a); thus,
by public fundingthere
fromare
the no seed number/fruit
Spanish Ministerio and individual
de Ciencia y Tecnologı́a seed mass. REN2003-00273,
(BOS2000-1366-C02-01, As expected,CGL2006-
a
differences between
00373) megafaunal
and RNM-305 andAndalucı́a)
(Junta de non-megafaunal
to PJ, CNPqspecies
(Bolsa deinProdutividade),
negativeFAPESP, FUNDUNESP
trend between andvariables
both IFS to MGisand FAPESP
evident in to
thePRG
two(01/1737-3);
groups our
collaborationwhen
seed(s) mass/fruit was also funded by CYTED
accounting and a CNPq-CSIC
for variation in fruitinstitutional
mass agreement.
(Fig. 4b), with individual seed mass decreasing linearly with
P = 0.17, d.f.
(F = 2.11,Competing = 2, 11The
Interests: the a have
forauthors posteriori contrast
declared with
that no fruit interests
competing exist. fruit seediness (F = 126.0, P,0.0001, d.f. = 3, 87). Yet
increasing
mass as the covariate).
* E-mail: jordano@ebd.csic.es megafaunal species have significantly larger seeds when controlling
Mamíferos Modernos
Text
¿Son los Placentarios “Superiores” a los Marsupiales?
Cáscara no se mineraliza
Corioalantoica
(Theria)
Hipótesis del Trofoblasto
Lactancia Restricciones a
Lactancia corta extendida Morfología de
$ $$$ Extremidades
conflicto evolutivo entre sexos y problemas en gestación
Hipótesis de las Tasas Metabólicas
126 Localidades
56
Variables
ecogeográficas
Lizcano 2008
Felinos Neotropicales
http://www.panthera.org/jaguar_corridor.html
Current Biology Vol 20 No 2
R62
the key finding on which the proposal is 3. Owen, A.M., Schiff, N.D., and Laureys, S. 10. Bartels, A., and Zeki, S. (2000). The architecture
(2009). A new era of coma and consciousness of the colour centre in the human visual brain:
based generalizes over stimulus sets science. Prog. Brain Res. 177, 399–411. new results and a review. Eur. J. Neurosci.
and methods of achieving invisibility. If 4. Schurger, A., Pereira, F., Treisman, A., and 12, 172–193.
reproducibility does generally correlate Cohen, J.D. (2010). Reproducibility 11. Jiang, Y., Zhou, K., and He, S. (2007). Human
distinguishes conscious from nonconscious visual cortex responds to invisible chromatic
with consciousness, then this could neural representations. Science 327, 97–99. flicker. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 657–662.
provide a useful diagnostic criterion. 5. Moutoussis, K., and Zeki, S. (2002). The 12. Rao, R.P., and Ballard, D.H. (1999). Predictive
relationship between cortical activation and coding in the visual cortex: a functional
The hard problem will then be to perception investigated with invisible stimuli. interpretation of some extra-classical
demonstrate a causal, mechanistic link Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9527–9532. receptive-field effects. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 79–87.
between the reproducibility of a neural 6. Haynes, J.D., and Rees, G. (2006). Decoding 13. Murray, S.O., Kersten, D., Olshausen, B.A.,
mental states from brain activity in humans. Schrater, P., and Woods, D.L. (2002). Shape
process and its role in consciousness. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 523–534. perception reduces activity in human primary
7. Tononi, G., and Edelman, G.M. (1998). visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99,
Consciousness and complexity. Science 15164–15169.
References 282, 1846–1851.
1. Haynes, J.D. (2009). Decoding visual 8. Dehaene, S., and Naccache, L. (2001). Towards
consciousness from human brain signals. a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: School of Psychology, University of Sydney,
Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 194–202. basic evidence and a workspace framework. Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
2. Owen, A.M., Coleman, M.R., Boly, M., Cognition 79, 1–37. E-mail: colinc@psych.usyd.edu.au
Davis, M.H., Laureys, S., and Pickard, J.D. 9. Wandell, B.A., Dumoulin, S.O., and Brewer, A.A.
(2006). Detecting awareness in the vegetative (2007). Visual field maps in human cortex.
state. Science 313, 1402. Neuron 56, 366–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.001