Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Old Designs Approved

    Uploaded by

    D.V.Srinivasa Rao
    68 views14 pages
    Approved dewgs of T Beam bridge

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Approved dewgs of T Beam bridge

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    68 views14 pages

    Old Designs Approved

    Uploaded by

    D.V.Srinivasa Rao
    Approved dewgs of T Beam bridge

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 14
    GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH r PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, HYDERABAD. Memo.No. DEE(D)/ PMGSY Ph-X / Thotla Vailuru/ Krishna/2013__Dt: 09- 01- 2015 Sub: PR ~ PMGSY Ph-X Grant- Krishna District- Construction of bridge across tributary of Krishna River @ KM 0 /360 to 0/700 on the R/F Thotlavalluru to Pamululanka —Detailed Drawings approved-communicating with certain instructions- reg, Ref: 1. Memo No. AEE 2/DEE 2/ PMGSY/Ph-X/Pamulalankal2013_ Dt: 09/04/2014 of Engineer in Chief, PR, Hyderabad. 2. Lr.No, AE2/PMGSY/Pamulalanka Bridge/14, Dt 27/5/2014 of Superintending Engineer, PR, Machilipatnam @ Vijayawada. 3. Lr.No, AE2/PMGSY/Pamulalanka Bridge/2013-14, Dt 07/8/2014 of Superintending Engineer, PR, Machilipatnam @ Vijayawada ob 88% en ‘The Superintending Engineer, PR, Machilipatnam at Vijayawada is informed that the 2 tailed designs & drawings for the work, “Construction of bridge across tributary of Krishna River 2 wr on veh KM 0 /380 to 0/700 on the R/F Thotlavalluru to Pamululanka in Krishna district,” are approved N07” uth Pile foundations and a copy of the approved drawings are communicated herewith for taking + \ M eadcessary action, He is informed that the designs and drawings are wholly prepared as per the 347-7” base ine data submited by the Superintending Engineer. Further the SE is informed as follows ‘ " Specific Instructions to S E : The estimate shall be prepared as per the approved drawings and got sanctioned 1 by.the competent authority and permission shall be obtained from the competent authority before grounding the work. Design discharge and velocity at proposed site are considered as 7850 cumecs and 2.277 m/sec respectively which are arrived based on hydraulic data submitted by SE, The S E has not submitted the catchment area for the proposed site stating that the proposed bridge is at downstream of Prakasam Barrage across a branch of Krishna River. Hence the S E shall appraise the concerned authority of | & CAD Dept regarding considering 7850 cumecs as design discharge and also the S E is requested to ensure the maximum. velocity as noted above using velocity meter. If any discrepancy is observed in either of them then the same shall be brought to the notice of the competent authority for approval of modified designs with actual data observed, befote commencement of work, duly submitting these actual details/data. The Hydraulic particulars of the branch of Krishna River and other data considered in approved designs, as per the details/data submitted by S.E, are as noted below. Hydraulic Particulars: () MFL: +15.30 ; (v) Design velocity 2.277 mis MWe 412.315; (vl) Rugosity coefficient : 0.025 qa) LBL +4905 ; (vii) Longitudinal slope : 0.00022 (iv) Design discharge: 7850 cumecs; Salient Features : (@BDK +17.001 ; (ii) Type of crossing: Right crossing (i) RCL 418.751 ; (v) Carriage way Width : 5.50m without Footpaths (v) Ventage proposed is 21 Vents of 16.50m effective span Superstructure : The centre to centre distance of main girders in Superstructure is proposed as 2.0m as shown in revised approved Drg. Sheet 3 of 9 and all other specifications and guidelines as per MOST drg. No. BD/13-76, BD/14-76A & BD/15-76A in VRCC M25 grade design mix concrete and Fe 415 steel is rested on pedestal and Wall type Substructure: Circular Piers with hammer head, wi ‘Abutments in VRCC M25 grade design mix concrete are proposed. Two types of piers are proposed with different sill levels due to variation in depth of flow as well as type of soils met with. Type P | Piers : For piers P1, P2 & P20 ,Sill level is considered as (+10.50) . Circular pier of 2.20 m dia is proposed for a height of 3.90m above sill level. Type P Il Piers : For piers P3 to P19, Sill level is considered as (+4.80) . Circular pier of 2.20 m dia is proposed for a height of 9.60m above sill level. Abutments : For abutments A1 & A2, Sill level considered is (+10.50) .Wall type abutments with a top width of 1.20 m and width at sill level as 1.50m are proposed with a height of 5.80 m above sill level. The length of pile, foundation level of pile at the location of piers & abutments considered in approved designs are as follows based on the details & soil test report submitted by S E. Foundations: Pile Foundations are proposed for piers and abutments with 1.20 m dia bored cast in situ piles in VRCC M 35 grade design mix concrete. 1.80m thick Pile caps are proposed in VRCC M25 grade design mix concrete with top of pile caps at sill levels. Piles shall be taken into pile cap for 100mm and reinforcement in piles shall be taken into pile cap with proper anchorage ) is proposed under as shown in approved drawings. 100 mm thick leveling course in M10 (1 pile caps. c. ‘ Type P I piers: | Type P ll Piers: | Abutment A1 on | Abutment A2 on is P4, P28 P20 P3 to P19 Thotlavalluru side | Pamullanka side No of Piles 6No-1.20mdia | 6No-120mdia | 12No-1.20mdia | 12No-1.20mdia Length of ple below pile cap | 28.30 m 24.50 am 28.0m Bottom level of Pile “19.60 2150 -18.30 -19.30 —T —— teat Pile capacity considered 178 | at 188t Safe load on working pile | 1 2st 2671 2e7t | 2s2t | (FOS of 1.5) To Be ensured | Safe Bearing Capacity : Based on the soil test report submitted by the Superintending Engineer, Safe load carrying capacity of 1.20m dia piles are considered as above assuming that the same soil profile, soil properties, as given in soil test reports , will be there up to bottom of foundation level. The Superintending Engineer is requested to take necessary action to conduct pile load * tests as per | S 2911 (Part 4) and ensure that the Safe load of 1.20m dia working pile is not less than 1.50 times the Pile capacity as noted in previous page and also the Safe load of 1.20m dia Test pile is 2.50 times the Pile capacity as noted in previous page. Bearings: Neoprene Elastomeric bearings of size 630 X 220 X 61 mm are proposed under girders as per MOST drgs. Bed block: Hammer head bed block of size 5.20 X 2.20 X 1.40 m is proposed for piers and Rectangular bed block of size 6.45 X 1.275 X 0.50M is proposed for abutments in VRCC M 25 grade design mix concrete. Return walls with counter forts shall be provided behind abutments resting on pile caps in VRCC M 25 grade design mix concrete, Approach Slab: Approach slab with VRCC M30 grade design mix concrete shall be provided for a length of minimum 3.50 m with one end resting on the backing wall covering the full width of the road way. The thickness of the slab is 0.30M with 12 dia @ 150mm c/c both ways @ top and bottom. Wearing Coat : Wearing coat shall be provided in VRCC M30 grade design mix concrete for an average thickness of 0.075 m over Deck slab and approach slabs as per MOST specifications. Weep holes: @ 1.0m cic vertically and horizontally duly staggered shall be provided as per Appendix 6 of IRC 78-2000 in abutments and retaining walls, Back filling: Of the abutment shall be with granular soils confirming to specifications given at appendix of IRC-78. The value of internal friction shall not be less than 30 degrees. Filter Media: The filter material shall be well packed to thickness not less than 600mm with smaller size towards the soil and bigger size towards the Abutment and retaining wall and Provided over entire surface behind abutment and retaining walls to the full height confirming to spetifications as given at appendix 6 of IRC-78-2000. Alignment : Superintending Engineer is requested to inspect the site before starting the work and after alignment of bridge and check the alignment of bridge i.e., piers and abutments ete and ensure that the bridge is aligned suitably so as not to obstruct smooth flow of water and also ensure that the crossing is right angle crossing i.e., without skew as the bridge is designed without skew. The Superintending Engineer during inspection, before laying the foundation concrete shall check the location of the vented portion Le., chainages and confirm that itis as indicated in the approved drawings. If itis not possible to locate the vented portion as indicated in approved drawings, then the SE shall submit the reasons that necessitated to change the location of vented portion and cross section of stream at Proposed site with all RLs, chainages,MFL etc., and also duly marking/indicating/showing /locating vented portion proposed by the SE to execute and get them approved by the ENC/ the Chief Engineer concerned before proceeding further work During inspection the SE shall also ensure that the hydraulic particulars ie., RLs, HFLs, OF Ls, LBLs etc., are as per those considered in approved designs and also the type of soils, their location/depth and SBC shall be verified during inspection as well as execution and are as per those considered in the approved designs, as per the details/data submitted by S E. If any deviation is observed in any one of them or more than those considered in approved designs then the modified designs for the components as per the actual details observed during inspection/execution should be got approved by the concemed Chief Engineerithe ENC,PR before commencement of further work duly submitting the details as observed during inspection/execution. The Superintending Engineer is requested to get the design mixes approved well in advance in any standard Q. C, Lab or reputed & recognized Engineering college before concreting with out fail The Superintending Engineer is requested to get all the materials used for construction checked for QC test results both at factory and at site for acceptance/permissible . The Superintending Engineer is requested to finalise Land Acquisition, forest clearance & shifting of electrical poles etc. if required, duly addressing the concerned competent authorities so that there will be no stoppage of work due to these issues at a later stage. ‘The work shall be in accordance with the provisions stipulated in the bridge codes of IRC- 5, 6, 21, 78, & 89 & IS 2011-Part | (sec 2), Part IV & SP-13-2004 and SP- 20 for adopting Grade of Concrete and other relevant IRC & IS codes and concerned circulars & G.O. s issued from time to time. All the standard Q C tests in respect of VRCC,VCC etc have to be followed as per concerned IS codes. The Superintending Engineer is requested to propose the body walls /earthern embankments for approaches, if required, based on the site conditions Action shall be taken to clear/remove bushes/trees and raised portion of earth in the stream portion on u/s and dis sides of proposed sites to required length and at proposed site also, if required, in order to have smooth flow in the stream at proposed site. Side drains and pipe culverts at dip portions wherever necessary in approaches on both sides are to be provided in order to drain out the rain water and to safeguard the approaches. Encl: Copy of approved Drawings -11 No Sdi- Drg No PR/PMGSY/Bridge/Thotlavallur/Krishna/SD/ 01 to 11 Engineer in Chief, PR PMGSY, Hyderabad. To ‘The Superintending Engineer, PR, Machilipatnam at Vijayawada. Copy to the Executive Engineer, PMGSY section, O/o ENC, PR, Hyderabad (w.e.) Copy to the Executive Engineer, PR, PIU, ijayawada, rs Itef. bo. I ve - ors we 4 Gg? & Dy. Executive Engineer ny he Designs Section. wa] ipase LP) \ 9 gee" CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGE ACROSS TRIBUTORY OF KRISHNA RIVER @ CH 0/360 TO 0/700 ON ROAD FROM THOTLA VALLURU TO PAMULLANKA IN KRISHNA DISTRICT. KRISHNA FLOOD BANK SIDE PAMULLANKA SIDE, oan Length of Bridge = Back to back of Abutments = 360.25 m(CH -35 TO CH +325.25) +] vi . ECTIVE SPA eu EXPANSION JOINT ee oe t + 1 Yana ra I { 0.30m THICK RCL, RCL +18.751 4° 3m AreROAcH 17 97m Sab BOD + 17.008 | return — MEL + 15.50 _ all of RETURN r--[-F------- ---f-}+------+------ | 851m WALL hei 5.80 m| T rey 80m BaL + 12.38 39pm 390M * 6.90 m—}-+| 4 aaTiave. so? st FE oe 90 m % oe 110.50, —" +1650 [7.80 Tex +1030 [780m Tacx oars 2 He — ae a sem. | MubeaP os: pe PILE CAP : azo aL Te “aL 18 amsae all ise lt iN ABUTMENT AL \ 8 #25 Bars ‘Abutment amas ee 810m }-0.40m 7-0.40m 2.925 m Y 16 @ 150 mm 0.30}m-| v ae 0.30m 1 0.825 m Y'10 @ 150 mm CIC (V) ! 4 “eo L-® SECTIONAL PLAN AT BASE OF COUNTER FORT RETAINING WALL ON PILE CAPS AT ABUTMENTS A1 & A2 omersioe 0.30m 0.20m | 0.20m. 030m onensne ROL, +18.754 1 st | rot 18.751 EARTH SIDE 7 Y10@ 150: Y16 @ 150 Y10@ 150 mm CIC (V) t mm CIC (H) + mm CIC (V) Y10 @ 150 mm CIC (V) Y16@ 150—

    You might also like