Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Denis Dutton
Kitsch (from German, pretentious trash, < dialect, kitschen, to smear, verkitschen,
to make cheaply, to cheapen).
“Kitsch” has sometimes been used (for example, by Harold Rosenberg) to refer to
virtually any form of popular art or entertainment, especially when sentimental.
But though much popular art is cheap and crude, it is at least direct and
unpretentious. On the other hand, a persistent theme in the history of the usage of
“kitsch,” going back to the word’s mid-European origins,
is pretentiousness, especially in reference to objects that ape whatever is
conventionally viewed as high art. As Arnold Hauser has remarked, kitsch differs
from merely popular forms in its insistence on being taken seriously as art. Kitsch
can thus be defined as a kind of pseudo-art which has an essential attribute of
borrowing or parasitism, and whose essential function is to flatter, soothe, and
reassure its viewer and consumer.
In his 1757 essay, “Of the Standard of Taste,” David Hume remarks on “a species
of beauty, which, as it is florid and superficial, pleases at first; but...soon palls
upon the taste, and then is rejected with disdain, or at least rated at a much lower
value.” Kitsch was a term unavailable to Hume, but he may have had something
like it in mind. Clive Bell, inArt (1913), came closer to it when he denied that Sir
Luke Fildes’s The Doctor (1891, London, Tate) was a work of art because its
effect relies wholly on its sentimental subject-matter: the painting is “worse than
nugatory because the emotion it suggests is false. What it suggests is not pity and
admiration but a sense of complacency in our own pitifulness and generosity.”
Not only religion, but also popular politics is fertile ground for kitsch: Nazi art
exploited kitsch imagery, as did official art in the Soviet Union. Kitsch is more
difficult to identify in purely abstract painting or nonprogrammatic music because
its effects so depend on descriptive elements. Still, the “contemporary decor” of
many homes includes mass-produced coffee-table sculptures in crude imitation of
modernist styles, suggesting, for example, Hans Arp or Henry Moore; along with
reproductions of the Parisian scenes of Bernard Buffet (1928- ), such items qualify
as modernist kitsch: they function to produce a thoroughly up-to-date aura of
refinement.
Bibliography
A. Celebonovic: Some Call It Kitsch: Masterpieces of Bourgeois Realism (New York, n.d.)
F. Karpfen: Der Kitsch: eine Studie über die Entartung der Kunst (Hamburg, 1925)
G. Highet: Talents and Geniuses (New York, 1957)
G. Dorfles (ed.): Kitsch: an Anthology of Bad Taste (London, 1969)
H. Rosenberg: The Tradition of the New (New York, 1970)
L. Giesz: Phänonmenologie des kitsches (Munich, 2nd ed, 1971)
A. Moles: Le Kitsch: l’art du bonheur (Paris, 1971)
A. Hauser: Soziologie der Kunst (Munich, 1974)
A. Hauser: Sociology of Art, trans. K.J. Northcott (Chicago, 1982)
P. Crick: “Kitsch”, British Journal of Aesthetics, xxiii (1983), pp. 48-52.
M. Kundera: The Unbearable Lightness of Being (London, 1984)
T. Kulka: “Kitsch”, British Journal of Aesthetics, xxviii (1988), pp. 18-27.