Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INDIA
Journal
Vol. 10, No. 1 - January 2021 (Half Yearly Journal)
Join CIGRE
The World Forum for Electric Power System
India
Governing Body of CIGRE-India
A. Governing Council (2020 - 22)
President
CIGRE-India
Vice Presidents, CIGRE-India
I.S. Jha Seema Gupta U.K. Bhattacharya Renuka Gera Praveer Sinha Manish Agrawal Anil Saboo
Member, CERC Director, Powergrid Director, NTPC Director, BHEL MD, Tata Power CEO, Sterlite Power President, IEEMA
Transmission
Chairman Tech. Jt. Chairman Tech. Member Secretary Director
CIGRE-India CIGRE-India CIGRE-India CIGRE-India
R.P. Sasmal N.N. Misra Sunil Misra A.K. Dinkar A.K. Bhatnagar
Former Dir. Powergrid Former Dir. NTPC Director General, IEEMA Secretary, CBIP Director, CBIP
Seema Gupta K.V.S. Baba Subir Sen Anil Kumar Arora B.B. Chauhan R.K. Tyagi
Director, Powergrid CMD, POSOCO ED, Powergrid ED, Powergrid Former MD, GETCO ED, Powergrid
Chairperson CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE
NSC A2 NSC C2 NSC C1 NSC B4 NSC C4 NSC A3
B.N. De Bhomick Anish Anand Debasis De, S.C. Saxena Dr. B.P. Muni S.S. Misra
Former ED, Powergrid ED, Powergrid ED, NLDC, POSOCO SGM, POSOCO GM, BHEL GM, NTPC
Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE
NSC C3 NSC B2 NSC D2 NSC C5 NSC D1 NSC C6
Subhas Thakur D.K. Chaturvedi Y. B. K. Reddy Nihar Raj Lalit Sharma Santanu Sen
AGM, NTPC Former GM, NTPC AGM, SECI VP, Adani Ltd. COO, KEI DGM, CESC Ltd.
Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Co-Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Co-Chairman CIGRE
NSC B5 NSC A1 NSC C6 NSC B3 NSC B1 NSC C1
CIGRE India Journal
Volume 10, No. 1 January 2021
CONTENTS
Page No
Editor’s Note 2
Articles
• Open Line Test Application in Uhvdc for Condition Monitoring of Insulation Health of Ultra High
Voltage Equipments – Tuhin Suvra Das and Vinita Kumari 3
• Significance of Quality & Quantity of Gravel for Safe Designing of Grounding (Earthing) System
of Substations – Dr. Rajesh Kumar Arora 11
• Condition Monitoring of GIS Surge Arresters – M. Mohana Rao, Archana L and Mritunjay Kumar 18
• Project GPTL – Sandip Maity and Abshan Farooq 24
• Utility Roadmap for System strength aspects for Reliability, Stability and Flexibility of RE Rich
Modern Power Grid– Indian grid context – B.P. Soni and N.M. Sheth 28
Disclaimer : The statements and opinions expressed in this journal are that of the individual authors only and
not necessarily those of CIGRE-India.
Subscription Information 2021/ (2 issues)
Institutional subscription (Print & Online) : Rs. 900/US$75
Institutional subscription (Online only) : Rs. 600/US$50
Institutional subscription (Print only) : Rs. 600/US$50
Subscription for 10 Years (Print Only) : Rs. 5,000
Subscription for 10 Years (Online) : Rs. 5,000
Subscription for 10 Years (Print & Online) : Rs. 8,000
Editor’s NOTE
CIGRE the International Council on Large Electric Systems founded in 1921, is leading worldwide
Organization on Electric Power Systems, covering technical, economic, environmental, organisational
and regulatory aspects. It deals with all the main themes of electricity. CIGRE is the unique worldwide
organization of its kind - 14,000 equivalent members in around 90 countries. CIGRE is focused on practical
technical applications. The main aim of CIGRE is to facilitate and develop the exchange of engineering
knowledge and information, between engineering personnel and technical specialists in all countries as
regards generation and high voltage transmission of electricity. CIGRE achieves its objective through the
16 Study Committees, each consisting of about 30 members from different countries. India is representing
in all the 16 Study Committee of CIGRE.
Besides National Committees in about 60 Countries CIGRE has also constituted its regional chapters
in the world. The chapter created for Asia is named as CIGRE-AORC (Asia Oceans Regional Council).
CIGRE-AORC is a forum for sharing experience and knowledge regarding pertinent technical issues particularly those affecting
power systems in the Asia-Oceana Region. The countries from Asia Oceana Region, who are associated with the forum are
Australia, China, Cambodia, Gulf Cooperative Council, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Iran, Jordan, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, New
Zealand, Taiwan and Thailand.
It is a matter of great honour for India that CIGRE AORC has been chaired by India during 2016-2018. Dr. Subir Sen, ED,
POWERGRID was Chairman and Shri P.P. Wahi, Secretary of CIGRE AORC for two year during 2016-18.
It is a matter of pride that CIGRE (India) has been in the administrative Council of CIGRE since 1970 and got seat in Steering
Committee in 2018. CIGRE India functions as the National Committee, for CIGRE HQ (Paris). The CIGRE (India) coordinates
interest of Indian members; organises National Study Committee (NSC) meetings. It recommends appropriate persons for CIGRE
Study Committees. The National representatives are instrumental in providing feed back to CIGRE Study Committees at Paris.
The aims and objectives for which the committee, i.e., CIGRE (India), is constituted, is to implement and promote objectives of the
International Council on Large Electric Systems (CIGRE) and accelerate its activities, which include the interchange of technical
knowledge and information between all countries in the general fields of electricity generation transmission at high voltage and
distribution etc.
All-out efforts are being made to increase the CIGRE membership and activities in India. CIGRE India has regularly been making
efforts to invite various CIGRE study committees and their working groups to hold their meeting in India. We in the recent past
have already hosted SC D2 on Information and telecommunication in 2013; SC B4 on HVDC - in 2015 and SC B1 on HV Insulated
cables in 2017 in India. In the Year 2019 we have hosted four Study Committees SC A1 on Rotating Electrical Machines in Sept.
2019 & SC A2; SC B2 & SC D1 on Transformers, Overhead Lines and Materials & test techniques respectively in Nov. 2019. This
is done with the aim to provide opportunities to professional to exchange & share views / knowledge with international experts.
We have already got approval from CIGRE to host Study Committee SC A3 on high voltage equipment’s and B5 on Power System
Protection in 2021 and 2023 respectively. There was excellent participation from India in CIGRE session 2018 at Paris. Total 22
papers were presented and more than 150 officers from India including CEOs & Sr. Officers from various PSUs, State Electricity
Corporation and various Regulatory Commissions participated in CIGRE session 2018 besides six exhibitors.
For CIGRE Session 2020, CIGRE India received 240 Abstract for consideration. Out of the 45 Abstracts were recommended to
CIGRE HQ for their consideration, 37 abstracts were accepted.
The Covid 2019 affected organisation of CIGRE session 2020, virtual session was organised by CIGRE, where these were 107
participants from India.
In this present COVID-19 situation where skill enhancement and training of professional is emerged as an important aspect
and a challenge, CIGRE- India held series of virtual Tutorials/ Workshops/ Webinars on the subject relevant to 16 CIGRE Study
Committees, to further promote CIGRE in India and involve additional professional including New Generation / Young professionals
with CIGRE. The reports of the virtual tutorials is included in this issue of journal.
The Membership of CIGRE from India is also on the rise and in the year 2018 we achieved membership count to 827 Nos. and
the same was maintained for 2019. For 2020 total 800 members were registered as CIGRE Member from India.
We are bringing out this Journal on half yearly basis. The last issue was published in the month of July 2020.
This issue covers the informative and useful technical articles and statistical data on the subject.
I am thankful to the Governing Council and the Technical Committee of CIGRE-India for their valuable time and guidance, but for
which, it would not have been possible to achieve the above significant progress, appreciated by CIGRE HQ Paris.
I am also thankful to all the senior experts from India and abroad and also to one and all who have supported in the past to realize
the goal set forth for CIGRE India and expect the similar support in future too.
A.K. Dinkar
Secretary & Treasurer CIGRE India
2. Equivalent
2. EquivalentCircuit Model of OpenModel
Circuit Line Test of Open
Line Test
The capacitances shown in the fig 1 are the value by...(4) cally
controlling the tapcalculated
changer posi-dc pole voltage follows a
Fig. 3 : Theoretical relation between Vdc and alpha during
equivalent capacitances of the the Fig. 1inare thetion.
in insulators cosineinsulation
In case of persisting relation
normalwith
poweralpha.The
fault,
flow operationdc pole vol-
pole
The capacitances shown equivalent
dc yard as wellof
capacitances as the
in dcinsulators
line. Similarlyin dctheyard asthe 𝑅𝑒𝑞asacross
well in the capacitance reduces to a
resistances shown in fig1 are the equivalent
dc line. Similarly the resistances shown in Fig. 1 are which forces the controller to
very low value
shunt
the resistance across
equivalent shunteach non-idealacross
resistance capa- eachreduce the thyristorThe
non-ideal firingrectifier
angle to a station
very valves are designed to
citance. The resistance can be calculated
capacitance. The resistance can be calculated from the low value tobuild the dc voltage. Voltage
from the loss
dielectric dielectric
or tanloss or value.The
delta tan delta val- theoreticaldifference
equation betweentake more voltage
the theoretically calcu- than inverter station.
ue.The
(3) used theoretical equation
to calculate the(3)dc used to cal- in controller
voltage is a and theHence,the
lated voltage
no load voltage of inverter station
actual voltage enforces
culate the dc voltage in controller is a func-
function of the thyristor firing angle alpha and no load dc the controller to operate Open Line Test pro-
tion of the
voltage Vdiothyristor firing angle
VLL in equation is theand
(4)𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎 tection.
line to line voltage Theofplot ofisdcless
voltagethanwiththe rectifier station. The theoreti-
respect
no load dc voltage 𝑉𝑑𝑖𝑜. 𝑉 in equation (4)
the ac bus. In Open Line𝐿𝐿Test mode the controller keeps to cos( 𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎 − 60° ) helps to understand the
is the
the noline
loadto dc
linevoltage
voltage of Vdiothe constant
ac bus. In to a set behavior
valueofby
cally
Open Line Test. calculated dc pole voltage follows a
Open Line the
controlling Testtapmode the controller
changer position. keeps
In case of persisting cosine relation with alpha.The dc pole vol-
insulation fault, the Reg across theacapacitance
the no load dc voltage 𝑉𝑑𝑖𝑜 constant to set reduces
to a very low value which forces the controllerFig2. to reduce
: Theoretical relation between
the thyristor firing angle to a very low value 𝐶𝑜𝑠 tobuild the − 60°) Fig.
and 𝑉𝑑𝑐4 : Theoretical and actualrelation between Vdcpole and
(𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎 𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒 during nor-
dc voltage. Voltage difference between the theoretically mal power Fig4. flow : Theoretical andduring
alpha for rectifier
operation actualrelation
OLT be-
tween 𝑉𝑑𝑐𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒 and 𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎 for rectifier dur-
Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021 ing OLT
OLTbe can
plotted with the actual
be performed for theone from thecir-
following oper- of offline simulation platform it is required
cuitational experience of Open Line Test opera-
configurations: to design the controller in the respective
Open Line Test Application in Uhvdc for Condition Monitoring of Insulation Health of Ultra High Voltage Equipments 5
tion. platform. The controller has to be same as
(a) Converter is connected to DC bus therunmain
To controller
the electrical model used in real
a closed loopHVDC sys-
control system
without DC filter and without DC line. is required, which can be done with
tem. The controller shown in fig6 used for the help of control
system replica with RTDS simulation.But to design
(b) Converter is connected to DC bus with Open
in LineSimulink
MATLAB Test has been replicated
platform or in any kindfrom the
of offline
DC filter and without DC line. simulation platform it is required
controller used by ABB for the ±800kV to design the controller
in the respective platform. The controller has to be same
(c) Converter is connected to DC line with NEA-Agra
as multi-terminal
the main controller HVDC
used in real HVDCproject.
system. The
DC filter. controller shown in Fig. 6 used for Open Line Test has
been replicated from the controller used by ABB for the
(d) Converter is connected to DC line ±800kV NEA-Agra multi-terminal HVDC project.
without DC filter
Fig. 5 : Theoretical and actual relation between
Fig5. :(alpha
Cos Theoretical and
– 60o) and Vdc pole actual relation be-
for rectifier during OLT
An equivalent electrical model can be de-
Fig.
tween4 and𝐶𝑜𝑠 Fig.(5𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎
have been plotted
) and with 𝑉𝑑𝑐the actual data
signed in any
sets taken fromofanthe
− 60°
OLTsimulationplatforms
operation performed on𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒 like for
converter
rectifier during pole)OLT
EMTDC/PSCAD,RSCAD,HYPERSIM,
of station1(+ve of ±800kV NEA-Agra multi-terminal
HVDC project as per the configuration shown in Fig. 1.
MATLAB SIMULINK etc. All the simula-
to 𝑉𝑑𝑐
Fig 4. shows . The
𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒 the 𝐶𝑜𝑠(of𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎
deviation actual dc −pole ) follows
60°voltage from
tion
the platformshave
theoretically calculated their one.
ownTheadvantages.
dc pole voltage
a cosine
varies
curve for different dc voltages.
Most oflinearly
them withuse alpha. The linear
their patent relationship
solving tech-of dc
voltage with alpha can be better interpreted by plotting Fig. 6 : Closed and Open Loop control strategy for Open
nique
Theor
Cos(alpha solver
deviation for
– 60o) with simulation
of actual
respect to Vdcresults.
curve from
pole
. Thethe The
theo-
Cos(alpha Fig6. :Closed and Open
Line Test of aLoop
rectifiercontrol strate-
–
basic60 o
) follows
control
retical a
one and cosine curve
electrical
in fig5 for different
showsblocks dc voltages.
are the
the nonlinearity gy for
3.2 OpenLoop
Closed Line Test of a rectifier
Control Model in MATLAB
The deviation of (actual curve from)the theoretical one in
IEEE/IEC
betweenstandard 𝐶𝑜𝑠 𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎 blocks.
− 60°Theand
Fig. 5 shows the nonlinearity between Cos(alpha
parameter
𝑉𝑑𝑐𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒of–. 60 Too) Simulink
theand
blocks
Vdcpolecan
understand . Tothebe changed
behavior
understand thetoofcustomize
the Open
behavior theLine
of the Open The basic controller shown in fig 7 is a negative feedback
Line Test the practical data is required for different loop using a comparator, PI controller and the HVDC
model.
Test the practical data is required for differ-
configurations which is not feasible from commercial equivalent electrical model. The PI controller is designed
ent configurations
point of view. So electrical which is not feasible
modelling is necessary from for to have a faster response so that the simulation time to
3.2Closed
better understanding
commercial point Loopof Control
of the basic Open Line
view. So electrical Model
Test circuit in MATLAB Simulink
reach steady state is less. The open loop electrical model
with an alpha regulator can be used to check the behavior
configurations.
modelling is necessary for better under- of the system for different values of alpha.
The3. basic
Modelling
standing
controller
of the
ofshown
basic
Open
Open
inLine
fig
Line
7 Test
is a neg-
Test circuit
time to reach steady state is less. The open
Configuration of HVDC System
ative feedback loop using a comparator, PI
configurations. loop electrical model with an alpha regulator
OLT can be performed for the following circuit
controller
configurations: and the HVDC equivalent elec- can be used to check the behavior of the sys-
trical model. The
(a) Converter PI controller
is connected to DC is busdesigned
without DC to filter tem for different values of alpha.
have aand faster response
without DC line. so that the simulation
(b) Converter is connected to DC bus with DC filter and
without DC line. Fig7.Fig. 7 : loop
: Closed Closed
controlloop
modelcontrol model
in MATLAB in MATLAB Simulink
Simulink
(c) Converter is connected to DC line with DC filter. TheVdc_ref
The Vdc_refinput isinput
given is
by given by usinging.
using a ramp a The
ramp function
forward and is increased
biased voltage
(d) Converter is connected to DC line without DC filter a ramp
function andrate
a rampisrate
used totobuild
is used up theslowly
build up dc voltage. An alpha
by regulating alpha to get the re-
limiter
the is used
dc voltage. An alphainlimiter
the controller
is used in toquired
maintain the alpha
dc pole voltage. The subsystem con-
An equivalent electrical model can be designed in any of the controller toamaintain
between giventhemaximum
alpha between and sists of the electrical
minimum modelling of the AC
value.The
the simulationplatforms like EMTDC/PSCAD, RSCAD, a given maximum and minimum value.The
positive phase voltage across anode to cathode of asource,Converter transformer and Converter
HYPERSIM, MATLAB SIMULINK etc. All the simulation positive phase voltage across anode to ca-
valve is required for forward biasing.
subsystem with the DC filter and line equiv-
The forward biased
platformshave their own advantages. Most of them use thode of a valve is required for forward bias- alent parameter shown in fig8.
voltage is increased slowly by regulating alpha to get
their patent solving technique or solver for simulation the required dc pole voltage. The subsystem consists
results. The basic control and electrical blocks are the of the electrical modelling of the AC source,Converter
IEEE/IEC standard blocks. The parameter of the blocks transformer and Converter subsystem with the DC filter
can be changed to customize the model. and line equivalent parameter shown in Fig 8.
Fig. 9 : Converter Subsystem model in MATLAB Simulink with DC filter, DC yard and DC line equivalent model
Fig9.: Converter Subsystem model in MATLAB Simulink with DC filter, DC yard and DC line
equivalent
The control model scheme is the Equidistance The DC yard components consists of smoothing and
pulse generation
Phase Control (EPC) by using the phase voltages. In blocking reactor, bus post insulator, dc voltage divider
practical
Thescenario there
control is a Phase
pulse Locked
generation Loop (PLL)
scheme is the and other supporting
insulator, insulator.
dc voltage The insulators
divider and othercansup-
to change the pulse generation depending upon the be modelled as an equivalent capacitance of parallel
Equidistance
frequency Phase Control
of AC bus voltages. (EPC) by
In the simulation, using
ac bus porting
connected insulator.
insulators with anThe insulators
equivalent can be
resistance
voltagesthe
andphase voltages.
frequencies In kept
have been practical
constantscenario
which modelled
across the as an equivalent capacitance of
capacitance.
is a valid approximation for the steady state
there is a Phase Locked Loop (PLL) to condition. parallel
Similarly the dc connected
line can be insulators with
modelled like thean
dcequiva-
yard
Each converter
change valve consists
the pulse of an equivalent
generation thyristor,
depending upon component. The dielectric loss coefficient
lent resistance across the capacitance. tan delta
a valve reactor, connected in series with another valve is the measuring index for insulation resistance. The
and anthe frequency
equivalent of AC
snubber bus voltages.
capacitance In the si-
and resistance loss coefficient varies with ageing, weather, pollution
across mulation,
the valve. ac bus voltages and frequencies Similarly
and other factors.the
Thedcstring
line insulators
can be modelled
connectedlike
the dc yard component. The dielectric loss
have been kept constant which is a valid ap-
Volumeproximation
10 v No. 1 vfor the steady
January 2021state condition. coefficient tan delta is the measuring index
for insulation resistance. The loss coefficient
Where i = current through inductor Leq
Vm=maximum phase voltage
Vceq(t)=voltage across capacitance Ceq
𝜔=fundamental frequency of the AC voltage
Open Line Test Application in Uhvdc for Condition Monitoring
Vm=maximum phaseof voltage
Insulation Health of Ultra High Voltage Equipments tors. 7The charg
The operation of rectifier under open cir- ances are limit
insulation. frequency
between conductor and tower provides the𝜔=fundamental of
cuitthe of thecan
condition AC be
equivalent voltage
circuit capacitances.
described as simulta- The charging reactor, valve r
The equivalent capacitance is the series and parallel capacitances(Ceq)
neous charging andconsists tors.
of the
discharging ofThethecharging
snubber currents
valve ofand
circuit,reactance thed
combination of the insulation capacitance. TheThe operation ofsupport
equivalent rectifierinsulators,
equivalent under
circuitopen cir-bushing,
capacitances.
pole ances
The areinsulators,
charg-
arrester limited been
bybusthe
shown assm
pole L
resistance is calculated from dielectric loss cuitincondition
actual canpost
be described
ing aspole
simulta-
capacitances(Ceq)
insulators, reactor,
consistsreactor
smoothing of the valveinsulator,
post reactors, dctransformer
circuit. neous charging voltage
and discharging
snubber circuit,and
divider ofline
valve the reactance
support insulators,
insulators. and dccurrents
The charging line reactance
During w
chargin
equivalent circuitpole
capacitances. The charg-
of thebushing, arresterare
capacitances limited been
insulators, shown
busthe
by postpoleassmoothing
Leq.the 2nd order C
ing capacitances(Ceq) consists
insulators, of the reactor post in-
polereactors,
smoothing can be written a
reactor, valve transformer leakage reactance
snubber circuit, valve support insulators, During charging and discharging o
sulator,
and dc voltage
dc line reactance divider
which andhas linebeen
insula-
shown as Leq.
pole bushing, arrester insulators, bus post the 2nd order Capacitor Voltage eq
insulators, pole smoothing reactorand
During charging post in-
𝑑2discharging can be written
operation theas
𝑑𝑉𝑐𝑒𝑞 2nd
(𝑡)order 2
2
sulator, dc voltage divider and line insula-
Vceq ( t ) +
Capacitor Voltage equation can be written as 𝜏 ∗ 𝜔𝑛 ∗ + 𝜔𝑛 ∗ 𝑉𝑐𝑒𝑞
𝑑𝑡2 𝑑𝑡
2
𝑑2 𝑑𝑉𝑐𝑒𝑞(𝑡=) 𝜔𝑛 ∗2 𝑉𝑚 ∗ 𝜔 ∗ cos(𝜔𝑡 + 𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ
Vceq(t) + 𝜏 ∗ 𝜔𝑛2 ∗ + 𝜔𝑛 ∗ 𝑉𝑐𝑒𝑞(𝑡)
𝑑𝑡2 𝑑𝑡
(6) = 𝜔𝑛2 ∗ 𝑉𝑚 ∗ 𝜔 ∗ cos(𝜔𝑡 + 𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎 + 𝜋/6)
...(6)
𝐿𝑒𝑞
(6) Where time constant,𝜏 = and natural frequency of oscillation,𝜔
Fig.10 : DC filter equivalent model in MATLAB
Where time constant, 𝑅𝑒𝑞 and natural frequency
Fig10.: DC
Fig10.: DC filter
filter equivalent
equivalent model
model in
in MATLAB
MATLAB SIMULINKwith
SIMULINKwith equivalent
equivalent electrical
electricalparame-
parame-
SIMULINKwith equivalent electrical parameters 𝐿𝑒𝑞 2 1
ters
ters Where time constant,𝜏
Equation = (6) and natural frequency of oscillation,𝜔𝑛 = � 𝐿𝑒𝑞 ∗𝐶𝑒𝑞
𝑅𝑒𝑞 can be solved analytically.
The DC filter is modelled on the basis of parameters of oscillation,
The DC
The DC filter
filter is
is modelled
modelled on
on the
the basis
basis of
of speed
speed and
and increases
increases the
the computational
computational
Thesolved bur-
currentbur-through the capacitor can be expressed as
used in the electrical model of ±800kV NEA-Agra Equation multi-
(6) can be
Equation analytically.
(6) can be solved analytically.
parameters used in the electrical model
model of
of den.To
den.To achieve
achieve thethe simulation
simulation response
response
terminal HVDC multi-terminal
system replica.This
HVDC
DC
nearly
filter
equal
model
toto the
±800kV NEA-Agra HVDC nearly The
equalcurrentthe actual response,
actualThe
response,
current anan through the capacitor can be expressed as
used in the simulation decreases the simulation
system replica.This DC filter model used
used in
in
speedthrough
equivalent
equivalent model
model can
can be
the
be used
capacitor
used toto represent
can be expressed as
represent
and increasesdecreases
the simulation the computational
simulationburden.To
the simulation the DCachieve
the DC filterwith
filter the
withan
an equivalentRLC
equivalent RLCcircuit.
circuit. 𝜋
𝑉𝑚 ∗sin �𝑎𝑙𝑝 ℎ𝑎 + �−𝑉𝑐𝑒𝑞 (0)
simulation response nearly equal to the actual response, 𝑖𝑐(𝑡) = 6
∗ 𝑒 −ξ∗𝜔𝑛 ∗𝑡 ∗ cos(𝜔𝑛 ∗ 𝑡)(7)
3.3equivalent
an Mathematical
model canModel-
be used to represent the DC 𝜋
𝑉𝑚 ∗sin �𝑎𝑙𝑝 ℎ𝑎 + �−𝑉𝑐𝑒𝑞 (0)
𝜔𝑛 ∗𝐿𝑒𝑞
...(7)
filter with an equivalent RLC
ling of Converter in Open circuit. 𝑖𝑐(𝑡) = 6
∗ 𝑒 −ξ∗𝜔𝑛 ∗𝑡
1 2 𝐿𝑒𝑞
∗ cos(𝜔𝑛 ∗ 𝑡)(7)
𝜔𝑛 ∗𝐿𝑒𝑞
damping ratio ξ = �𝐶𝑒𝑞 (8)
3.2 Circuit Condition 2∗𝑅
Mathematical
Circuit Condition Modelling of Converter in Open damping
1 2 𝐿𝑒𝑞ratio ...(8)
Circuit Condition damping ratio ξ = �𝐶𝑒𝑞 (8)
whereR=
2∗𝑅 resistance of line
where R = resistance of line
whereR= resistance of line
Fig.:Closed
Fig15. 15 : Closed loop of
loop simulation simulation
rectifier(+veof rectifier(+ve
pole) pole) with3 (c). DC Volt
with circuit configuration
Fig15. :Closed loop simulation of rectifier(+ve pole) with circuit configuration 3 (c). DC Volta
circuit configuration 3 (c). DC Voltagecommand = 400 kV
gecommand=400kV
gecommand=400kV
Fig13. :: Current
Fig13. Current
Fig.through 12valves
valves
13 : Current
through 12 through 12 valves
Fig.:Closed
Fig16.
Fig16. 16 : Closed
:Closed loop loop of
loop simulation
simulation simulation
of rectifier(+veof
rectifier(+ve rectifier(+ve
pole)
pole) with
withcircuit pole) with33(c).
circuitconfiguration
configuration (c).DC
DCVoltag
Voltag
circuit configuration 3 (c). DC Voltage command = 600 kV
command=600kV
command=600kV
Fig18. :Three sets of data (S1,S2,S3) for different reference voltages of 400 kV, 600kV, 800kV
during Open Line Test operation of +ve pole at rectifier station1.
Case 2:Converter is connected to DC bus without DC Simulation result is shown in Fig. 19 and actual TFR
filter and without DC line. data for OLT performed at –ve pole of rectifier station
2is shown in Fig. 20.
Vdc_ref=-800kV is given
Fig19. : Closed loop simulation of (–vepole) of Station 2 with circuit configuration 3 (a). DC
Fig19. : Closed ofloop simulation of (–vepole) ofconfiguration
Station 2 with
3(a).circuit configuration
command =3 -800
(a). kV
DC
Voltage
Fig. command=-800kV
19 : Closed loop simulation (–vepole) of Station 2 with circuit DC Voltage
Voltage command=-800kV
Fig.Fig20. : Negative
20 : Negative pole of2 with
pole of Station Station
circuit2configuration
with circuit3(a).configuration 3 (a). =DC
DC Voltage command 800Voltage
kV com-
Fig20. : Negative pole of considering
mand=800kVwithout Station 2 the
without with
sign. circuit
considering configuration 3 (a). DC Voltage com-
the sign.
mand=800kVwithout
5. Results considering the sign.
and Discussions connected insulators between conductor and tower
5. Results and Discussions
In both the cases, it can be seen that alpha required increases.So the equivalent IR value decreases. As the
5. Results and Discussions
to build up the reference dc voltages is almost same
in the simulationInresult
equivalent IR decreases for a long line, the loss increases
during open line test. It is evident from fig16 that the
both asthe well
cases,asitincan
thebeactual
seen that
OLT alpha
dielectric
during OLT. This small DC power is a
loss is very less in case of a circuit configuration
operationresult.This validates the accuracy of the
In both
simulation therequired
model. cases, toit build
can up be the reference
seen dc voltag-
that alpha whereduringmeasure
the OLT.of the
converter dielectric
isThis
only smalllosses
connected DCtoincurred
power
dc bus.Theinis a
required es
toand is
build almost same
upvalues, in
the referencethe simulation
dcobtained result as
equivalent
voltag- for a circuit the
measure IR insulation of the
value is typically
of the where HVDC
between
dielectric circuit
10MΩ toequip-
100MΩ
losses incurred in
In addition to Vdc alpha the TFR data configuration converter is connected to
well as in the actual OLT operationre- ments during OLT operation.
fromes is almost
actual same in
OLT operation the18simulation
(Fig. resulttheas dc busthe
& Fig. 20) shows insulation
without line and of the The
dc filter. HVDC circuit
different equip-
equivalent
DC power during sult.This
OLT. Thisvalidates
small DCthe poweraccuracy of the simu-
is a measure IR values have been used in the simulation for different
well as in the incurred actual OLT operationre- ments
The during OLT
dielectric loss operation.
is inversely proportional
lation model. in the insulation of the
of the dielectric losses configurations.
HVDC sult.This validatesduring
circuit equipments the accuracy of the simu-
OLT operation. to the IR value. As the line length increases
In isaddition to proportional
Vdc and alpha values,
As seenThe thedielectric
number ofloss
from the results ofisactual
inversely
connected proportional
OLT operation in
The lation model.
dielectric loss inversely to the IR the parallel insulators
Fig. 18, for constant IR the losses vary significantly for
value. As the line TFR
lengthdata obtained
increases thefrom
number actual OLT opera-
of parallel to the
between
different dc
IR value. As
conductorThe
pole voltages.
the line length
andtheoretically increases
tower increases.So
calculated
In additiontion(fig
to Vdc18 &and
fig alpha values,
20)shows the DCthe
power thethe
number of parallel
equivalent IR valueconnected insulators
decreases. As the
TFR data obtained from actual OLT opera- between conductor and tower increases.So
tion(fig 18 & fig 20)shows the DC power Volume
the equivalent IR10value
v No. decreases.
1 v JanuaryAs2021the
equivalent IR decreases for a long line, the equivalent IR values have been used in the
loss increases during open line test. It is evi- simulation for different configurations.
dent from fig16 that the dielectric loss is
very less in case of a circuit configuration As seen from the results of actual OLT op-
10
where the converter is only connected to dc eration in fig 18,for constantCIGRE
IR the losses
India Journal
bus.The equivalent IR value is typically be- vary significantly for different dc pole vol-
tages. The theoretically calculated losses
losses
tween 10MΩwith respect
to 100MΩ for a circuittoconfi-
different dc pole voltages for
with respect to different dc pole voltages for
different
guration where equivalent insulation
converter is connected to dc resistance (IR) is shown
bus different equivalent insulation resistance
in without
Fig. 21.line and dc filter. The different
(IR) is shown in fig21.
dc pole voltage. Similarly the alpha during subsequent maintenance shutdowns can be
most importance to theforUltra
respect to dc voltage differentHigh Voltage
IR values shown in Fig. configurations
compared can one.
with the previous be If to
usedbuild to identify
up the same the
23. During annual maintenance of the HVDC substation, dc voltagereduction of alpha value is observed, it clearly
tem where
OLT can thebe failure
performedof foreven
differentone insula- and
configurations degraded
indicates the insulation
degradation ofzone. If the
insulation. Thereduction
results in
the characteristic graphs can be plotted to track down from different configurations can be used to identify
can cause a ofprolonged
the rate outageIRof
change of equivalent the con-
value.The signature the IR value obtained from the Open Line
the degraded insulation zone. If the reduction in the
ned pole.During the maintenance
curve obtained for a circuit configuration where converter
is isolated from dc line is very important.
Test
IR value is lessfrom
obtained than the Linethreshold
the Open value, a
Test is less than
the threshold value, a preventive action can be taken
tdown when the system is healthy i.e., preventive
by replacing the action can be
faulty insulator. Thetaken by replacing
faulty insulators
can be detected by IR test. Thus, using the results of
e from any insulation fault,OLT can be the faulty
Open insulator.failure
Line Test,insulation The can faulty insulators can
be anticipated
formed for different configurations.The be indetected
well advance andby henceIRpreventive
test. Thus,action can using
be the
taken.Thus,OLTproves to be an effective tool for the
t between 𝑎𝑙𝑝ℎ𝑎 and 𝑉𝑑𝑐𝑝𝑜𝑙𝑒 obtained resultsmonitoring
condition of Open Line Test,insulation
of insulation health of the HVDCfailure
equipments.
m the TFR can be treated as a signature can be anticipated well in advance and
References
ve for the insulation health of the HVDC hence preventive action can
[1] ABB controller used in ±800kV NEA-Agra multi-
be
uit components.Signature curve of OLT taken.Thus,OLTproves
terminal HVDC project to be an effective
[2] HVDC Control System Functional Descriptionfor
formed Fig during subsequent maintenance tool for the condition monitoring of
±800kV NEA-Agra multiterminal HVDC by ABB
22 : Cos(alpha – 60 ) with respect to dc pole voltage,
tdownsFig22. (compared withtherespect [3]to
)Reg.
o
Abstract
An electrical sub-station is an assemblage of electrical components including busbars, switchgear, power
transformers, auxiliaries etc. These components are connected in a definite sequence such that a circuit
can be switched off during normal operation by manual command and also automatically during abnormal
conditions such as short-circuit.
Sub-station are integral parts of a power system and form important links between the generating station,
transmission systems, distribution systems and the load points.
The main objective of grounding electrical systems is to provide a suitably low resistance path for the
discharge of fault current which ultimately provide safety to working personnel and costly installed
equipments in the substation. The flow of heavy fault current results in rise of potential in the vicinity of
point /area of fault (ground fault) with respect to remote ground. There is need to ensure that the ground
potential rise, and touch and step voltages are within permissible limits.
This paper provides an overview of significance of quality and quantity of gravel in the substation in
accurate designing of grounding system.
Keywords : Electrical Shock, Grounding (Earthing), Step and Touch Potential, Gravel (Surface
Material)
RA is the total effective resistance of the accidental The Thevenin voltage V Th is the voltage between
circuit in Ω terminals H and F when the person is not present. The
VA isFig.
the1 total
Air Insulated Substation with Gravel Surface
effective voltage of the accidental circuit Thevenin impedance ZTh is the impedance of the system
(touch or step voltage) in V as seen from points H and F with voltage sources of the
Fig.4 Thevenin
system short circuited. The currentEquivalent
Ib, throughof
theCircuit
body of figu
of a person coming in contact with H and F is given by
𝑽𝑻𝒉
𝑰𝒃 = -----Equation (1)
𝒁𝑻𝒉+𝑹𝑩 ...Equation (1)
Figure 5 shows the fault current If being discharged to the
ground by the grounding system of the substation. The
ForIb,touch
current, flows voltage
from oneaccidental circuit the body of
foot F1 through
the person
𝒛 to𝑹𝒇the other
..... foot, F2. Terminals
Equation (2)F1 and F2 are
Fig.
Fig. 2 Flow 2 : Flowthrough
of Current thethrough
of Current Working Staff
the during
Working Fault the areas𝑻𝒉=on the
� surface of the earth that are in contact
𝟐
Staff during Fault with the two feet, respectively. The Thevenin theorem
allowsAnd
us tofor
represent this
the step two-terminal
voltage (F1, F2)
accidental network
circuit
The tolerable body current, Ib, above, is used to define
in Figure 6. The Thevenin voltage VTh is the voltage
the tolerable total effective voltage of the accidental circuit
between𝒛𝑻𝒉=𝟐𝑹
terminals...... Equation
F1 and F2 when the (3)
person is not
(touch or step voltage) i.e. the tolerable total effective 𝒇
present . The Thevenin impedance ZTh is the impedance
voltage of the accidental circuit is that voltage that will
of the system as ween from the terminals F1 and F2 with
cause the flow of a body current, Ib,, equal to the tolerable
the voltage sources of the system short circuited.
body current, Ib.
For touch voltage accidental circuit
Figure 2 shows the fault current If being discharged to
the ground by the grounding system of the substation zTh = Rf ⁄ 2) ...Equation (2)
and a person touching a grounded metallic structure at H. And for the step voltage accidental circuit
Various impedances in the circuit are shown in Figure 3 .
Terminal H is a point in the system at the same potential zTh = 2Rf ...Equation (3)
as the grid into which the fault current flows and terminal
F is the small area on the surface of the earth that is in
contact with the person’s two feet. The current, Ib, flows
from H through the body of the person to the ground at
F the Thevenin theorem allows us to represent this tow
terminal (H,F) network of Figure 3 by the circuit shown
in Figure 4.
Fig. Fig.
5 Fig.55:Different
Different
Different Resistances
Resistances of Circuit
of Circuit
Resistances forfor
of Circuit for Voltage
Step
StepStep Voltage
Voltage
𝑹For
𝝆 the purpose of
𝒇= ...... Equation (4)
circuit analysis, the human foot is
usually
𝑹𝒇= 𝝆 ......
𝟒𝒃
represented
Equation (4) as a conducting metallic disc and
𝟒𝒃
Where ρ = Resistivity
the contact resistanceof the
of soil
shoes, socks, etc., is neglected.
Fig.4 WhereFor
ρ touch
= Resistivity
Traditionally, of the
the soil
metallic
voltage accidental circuit disc representing the foot is
Fig.Thevenin Equivalent
4 : Thevenin of Circuit
Equivalent of figure
of Circuit 3
of figure 3
Fig.4 Thevenin Equivalent of Circuit of figure 3 For touch voltage accidental circuit
ZTh= 1.5ρ ........ Equation (5)
𝑽𝑻𝒉 ZTh= 1.5ρ (5)circuit
𝑰𝒃 = -----Equation (1) For step voltage
........ accidental
Equation
Volume
𝒁𝑻𝒉+𝑹𝑩 10 v No. 1 v January 2021
𝑽𝑻𝒉
𝑰𝒃 = -----Equation (1) For step voltage accidental circuit
𝒁
Significance of Quality & Quantity of Gravel for Safe Designing of Grounding (Earthing)
is the maximum System
fault of Substations
clearing time (s) 13
Fig.6 Thevenin Equivalent of Circuit of figure 5
taken as a circular plate with a radius of 0.08m. With only
slight approximation, equations for ZTh can be obtained in ...Equation (13)
numerical from and expressed in terms of as follows: .......... Equation (13)
Cs is theis surface
WhereWhere layer
layerderating factor
𝑹𝒇= 𝝆 ...... Equation (4) the surface derating factor
𝟒𝒃 ...Equation (4) ρ is thesoil
is the soilresistivity
resistivity (Ω.m)
(Ω.m)
is the resistivity of the surface layer material (Ω.m)
Where ρ = Resistivity of the soil Ps is the resistivity of the surface layer material
Where ρ = Resistivity of the soil
For touch voltage accidental circuit
is the thickness of the surface layer (m)
(Ω.m)
For
ZTh = touch
1.5 ρ voltage accidental circuit
...Equation (5) hs is the thickness of the surface layer (m)
But, if we don’t fill with gravels then after some days/ 4. Impact of Quality and Quantity
is the resistivity of the surface layer material (Ω.m)
is the thickness of the surface layer (m)
months/years, some soils & water will accumulate in of Gravel (Surface Material) on
many parts on the Switchyard and grass will also grow. Grounding (Earthing) Design
Thus, Gravels prevents the growth of grass & other small It is very interesting to understand the impact of resistivity
plants inside the Switchyard and Substation remains (quality) of gravel (surface layer material) & height of
nice & clean. gravel (quantity) on different parameters of design of
5. Prevents the Entry of Animals & Wildlife: earthing (grounding) system.
The entry of animals likes Rats, Snakes, Lizards, etc. First of all , to analyze the impact of gravel resistivity on
are also prevented to some extent by spreading Gravels safe step and touch potential for 70 kg body weight refer
over the Switchyard surface. Table 1 along with Figure 7 below.
is the maximum fault clearing time (s)
6. Improves Yard Working Condition
Gravels also improve the working condition in the
Switchyard of a Substation.
7. Protect from Fire when Oil Spillage Takes
Place .......... Equation (13)
In Substation, Power Transformers & Shut Reactors
are filledWhere is theand
with oil as a cooling surface layer
insulating derating factor
medium.
Oil leakage may takes place during operation or when Fig.Fig.7 Impactof
7 : Impact ofResistivity
Resistivityof
ofGravel
Gravel on
on Safe
SafePotentials
Potentials(70
(70kg)
kg)
changing the oilis thetransformer.
in the soil resistivity (Ω.m)
The spillage oil which Further to analyze the impact of gravel resistivity on safe
can catch fire is dangerous to the switchyard operation. step andmaterial
touch potential for 50 kg body weight refer Table
So, Stones/Gravel is isthe resistivity
provided to protectof the
from firesurface
when layer (Ω.m)
2 along with Figure 8.
oil spillage takesisplace.
the thickness of the surface layer (m)
Table 1 : Impact of Gravel Resistivity on Safe Potentials (70 kg)
Further to analyze the impact of gravel resistivity on safe step and touch
potential for 50 kg body weight refer table 2 along with figure 8 below.
Fig.
Fig.8 8 : Impact
Impact of Resistivity
of Resistivity ofon
of Gravel Gravel on Safe Potentials
Safe Potentials (50 kg) Fig. 9 :Impact
Fig.9 ImpactofofHeight
HeightofofGravel
Gravelon on Safe
Safe Potentials
Potentials (70 kg)
(70 kg)
(50 kg)
From above it can be seen that with the increase in the resistivity of the Now to analyze the impact of height of gravel on safe step and touch
gravel From
the safeabove
potentialsit (step potential for 50 kg body weight refer table 4 along with figure 10 below.
canand
betouch
seenpotential)
that withalso increase.
the increase in the
resistivity
Next ,to analyze theof the gravel
impact of heightthe safe on
of gravel potentials (step
safe step and touchand touch
potential)
potential alsoweight
for 70 kg body increase.
refer table 3 along with figure 9 below.
From above it can be seen that with the increase in the height of the gravel
Table 3 : Impact of Gravel Height on Safe Potentials (70 kg)
the safe potentials (step and touch potential) also increase.
Fig.12 : Impact
Fig.12 Impact of of Resistivity
Resistivity of Gravel
of Gravel on Potentials
on Safe Safe Potentials
From above it can be seen that with the increase in the
height of the gravel the derating factor also increases
which further increase the safe potentials.
5. CONCLUSION
Fig.11 Impact of Resistivity of Gravel on Derating Factor
Fig. 11 : Impact of Resistivity of Gravel on Derating Factor The voltage drop in the soil surrounding the grounding
From above it can be seen that with the increase in the resistivity of the system can present hazards i.e. Step and touch voltage
From(ratio
gravel above it can
of gravel beresistivity)
to soil seen that with the
the derating increase
factor decreases.in the for personnel standing in the vicinity of the grounding
resistivity of the gravel (ratio of gravel to soil resistivity)
Further to analyze the impact height of gravel on derating factor refer table system. Adequate designing of grounding system will
6the derating
along with figurefactor decreases.
12 below. help in mitigating or eliminating electric shocks, fire and
Further to analyze the impact height of gravel on derating damage to equipments.
factor refer Table 6 along with Figure 12 below.
Role of quality (resistivity) and quantity (height) of gravel Authors Biographical Detail
in the switchyard play important role in deciding the Dr. RAJESH KUMAR ARORA obtained the B. Tech.
safe potential (tolerable potentials i.e. touch and step & Master of Engineering (ME) degrees in Electrical
potentials). Engineering from Delhi College of Engineering,
REFERENCES University of Delhi, India in 1999 and 2003 respectively.
He completed his PhD in grounding system design from
[1] IEEE Std. 80-2013, IEEE Guide for Safety in AC UPES, Dehradun. He is also certified Energy Manager
Substation Grounding and Auditor. He has worked in 400 kV and 220 kV
[2] I.S.3043-2018- Code of Practice for Earthing. Substation for more than 14 years in Delhi Transco
[3] Manual on,” Earthing of A C Power Systems,” Limited (DTL). He has also worked as Deputy Director
Publication No 339, C.B.I.P. New Delhi. (Transmission and Distribution) in Delhi Electricity
Regulatory Commission (DERC) for 03 years and 06
[4] IEC 60479 - Effect of Electric Current on Human months. He has also given his contribution in the OS
Being and Livestock department of DTL for more than 2 years and rendered
his services in the SLDC of Delhi Transco Limited
(DTL) also. Presently he is working in D&E (Design and
Engineering) department of DTL. His research interests
include high voltage technology, grounding system,
protection system, computer application and power
distribution automation.
Table 3 : Calculation of Leakage Current components by designing suitable number of turns, cross section of
using indirect method. the sensor core and choosing core material with required
properties. More clearly, the sensitivity of the developed
Voltage, Ic, p.u. Ir, p.u. Ic, p.u. Ir, p.u. sensor as per its design is in the order of few micro-
kV (0% non- (0% non (-8% (-8%
amperes for surge arrester monitoring.
linearity -linearity non- non-
voltage voltage linearity linearity The leakage current measurements have been carried
factor) factor) voltage voltage out on 145 kV and 420 kV GIS surge arrester prototypes
factor) factor) and results are validated with the conventionally available
30.0 0.1508 0.0603 0.1387 0.0844 current sensors. From the measurements, the variation of
40.0 0.2011 0.1573 0.1850 0.1760 third harmonic component and the resistive component of
50.0 0.2513 0.1390 0.2312 0.1704 leakage current with applied voltage are found to be mostly
similar and alike. The extraction of resistive component
60.0 0.3016 0.1568 0.2774 0.1963
from the total leakage current is found to be accurate
70.0 0.3518 0.1708 0.3237 0.2195 enough with the method proposed in the study.
80.0 0.4021 0.2002 0.3699 0.2548
Acknowledgment
.90.0 0.4524 0.2387 0.4162 0.2974
Authors are thankful to the Management of BHEL for
100.0 0.5026 0.2523 0.4624 0.3201
their permission to publish the work.
110.0 0.5529 0.3024 0.5087 0.3720
120.0 0.6032 0.3937 0.5549 0.4592 References
[1] Kuffel, “High Voltage Engineering: Fundamentals”,
One of the most widely used techniques for extracting
2e, Elsevier Science (reprint Technical Science &
the resistive leakage current for the purpose of condition
Engineering), 2005.
monitoring of surge arrester is the compensation
technique. In the compensation technique, for [2] IEC60137-2008, Insulated bushings for alternating
measurement of the resistive leakage current, the voltages above 1 000 V.
applied voltage is not required to be monitored. This [3] Lundquist, L. Stenstrom, A. Schei and B. Hansen,
technique is most suitable for on-site conditions. The “New method for measurement of the resistive leakage
method is based on the conditioning of the total leakage currents of metal oxide surge arresters in service”, IEEE
current waveform to get its resistive component. Authors Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 5, no.4, pp. 1811-1822, Oct.
developed a system with necessary software module to 1990.
calculate the resistive component of the leakage current [4] Tong Zhao, Qingmin Li and Jiali Qian, “Investigation on
of the GIS surge arrester using above compensation digital algorithm for on-line monitoring and diagnostics
technique [9]. Results obtained in the present study are of metal oxide surge arrester based on an accurate
compared with resistive leakage currents extracted from model”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 20,
leakage current data using compensation technique. No. 2, pp. 751 - 756, April 2005.
From the available data, it is evident that the proposed [5] Surge arresters: Part 5: Selection and application
estimation of resistive leakage current from leakage recommendations, International Electro-technical
current measurement is accurate enough to monitor Commission (IEC): IEC 60099-5, 2000-2003.
healthiness of GIS surge arrester. [6] Z. Abdul-Malek and Aulia Novizzon, “Metal Oxide
Surge Arrester Degradation Monitoring using Third
CONCLUSION Harmonic of the Resistive Leakage Current Component
The leakage current measurement can be used for ass Indicator”, AUPEC, 14-17 December 2008, Sydney,
monitoring healthiness of surge arresters, insulators and Dec 2008, pp. 1-5.
various other electrical power apparatus. The insulation [7] Vegard Larsen and Kjetil Lien, “In-service testing and
failure of an electrical device is always unintentional and diagnosis of gapless metal oxide surge arresters”, IX
causes a flow of either leakage current or short circuit International Symposium on Lightning Protection, 26th
current. The leakage current, however, flows continuously -30th November 2007, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil,
unlike short circuit current, with its magnitude being [8] C.Karawita and M. R. Raghuveer, “Onsite MOSA
related to the condition of the insulation. The leakage Condition assessment-A New Approach”, IEEE Trans.
current sensor as described in this paper is based on Power Del., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1273-77, July 2006.
novel, compact and low cost design. The sensor design [9] M. Mohana Rao and Mritunjay Kumar, “Experimental
is optimized based on the type of power equipment evaluation of resistive leakage current in GIS surge
and the leakage current levels to be monitored. The arresters”, International Journal of Power and Energy
sensors output signal amplitude is increased optimally Systems, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2016.
I. INTRODUCTION land, along with the high cost of land was a major issue
GPTL is a very crucial transmission project awarded, in which required that the stations be built with the smallest
terms that the new (GIS) substations being built under footprint for economic reasons without compromising
this project are a part of Inter-State Transmission System any technical standards.
(ISTS). II. GIS SUBSTATION
The project includes three new 400/220 kV GIS As explained in the introductory section that Gurgaon
Substations in Palwal & Gurgaon districts. It also being a metropolis has major land availability issues. This
II. GIS SUBSTATION
includes an extension project in an existing 400/220 constraint, with respect to land, led to a solution which
kV AIS Substation at Dhanonda (Haryana), which was an innovative layout, giving a remarkable reduction
As explained in the introductory section that Gurgaon being a metropolis has major land
comes under HVPNL (Haryana Vidyut Prasaran in footprint
availability meeting
issues. This constraint,all
withthe functionalities
respect required.
to land, led to a solution which was an
Nigam Limited). In addition to this extension work at innovative layout, giving a remarkable reduction in footprint meeting all the functionalities
The 400/220 kV GIS layout has the location of the
required.
Dhanonda, HVPNL Substation, a double circuit 400kV 400kV & 220 kVhasGIS installations at multiple levels
The 400/220kV GIS layout the location of the 400kV & 220kV GIS installations at
transmission line too is under scope which connects of thelevels
multiple same building,
of the same with
building, with 220kV 220kV line side
line side equipment placedequipment
in the same
the aforementioned substation and PGCIL Neemrana building,
placed thereby
in increasing
the same the power handled per unit
building, area. The layout
thereby has the 400kV GIS
increasing the
Substation (Rajasthan). with its Control & Protection system installed on the ground floor, which is further connected
topower
500MVA handled
400/220/33kV ICTs perand unit
420kV area.
125MVAr The layout
Reactor has
placed just theto 400
adjacent the
The project scope also includes, a 400kV double circuit kV GIS
building. with itsis Control
This connection & Protection
through Gas Insulated Bus (GIB) ducts,system installed
thus eliminating SF6 to
Oil Bushings for the Transformers and Reactor. The GIB ducts from 220kV side of
transmission line, which runs from PGCIL Aligarh (U.P.) on the ground floor, which is further connected to 500
transformer is routed from inside the building. This forms the bus ducts being routed from
to (new) 400/220kV GIS Substation in Prithala (Palwal). MVAfloor
ground 400/220/33kV
to the first floor of theICTs and
building, where420
220kVkV GIS125 MVAr
is placed, Reactor
alongside its
From Prithala Substation, a 400kV double circuit line placed
Control just adjacent
& Protection system. to the building. This connection is
connects the second (new) 400/220kV GIS Substation at
Kadarpur (Gurgaon). Further, from Kadarpur Substation,
a 400kV double circuit line connects the third (new)
400/220kV GIS Substation at Sohna Road (Gurgaon).
Furthermore, a double circuit 400kV line which connects
PGCIL Manesar and PGCIL Gurgaon, is being LILOed
at Sohna Road Substation.
The paper describes a Gas Insulated sub-station
(GIS) installation executed by Sterlite Power, India,
which employs an unconventional approach towards a
400/220kV GIS installation. The project is situated near
the large metropolis of Gurgaon in India, with availability
of land being a major challenge as three 400/220kV
GIS sub-stations had to be built relatively near to one
another. Being so close to a major city, availability of Fig. 1 : 400 kV Gas Insulated Switchgear
Figure 1.
Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021 24 400kV Gas Insulated Switchgear
Project GPTL 25
through Gas Insulated Bus (GIB) ducts, thus eliminating from inside the building. This forms the bus ducts being
SF6 to Oil Bushings for the Transformers and Reactor. routed from ground floor to the first floor of the building,
The GIB ducts from 220kV side of transformer is routed where 220kV GIS is placed, alongside its Control &
Figure 2.
400kV GIS BUILDING (GROUND FLOOR)
LAYOUT
Fig. 2 : 400 kV GIS Building (Ground Floor) Layout
Figure 2.
400kV GIS BUILDING (GROUND FLOOR)
LAYOUT
Figure 5.
400kV Switchyard (View from
Rooftop)
Figure 5.
Switchyard (View from
Rooftop)
Figure 6.
Fig. 6 : Line Side Equipment (Rooftop) Layout
220kV LINE SIDE EQUIPMENT (ROOFTOP)
LAYOUT
Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021
Project GPTL 27
Figure 7. Figure 8.
Monopole Monopole
Figure 7. Figure 8.
Monopole Monopole
Utility Roadmap for System strength aspects for Reliability, Stability and Flexibility of
RE Rich Modern Power Grid– Indian grid context
Obtained Graduation in Electrical Engineering from Saurashtra University Rajkot; and Qua
of Certified Project Management Associate (Project Management Level-D, National Rank
International Project Management Association (IPMA). Working in GETCO since 1994. Ex
in the field of Substation Operation & Maintenance as well as Commissioning.
Presently working in Engineering department and responsible for Design & Engine
Control, Protection, Automation, schemes & Philosophies, Digital substation, Se
Fig.1: Power
engineering generation
as :well
Fig.1 scenario
asgeneration
Power RE integration &&growth
growth
scenariorelated potential
domains.
potential
But, with planned development there will be impact on dynamic aspects also. Hence, now there is
need to look into study of dynamic aspects of inertial, primary frequency response and also
reactive power support.Fig. 2: Fig.
Paper Role 2 : Role of Hydro in system balancing
focuses ofon
Hydro
thesein system balancing
aspects.
But, with planned development
1. Synchronous there will
generation be impact
(SG) on
Vs Inverter 5.based
Faultgeneration
ride through capability
(IBG) - Characteristics
dynamic aspects also. Hence, now there is need to2 6. Short circuit capability
difference
look into study of dynamic aspects of inertial, primary
frequency 7. Grid voltage support
Thereresponse and also reactive
is a fundamental power support.
difference between synchronous generation and inverter based
Papergeneration
focuses on (IBG)
these (Fig.3).
aspects.IBGs inherently do not have8. following
Reactivecharacteristics.
power support
1. Inertia
1. Synchronous generation (SG) Vs Inverter based 9. Synchronization capability (Torque)
2. Frequency
generation response capability
(IBG) - Characteristics difference 10. Damping torque
There is a 3. Frequency
fundamental sensitive
difference mode synchronous
between 11. Harmonic voltage reduction etc.
generation4.
andConstant voltage
inverter based source (IBG) (Fig.3).
generation Recently many new capabilities are covered in Grid
5. Fault
IBGs inherently ridehave
do not through capability
following characteristics. code for technical requirements. Annexure-A depicts the
1. Inertia6. Short circuit capability potential difference between SG and IBG along with the
7. Grid voltage support feasibility of advanced capability.
2. Frequency response capability
8. Reactive power support
3. Frequency sensitive mode capability (Torque) Some of the characteristics and behavioural differences
9. Synchronization are elaborated in brief hereunder.
4. Constant
10. voltage
Damping source
torque
11. Harmonic voltage reduction etc.
IBG
SG
Fig.3:
Fig. Characteristics
3 : CharacteristicsDifference between
Difference between SGSG
andand
IBGIBG
Recently many new capabilities are covered in Grid code for technical requirements. Annexure-A
depicts the potential difference between SG and IBG along with the feasibility of advanced
Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021
capability.
30 CIGRE India Journal
(a) Rotating mass stand short circuit of any kind without failure as it
• IBGs do not have follows law of electrodynamics.
• Available reserve energy in IBG is limited and • In case of IBGs, voltage phase angle cannot be
inertial response is not of significance inherently detected when line voltage is very low as mag-
• Rating of electronic devices also limits for addi- netic contactor loses excitation. However, new
tional energy IBGs are available with this characteristic.
• To really use inertial response, a significant over- (f) Reactive power support
sized IBG inverters are required • During steady state
(b) Fault current contribution (i) Rate P.F. of synchronous machine is 0.8 to
• Inverter predominantly lack inductive character- 0.95, in case of IBG it is unity.
istics associated with rotating mass (ii) Most of the IBGs are not desired to provide
• Short circuit contribution by Synchronous gen- reactive support at full output voltage un-
erator is due to law of constant flux in rotating less larger sized IBGs are designed.
machine. • During transient condition
• IBGs can contribute fault current slightly above 1 (i) Synchronous generator instantaneously/
p.u. unless specifically designed for over size. immediately provides reactive power out-
(c) Constant voltage source put as an electrodynamic phenomenon.
• In case of Synchronous generator (ii) In case of IBGs, due to detection time of
(i) Internal induced voltage is independently controllers, it cannot be physically instanta-
regulated from grid voltage. neous.
(ii) Also it is higher than grid voltage. (iii) Additional reactive power can be supported
(iii) This will cause increased current when grid by decreasing active power output within
voltage sags. rated current range.
• In case of IBGs this is limited to 1 p.u. due to This reveals that, steady state as well as dynamic
control system behaviour unless designed over- behaviour of inverter based generation is quiet different.
sized. Even, different type of machines behaves differently
(d) Transmission level voltage support when exposed to transient condition. This has given
rise to stability and reliability aspects. Apart from above,
• Synchronous generators operate in AVR mode renewable generation is intermittent and highly variable
where as IBGs operate in unity Power factor which challenges existing operational aspects also.
mode means AQR mode.
Looking to above challenges, a multidimensional
• Thus voltage support cannot be expected unless
conceptual approach to enhance the stability and
designed for oversized.
reliability of RE rich modern power system should
(e) Fault ride through capabilities be adopted at state, region as well as national level
• Synchronous generators are required to with- (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4 :Multidimensional
Fig.4: Multidimensional Approach
Approach
2. Improvement in technical requirement for grid connectivity as per new grid code
standard
Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021
2. Improvement in technical requirement for grid connectivity as per new grid code
standard
For RE Roadmap
Utility integration, IndianStrength
for System grid code standard
Aspects 2013 isStability
for Reliability, specifying someofbasic
& Flexibility requirements
RE Rich Modern Powerlike;
Grid 31
i) Harmonic current injections limit: As per IEEE- 519 (2014)
2. Improvement
ii) DC current in technical
injectionrequirement
not greater forthan grid
0.5 % of (vi)the
Frequency:
full ratedOperating
output range - 47.5 Hz to 52 Hz &
connectivity as per new grid code standard
iii) Flicker limit: As per IEC 61000 Class A Rated output range - 49.5 Hz to 50.5 Hz
For REiv) integration, Indian grid
Measurement code standard
of Harmonic, 2013 is and(vii)
DC injection LVRT- Once
flicker Capability: V/Vn - 0.15 p.u. for 300ms & 0.85
in a year
specifying some basic requirements like; p.u. for 3 sec
v) Dynamically varying Reactive power support - Power factor within the limits of +0.95
(i) Harmonic current injections
vi) Frequency: Operatinglimit:range
As per- 47.5
IEEE- Hz519
to 52 Hz But,&with
Rated present
output planning
range -and
49.5future
Hz toscenario,
50.5 Hz these
(2014) requirements are not sufficient as they do not address
vii) LVRT Capability: V/Vn - 0.15 p.u. for 300ms & 0.85 p.u. for 3 sec
the aspects necessary to articulate IBG characteristics
(ii) DC current injection not greater than 0.5 % of the
But, with nearerrequirements
present planning and future scenario, these to conventionalaregeneration for steady
not sufficient as do
as they well
full rated output
not address the aspects necessary to articulate IBG characteristics nearer to conventionalfor
(iii) Flicker limit: As per IEC 61000 Class A
as dynamic operations and leading towards need
improvement in technical requirements.
generation for steady as well as dynamic operations and leading towards need for improvement
(iv) Measurement of Harmonic, DC injection and flicker In Feb 2019, the grid code requirements are amended by
-in technical
Once requirements.
in a year hon’ble CEA including many of these technical aspects
In Feb 2019,
(v) Dynamically the grid
varying code
Reactive requirements
power are amended
support - Power by quantification
along with hon’ble CEAofincluding many
parameters of these
as under.
factor withinaspects
technical the limits of +0.95
along with quantification of parameters as under.
TheseThese parameters
parameters are nowarethe now the “Key
“Key reliability reliability
indices” as indices” as well as
3. Continuous “Emerging
analysis tools” for further
and monitoring of new
well as “Emerging tools” for further analysis, monitoring & technical parameters
analysis, monitoring & considerations of system strength as well as operational aspects to – Concept thereof
considerations of system strength as well as operational
3. Continuous
enhance the analysis
grid strength andbymonitoring
improving of new
steady technical
asToday,
well gridparameters
asasdynamic performance
reliability indices– parameters
Concept thereof
of the grid.
like Angular
aspects to enhance the grid strength by improving steady diff., Voltage Deviation Index, Violation of Available
as well as
Today, asdynamic performance
grid reliability of the
indices grid.
parameters like Angular
Transferdiff., Voltage
Capacity Deviation
etc. are Index, Violation
being continuously of
monitored
at national
Available Transfer Capacity etc. are being continuously level (Fig.
monitored 5).
at national level (Fig.5).
5
Fig. 5 : Angular Difference, Voltage Deviation Index, Violation of ATC monitoring & analysis
Fig. 5: Angular Difference, Voltage Deviation Index, Violation of ATC monitoring & analysis
Now, it is proposed to monitor new grid code parameters also. This will definitely improve the
increased concern to these aspects as well as their compliances.Volume
On the10other
v No.end
1 v January 2021
there will be
32 CIGRE India Journal
Now, it is proposed to monitor new grid code parameters (ii) Ancillary services requirement
also. This will definitely improve the increased concern (iii) Optimization of ramping requirement of conventional
to these aspects as well as their compliances. On the generation
other
3.end there will beanalysis
Continuous clear ideaand
regarding grid support
monitoring of new
and ultimately the available system strength at any given (iv) Additional parameters
technical reactive support– Concept
requirement thereof
etc.
time.Today, as grid reliability indices parameters like Angular
and help to add
diff., to efficient
Voltage and reliable
Deviation system
Index, operation
Violation of
Available Transfer Capacity etc. are being in new
continuously
For quantifying the grid performance at any given time, generation
monitored mix
at scenario.
national level (Fig.5).
a system of metrics providing the details of percentage 4. System strength aspects and related concerns
generation providing above technical support should be
System strength can be defined as an ability of power
adopted at State, Region as well as National level. Also,
system to produce and maintain control of sinusoidal
minimum requirement of percentage generation providing
3 phase voltage waveforms which are the basis of AC
above support for grid strength under various operating
network.
scenarios should be derived (based on simulation
studies) and accordingly, it should be considered for It provides indication of network sensitivity to any sudden
system operational aspects e.g. for Parameter: Governor changes in operating conditions such as variations in
Response active and reactive power flows, status of the network
elements and occurrence of fault induced disturbances.
% Generation providing support at 20% RE is x machines
It is a fundamental characteristics specific to each
and
connection point and will vary over a time as power flow
Minimum requirement for grid strength at 20% RE is a and generation dispatch condition change.
machines. Now,
Thus, strength of the grid is an intrinsic characteristic
If x=a : Good operating condition, of the local power system and reflects the sensitivity
Fig. 5: Angular Difference, Voltage Deviation
If x < a: More machines (having governor response)
Index,
of Violation
power of ATC monitoring
system variables & analysis
to disturbances. It indicates
should be considered for operation inherent local system robustness.
Now, it is proposed to monitor new grid code parameters also. This will definitely improve the
If x>a: better operating
increased condition
concern to (Similarlyas
these aspects forwell
other It iscompliances.
as their a measure ofOn thethe
stability
other of power
end thereelectronic
will be
parameters, Fig. 6). interfaced control systems, synchronous generators,
clear idea regarding grid support and ultimately the available
network system
dynamics andstrength
protectionatsystems
any given time. the
to assist
Today machines are running based on merit order
For quantifying the grid performance at any givenpower
dispatch and IBGs are must run. But, for RE rich future
time,system rapidly
a system ofreturning
metricstoproviding
steady-state
theconditions
details
following a disturbance.
of percentage generation providing above
grid, if required, machines having better grid code technical support should be adopted at State, Region
as well may
compliance as National level. Also,
also be required to beminimum
considered Beforeofgoing
requirement
for to furthergeneration
percentage details, we need to understand
providing above
operation irrespective of merit order dispatch to maintain why there is a concern for grid strength. In this regard,
support for grid strength under various operating scenarios should be derived (based on
minimum strength
simulation of the and
studies) grid accordingly,
(highlighted part). With be types
it should
of generators and its behavioural impact is
considered for system operational aspects e.g.
this vision, system operational aspects should also be highlighted.
for Parameter: Governor Response
replanned if necessary. Type of generation and its characteristics:
% Generation providing support at 20% RE is x machines and
Thus, these are the useful tools in planning of many
Minimum requirement for grid strength at 20% RE (a)
is a Synchronous
machines. Now, generation
power system aspects like;
If x=a : Good operating condition, (i) It has its own source
(i) Frequency control reserve requirement (ii) Synchronous generation is balanced sinusoi-
If x < a: More machines (having governor response) should be considered for operation
dal waveform.
If x>a: better operating condition (Similarly for other parameters, Fig 6).
Need action
Good
Better
Fig.Fig.
6: 6Grid
: Grid code parameter monitoring
code parameter monitoring
Today machines are running based on merit order dispatch and IBGs are must run. But, for RE rich
Volume 10 grid,
future v No.if1required,
v January 2021
machines having better grid code compliance may also be required to be
Utility Roadmap for System Strength Aspects for Reliability, Stability & Flexibility of RE Rich Modern Power Grid 33
(iii) Active and Reactive power transfer influenced (i) Large scale solar and wind generally connected to
by angular position and MMF. grid at larger distance from load centres
(iv) Response of machine is by electrodynamics (ii) It is also remote from Synchronous generation
and hence inherently act in right direction to
(iii) Energy input from RE takes priority in dispatch even
support/stabilize the grid.
other alternate exists
(v) The instantaneous response is without relying
(iv) Renewable energy targets are being achieved earlier
on any measurement.
than planned.
(vi) No requirement of minimum strength
(v) Reduced synchronous generation online
(vii) Predictive and linear response
(vi) High power transfer over a long distance
(viii) Large fault current contribution during distur-
bance Impact of System strength:
(ix) They act as a source of fault current having A. During normal network operation:
positive contribution. (i) Poor voltage regulation, potentially exceeding
(b) Inverter based generation (Traditional) the acceptable steady state limits as power flow
(i) IBGs are constant current source rather than conditions vary over a time.
an “Independent Voltage Source”. (ii) Large changes in voltage during and following
(ii) IBGs act by measuring magnitude and phase switching events including operation of shunt
angle of grid and thus they are “Grid following” connected reactive plant.
generation technology. (iii) High sensitivity of voltage magnitude to changes in
(iii) It is called grid following inverter active/reactive power flow can give rise to unstable
behaviour of fast control systems unless they
(iv) Need sufficient synchronous generation near- are appropriately tuned and coordinated. This is
by for stable operation particularly when multiple IBGs are operating in close
(v) Two important factors determining system sta- proximity to one another.
bility (iv) Increased risk of voltage instability, including
• Strength of interconnected network occurrence of localised voltage collapse.
• Design and tuning of controller B. During and following contingency event:
(vi) Highly controlled, sophisticated and non-linear (i) Much wider propagation of fault induced voltage
response depression which can cause converter connected
(vii) Limited fault current contribution generally 1 equipment to “see the fault” and foster FRT (Fault
p.u. and sometimes 2 p.u. if designed due to Ride Through) mode which in turn has potential
rating of semiconductor components negativity on system frequency.
(viii) They act as a sink of fault current having nega- (ii) High sensitivity of voltage magnitude to changes in
tive contribution active/reactive power flow making stable recovery
(c) Inverter based generation (Grid forming) from FRT difficult unless active and reactive power
controls are properly coordinated. Particularly area
(i) Aiming to emulate synchronous machine char-
where multiple IBGs operate in close proximity and
acteristics as close as possible (virtual syn-
attempts to recover at same time (means repeated
chronous generation)
FRT behaviour which is credible risk).
(ii) Synthesises voltage sine wave with constant
(iii) High sensitivity of voltage phase angle to changes in
frequency without need of external reference.
active power flow and voltage magnitude impending
(iii) Do not cause any adverse interaction with oth- the performance of Phase locked loops (PLL) which
er generators and grid devices. are required for stable operation of power converters
(iv) Can provide black start capability where need- which are grid following.
ed (iv) Voltage angle transient being mis interpreted as
(v) Key concern is; how similar/dissimilar they are changes in local network frequency which creates
compared to Synchronous generation risk of mal-operation of frequency based protection
What are the factors weakening the grid? including ROCOF.
Following are the fundamental building blocks for “Weak (v) Increased risk of over voltage if dynamic control
network operating condition”. of reactive power is slow, poorly designed or not
available.
(vi) Reduced fault currents which can reduce effectiveness (c) Can IBGs look after themselves in future?
and/or impedance based or over current based Until a precise matric of system strength can be defined,
protection schemes. the most reliable method to determine how to operate
The most significant impact of most of these aspects power system in secure manner is to perform detailed
is instability results in disconnection of generating power system simulation studies. These studies will
equipments. provide insight into how system performs for varying
despatch scenarios, fault conditions and thereby
System Strength Parameters :
evaluation of the strength of the grid. (Fig. 8)
Thus system strength is a multidimensional problem.
It is emphasized to identify pre-determined sets of
Following are the key indicators for system strength
synchronous machines needed to remain online to
aspects but not limited to (Fig. 7);
i. Ratio of the Non-synchronous generationmaintain sufficient system
to Synchronous strength, with(System
generation. high proportions
Non
(i) Ratio of the Non-synchronous generation to of non-synchronous generation/IBGs and identify “Key
synchronous penetration – SNSP)
Synchronous generation. (System Non synchronous efficiency breakpoint”, which is the “largest overall
ii. System– Inertia
penetration SNSP) amount of non-synchronous generation/IBGs that can be
iii. Proximity of the synchronous generation (SCR, CSCR,
online for WSCR,
the leastESCR)
number of synchronous generators”
(ii) System Inertia
necessary to alleviate system strength concerns and
(iii) Proximity of the synchronous generation (SCR,
should be included in monitoring aspects
CSCR, WSCR, ESCR)
Further set of question will be: 5. System strength parameters
(a) How many synchronous machines are needed to 5.1 Inertia
i. Ratio
look after of the
increased Non-synchronous
number of IBGs? generationConcept
to Synchronous
: generation. (System Non
(b) How muchsynchronous penetrationmachines
close synchronous – SNSP) to load Inertia is the first and fastest line of defence after transient
ii. System Inertia
centres? period followed by disturbance or contingency event
iii. Proximity of the synchronous generation (SCR, CSCR,MW
WSCR, ESCR) MVA
Figure
Fig. 8 8: Grid
: Grid strength
strength analysis
analysis criteria criteria
ΔIn almost all the cases system inertia is comfortably where SCMVA is the short circuit capacity at PCC without
above the minimum requirement except October 30 th current contribution from IBG, MWVER is the nominal
(where it was Figure 10: System
just above inertia
the critical analysis
inertia) which was power rating of IBG.
minimum demand scenario and all hydro, gas and many
e casesthermal
systemplantsinertia is not
comfortably Significance:
were in operation.above the minimum requirement except
here it was just above the critical inertia) which was minimum (i) SCRdemandis a measure
scenarioof thevenin impedance of AC
Such practices should be adopted at state, region as
and many system.
well thermal
as national plants
level were not in aspects
as reliability operation.and counter
measures if any. (ii) A low SCR system (“weak system”) indicates high
hould be adopted at state, region as well as national level as sensitivity reliabilityofaspects
voltage (magnitude and phase angle)
5.1.2
sures if any. Real time
Figure tracking
10: System of Inertia
inertia analysis to changes in active and reactive power injections
or consumptions.
cases Details
eetracking system of machines
inertia
of Inertia
which are above
is comfortably connected to grid is requirement
the minimum except
available on unit commitment and despatch plan. Based (iii) High SCR (“stiff”) systems have a low sensitivity and
here it was just above the critical inertia) which was minimum demand scenario
on these details, current as well as future total inertia are predominantly unaffected by changes in active
nes
s andwhich
many are connected
thermal plants were to grid
not in is operation.
available on unit commitment and despatch
contribution of all online synchronous generators can be and reactive power injection.
hese details,
hould becalculated
current
adopted based
at state,
as well
on the asasfuture
inertia
region parameters totalof inertia
well as national individualcontribution aspects
level as reliability
of all online
erators can be calculated (iv) Low SCR is of significance concern because internal
sures units
if any. in the network based on the inertia
with aggregation. Thus,parameters
system of individual units in
Significance: plant controls will not function in a stable manner and
inertia can
h aggregation. Thus, be system
continuouslyinertia monitored as situational monitored as situational
can be continuously
i. SCR isperiod
a measure of may not represent the true behaviour of plant which
e tracking
(Fig. If of
at Inertia
11).awareness
any tools
time(Fig.
period 11). where
If at any timeexpected
the where thethevenin
system inertia impedance
is less the of AC
than thesystem.
increases chance of sub synchronous behaviour
expected system inertia is less than the critical
ii. A low level can
SCR system (“weak system”) indicates high sensitivity of voltage (magnitude a
be which
nes identified
beare
and and
connected
identified
appropriate
to grid isactions
appropriate available
actions
should
on unit
should be
be planned toand
commitment
planned
maintain
controlitinteractions.
anddespatch above
angle) to changes in active and reactive power injections or consumptions.
these details, current as well as level.
future total inertia contribution of all online
(v) The
to maintain it above critical iii. High SCR (“stiff”) systems have aSCR lowmetric is most appropriate when considering
sensitivity and are predominantly unaffected b
nerators can be calculated based on the inertia parameters of individual a single
unitsinverter-based
in resource operating at PCC
in active and reactive power (i.e. injection.
does not account for the presence of other
h aggregation. Thus, system inertia can be continuously monitored as situational
iv. Low SCR is of significance concern because internal plant controls will not function i
inverter-based
(Fig. 11). If at any time period where the expected system inertia is less than the resources or power electronic-based
manner and may not represent the
equipment true behaviour
electrically of plant
close to thewhich
PCC).increases the chan
be identified and appropriate actions should be planned to maintain it above
synchronous behaviour and control interactions.
5.2.1 SCR in case of multiple inverter based sources
v. The SCR metric is most appropriate when considering a single inverter-based
at or near PCC
operating at PCC (i.e. does not account for the presence of other inverter-based res
IBGs connected close to other IBGs may interact
power electronic-based equipment electrically close to the PCC).
with each other and oscillate which can lead to overly
5.2.1. optimistic
SCR in case of multiple results
inverter with sources
based SCR. Inat
this
or regard,
near PCCseveral
methods are there.
IBGs connected close to other IBGs may interact with each other and oscillate which ca
(i) Composite Short Circuit Ratio (CSCR)
Figure 11:
Fig.Real timetime
11 : Real monitoringoverly
monitoring optimistic
ofofsystem
system results with SCR. In this regard, several methods are there.
inertia
inertia
Composite short circuit ratio (CSCR) estimates
Looking
e aspects, to above aspects,
it is preferable it i)isinertial
to include Composite
preferable toShort
aspects include Circuit
in grid codeRatio (CSCR) system
requirements
the equivalent for impedance seen by multiple
inertial aspects in grid code requirements for IBGs also. inverter-based resources by creating a common
gh, they inherently do not exhibit inertia
Composite but, it
shortbut, is
circuit possible to program the
Though, they inherently do not exhibit inertia it is ratio (CSCR) estimates the equivalent system impedance seen b
medium voltage bus and tying all inverter-based
ide a Figure
form of inertial
11: Real
possible timeresponse
monitoring
to program called
the controls synthetic
inverter-based
of system inertia
to provide inertia
aresources
form of bywhich will aadd
creating
resources
to grid
common medium
of interest voltage
together at thatbus and tying
common bus. all inver
reduceinertial
the reserve requirement
response and
called synthetic ancillary
resources
inertia services.
of interest
which will addtogether atCSCR
that common bus.
can then be CSCR canas;
calculated then be calculated as;
e aspects, to itgrid
is preferable
strength andtoalso
include
reduceinertial aspects
the reserve in grid code requirements for
requirement
it Ratio
gh, theyand(Grid
inherentlystiffness)
do not
ancillary services. exhibit inertia but, it is possible to program the
ide a form of inertial response called synthetic inertia which will add CSCR
to grid ……... (3) ...(3)
ond easily5.2
reduce applied
the Short metric
reserve Circuit to determine
Ratio
requirement (Grid the relative
stiffness)
and ancillary services.strength of a power system is
(SCR). The
SCRmost is defined as the ratio between
where, MWshort is circuit power
where,
apparent
the nominal powerMWVER
(SC
rating is
all)the
ofMVA nominal
IBGs power and
considered rating ofMVA
CSC all is the c
basic and easily applied metric to
VERdetermine
itatRatio (Grid stiffness) short circuit MVA IBGs considered and CSCMVA is the composite
a given location
the relative in the
strength of apower
power system
system isto theat
short common
rating
circuit of bus
thewithout current contribution from IBG.
inverter-based
short circuit MVA at common bus without current
nd ratio
ed easily
to that (SCR).
location
applied SCR is
(i.e.to
metric defined as the
it determine
is location ratio
specific
the between
unlike
relative shortof a power system is
frequency).
strength
circuit apparent power (SCMVAii) Weighted
a 3LG Short
fault atCircuit Ratio (WSCR)from IBG.
contribution
) from a
o (SCR). SCR is defined as the ratio between short circuit apparent power
(ii) (SC MVA
Weighted )
Short Circuit Ratio (WSCR)
given location in the power system The to the rating
weighted of the
short circuit
t at a given location in
inverter-based the power
resource system
connected to to
thatthe of the inverter-based been recently started for more accurat
rating(i.e.
location
ratio (WSCR) has
ted to that SCR POIit is location specific
………
applied (2)
in defining system strength
The weighted
aspects.short
In circuit ratio (WSCR)
his method has beenthat, all
it is assumed
it islocation
location (i.e.
specific unlike frequency).unlike frequency).
electrically close to each otherrecently started for
and provides SCRmore
at aaccurate
“Virtual”metrics
point applied
of connection
the short circuit capacity at PCC without current
defined as; contribution in
from defining
IBG, system
MW VER strength
is aspects. In his method
it is assumed that, all IBGs are electrically close to
er rating of IBG.SCR POI ……… (2) ...(2) each other and provides SCR at a “Virtual” point of
WSCR
the short circuit capacity at PCC without current contribution from IBG, = VER isWSCR is defined………
connection.
MW as; (4)
er rating of IBG. 11
where, SCMVAi is the short circuit capacity at bus i without current contribution f
Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021
11 synchronous generation and PRMWi is the MW output of non-synchronous generati
short circuit ratio (WSCR) has been recently started for more accurate metrics
ning system strength aspects. In his method it is assumed Fig. 12: Western
that, all IBGs are cost high IBG penetration network
e to each other and provides SCR at a “Virtual” point of connection. WSCR is
This
Utility Roadmap for System is another
Strength Aspectsgood monitoring
for Reliability,Fig.
Stability aspect
12: Western and
cost
& Flexibility ithigh
of RE isRich
proposed
IBG for adoption
penetration
Modern Power 37 at state
network
Grid
national
Thislevel and should
is another be considered
good monitoring aspectfor;
and it is proposed for adoption at state, re
(ii) Mitigation measures to counter the lower SCR
i. System
nationalplanning
level and criteria
should be considered
aspects.
for;
WSCR = ………
i. System(4)planning
...(4) criteria
ii. Mitigation measures to counter the lower SCR aspects.
ii. Mitigation measures 5.2.2
toShort
counter Circuit Interaction
the lower Factor (SCRIF)
SCR aspects.
where,circuit
is the short SCMVAi capacity
is the shortatcircuit
bus capacity
i without at bus i without
current contribution from non-
current 5.2.2. ShortShort Circuit Interaction
When multiple Factor (SCRIF)
inverter based resources are located very
eneration and contribution
PRMWi is thefrom MWnon-synchronous
output 5.2.2. generation
of non-synchronous Circuit Interaction
generation
close to each
Factor
to be (SCRIF)
other, they share the grid strength and
us i. N isand
the PR
number
MWi
is the MW output of non-synchronous
of wind plants When multiple
fully When
interacting inverter
multiplewith based
each
inverter other
short
basedresources
and
circuit i is the
level.
resources are
Hence
are located
grid
located veryclose
strength
very close
is toto
much each
lower
each other,
than
other, theyths
generation to be connected at bus i. N is the number of
x. wind plants fully interacting withstrength
each andand
strength
other short
andi is circuit
short overall
level.
the circuit short
Hence
level. circuit
Hencegrid level calculated
gridstrength
strength is at
is much buses.
muchlower
lowerthan
than overall
overall shors
wind plant index.
mple SCR, CSCR and WSCR parameters calculated
calculated at
at buses.
are calculated buses. SCRIF captures
for some of the highest IBG the changes in bus voltage at one bus
a of GETCO grid (Table-II) whichCSCRare atandthe western coast and corresponding
at extreme to of
resulting from changes in bus voltage at
For typical example SCR, WSCR parameters
SCRIF captures the changes in busendvoltage at one bus corresponding to resulting fro
are calculated
ig. 12). Analysis showsfor some
that, CSCR SCRIF
of the
andhighest
WSCR captures
bus IBG
are the
penetrated
at
voltage
changes
comfortable
at other bus.
in
other
level bus
bus. voltage
Metric
though
Metric SCR
considering
at one
considering bus
SCRIF
SCRIF isas
corresponding
ESCR (Effective
to resultin
is ESCR (Effective
SCR) which ca
SCR) which can be derived formula mentioned
w. area of GETCO grid (Table-II)bus whichvoltage
asare at other
at the
formula western bus. Metric
mentioned hereunder. considering SCRIF is ESCR (Effective SCR) which
hereunder.
coast and at extreme end of theas
network (Fig.mentioned
formula 12). Analysis hereunder.
shows that, CSCR and WSCR are at comfortable level
though SCR at one bus is low.
(Table-II
Table-II : SCR: calculation
SCR calculation
aspects aspects) where,capacity
Si is theatshort
where, Si is the short circuit bus icircuit
withoutcapacity at contribution
current bus i without from no
current contribution from non-synchronous generation
generation and PMFi is the MW output of non-synchronous generation to be conn
and PMFi is the MW output of non-synchronous generation
where, Si isis the
PMFj theMW
short circuit
output ofbe
to
capacity at bus i without
non-synchronous
connected at busgeneration
current
toMW
i. PMFj is the
contribution
be connected at busfrom
output of non- j. W
generation
of change andinPbus
MFi is the
voltage MWat output
Bus i due of
to non-synchronous
change in bus voltage generation
at Bus
synchronous generation to be connected at bus j. W is j. to be c
PIFii
PMFj is5.2.3.
the MW the ratio of change in generation
output of non-synchronous
Monitoring bus voltage atto
Bus
bei due to change at bus
connected
12 in bus voltage at Bus j.
of change
Basedinon
bus voltage
available at Bus i due
generation data,to change
SCR in buscan
parameters voltage at Bus
be derived forj.various ext
5.2.3 Monitoring
5.2.3.andMonitoring
utilized for analysis, monitoring and planning. Here again typical example of
Based on available generation data, SCR parameters
presented for maximum demand, minimum demand and maximum wind scenarios.
can be derived for various extreme scenarios and utilized
Basedthat,
on available
Nos of IBGgeneration data, monitoring
connected buses
for analysis, SCR parameters
where SCR is <5 andcan
justbe
and planning. derived
above
Here
5 arefor
notvarious
again typical
changin
scenario (Fig. 13).
and utilized for analysis, example
monitoring and planning.
of GETCO Here again
grid is presented typical example
for maximum
demand, minimum demand
presented for maximum demand, minimum demand and maximum wind and maximum wind scenar
scenarios. Results shows that, Nos of IBG connected
that, Nos of IBG connected buses
buses where
where SCR isSCR is <5
<5 and justand just
above above
5 are 5 are not cha
not changing
scenario (Fig. 13). (Table-II : SCR calculation
in any of the scenario (Fig. 13). aspects)
ost high IBG penetration network
and it is proposed for adoption at state, region as well as
for;
lower SCR aspects. Fig 13: SCR analysis of IBG connected Buses under various scenarios
or (SCRIF) 13
are located very close to each other, they share the grid
id strength is much lower than overall short circuit level
Fig. 13 :of
Fig 13: SCR analysis SCR analysis
IBG of IBG connected
connected Buses under
Buses under various scena
various scenarios
ge at one bus corresponding to resulting from changes in
From the unit commitment and despatch plan real time
ring SCRIF Fig.
is ESCR (Effective
12 : Western SCR)
Fig.
cost high IBGwhich
12: cannetwork
Western
penetration be derived
cost high IBGsystem
penetration
scenarionetwork 13
will be available. It is also possible to
This track SCR in real time by integrating real time status
Thisisisanother good
another monitoring
good aspectaspect
monitoring and it isand
proposed
it is proposed
of
for adoption at state, region as well as
network elements in short circuit studies to derive
for adoption at state, region as well as national level and
national level and should
should be considered for; be considered for; short circuit levels. Then, these details can be utilized
i. System planning criteria to calculate SCR, CSCR and WSCR.
(i) System planning criteria
ii. Mitigation measures to counter the lower SCR aspects.
bus i without
5.2.2. current contribution
Short Circuit from Factor
Interaction non-synchronous
(SCRIF)
f non-synchronous generation to be connected at bus i. Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021
When multiple
us generation inverter based
to be connected resources
at bus j. W are is located very close to each other, they share the grid
the ratio
circuit studies to derive short circuit levels. Then, these details can be utilized
(Table-III to calculate
: SCR calculation SCR, and
methods
CSCR and WSCR.
From the unit commitment and despatch plan real time system scenario will be available. It is also
As a way forward and to add to grid strength aspects, techn
possibleoftodifferent
Comparison track SCR in
SCRrealmethods
time by integrating real time status
are summarised of network
hereunder. elements initshort
Accordingly, should be
38
circuit studies to derive short circuit
CIGRE
levels. Then, i. Synthetic
India Journal
these Inertia
details can be utilized to calculate SCR,
implemented for system strength aspects. ii. Voltage Control through Reactive Power Control or Pow
CSCR and
Comparison WSCR. SCR methods are summarised hereunder.
of different Accordingly, it should be implemented for system
strength aspects. of different SCR methods are summarised hereunder. Accordingly, it should be
Comparison
Table
implemented for system III : SCR
strength calculation methods and its applicability
aspects.
0.2
h plan real time system scenario will be available. It is also to
1
ntegrating real time status of network elements in short pu
vels. Then, these details can be utilized to calculate SCR, of
P
0.2
0.2to
to 1
1pu Reactive current injection
puof during fault for few ms
P
of
ulation methods and its applicability) P
Reactive current injection (i) Provide inertia due to rotating heavy mass
during
are fault for few ms
proposed (ii) code
to review for including in Indian grid Meetsstandard
reactive including
power requirement
continuousarising
powerout of
Power Factor at POC retiring generators
POC Power Factor at POC
quality monitoring
(iii) Dynamic reactive power compensation
14
trol
are proposed to review for including in Indian grid code standard including continuous power
Volume 10 v No. 1 v January 2021
quality monitoring
build synthetic inertia in IBGs by modifying controls, it depends on measured RoCoF and hence
cannot be considered completely equivalent to inertia provided by synchronous generators. With
thisUtility
pace grid will face deficit of Inertia, Reactive power support, Short circuit capabilities, Ride
Roadmap for System Strength Aspects for Reliability, Stability & Flexibility of RE Rich Modern Power Grid 39
through capabilities etc.
(i) Deriving system Inertia and monitoring including Real (ii) Fast frequency response
time monitoring (iii) Primary frequency response
(ii) Deriving SCR, WSCR, ESCR metric of IBG prone (iv) Secondary frequency response
area including Real time monitoring (v) Tertiary frequency response
(iii) Grid code compliance metric (vi) Fast Ramping response
(iv) Scheduling considering system strength aspects (vii) Slow Ramping response
(v) Frequency reserve requirement under various
9. Conclusion
dispatch scenarios
Changing power system development scenario and
(vi) Ramping reserve requirement under various dispatch
new generation mix aspects are offering challenges at
scenarios
present for seamless transition to RE rich future grid
(vii) Reactive power support requirement with prevailing practices of system planning, operation,
C. Additional technical analysis through modelling monitoring and simulation.
and simulation Hence, there is a need to have paradigm shift in these
Present simulation and modelling practices should be aspects. In this regard, roadmap proposes comprehensive
enhanced and following parameters should be derived multi-dimensional approach to harmonise seamless
under various operating and dispatch scenarios including integration of planned Renewable generation in Indian
extreme conditions and should be considered for real grid.
time system operation, outage planning, merit order Significance of new grid code parameters as reliability
dispatch as well as system planning. indices as well as utilization of them as emerging tools,
(i) ROCOF limits system strength aspects, Inertia and SCR monitoring
with typical examples of GETCO grid and roadmap are
(ii) Minimum fault level of synchronous generation
discussed in an attempt of deriving appropriate counter
(iii) Key efficiency break point measures as well as system planning to operate future
(iv) SNSP (System Non synchronous Penetration) grid in efficient and reliable manner with sufficient system
ratio strength at any given time.
(v) Critical Inertia level There is no any simple solution to the system strength
aspects. Continuous analysis and monitoring of power
(vi) Utilization of hydro plants as synchronous
system is necessary for studying and analysing the
condenser
emerging needs and it is a continuous process. Here,
(vii) Identifying weaker part of the grid and counter an effort is made to support the journey of Indian power
measures system towards greener world.
D. New equipments or technology
Following technology (not limited to) should be promoted
Annexure A –– Potential
Annexure-A Potential Difference
DifferenceSG
SG & IBG
& IBG
[3] Indian Grid code 2013 for Grid connectivity [9] G.A. Chown, J.G. Wright, R. Van Heerden and M.
requirements Cocker PPA energy (South Africa), “System Inertia
and Rate Of Change Of Frequency with increasing
[4] Indian grid code 2019 for Grid connectivity non-synchronous renewable energy penetration,
requirements Cigre Science and Engineering volume N011 June
[5] Saulo J. N. Cisneiros; Manoel J. Botelho; Dalton O. 2018.
C. Brasil and othes, Brazil, “New challenges caused [10] Implementation of Inertia monitoring in Ercot by Julia
by the new energy sources In the Brazilian power Matevosyan, Nov 2018
system” Cigre SC C4 Paper 104, 2014
[11] Short circuit modelling and system strength”, NERC
[6] System reliability indices daily report, National Load white paper, 2018.
Despatch Centre
[12] “Integrating inverter based resources into low short Presently, he is working as an In-Charge Superintending
circuit strength system”, NERC reliability guidelines, Engineer at Engineering Department, GETCO, Corporate
December 2017. office, Vadodara looking after all the engineering activities. A
BVQI – TUV certified ISO auditor, he is a member of CIGRE and
[13] “Greeting the grid – Pathway to integrate 175 GW various Technical Committees of Electrotechnical Department
Renewable Energy into India’s Electric Grid, Vol.I of Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS). He was also a Technical
– National study, Ministry of Power, Govt. of India Committee Member of CBIP for Substation Manual 2019.
June 2017 He has presented Technical Papers in various National &
International conferences like GRIDTECH, SWITCHCON, CBIP
[14] Cigre 2020 Tutorial on “System strength Aspects – A & PowerLine events
story of not enough Shepherds and too many Ships”
covering following N. M. Sheth – Executive Engineer, Corporate Engineering,
Obtained Graduation in Electrical Engineering from Saurashtra
(a) Description of system strength and its relation University Rajkot; and Qualification of Certified Project
with inertia Management Associate (Project Management Level-D,
(b) How lack of system strength can create is- National Ranker) from International Project Management
Association (IPMA). Working in GETCO since 1994. Experience
sues
in the field of Substation Operation & Maintenance as well as
(c) Tools and techniques for analysing low system Commissioning.
strength operating condition
Presently working in Engineering department and responsible
(d) Design planning and Operational requirements for Design & Engineering of Control, Protection, Automation,
under low system strength condition schemes & Philosophies, Digital substation, Secondary
(e) Current and prospective system strength solu- engineering as well as RE integration related domains.
Presented several technical papers at various national
tions
and international conferences CIGRE, GRIDTECH, CBIP,
Biographical Details of the POWERLINE etc. on Relay protection, Substation Automation,
Authors Digital Substation and RE Integration challenges related matter.
One of the contributor from GETCO to review Draft Grid code
B. P. Soni – I/C Superintending Engineer Corporate standards and suggesting some of the additional Technical
Engineering, Obtained Graduation in Electronics Engineering requirement in context to RE integration challenges.
from Birla Vishwakarma Mahavidyalaya, Vallabh Vidyanagar
(Gujarat) in 1989. He joined erstwhile Gujarat Electricity Board Member of distinguished organization committees like; (i) BIS
(GEB) in 1990. Having total 30 years of experience in Power Relay committee ETD 35, (ii) 35 th RAC Committee ERDA,
Generation & Transmission, he has worked in various fields e.g. (ii) Substation Automation Expert Group of CBIP and Cigre
Hydro and Thermal Power Plants, Operation & Maintenance India (iv) R&D consortium of National Institute of Wind Energy
of EHV Substations, Telecommunication, Protection and (NIWE)
Automation, Substation Design and Equipment Engineering.
CIGRE (India)
Benefits to members
• Free downloading of about 9000 reference documents i.e., papers & proceedings of Session & symposium; Technical
brouchure on the work of study committees and Electra technical papers etc.
• A free delivery of the ELECTRA Journal, a bilingual (French/English) magazine issued every two months which publishes
the results of work performed by the CIGRE Study Committees and informs on the life of the Association.
• Reduced registration fees for Sessions and Symposia.
• Session and Symposium Papers and Proceedings available at a preferential price (50%).
• Technical Brochures and other Reports at a preferential price, or free of charge when downloaded from CIGRE on-
line Bookstore.
• A Membership Directory which is a link between members and an essential tool for contacts, free of charge.
• Updated Information about CIGRE International and other Meetings of interest for members.
• The assistance of the Central Office for any query.
I.S. Jha
Member, CERC
Vice-Presidents
U.K. Bhattacharya Renuka Gera Seema Gupta Anil Saboo Praveer Sinha Manish Agrawal
Director, NTPC Director, BHEL Director, Powergrid President, IEEMA MD, Tata Power CEO, Sterlite Power
Transmission
Technical Council Member Secretary, CIGRE-India Director, CIGRE-India
1. Membership in CIGRE
(i) Steering Committee Members:
• Mr. I S Jha Hon’ble Member, CERC in 2018-2020 & 2020-2022
• Mr. R P Singh the then President CIGRE-India and Former CMD, POWERGRID in 2006-2008
(ii) Administrative Council Member:
Mr. I.S.Jha Member, Steering Committee, CIGRE (Paris) & Hon’ble Member, CERC
4. Participation in CIGRE Paris session (e session 2020 from 24th August-3rd September 2020 & Session
2021 from 20-25 August 2021)
(i) Total 240 abstracts were reviewed. Synopsis accepted – 35 Nos. out of 45 recommended Full papers submit-
ted to Paris.
(ii) Two additional papers under Chairman Quota have also been approved one from Sterlite and another from
CEA in Study Committee B2: Overhead Lines & C6: Active Distribution Systems and Distribution Energy Re-
sources respectively.
(iii) 2020 shall be e-session because of Covid -2019. (from 24th August – 3rd Sept. 2020).
(iv) Authors have been invited to make presentations (10 Minutes time; 10 Slides), information circulated to all
concerned about registration for e-session 2020.
(v) Those who will register for 2021 Paris session for them e-session for 2020 shall is free.
(vi) Only Cigre 2020 e-session, 100 Euro for members and 200 Euro for non-member is the Registration. E-
session 2020 registration shall be done by HQ Paris. Last date for registration is 15 August 2020.
(vii) Information sent to exhibitors that who are already registered for Cigre 2020 shall continue to be an exhibitor
for session 2021 without any additional cost
(viii) For e-session 50 Participants have already registered, so far, including Authors of papers from India.
(ix) NGN – Papers for CIGRE session 2020 :
• Out of four papers recommended from CIGRE India ,two papers from GETCO have been accepted. The
authors have been recommended for consideration for free registration for 2021 Session
(x) Participation in CEO Meet at Paris during CIGRE Session 2021
The following Sr. Executives have been invited for participation from India :
D.K. Chaturvedi Dr. B.P. Muni Nihar Raj S.S. Misra Santanu Sen
Former GM, NTPC GM, BHEL VP, Adani GM, NTPC DGM, CESC Ltd.
Chairman CIGRE NSC A1 Chairman CIGRE NSC D1 Chairman CIGRE NSC B3 Chairman CIGRE NSC C6 Co-Chairman CIGRE NSC C1
Y. B. K. Reddy S.C. Saxena Anil Kumar Arora, Debasis De, Lalit Sharma
AGM, SECI SGM, POSOCO ED, Powergrid ED, NLDC, POSOCO COO, KEI
Co-Chairman Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE Chairman CIGRE
CIGRE NSC C6 NSC C5 NSC B4 NSC D2 NSC B1
4. B1 : HV Insulated Cables Mr. Dipal Shah, Pfistrer 9-13 Oct. 2017 Mr. Dipal Shah Mr. Lalit Sharma, KEI 9th Sept. 2019 NIL
India and Mr. Dipal Shah (Denmark)
5 B2 : Overhead Lines Mr. Gopal Ji, POWERGRID 29-30 May 2017 Prof. C. Johnson Mr. A..K. Vyas, PG 19 Nov. 2019 Mr. Anish Anand, PG
Dublin, Ireland Excel Engg. college New Delhi
6 B3 : Substations Mr. Abhay Choudhary, Sept. 2017 Mr. Rajil Srivastava, Mr. R.P. Sasmal, CIGRE-India 20-25 Sept. Mr. Raji Srivastava, PG &
POWERGRID Brazil PG and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, 2019 China Mr. Abhay Kumar, PG
7 B4 : HVDC Link and AC Shri R.K. Chauhan, 30 Sept. – 6th Shri R.K. Chauhan 28-30th Sept 19, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Dir, PG
Power Electronic PowerGrid PG
Nil 1-5th Oct 2019- and
Oct. 2017 Mr. Rakesh Kumar
Equipment Canada South Africa Mr. B.B. Mukharjee, PG
8 B5 : Power System Mr. Subhash Thakur Sept. 2017 Mr. Subhash Thakur Mr. Subhash Thakur 24-28th June 19 Mr. Abhishek Khanna,
Protection and Local NTPC New Zealand NTPC Norway Mr. Debashish Dutta,
Control -- Mr. Anand Pandey, NTPC
9 C1 : Power System Ms. Seema Gupta, May 2017 Mr. K.V.S. Baba, Mr. R.K. Verma and Mr. R.P. 20-26th Sept. Ms. Seema Gupta,
Planning and PowerGrid Dublin, Ireland POSOCO Sasmal, CIGRE -India 2019 POWERGRID and Mr.
Development Chengdu, Ashok Pal, PG
China
10 C2 : Power System K.V.S. Baba May 2017 Mr. K.V.S. Baba, Mr. P.K. Agarwal 4-7th June 2019 Mr. KVS Baba, POSOCO
Activities of the Society
14 C6 : Distribution Systems Dr. Subir Sen, POWERGRID May 2017 Mr. S.C. Saxena (3-6 June 2019) Dr, Subir Sen, PG and
and Dispersed Dublin, Ireland POSOCO
Nil Aalborg, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, PG
Dr, Subir Sen, PG
Generation Denmark
15 D1 : Material for Electro Mr. Jithinsunder, BHEL 30 Sept. – 6th Mr. Jithinsunder, BHEL 18-23 Nov. Mr. B.P.Muni, BHEL
technology
Nil 2019
Oct. 2017
Canada New Delhi
16 D2 : Information Systems N.S. Sodha, PowerGrid 20-22/09/2017 Mr. N.S. Sodha Mr. N.S. Sodha 11-14th June Mr. N.S. Sodha
& Telecommunications for Moscow 2019
System Helsinki, Finland
54 CIGRE India Journal
CIGRE India has launched its first “Women in engineering Forum” on 18th October 2019 at national level. The event
was hosted in association with POWERGRID at its corporate office, Gurgaon. The objective of the event was to
introduce CIGRE Women in Engineering forum, highlighting the contribution of women in CIGRE structure and to
enable its members with knowledge transfer and networking. Participants from various organisations across INDIA
such as NTPC, NHPC, POWERGRID, Sterlite, SJVN, POSOCO, KEC, L&T, NEEPCO, Siemens, TPDDL, WAPCOS,
BYPL, KEI etc. has made the event remarkable.
Ms. Seema Gupta, Vice President, CIGRE-India and Director (Operation) POWERGRID has led the brain storming
session of WIE forum as its Chairperson. Besides Mr. I.S. Jha, President CIGRE-India & Hon’ble Member, CERC,
Mr. R.P. Sasmal, Technical Chair, CIGRE-India, Mr. K. Srikant, CMD, POWERGRID, Mr. R.K. Chauhan, Director
(Projects), POWERGRID, Mr. V.K. Kanjlia, Secretary, CIGRE India and Mr. P.P. Wahi, Director, CIGRE-India addressed
the participants.
The theme of the event was “To inspire and empower women as leaders in engineering and technology.” Ms Seema
Gupta introduced the participants about CIGRE WIE forum who is taking initiatives to grow women engineers and
providing a platform to submit technical papers, attending workshops, technical discussions and getting mentored
by experienced professionals. She presented about various study committees & working group of CIGRE- INDIA
and activities to participate and get benefitted from them. She talked about women empowerment and challenges
women’s usually face in a technical field and provide solutions to deal with these problems.
An open house session was organised and women from various organisations shared challenges faced during their
respective works and their experiences in dealing with them. The event was concluded by proposing recommendation
to take full advantage of CIGRE forum and professional network of Women in Engineering was formed to connect,
to interact, to share experiences in future.
Ms. Tara Lee (Australia) was the moderator of the Session. Ms. Rachana Garg - IEEE India WiE Vice Chair had
raised the concern about the challenges women’s face in technical field. Several Ex-CIGRE members share their
experience and views that by being a member of CIGRE committee and part of its Working Group, it’s an honour
and opportunity to learn about technological advancement by connecting to global knowledge partners in Power
System. The meeting was concluded with remarks of creating awareness across INDIA to inspire and empower
more women to become part of this professional network.
Dr. Chandana Karawita Dr. Hiranya Suriyaarachchi Dr. Nigel Shore Mr. Anil Kumar Arora
Canada, Sectetary, WG-B4 87 Canada, Converner Sweden ED, POWER GRID
TAKEAWAYS
Day-1
The capabilities of the inverters currently used in renewable energy sources and HVDC systems may not be
adequate for the grids with a small percentage or no synchronous generators. For more than a century, synchronous
generators have been successfully operated in power systems. This tutorial will first evaluate the contributions from
the synchronous generators in terms of voltage, inertia and frequency support and define the requirements for the
grid-forming and grid-following inverters. The current capabilities and future expectations will be evaluated using
example simulation cases.
Day-2
This tutorial presents the work of Working Group B4.68, which produced TB 754. This Technical Brochure examines
the harmonic aspects of voltage source converters used for HVDC transmission. The harmonic profile of such
converters differs greatly from that of the more established line commutated converters. The low magnitude of
harmonic generation may imply that AC filters are not needed, or may be very small. The control system factors
affecting both harmonic generation and the active internal impedance are examined. Possible deleterious effects of
higher frequencies, inter-harmonics and even order harmonics are discussed, and recommendations given regarding
statutory limitations. Mitigation of harmonics by means of either passive filtering or active filtering by converter
control action is described. The Brochure explains various techniques for modelling the harmonic behaviour of VSC
HVDC, and concludes with a review of harmonic stability issues and various techniques used to identify the risk of
its occurrence and to indicate means of mitigation.
TAKEAWAYS
Gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) have been in operation for more than 45 years and it shows a high level of reliability.
However, the return of experience from GIS indicates that some of the in-service failures are related to defects in the
insulation system. Many of these defects can be detected by partial discharge (PD) diagnostics. An Electra Report
published in 1999 describes the two-step procedure for the sensitivity verification of the UHF and acoustic system.
The CIGRE Technical Brochure No. 654 collects the available experience on sensitivity verification from the last 15
years and describes its practical applications for GIS. It summarizes the established guidelines and recommendations
which will help manufacturers and users in the effective application of the UHF method for PD detection on GIS. In
addition general guidelines on the acoustic method for PD detection will be presented.
Mr. Bruno Bisewski Mr. Kees Koreman Mr. Willem Leterme Mr. A K Arora
Canada Netherlands, Chairman Belgium ED, Powergrid
JWG B4/B5-59
TAKEAWAYS
Day - 1
The key factors that the participant will take away from the tutorial is an understanding of the many considerations
encountered when planning and specifying an HVDC system that will meet the requirements of the project. The
material presented is based on long time experience on many projects in many countries will cover practical questions
encountered while planning a new HVDC project including technology selection, cost, footprint, losses, maximum
rating, and fault recovery performance that may be decisive in the selection of one technology as well as other
factors which may not be decisive but could still influence the decision in favour of one technology over the other.
The tutorial will also cover selected topics related to specification of both LCC and VSC technology including ratings,
performance requirements and testing.
Day - 2
The webinar will inform the participants about protection and local control systems in HVDC grids. First, the fault
response of converters with and without fault blocking capability is compared. Then, various strategies for clearing
DC-side faults are discussed. Examples of short circuit calculations examples are given for both monopole and bipole
HVDC grids. Thereafter, various principles in fault detection and localisation are explained and compared. Finally,
the basic operation of DC Circuit Breakers is described.
Participants will get:
• Information about the different HVDC converter technologies.
• Short circuit phenomena in DC grids.
• Basic requirements on protection and local control.
• Fault clearance strategies.
• Protection system components such as measurement and detection systems.
• DC Circuit Breakers and fault localisation techniques.
The obtained knowledge can be used in the future development, engineering, design and operation of meshed DC
networks, both offshore and onshore. It will allow for the design of protection systems including the selection of fault
clearance strategies that will be applied.
Summary of Membership
Collective-1 Collective-2 Individual-1 Young (below Student
(Organisation) (Regulatory & 35 years of age) Members
Institution)
95 20 159 22 142
Total equivalent x 06 x03 x01 x0.5
570 60 159 11
Grand Total 800 142
Institutional Members
Individual Members
S. Name Organisation 11 Apar Industries Ltd. Srimanta Kumar Jana
No. 12 AVAADA Power Deepak Kumar
1 ABB Urmil Parikh Saxena
2 ABB Global Industries Sachin Srivastava 13 Bechtel (I) Pvt. Ltd. Sanjeev Bhatia
& Services Ltd. 14 BHEL Corporate R Mohana Rao
3 ABB India Ltd. Nihar Raj &D Mandava
4 Adani Electricity Arvind Kumar Sharma 15 CBIP V K Kanjlia
Mumbai Limited - 16 Consultant Narendra Nath Misra
Trans
17 Consultant Virendra Kumar
5 Adani Power Niraj Agrawal Lakhiani
Maharashtra Ltd.
18 Consultant N S Sodha
6 Adishaktyai- India Neeraj Khare
19 Consultant R P Sasmal
7 Aditya Birla Insulators Harleen Singh
20 Consultant Dhananjay Kumar
8 Aditya Birla Insulators Sanjeev Sachdev Chaturvedi
9 Alfa Consultants Ramesh Dattaraya 21 Consultant Sanjay Patki
Suryavanshi
22 Consultant Pramod Rao
10 Anna University Usa Savadamuthu
Organisational Members
60 Power Research & Develop. Cons. Pvt. 77 Powergrid Corporation of India, Vadodara
Ltd 78 Powergrid Corporation of India, WRTS-1
61 POSOCO- ERLDC 79 Powergrid Corporation of India, Kolkata
62 POSOCO- NERLDC 80 Powergrid Corporation of India, Guwahati
63 POSOCO- H.Q. 81 Siemens Ltd, EM TS
64 POSOCO- SRLDC 82 Sterlite Power Transmission Limited
65 POSOCO- WRLDC 83 Savita Oil Technologies Ltd.
66 Powergrid Corp. of India Ltd, Lucknow 84 SJVN Limited
67 Powergrid Corp. of India Ltd, Shillong 85 Solar Energy Corporation of India Ltd.
68 Powergrid Corp. of India Ltd.,Jammu 86 Sanvijay Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.
69 Powergrid Corp. of India Ltd., Delhi 87 Sicame India Connectors Pvt. Ltd.
70 Powergrid Corp. of India Ltd-Orissa 88 THDCIL
71 Powergrid Corp. of India Ltd-Nagpur 89 The Motwane Manufacturing Co. Pvt Ltd
72 Powergrid Corporation of India, H.Q. 90 The Tata Power Company Ltd.
73 Powergrid Corporation of India, Bangalore 91 Tata Power Delhi Distribution Limited
74 Powergrid Corporation of India, 92 Transmission Corporation of Telangana Ltd.
Kurukshetra
93 Transrail Lighting Limited
75 Powergrid Corporation of India,
94 Universal Cables Limited
Secunderabad
95 UE System Imena Pvt. Ltd.
76 Powergrid Corporation of India, Patna
Young Members
S.No. Name Organistaion 12 GETCO Vasantkumar Ramanlal
1 Power Grid Ankur Kumar Patel
2 Power Grid Jeetesh Kumar 13 Power Grid Vinita Kumari
3 Power Grid Amandeep Singh 14 Power Grid Ashish Kumar Singh
4 Power Grid Prasoon Tripathi 15 Power Grid Ashutosh Digambar
Rajurkar
5 POSOCO Nitin Yadav
16 Power Grid Priyam Maity
6 POSOCO Aman Gautam
17 Power Grid Aman Bansal
7 Aditya Birla Vikas Rai
Insulators 18 Sterlite Power Venkata Krishnaji
Palasanipalli
8 POSOCO K B V Ramkumar
19 Sterlite Power Ashok D.K.
9 POSOCO Vishal Puppala Transmission
10 GETCO Bhavesh Kumar Manubhai 20 Power Grid Vikas Bishnoi
Rana
21 Power Grid Deepthy C Nair
11 GETCO Sanjay Jadav
22 Power Grid Ankit Prakash Vaishnao
Student Members
Study Committee
SC A2 SC B2 SC C2 SC D2
Power Transformers and Overhead Lines Power System Operation Information Systems and
Reactors and Control Telecommunication
72
SC A3 SC B3 SC C3
Transmission & Distribution Substations and Electrical Power System
Equipment Installations Environmental Performance
CIGRE India Journal
SC B4 SC C4
DC Systems and Power Power System Technical
Electronics Performance
SC B5 SC C5
Protection and Automation Electricity Markets and
Regulation
SC C6
Active Distribution Systems
and Distributed Energy
Resources
FIELDS OF ACTIVITY OF CIGRE STUDY COMMITTEES
Study Scope
Committees No.
A1 Rotating Electrical Machines : The SC is focused on the development of new technologies and the international exchange
of information and knowledge in the field of rotating electrical machines, to add value to this information and knowledge
by means of synthesizing state-of-the-art practices and developing guidelines and recommendations.
A2 Power Transformers and Reactors : The scope of SC A2 covers the whole life cycle of all kind of power transformers,
including HVDC transformers, phase shifters, shunt reactors and all transformer components as bushing and tap-
changers.
A3 Transmission & Distribution Equipment : The scope of the SC A3 covers theory, design, construction and operation
for all devices for switching, interrupting and limiting currents, surges arresters, capacitors, busbars, equipment insulators
and instrument transformers used in transmission and distribution systems.
B1 Insulated Cables : The scope of SC B1 covers the whole Life Cycle of AC and DC Insulated cables for Land and Submarine
Power Transmission, which means theory, design, applications, manufacture, installation, testing, operation, maintenance,
upgrading and uprating, diagnostics techniques. It has been focused on HV & EHV applications for a long time. Nowadays
MV applications are more and more taken into consideration.
B2 Overhead Lines : The scope of the Study Committee SC B2 covers all aspects of the design and refurbishment of overhead
power lines. The Study Committee’s strategic goals include: increased acceptance of overhead lines; increased utilization
of existing overhead lines; improved reliability and availability of overhead lines.
B3 Substations and Electrical Installations : The scope of work for SC B3 includes the design, construction, maintenance
and ongoing management of transmission and distribution substations, and the electrical installations in power stations,
but excluding generators.
B4 DC Systems and Power Electronics : The scope of SC B4 covers High Voltage Direct Current systems and Power
Electronics for AC networks and Power Quality improvement. Overhead lines or cables, which may be used in HVDC
systems are not included in the scope, but are the responsibility of SC B2 and SC B1 respectively. The members of B4
come from Manufacturers, Utilities, transmission system operators (TSOs), Consultants and Research Institutes. SC B4
is active in recruiting young engineers to participate in its activities.
B5 Protection and Automation : The scope of the Committee covers the principles, design, application and management
of power system protection, substation control, automation, monitoring, recording and metering – including associated
internal and external communications and interfacing for remote control and monitoring.
C1 Power System Development and Economics : The SC’s work includes issues, methods and tools related to the
development and economics of power systems, including the drivers to: invest in expanding power networks and sustaining
existing assets, increase power transfer capability, integrate distributed and renewable resources, manage increased
horizontal and vertical interconnection, and maintain acceptable reliability in a cost-efficient manner. The SC aims to
support planners to anticipate and manage change.
C2 Power System Operation and Control : The scope of the SC C2 covers the technical, human resource and institutional
aspects and conditions needed for a secure and economic operation of existing power systems under security requirements
against system disintegration, equipment damages and human injuries.
C3 Power System Environmental Performance : The scope of this Study Committee is focused on the identification and
assessment of electric power systems environmental impacts and the methods used for assessing and managing these
impacts during the all life cycle on the power system assets.
C4 Power System Technical Performance : The scope of SC C4 covers system technical performance phenomena that
range from nanoseconds to many hours. SC C4 has been engaged in the following topics: Power Quality, EMC/EMI,
Insulation Coordination, Lightning, and Power systems performance models and numerical analysis.
C5 Electricity Markets and Regulation : The scope of the Study Committee is “to analyze the different market approaches
and solutions and their impact on the electric supply industry in support of the traditional economists, planners and operators
within the industry as well as the new actors such as regulators, traders, technology innovators and Independent Power
producers.
C6 Active Distribution Systems and Distributed Energy Resources : SC C6 facilitates and promotes the progress of
engineering, and the international exchange of information and knowledge in the field of distributions systems and dispersed
generation. The experts contributes to the international exchange of information and knowledge by the rizing state of the
art practices and developing recommendations.
D1 Materials and Emerging Test Techniques : The scope of Study Committee D1 covers new and existing materials for
electrotechnology, diagnostic techniques and related knowledge rules, as well as emerging test techniques with expected
impact on power systems in the medium to long term.
D2 Information Systems and Telecommunication : The scope of this SC is focused on the fields of information systems and
telecommunications for power systems. SC D2 contributes to the international exchange of information and knowledge,
adding value by means of synthesizing state of the art practices and drafting recommendations.
Net Capacity
Installed Capacity (MW) added
Percentage
Sector
Thermal Nuclear Hydro RES Total Share During
Dec. 2020
“It is imperative to revisit the earlier planned islanding Power consumption grows 7.8% in
scheme for Delhi to prevent a repeat of what could not first half of November
have happened in Mumbai and could happen in Delhi,”
India’s power consumption grew 7.8 per cent to 50.15
said the sources. It is understood that a group in the
billion units (BU) in the first half of November this year,
power ministry is studying various upgradations that are
showing rise in economic activities, as per government
required to build a robust islanding facility for Delhi and
data. Power consumption in the country was recorded
a decision on the same would be taken soon.
at 46.52 BU during November 1-15 last year, according
Sources said that NTPC is ready to keep at least two to the power ministry data. For a full month in November
units of Dadri power plant and one unit of Jhajjar plant last year, power consumption was 93.94 BU.
on bar at all times to take care of any grid disturbances. Thus, the extrapolation of half-month data clearly
These coal-fired units would become critical in times of indicates that power consumption may witness year-
frequency collapse to ensure power generated from there on-year growth for the third month in a row, according to
helps to keep essential services running in the Capital. experts. After a gap of six months, power consumption
“The question is whether we need to keep running coal- recorded a growth of 4.4 per cent in September this
fired power plants in the vicinity of the capital as they year at 112.24 BU compared to 107.51 BU in the same
are also a source of pollution the affects the region. But month last year.
systems could be developed so that these units become India’s power consumption grew nearly 12 per cent to
critical in times of grid disturbances,” said a former head 109.53 billion units (BU) in October this year as against
of POSOCO asking not to be named. 97.84 BU in the same month last year. The growth
Two severe power blackouts had affected most of in power consumption in the first half of this month
Northern and Eastern India on 30 and 31 July 2012. showed that there is consistency in improvement in
The blackout on 31st July was the largest power outage commercial and industrial demand due to easing of
affecting more than 62 crore people in Northern, Eastern, lockdown restrictions, experts said. The government
and Northeast India. Based on the recommendations of had imposed the nationwide lockdown on March 25 to
enquiry committee constituted under MOP, an Islanding contain the spread of COVID-19. Power consumption
scheme for Delhi was framed. started declining from March onwards due to fewer
economic activities in the country. The COVID-19
The Delhi Region is a part of Northern Grid and in case
situation affected power consumption for six months
of any grid disturbance, this islanding scheme will isolate
in a row -- from March to August this year. Power
Delhi from rest of the grid. Once islanding is done, the
consumption on a year-on-year basis declined 8.7
demand is matched with the own generation. The priority
per cent in March, 23.2 per cent in April, 14.9 per cent
is Delhi Metro, Railways, DIAL and the healthcare
in May, 10.9 per cent in June, 3.7 per cent in July and
facilities. As per guidelines, each state has been given
1.7 per cent in August.
a share of load shedding which should contribute in
case of any fall in frequency. When any grid disturbance The data showed that electricity consumption had
occurs in the grid, there’d be an increase or decrease grown by 11.73 per cent in February. It has shown
in frequency. an improvement post-lockdown easing for economic
activities after April 20. Peak power demand met, the
The Delhi Islanding scheme has incorporated load highest supply of power in the country in a day, in the
shedding at Flat frequency up to stage 48.6 Hz and df/ first half of November was recorded at 160.77 GW (on
dt slope stages of 0.1Hz/sec,0.2Hz/sec and 0.3Hz/sec November 3, 2020), 5.2 per cent higher than 152.77 GW
for frequency less than 47.9Hz. In case the frequency on November 6, 2019. The peak power demand in the
fall beyond 47.9 Hz the Islanding of Delhi is initiated by month of November last year was 155.32 GW.
tripping of Circuit Breakers at various locations.
The peak power demand met in October was recorded at
On an average, typical daily electrical load in Delhi is 170.04 GW, 3.52 per cent higher than 164.25 GW in the
around 3000 MW and internal generation is only around same month last year. Peak power demand in September
500 MW. Due to low and uncertain gas allocations to this year recorded a growth of 1.7 per cent at 176.41 GW,
CCGT Bawana, Pragati, Rithala and IPGCL GT station, compared to 173.45 GW a year ago, the data showed.
it has become important to keep a minimum number of Peak power demand met had recorded negative growth
thermal coal-fired units on bar at all times. from April to August this year due to the pandemic.
This was also envisaged in the original islanding scheme It had dropped to 24.9 per cent in April, 8.9 per cent in
for Delhi. May, 9.6 per cent in June, 2.7 per cent in July and 5.6 per
Source : IANS December 12, 2020 cent in August. In March, it was muted at 0.8 per cent.
Source : PTI, Nov 16, 2020
CIGRE - HQ
President Chairman TC Treasurer Secretary General
Michel AUGONNET (FR) Marcio SZECHTMAN (BR) Michael Heyeck Philippe Adam (FR)
80
…………………………………….……………..… TEL ………………………………………………… TEL …………………….…………………………………
TEL ……………………… Mobile no. ………………………
Mobile no. ………………………………………………… Mobile no. …………………………………………………
FAX ………………E-Mail : ………… FAX …………………………………………………………
FAX ………………………………………………………
Year of Birth ………….….…… E-Mail…………….………………………..………..….
E-Mail………………….……….…………………………
for information pl contact – Vishan Dutt, CIGRE India, CBIP Building, Malcha Marg, Chanakyapuri, New Delhi – 110 021, Mobile – 9811431554 ; vishandutt@cbip.org;
rohinithomas@cbip.org