Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E-mail: dtlu@ustc.edu.cn
Abstract
Significant discontinuities exist in the production data of many unconventional reservoirs, which
always causes difficulties in production data analysis (PDA). This paper proposes a PDA method
to address the problem caused by the significant discontinuities based on the virtual equivalent
time, which is calculated by using the average formation pressure. With the virtual equivalent
time, production data with significant discontinuities are converted into several interconnected
segments, and new type curves are then generated and applied to PDA, which improves the
fitting precision of the production data. With the improved fitting results, accurate productivity
forecasting can be achieved. A field case study is carried out, comparing the new method with
commercial software. The results show that the new method has better fitting results, and that the
errors caused by significant discontinuities are effectively eliminated. The effectiveness of the
proposed method is further verified by the comparison between the forecasting data and the field
data. The method proposed in this paper can improve the precision of the interpreted parameters,
which is beneficial to the more reliable and efficient prediction of well production performance.
PDA is widely applied to long-term production data of a However, most of the present PDA methods cannot
single well (Ali et al 2013), and provides a full-life analysis for address the issues caused by significant discontinuities ade-
unconventional oil and gas production. It can estimate flow quately. In the case of significant discontinuities in production
regimes and formation parameters, and provide history matching data, the currently popular approach is to divide the produc-
and production forecasting results (Matter 2008). The conven- tion data into several stages and choose the favorable stages
tional PDA method for vertical wells was first proposed by Arps for analysis. Although the impacts of significant dis-
(Arps 1945). He presented the decline curve analysis method to continuities can be reduced in this way, the initial formation
obtain the reserves of oil reservoirs and forecast their production. pressure of each period becomes unknown. This will affect
Fetkovich (1980) developed the decline curve analysis method, the result’s accuracy considerably. On the other hand, the
extending the Arps type curves to the unsteady flow prior to commercial software (Topaze NL 2016) presented the time-
the boundary control flow. Palacio and Blasingame (1993) pre- dependent skin method to address the issue of significant
sented the definition of material balance time and normalized discontinuities. The skin factors of different time stages are
pressure/rate to deal with the variable bottom hole pressure assumed to be different. In fact, both the stage division and
condition. PDA of gas wells can be conducted on the basis of skin assignment are determined by the operators. Thus, this
1836
J. Geophys. Eng. 15 (2018) 1835 Q Li et al
tc =
ò qdt (3 ) Figure 2. Definition of virtual equivalent time.
q
pi - pwf
pd = . (4 ) • Fracture half-length:
q
K 1 B P
As for type curve matching, besides the above pd , xf = ⋅ = ⋅ M. (10)
another two auxiliary variables are employed so as to improve fmc TM 2phfc TM
the resolution and function of type curve matching:
tc pi - pwf • Skin factor:
2
pdi =
tc ò0 q
dt (5 )
⎛r ⎞
S = ln ⎜ w ⎟. (11)
⎝ xf ⎠
dpdi dp
pdid = = tc di = 2pd - pdi . (6 )
d ln tc dtc
With the field data converted, type curve matching can be 3. PDA considering significant discontinuities
conducted. Then with any match point recorded we can obtain
the matched values of time and pressure: When there exist several significant discontinuities, the above
type curves cannot always match the field production data
⎛t ⎞ very well, as mentioned in the Introduction. In this section,
TM = ⎜ D ⎟ (7 )
⎝ tc ⎠ MP the virtual equivalent time is introduced to address the issues
caused by significant discontinuities.
⎛p ⎞
PM = ⎜ D ⎟ . (8 ) 3.1. Definition of virtual equivalent time
⎝ pd ⎠ MP
Figure 2 shows the history data of well bottom hole pressure
Note that some formation parameters such as oil and gas with one shut-in. Herein, pi is the initial formation pressure, t0
reserves, permeability, skin factor, can be calculated via the is the starting time. The well produces at constant rate q0 from
above matched values (Ilk et al 2010), as shown below: t0 to t1, and it is shut down until t2. p represents the average
formation pressure at t1. Clearly, the pressure first drops
• Formation effective permeability:
before the well is closed (t0 < t < t1). The pressure buildup
then occurs during the shut-in period (t1 < t < t2 ), and after
mB
K= ⋅ PM. (9 ) the short shut-in, the well resumes production and the pres-
2ph sure continues to drop (t > t2 ).
1837
J. Geophys. Eng. 15 (2018) 1835 Q Li et al
With the relation of pwf =f (t), we calculate a piece of 3.3. Procedure for PDA with consideration of significant
virtual data under the condition of constant flow rate q2 (flow discontinuities
rate at t2). In this piece of virtual data, p is the initial for-
In summary, the overall procedure of PDA for multi-fractured
mation pressure, and the flow rate is q2. The virtual equivalent
time te is defined as horizontal wells in unconventional reservoirs is provided as
follows:
te = f -1 ( p - p2 ) (12) 1. Verify the basic parameters of the reservoir, and
where p2 is the pressure at t2. configure the field production data with pd−tc, pdi−tc,
By integrating the pressure distribution (Lu and and pdid−tc form on a scaled log−log grid.
Kong 1993, Li et al 2000), the average formation pressure p 2. Choose a group of reasonable well parameters and
can be obtained as formation boundaries xe ´ ye , and generate the type
curves using the methods.
3. Calculate the virtual equivalent time te at the time points
∬ p (x, y, t ) dxdy of significant discontinuities and modify the type curves
p (t ) =
4c -1⎡ 4pkh ( p2 - p ) ⎤ Note that the nozzle was changed at about the 3100th hour,
te = - Ei ⎢ ⎥. (17) and well interference occurred around from the 10200th hour to
r2 ⎣ q2 Bm ⎦
the 13000th hour. The four key time points are 3168, 6192,
10 968, 13 704 h. The basic properties are listed in table 1. The
For the production data with several significant dis- fitting parameters are shown in table 2. We conduct the type
continuities, we can follow the above steps to calculate the curve matching as shown in figure 3. We can see that significant
virtual equivalent times at each abrupt change point. discontinuities lead to distinct breaks in type curves.
1838
J. Geophys. Eng. 15 (2018) 1835 Q Li et al
1839
J. Geophys. Eng. 15 (2018) 1835 Q Li et al
Time points (hours) Pressure (MPa) Flow rate (m3/d) Average pressure (MPa) Virtual equivalent time (hours)
3168 36.72 62 664 41.604 27.27
6192 32.50 66 643 40.881 139.42
10 968 24.50 59 855 39.903 150.22
13 704 28.84 61 000 39.540 136.48
5. Conclusion
1840
J. Geophys. Eng. 15 (2018) 1835 Q Li et al
where S (x, y, t ) is the pressure solution under the condition that Clarkson C R and Beierle J J 2011 Integration of microseismic and
the flow rate is constant and q (t ) is the varying flow rate. Then, other post-fracture surveillance with production analysis: a
Horne and Temeng (1995) provided the solutions of bottom tight gas study J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 3 382–401
Clarkson C R 2013 PDA of unconventional gas wells review of
hole pressure based on Newman’s principle (Gringarten and theory and best practices Int. J. Coal Geol. 109 101–46
Ramey, 1973) and Duhamel’s principle (Thompson and Doublet L E, Pande P K, McCollum T J and Blasingame T A 1994
Reynolds 1986), as shown in the following: Decline curve analysis using type curves–analysis of oil well
production data using material balance time application to field
⎡ pD11 pD12 pD13 .... pD1n - 1⎤ ⎡ qD1 ⎤ ⎡ 0 ⎤ cases Int. Petroleum Conf. and Exhibition of Mexico
⎢ ⎥
⎢ p......
D21 pD22 pD23 .... pD2n - 1⎥ ⎢ qD2 ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ (Veracruz, Mexico, 10–13 October 1994)
⎢...... ⎥ ⎢....⎥ EIA 2016 Shale gas production drives world natural gas production
⎢ ⎥
⎢ pDk1 pDk2 pDk 3 .... pDkn - 1⎥ ⎢ qDk ⎥ = ⎢ 0 ⎥ (A-2) growth (https://eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=27512)
⎢...... ⎥ ⎢....⎥ (accessed 15 August 2016)
⎢ ..... ⎥
⎢ pDn1 pDn2 pDn3 .... pDnn - 1⎥ ⎢ qDn ⎥ ⎢ 0 ⎥ Fetkovich M J 1980 Decline curve analysis using type curves J. Pet.
⎢⎣ 1 ⎣⎢ p ⎦⎥ ⎣1 ⎦
1 1 .... 1 0 ⎥⎦ wD Technol. 32 1065–77
Gringarten A C and Ramey H J Jr 1973 The use of source and
tD
green’s functions in solving unsteady-flow problems in
ò0
1841
J. Geophys. Eng. 15 (2018) 1835 Q Li et al
Topaze NL—Rate Transient Analysis (https://kappaeng.com/ Wei M Q, Duan Y G, Dong M Z and Fang Q T 2016a Blasingame
software/topaze/) accessed Sep 2016 decline type curves with material balance pseudo-time
Vardcharragosad P, Ayala H and Luis F 2015 Production-data analysis modified for multi-fractured horizontal wells in shale gas
of gas reservoirs with apparent-permeability and sorbed-phase reservoirs J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 31 340–50
effects: a density-based approach SPE J. 20 99–111 Wei M Q, Duan Y G, Fang Q T and Zhang T T 2016b Production
Wang H T 2014 Performance of multiple fractured horizontal wells decline analysis for a multi-fractured horizontal well
in shale gas reservoirs with consideration of multiple considering elliptical reservoir stimulated volumes in shale gas
mechanisms J. Hydrol. 510 299–312 reservoirs J. Geophys. Eng. 13 354
1842