You are on page 1of 8

Incidence and Risk Factors for Glaucoma

Development After Bilateral Congenital Cataract


Surgery in Microphthalmic Eyes

JEONG-AH KIM, SANG-YOON LEE, KI HO PARK, YOUNG SUK YU, AND JIN WOOK JEOUNG

 PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term incidence and risk patients. (Am J Ophthalmol 2019;208:265–272. Ó
of glaucoma after bilateral congenital cataract surgery in 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
microphthalmic eyes.
 DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series.

M
 METHODS: SUBJECTS: Children with microphthalmic ICROPHTHALMIA IS A RARE CONGENITAL MAL-
eyes who had undergone surgery for bilateral congenital formation resulting from abnormalities in the
cataract within 6 months of birth and been followed up development of the primary optic vesicle.1 It
for at least 5 years. PROCEDURES: Review of medical re- has an incidence of 0.2-9 per 10,000 births, affects
cords at our institution. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prob- 3%-11% of blind children, and is associated with a high
ability of an eye’s developing glaucoma after bilateral prevalence of congenital cataract.2–5 Even for children
congenital cataract surgery and associated risk factors. with microphthalmic eyes, early cataract surgery is
 RESULTS: Thirty-eight eyes of 19 children with bilat- essential in order to prevent amblyopia and improve
eral congenital cataract were included. The mean age at visual outcomes, including stereopsis.6–9 However, despite
surgery was 3.2 ± 1.7 months, and the mean follow-up recent advances in pediatric cataract microsurgical
duration was 7.79 ± 2.61 years. After cataract surgery, techniques, early surgical treatment in children with
11 eyes (29.0%) developed glaucoma at the age of 4.0 microphthalmia remains challenging owing to several
± 1.4 years. Three of these eyes underwent Ahmed glau- intraoperative difficulties attributable to the crowded
coma valve implantation surgery. The probability of an anterior segment and the risk of postoperative
eye’s developing glaucoma was estimated to be 32.0% complications such as glaucoma.10–12
by 10 years after surgery. In a multivariate analysis, axial Glaucoma is one of the vision-threatening complica-
length was significantly associated with glaucoma devel- tions after congenital cataract surgery.13,14 However, its
opment (odds ratio [ 0.364, P [ .025). Age at the incidence varies widely in the previous reports in the
time of cataract surgery, corneal diameter, and aphakia literature, owing to differences among study populations
did not affect the risk of glaucoma (P > .10). Eyes (eg, race, age at cataract surgery, etc) and in follow-up pe-
without glaucoma had a better final visual outcome than riods.15–21 Especially in rare cases of microphthalmia, the
those with glaucoma (0.75 ± 0.60 and 1.47 ± 1.10 long-term risk of glaucoma development after congenital
logMAR, respectively, P [ .049). cataract surgery has not been well studied, and so disease
 CONCLUSIONS: The long-term cumulative risk of post- risk and the associated factors are still unclear. Since devel-
operative glaucoma development was 32.0% by 10 years opment of glaucoma after cataract surgery takes consider-
after bilateral congenital cataract surgery. Because the able time, even in cases of microphthalmia, long-term
risk of developing glaucoma persists for several years after study is needed to evaluate the incidence of glaucoma
surgery, careful monitoring and control of intraocular development and its risk factors after congenital cataract
pressure is needed to preserve vision in such surgery in microphthalmic eyes.
In the present study, we investigated the long-term risk
of glaucoma development and associated factors in micro-
Supplemental Material available at AJO.com. phthalmic eyes of Korean children who had undergone
Accepted for publication Aug 16, 2019. bilateral congenital cataract surgery within 6 months of
From the Department of Ophthalmology, Hallym University College of birth.
Medicine, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, South Korea
(J.A.K.); Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University
College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea (J.A.K., K.H.P., Y.S.Y.,
J.W.J.); Department of Ophthalmology, Jeju National University
College of Medicine, Jeju City, South Korea (S.Y.L.); and Department
of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South METHODS
Korea (K.H.P., Y.S.Y., J.W.J.).
Inquiries to Jin Wook Jeoung, Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul PATIENTS DIAGNOSED WITH MICROPHTHALMIA WHO HAD
National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of
Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea; undergone bilateral congenital cataract surgery within
e-mail: neuroprotect@gmail.com 6 months of birth at Seoul National University Children’s

0002-9394/$36.00 © 2019 ELSEVIER INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 265


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.08.005
Hospital between January 1997 and December 2008 were were measured. Visual acuity was measured with the
consecutively included in this retrospective observational Snellen chart for patients over 3 years of age, then
cohort study. All of the patients were followed for at least converted to the logMAR scale for statistical analysis.
5 years after the initial visit. This study’s protocol was IOPs were measured using (1) a Goldmann applanation
approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul Na- tonometer (AT 900, Haag-Streit, Koeniz, Switzerland)
tional University Hospital, and its conduct was consistent for children aged >_8 years old or (2) a noncontact tonom-
with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. eter (Keeler Instruments, Inc, Broomall, Pennsylvania,
Microphthalmia was defined based on a total axial USA), Tono-Pen XL (Mentor, Santa Barbara, California,
length at least 2 standard deviations below the mean for USA), or rebound tonometer (Icare PRO; Icare Finland
age.22,23 Congenital cataract was defined as cataract Oy, Helsinki, Finland) for children aged younger than 8
existing in patients younger than 6 months. Patients who years or those who were uncooperative. When 2 or more to-
had retinopathy of prematurity, traumatic cataract, nometers were used, the mean IOP value was used for the
aniridia, steroid-induced cataract, posterior persistent fetal analysis.
vasculature causing stretching of the ciliary process or trac- Glaucoma was diagnosed if the patient’s IOP was >_26 mm
tional retinal detachment, or glaucoma before cataract Hg on at least 2 consecutive visits30,31 or if there was a
extraction were excluded. Also, we excluded patients documented clinician’s decision for surgical intervention or
with Down syndrome or systemic diseases such as permanent medical glaucoma therapy.14,19,25 Gonioscopic
Hallermann-Streiff syndrome or Lowe syndrome, which examination and optic nerve and visual field evaluations
are independently associated with glaucoma.24–27 were not uniformly performed in our study population
All of the cataract surgeries were performed under gen- because patients could not cooperate consistently with
eral anesthesia and by 1 experienced pediatric surgeon those examinations.
(Y.S.Y.) using a previously reported method.28,29 All of Patients diagnosed with glaucoma were categorized by
the patients underwent simultaneous irrigation and IOP control: IOP < _21 mm Hg on all post–cataract surgery
aspiration (I&A) of the lens, posterior capsulectomy, and visits with topical medication (Group Bs) or >21 mm Hg
anterior vitrectomy in both eyes within 2 weeks of on at least 2 visits despite IOP-lowering medication or
diagnosis of congenital cataract. Preoperative anterior IOP-lowering surgery required (Group Bf).32 During the
segment and fundus examinations and B-scan postoperative follow-up, patients with uncontrolled IOP
ultrasonography were performed with the patients sedated despite medical therapy underwent Ahmed valve implan-
by oral chloral hydrate. The corneal diameters of all of tation (AVI) by 1 glaucoma specialist (K.H.P.).
the patients were measured during cataract surgery. A All of the AVI surgeries were performed using the
precise fundus examination for glaucomatous optic disc Ahmed valve (model FP-7 or FP-8). A fornix-based
damage was performed immediately after cataract conjunctival incision was made in the superior temporal
extraction because the efficacy of preoperative fundus quadrant or superior nasal area. After the sclera was
examination was limited owing to dense cataract. Two exposed, a partial-thickness limbal-based scleral flap was
years after cataract extraction surgery, patients with eyes cut in a rectangular shape. The tube was primed using
having a corneal diameter > _9 mm were operated on for balanced salt solution, and the Ahmed drainage plate
secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantations. was tucked under the subconjunctival space and sutured
In each cataract surgery, mechanical anterior capsulor- to the underlying sclera with its anterior edge 6-8 mm
rhexis, I&A of lens, posterior capsulectomy, and anterior posterior to the limbus, using 2 8-0-nylon anchoring
vitrectomy were performed using a vitrector. Aphakic sutures.
correction with glasses was started 1 week after surgery.
Secondary IOL (1-piece polymethylmethacrylate; 811 B,  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive statistics were
Pharmacia & Upjohn, Inc, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA; calculated for the individual-level characteristics of the
LK55 A, Lucid Korea Co, Ltd, Seoul, Korea) implantations 19 patients and for the eye-level characteristics of the
were performed through a 6-mm-sized scleral tunnel inci- 38 eyes. A Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate
sion at 2 mm from the superior limbus. For adequate poste- the probability of glaucoma development, as well as the
rior capsule support, the IOL was inserted into the capsular respective 95% confidence intervals, on a per-eye basis.
bag or fixated in the ciliary sulcus. In all cases, sodium Inter-group comparisons were performed using the
hyaluronate 1.4% (Healon GV; AMO Inc, Santa Ana, Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact test. Factors asso-
California, USA) was used, and the scleral tunnel incisions ciated with the development of glaucoma were assessed
were closed with interrupted 8-0 polyglactin sutures. by logistic regression analysis. Variables with a statistical
All of the patients were examined every 4 months until 4 significance of P < .10 in the univariate analysis were
years, and every 6 months until 8 years. Thereafter, they included in the multivariate model. The analyses were
were followed up annually. During the regular follow-up performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (IBM
visits after cataract surgery, visual acuity, manifest or Corp, Armonk, New York, USA). The cutoff for statisti-
cycloplegicV refraction, and intraocular pressure (IOP) cal significance was set at P < .05.

266 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DECEMBER 2019


 COMPARISON OF EYES ACCORDING TO DEVELOPMENT
RESULTS OF GLAUCOMA AND RISK FACTOR ANALYSIS FOR GLAU-
COMA DEVELOPMENT: The eyes were grouped according
 CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDY POPULATION:
to development of glaucoma: Group A, without glaucoma;
From 1997 to 2008, 42 eyes of 21 patients with micro-
Group B, with glaucoma. Table 2 shows the clinical char-
phthalmia underwent bilateral cataract surgery within
acteristics of the patients. The eyes in Group B had a
6 months of birth. Among them, 4 eyes of 2 patients
shorter mean axial length at the time of cataract surgery
were excluded from our study because they had syndromes
when compared with Group A (15.11 6 1.38 vs 16.95 6
known to be associated with increased risk of glaucoma
1.66, P ¼ .036). In contrast, there were no significant
(Hallermann-Streiff syndrome, 2 eyes of 1 patient; Lowe
inter-group differences in the proportion of male patients
syndrome, 2 eyes of 1 patient). Finally, 38 eyes of 19 pa-
(55.6% vs 63.6%, P ¼ .729), the mean age of patients at
tients were enrolled in this study. The patients underwent
the time of surgery (3.3 6 1.7 months vs 3.0 6 1.7 months,
I&A of the lens, posterior capsulectomy, and anterior vit-
P ¼ .660), corneal diameter (8.37 6 0.99 mm vs 8.05 6
rectomy at the age of 3.2 6 1.7 months (range, 3-29 weeks);
0.76 mm, P ¼ 0.334), or the mean follow-up period (7.31
only 1 infant underwent cataract surgery within 4 weeks of
6 2.09 years vs 8.96 6 3.46 years, P ¼ .278) (Table 2).
birth. All of the patients were followed up for 7.8 6 2.6
Group A had lower max and mean IOPs (19.9 6 4.6 mm
(range, 5.2-14.4) years. Eleven patients (57.9%) were
Hg vs 36.9 6 9.1 mm Hg and 13.5 6 2.2 mm Hg vs 20.1
male, and 10 (52.6%) had a family history of congenital
6 4.1 mm Hg, respectively, P < .001) with better visual
cataract. Preoperative IOP was 11.0 6 4.5 mm Hg, axial
outcomes (0.75 6 0.60 logMAR vs 1.47 6 1.10 logMAR,
length was 16.49 6 1.76 mm, and corneal diameter was
P ¼ .049) than Group B. In the logistic regression analysis
8.28 6 0.93 mm. After cataract surgery, 5 eyes underwent
to assess the factors associated with glaucoma development
removal of visual axis opacification and 12 eyes of 6 pa-
after cataract surgery, only axial length was significantly
tients (31.6%) underwent secondary IOL implantation at
associated (P ¼ .025) (Table 3).
the age of 2.3 6 0.5 months. None of the eyes underwent
During the follow-up, 3 eyes of 3 patients in Group A
any other intraocular surgery except secondary IOL im-
that showed temporary IOP elevation above 21 mm Hg
plantation, glaucoma surgery, or visual axis opacification
were not included in the glaucoma group, since the max
removal. The final IOP and best-corrected visual acuity
IOP was less than 26 mm Hg and dropped to within the
were 17.3 6 3.8 mm Hg and 0.93 6 0.81 logMAR, respec-
normal range without treatment.
tively (Table 1).
 INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE CONTROL AND VISUAL OUT-
 DEVELOPMENT OF GLAUCOMA AFTER BILATERAL COMES IN GLAUCOMA PATIENTS: In order to evaluate the
CONGENITAL CATARACT SURGERY: Eleven of 38 eyes
association between IOP control and visual outcomes, we
(29.0%) were diagnosed with glaucoma at the patient categorized eyes in Group B according to the success of
age of 4.1 6 1.4 years. Of them, 4 patients had bilat- IOP control; successful IOP control (Group Bs) has been
eral glaucoma. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis defined as patient IOP <
_21 mm Hg regardless of glaucoma
result for risk of development of glaucoma was 32.0% medications and failed IOP control (Group Bf) as patient
by 10 years after bilateral cataract surgery, and the IOP >21 mm Hg despite glaucoma mediation on at least
mean glaucoma-free time was 10.4 6 0.7 (95% confi- 2 visits or when surgery for IOP control was needed.32 Of
dence interval, 9.0-11.9) years (Figure). All of the the 11 eyes in Group B, 6 eyes were grouped in Bs and
eyes were of the late-onset open-angle type, without the remaining 5 in Bf. In the analysis of visual outcome,
family history of glaucoma. Only 1 eye among the glau- Group Bs had a significantly better final vision (0.69
coma group underwent secondary IOL implantation, 6 0.42 logMAR) than did Group Bf (2.40 6 0.89
and 10 eyes of 6 patients remained in aphakia status logMAR) (P ¼ .014). However, patients in Group Bs had
owing to their small corneal diameter (<9 mm) during a comparable final visual acuity to those without glaucoma
the follow-up period. (P ¼ .907) (Table 4).
The mean IOP of the glaucoma group was 20.1 6 4.1
(14.4-29.7) mm Hg. In 6 of those eyes, IOP was well
controlled to below 21 mm Hg with topical glaucoma
medication (mean IOP, 17.73 6 2.06 mm Hg). The DISCUSSION
remaining 5 eyes’ IOPs were poorly controlled during
the follow-up period (mean IOP, 22.90 6 4.34 mm WE EVALUATED THE LONG-TERM RISK OF GLAUCOMA AND
Hg). Consequently, 3 eyes underwent AVI surgery at the visual outcomes in infants with microphthalmia who
the patient ages of 5, 6, and 8 years, respectively. The had undergone bilateral congenital cataract surgery within
final IOP of the eyes in the glaucoma group was 19.3 6 months of birth. In our study, 11 of 38 eyes (29.0%)
6 3.3 (range, 14-23) mm Hg under topical glaucoma developed late-onset glaucoma after bilateral congenital
medication; the average number of glaucoma medications cataract surgery. The long-term cumulative incidence of
was 1.5. glaucoma development was 32.0% by 10 years of bilateral

VOL. 208 GLAUCOMA AFTER CONGENITAL CATARACT SURGERY IN MICROPHTHALMIA 267


TABLE 1. Clinical Characteristics of Study Population (38
Eyes of 19 Patients)

Variables Value

Sex (%)
Male 57.9%
Female 42.1%
Family history of congenital cataract 52.6%
Type of cataract (eyes), n (%)
Nuclear 21 (52.5%)
Total 15 (37.5%)
Anterior subcapsular 2 (5.0%) FIGURE. Kaplan-Meier plot of glaucoma-free survival in chil-
Age at initial visit (months) 2.6 6 1.6 dren with microphthalmic eyes after bilateral congenital cata-
Age at cataract extraction surgery (months) 3.2 6 1.7 ract surgery.
Preoperative ocular parameters
Axial length (mm) 16.49 6 1.76
Corneal diameter (mm) 8.28 6 0.93
Secondary IOL insertion surgery 12 eyes of were 18% and 32%, respectively.20 When we applied the
6 patients disease definition used in IATS to our data, the incidence
Age at surgery (years) 2.3 6 0.5
of glaucoma plus glaucoma suspect was 36.8%, which,
IOP
though higher than the IATS result, was not significantly
Preoperative IOP (mm Hg) 11.0 6 4.5
Mean IOP after cataract surgery (mm Hg) 15.4 6 4.1
different. In a study by Vasavada and associates,18 the
Final IOP (mm Hg) 17.3 6 3.8 risk of glaucoma development was 30.9% in 21 infants
Eyes diagnosed with glaucoma (eyes), n (%) 11 (29.0%) followed up for 25.6 6 11.3 months postoperatively,
Age at glaucoma diagnosis (years) 4.0 6 1.4 whereas Prasad and associates17 reported a lower incidence
Glaucoma surgery (eyes)a 3 (7.9%) of glaucoma: 13.5% of 37 microphthalmic eyes followed up
Age at glaucoma surgery (years) 6.3 6 1.5 for 18 6 5.1 months. This discrepancy might reflect differ-
Final BCVA (logMAR) 0.6 6 0.8 ences in the follow-up duration and patient population be-
Follow-up time (years) 7.8 6 2.6 tween the studies.
In our study, all of the patients with glaucoma had late-
BCVA ¼ best-corrected visual acuity; IOL ¼ intraocular lens;
IOP, intraocular pressure.
onset open-angle glaucoma and those with shorter axial
a
All cases underwent Ahmed valve implantation. length had a higher risk for developing glaucoma. Glau-
coma after congenital cataract surgery has a bimodal
onset33,34; early-onset glaucoma develops within a year of
cataract surgery, and late-onset open-angle glaucoma arises
much later.19,30 The mechanism of early-onset glaucoma
congenital cataract surgery. Although eyes without glau- might be related to genetic predisposing factors13,14,30,35
coma had better visual outcomes than those with glau- along with angle closure caused by pupillary block or
coma, glaucomatous eyes with well-controlled IOP had a inflammatory peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS)36–38;
comparable visual outcome to those without glaucoma. when glaucoma occurs, it tends to develop in both eyes
This study included patients on whom bilateral congen- (ie, bilaterally).14,30 In late-onset glaucoma, although the
ital cataract surgery had been performed, using modern sur- angle is usually open on gonioscopy, many cases have
gical techniques, by 1 experienced pediatric surgeon in abnormal pigment deposition and micro-PAS39 that might
order to exclude bias such as surgeon performance. More- be the result of early intermittent pupillary block and
over, only patients followed up for at least 5 years were chronic inflammation by remnant lens materials after sur-
included to achieve representative long-term results; in gery.33 Two possible mechanisms of late-onset glaucoma
our study, 10 of the 11 cases of glaucoma were diagnosed have been suggested. The first is the chemical theory that
within 5 years of surgery and the remaining 1 patient was may be associated with unique susceptibility of filtration
diagnosed at 8 years. Thus, this study can be considered angle to postoperative inflammation13 or toxic chemical
to have had a sufficient follow-up period for evaluation of factors from vitreous fluid38,40 to induce chronic
the long-term incidence of glaucoma development. trabeculitis15 that alter the microstructure of the trabecular
The incidence of glaucoma after congenital cataract sur- meshwork and may impair the normal maturation of angle
gery has been reported to be between 3% and 41%.15–20 In or acquire micro-PAS.39 The second is a mechanical the-
the recent prospective Infant Aphakia Treatment Study ory; loss of support to the trabecular meshwork in the
(IATS), the incidences of glaucoma and glaucoma plus aphakic eye induces a disorganization or collapse of the
glaucoma suspect after surgery by 5 years of follow-up trabecular meshwork that results in diminished function

268 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DECEMBER 2019


TABLE 2. Comparison of Patients’ Clinical Features According to Glaucoma Development

Variables Group A (Without Glaucoma) Group B (With Glaucoma) P Valuea

Number of eyes 27 11
Male (%) 15 (55.6%) 7 (63.6%) .729
Right:left (% of right eye) 13:14 (48.1%) 6:5 (54.5%) 1.00
Age at cataract surgery (months) 3.3 6 1.7 3.0 6 1.7 .660
Corneal diameter (mm) 8.37 6 0.99 8.05 6 0.76 .334
Axial length (mm) 15.11 6 1.38 16.95 6 1.66 .036*
Secondary IOL implantation 11 eyes (40.7%) 1 eye (9.1%) .121
Intraocular surgery after cataract surgery 14 eyes (51.9%) 3 eyes (27.27%) .486
IOP
Max IOP (mm Hg) 19.9 6 4.6 36.9 6 9.1 <.001*
Mean IOP (mm Hg) 13.5 6 2.2 20.1 6 4.1 <.001*
Final IOP (mm Hg) 16.4 6 3.7 19.3 6 3.3 .034*
Final BCVA (logMAR) 0.75 6 0.60 1.47 6 1.10 .049*
Follow-up period (years) 7.31 6 2.09 8.96 6 3.46 .278

BCVA ¼ best-corrected visual acuity; IOL ¼ intraocular lens; IOP, intraocular pressure.
Asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance.
a
P values of continuous variables from Mann-Whitney U test, and those of categorical variables from Fisher exact test.

TABLE 3. Risk Factors Associated With Development of Glaucoma After Cataract Surgery

Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis

Variables Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value Odds Ratio (95% CI) P Value

Age at cataract surgery, per 1 month older 0.896 (0.585-1.370) .611


Sex, female 0.714 (0.169-3.027) .648
Cornea diameter, per 1 mm thicker 0.676 (0.310-1.477) .326
Axial length, per 1 mm longer 0.364 (0.150-0.882) .025* 0.364 (0.150-0.882) .025*
Aphakia 6.875 (0.766-61.694) .085 0.803 (0.024-27.325) .903
Intraocular surgery after cataract extraction 0.469 (0.102-2.162) .331
surgery

Asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance.


CI ¼ confidence interval.
Variables with P < .1 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate model.

of trabecular meshwork as a filter and an active metabolic study, the age at surgery tended to be younger in the
tissue.41 Extremely early onset of cataract, subsequent sur- glaucoma than in the nonglaucoma group, but it was not
gery in such young microphthalmic eyes, and associated statistically significant. This could have been due to the
anomalies of the angle structures with peripheral crowding facts that only 5 of 19 infants underwent surgery within
might be risk factors for the development of glaucoma.42 2 months of birth and that the number of eyes was too
These theories can be possible pathophysiological mecha- small to conduct a meaningful statistical analysis.
nisms for the higher prevalence of postoperative glaucoma Glaucoma after congenital cataract surgery remains a
in infants with microphthalmic eyes, and support the result major concern for microphthalmic eyes, and it needs timely
that eyes with shorter axis length had higher risk of glau- management to prevent optic nerve damage and subse-
coma after surgery in the present study. quent vision loss. Although early surgery is associated
Among the known risk factors for development of glau- with a higher risk of subsequent glaucoma,21,33,35 timely
coma after cataract surgery in children, surgery at an early intervention is important to visual outcomes for the
age has been frequently identified in both normal and following reasons: surgery after 6 weeks of age can
microphthalmic eyes.17,18,20,21,33,35 However, in our deprive the neonatal visual system of vital stimuli during

VOL. 208 GLAUCOMA AFTER CONGENITAL CATARACT SURGERY IN MICROPHTHALMIA 269


TABLE 4. Visual Outcomes According to Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Control

Glaucoma (Group B)a

Variables Nonglaucoma (Group A) Group Bs Group Bf P Valueb Post Hoc Analysisc

Number of eyes 27 6 5
Mean IOP (mm Hg) 13.51 6 2.22 17.73 6 2.06 22.90 6 4.34 <.001* A < Bs < Bf
Final BCVA (logMAR) 0.75 6 0.60 0.69 6 0.42 2.40 6 0.89 .007* A ¼ Bs < Bf

BCVA ¼ best-corrected visual acuity; IOP ¼ intraocular pressure.


Asterisk (*) indicates statistical significance.
a
The success of IOP control (Group Bs) was defined as patient’s IOP <
_21 mm Hg regardless of glaucoma medications and the failure of IOP
control (Group Bf) was defined as patient’s IOP >21 mm Hg despite glaucoma mediation in at least 2 visits or when reoperation for glaucoma
was needed.
b
Kruskal-Wallis test.
c
Post hoc test by Mann-Whitney U test.

the critical period,43 and cataract surgery before 2 months relevant only to patients who have surgery for bilateral
of age has produced the best visual outcomes.44,45 In our congenital cataracts. Therefore, further study with
study, the surgeon’s concern about postoperative unilateral congenital cataract surgery in microphthalmia
glaucoma did not delay cataract surgery, even in patients is needed.
with bilateral cataracts. The surgery was performed at 3.2 This study has several limitations. First, it is a retrospec-
6 1.7 months, similarly to the findings reported by tive review of a small sample size without a control group.
Vasavada and associates (4.0 6 2.6 months)18 and Prasad Second, we analyzed the long-term outcomes for a homoge-
and associates (3.8 6 2.3 months).17 Most of the patients neous cohort of microphthalmic eyes that had undergone
in the current study underwent surgery within 2 weeks of bilateral congenital cataract surgery within 6 months of
initial diagnosis of the disease, regardless of their age, and birth; all of the patients were Korean. Though the results
they were more likely to be operated on earlier when from this cohort can provide useful data for this population,
referred earlier. However, some patients who had a delayed it may not apply as accurately to other racial or ethnic
parental consent underwent cataract surgery later. groups. Therefore, further prospective study with a larger
The present study included children with microphthal- sample size and a more diverse study population, along
mia who underwent bilateral congenital cataract surgery with comparison of these eyes with nonmicrophthalmic
because there were no patients with unilateral disease eyes, is needed. Third, given the present study’s limitations
who met our inclusion criteria. Because the number of pa- in terms of the capacity to evaluate glaucomatous anatomic
tients who performed surgery was not correlated with the and functional damage, the mechanism of glaucoma and
prevalence of the disease, we speculate that the reasons the severity of glaucomatous structural and functional dam-
for this are as follows: (1) infants with unilateral disease age could not be comprehensively evaluated. Lastly,
might be diagnosed and operated on later than those because we included patients who were followed up for at
with bilateral cases because visual signs (ie, decrease in vi- least 5 years postoperatively, some cases, especially uncom-
sual acuity) in preverbal infants are less helpful for early plicated ones, could not be included owing to insufficient
detection of cataract in cases of unilateral disease; and follow-up. Thus, there is a possibility that our data overes-
(2) the most frequent ocular abnormality in cases of unilat- timate the risk of developing glaucoma.
eral cataract and microphthalmia is persistent fetal vascu- In summary, the long-term cumulative risk of glau-
lature.2,46,47 In such condition, patients’ parents often coma development by 10 years after bilateral congenital
refuse to consent to surgery owing to its poor prognosis, cataract surgery was 32.0% in patients with microphthal-
especially when fellow eyes are normal. Since bilateral mia. Since the risk of glaucoma development persists for
congenital cataracts in microphthalmia are more likely to many years after surgery, regular IOP monitoring and
be syndromic or have other systemic findings that could thorough IOP controls are needed in order to preserve
influence the prevalence of glaucoma, our findings are patients’ vision.

FUNDING/SUPPORT: THIS STUDY WAS SUPPORTED BY GRANT NUMBER 0420170680 (2017-1182) FROM THE SNUH RESEARCH FUND.
Financial Disclosures: All authors have no financial disclosures. All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.

270 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DECEMBER 2019


REFERENCES 20. Freedman SF, Lynn MJ, Beck AD, et al. Glaucoma-related
adverse events in the first 5 years after unilateral cataract
1. Ragge NK, Subak-Sharpe ID, Collin JR. A practical guide to removal in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. JAMA
the management of anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Eye Ophthalmol 2015;133(8):907–914.
(Lond) 2007;21(10):1290–1300. 21. Magnusson G, Abrahamsson M, Sjostrand J. Glaucoma
2. Morrison D, FitzPatrick D, Hanson I, et al. National study of following congenital cataract surgery: an 18-year longitudinal
microphthalmia, anophthalmia, and coloboma (MAC) in follow-up. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78(1):65–70.
Scotland: investigation of genetic aetiology. J Med Genet 22. Weiss AH, Kousseff BG, Ross EA, Longbottom J. Complex
2002;39(1):16–22. microphthalmos. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107(11):1619–1624.
3. Kallen B, Tornqvist K. The epidemiology of anophthalmia 23. Gordon RA, Donzis PB. Refractive development of the hu-
and microphthalmia in Sweden. Eur J Epidemiol 2005;20(4): man eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1985;103(6):785–789.
345–350. 24. Shapiro MB, France TD. The ocular features of Down’s syn-
4. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Yang W, Harris JA, Finnell RH, drome. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;99(6):659–663.
Lammer EJ. Epidemiologic characteristics of anophthalmia 25. Kruger SJ, Wilson ME Jr, Hutchinson AK, Peterseim MM,
and bilateral microphthalmia among 2.5 million births in Cal- Bartholomew LR, Saunders RA. Cataracts and glaucoma in
ifornia, 1989-1997. Am J Med Genet A 2005;137(1):36–40. patients with oculocerebrorenal syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol
5. Bermejo E, Martinez-Frias ML. Congenital eye malforma- 2003;121(9):1234–1237.
tions: clinical-epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecu- 26. McSpadden K, Dolinsky Z, Schroerlucke K. Report on the
tive births in Spain. Am J Med Genet 1998;75(5):497–504. Lowe’s Syndrome Comprehensive Survey. West Lafayette:
6. Robb RM, Petersen RA. Outcome of treatment for bilateral Lowe Syndrome Association; 1991.
congenital cataracts. Ophthalmic Surg 1992;23(10):650–656. 27. Hopkins DJ, Horan EC. Glaucoma in the Hallermann-Streiff
7. Cheng KP, Hiles DA, Biglan AW, Pettapiece MC. Visual re- syndrome. Br J Ophthalmol 1970;54(6):416–422.
sults after early surgical treatment of unilateral congenital 28. Kim DH, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Yu YS. Long-term results of bilat-
cataracts. Ophthalmology 1991;98(6):903–910. eral congenital cataract treated with early cataract surgery,
8. Beller R, Hoyt CS, Marg E, Odom JV. Good visual function aphakic glasses and secondary IOL implantation. Acta
after neonatal surgery for congenital monocular cataracts. Ophthalmol 2012;90(3):231–236.
Am J Ophthalmol 1981;91(5):559–565. 29. Lee BJ, Kim JH, Yu YS. Surgical outcomes after intraocular
9. Gregg FM, Parks MM. Stereopsis after congenital monocular lens implantation for posterior lenticonus-related cataract ac-
cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1992;114(3):314–317. cording to preoperative lens status. J Cataract Refract Surg
10. Yu YS, Lee JH, Chang BL. Surgical management of congen- 2014;40(2):217–223.
ital cataract associated with severe microphthalmos. J Cata- 30. Simon JW, Mehta N, Simmons ST, Catalano RA,
ract Refract Surg 2000;26(8):1219–1224. Lininger LL. Glaucoma after pediatric lensectomy/vitrec-
11. Nishina S, Noda E, Azuma N. Outcome of early surgery for tomy. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5):670–674.
bilateral congenital cataracts in eyes with microcornea. Am 31. Rabiah PK. Frequency and predictors of glaucoma after pedi-
J Ophthalmol 2007;144(2):276–280. atric cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137(1):30–37.
12. Bradford GM, Keech RV, Scott WE. Factors affecting visual 32. Heuer DK, Barton K, Grehn F, et al. Consensus on definitions
outcome after surgery for bilateral congenital cataracts. Am J of success. In: Shaarawy TM, Sherwood MB, Grehn F, eds.
Ophthalmol 1994;117(1):58–64. Guidelines on Design and Reporting of Glaucoma Surgical
13. Phelps CD, Arafat NI. Open-angle glaucoma following sur- Trials. Amsterdam: Kugler; 2009:15–24.
gery for congenital cataracts. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95(11): 33. Vishwanath M, Cheong-Leen R, Taylor D, Russell-Eggitt I,
1985–1987. Rahi J. Is early surgery for congenital cataract a risk factor
14. Asrani SG, Wilensky JT. Glaucoma after congenital cataract for glaucoma? Br J Ophthalmol 2004;88(7):905–910.
surgery. Ophthalmology 1995;102(6):863–867. 34. Kuhli-Hattenbach C, Luchtenberg M, Kohnen T,
15. Wong IB, Sukthankar VD, Cortina-Borja M, Nischal KK. Hattenbach LO. Risk factors for complications after congen-
Incidence of early-onset glaucoma after infant cataract ital cataract surgery without intraocular lens implantation in
extraction with and without intraocular lens implantation. the first 18 months of life. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146(1):1–7.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93(9):1200–1203. 35. Keech RV, Tongue AC, Scott WE. Complications after sur-
16. Trivedi RH, Wilson ME Jr, Golub RL. Incidence and risk fac- gery for congenital and infantile cataracts. Am J Ophthalmol
tors for glaucoma after pediatric cataract surgery with and 1989;108(2):136–141.
without intraocular lens implantation. J AAPOS 2006; 36. Kang KD, Yim HB, Biglan AW. Comparison of delayed-onset
10(2):117–123. glaucoma and early-onset glaucoma after infantile cataract
17. Prasad S, Ram J, Sukhija J, Pandav SS, Gupta PC. Cataract surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol 2006;20(1):41–46.
surgery in infants with microphthalmos. Graefes Arch Clin 37. Ariturk N, Oge I, Mohajery F, Erkan D, Turkoglu S. Second-
Exp Ophthalmol 2015;253(5):739–743. ary glaucoma after congenital cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol
18. Vasavada VA, Dixit NV, Ravat FA, et al. Intraoperative per- 1998;22(3):175–180.
formance and postoperative outcomes of cataract surgery in 38. Mills M, Robb R. Glaucoma following childhood cataract sur-
infant eyes with microphthalmos. J Cataract Refract Surg gery. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1993;31(6):355–360. dis-
2009;35(3):519–528. cussion 361.
19. Beck AD, Freedman SF, Lynn MJ, et al. Glaucoma-related 39. Walton DS. Pediatric aphakic glaucoma: a study of 65 pa-
adverse events in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study: tients. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1995;93:403–413. discussion
1-year results. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130(3):300–305. 413-420.

VOL. 208 GLAUCOMA AFTER CONGENITAL CATARACT SURGERY IN MICROPHTHALMIA 271


40. Gimbel HV, Basti S, Ferensowicz M, DeBroff BM. Results of 44. Birch EE, Stager DR. Prevalence of good visual acuity
bilateral cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraoc- following surgery for congenital unilateral cataract. Arch
ular lens implantation in children. Ophthalmology 1997; Ophthalmol 1988;106(1):40–43.
104(11):1737–1743. 45. Ellemberg D, Lewis TL, Maurer D, Lui CH, Brent HP.
41. Asrani S, Freedman S, Hasselblad V, et al. Does primary Spatial and temporal vision in patients treated for bilat-
intraocular lens implantation prevent ‘‘aphakic’’ glaucoma eral congenital cataracts. Vision Res 1999;39(20):
in children? J AAPOS 2000;4(1):33–39. 3480–3489.
42. Solebo AL, Russell-Eggitt I, Nischal KK, et al. Cataract sur- 46. Mullner-Eidenbock A, Amon M, Moser E, Klebermass N.
gery and primary intraocular lens implantation in children Persistent fetal vasculature and minimal fetal vascular rem-
< or ¼ 2 years old in the UK and Ireland: finding of national nants: a frequent cause of unilateral congenital cataracts.
surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93(11):1495–1498. Ophthalmology 2004;111(5):906–913.
43. Elston JS, Timms C. Clinical evidence for the onset of the 47. Zhu X, Du Y, He W, et al. Clinical features of congenital and
sensitive period in infancy. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76(6): developmental cataract in east China: a five-year retrospec-
327–328. tive review. Sci Rep 2017;7(1):4254.

272 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DECEMBER 2019

You might also like