Bway, a Jounal of Udon Management § (2019) 225-256 © Accountability 0 ©, Good Governance 4° © Efficient Feonomy 0 7 (© Paticipation 0% © Vision & Planning © osusaiabi 220 000% * Sustainability © © Secviee Delivery © Relationship © © Civie Capacity © Security 0 ean NSN & 9 Equilty © obetitimacy ‘Wally Transparency Bureaucracy ° (C) Nenter statis ppeatng ny esta et Sid: Dstt: []} Aspen iy (JH asperEge' opin []-+ Aspe ii ti 2 eterna mp wiht i se em he deta tn sown i Zan 4 3.3.1.3, Asper equal sub-critera. In this case, the total weight of 1 to be disteibuted among the total aumber of sub-eriteria (5) nj=74. Hence, final score forall the sub-crterion is, m= o ence inal score fr” xiterion, (Seah = Za*m @) ‘The detail distribution is shown in Pig. 2: Good-governance components and weight-distribution among them Fig, 2 and Table 4 3.3.2. Measuring indicators In order to measure the framework, we quantified all the criteria, and the representative sub-criteria, By closely observing “Table 2, we realise that some sub-criteri can be measured by Direct Indicators, and the rest can be evaluated through fleld-survey by either of two ways ~ Yes/No questionnaire and Likert-scale based opinion, maintaining any of the weightage distribution process specified earlier. We have derived the Direct Indicator (DD as per available data from a secondary source, DI and Likert Scale (1) can ‘be a measure on O-10 scale by categorising the value with respect to reference or benchmark, whereas Yes/No questionnaire (¥/N) ‘Table 4 Weightage-lsteibution as per equa erierla or subrtera, eerie © Number of Seb Weiphtage Dutbutonw per Hqul Cetera Weghtge inebuton a per Equal Sub.Cteria Cela eee eee OOO Orrrvreeoereemwwe'_—01 ‘nal weigh or each oa wept foreach Fal weight or each caw substan Zy ceri 1. Accountabilsy 4 00769 00135 0500 2 ranypareney ‘ a. bois Basi0 5. paepation 3 00760 0135 3089 4 Bfecvenese ‘ 0768 bolas oslo 5 Equal 5 00760 bons 0675 Viton & Planing 5 00768 013s 067s 7. sosainbiy 3 8.0769 boias bows 8: Leglumacy t Burenueraey § 00769 cons 3089 2 ine capacity 5 0768 ooias urs 10. Serie Delivery 7 2.0760 bois 0595, 12 Relatonstip| 8 2.0769 bois owes 13 Secuity ‘ 0.0769 00135 ono