Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Team Members
CGT19003: Anil Kumar Nayak
CGT19004: Animesh Kumar Singh
CGT19005: Ankit Bansal
CGT19009: Bhavani Shankar
1|Page GMP – Tata Steel (2019-20)
Contents
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 2
Company Background ........................................................................................................................ 2
Ireland Subsidiary ............................................................................................................................... 2
The Sales Affiliates ............................................................................................................................. 3
The Issue ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Key Financial Problems: ......................................................................................................................... 3
1. Long Run Exposure of Irish Plant to Exchange Rate Risk ......................................................... 3
2. Overvalued US Dollar................................................................................................................. 4
3. Different views of Irish Plant Management & Group CFO ........................................................ 4
4. Difficulty in hedging the long run exposure ............................................................................... 4
Analysis .................................................................................................................................................. 5
1. Identifying Exchange Rate Risk to Irish Plant ............................................................................ 5
2. Assessment of exchange rate risk ............................................................................................... 5
3. Mitigation of Exchange Rate Risk .............................................................................................. 7
Summary and Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 7
Team Members:
Anil Kumar Nayak (CGT19003) | Animesh Kumar Singh (CGT19004)
Ankit Bansal (CGT19005) | Bhavani Shankar (CGT19009)
2|Page GMP – Tata Steel (2019-20)
Introduction
Company Background
Ireland Subsidiary
Team Members:
Anil Kumar Nayak (CGT19003) | Animesh Kumar Singh (CGT19004)
Ankit Bansal (CGT19005) | Bhavani Shankar (CGT19009)
3|Page GMP – Tata Steel (2019-20)
The total company sales force included the US sales force, wholly owned sales affiliates
in eleven countries and independent sales representatives in seventeen other countries.
Quote to customers were made in local currency based on US transfer price plus
shipping cost from US plus import duty plus target sales mark-up. Quotes and final
prices were flexible as per exchange rate, thus Universal was insulated from exchange
rate fluctuations.
The Issue
Labour and locally sourced supplies at Ireland plant accounted for 30% of direct cost
of sales. Operating and other expenses were also occurred in Irish punt. Thus, a total
51.4% of total sales amount is being spent in Irish punts at Ireland plant. Strong US
dollar prices in present has been contributing excellently to the profitability but this also
means that profitability of Irish plant was highly vulnerable to any weakening in US
dollar.
Labour and locally sourced supplies at Ireland plant accounted for 30% of direct cost
of sales. Operating and other expenses were also occurred in Irish punt. Thus, a total
~51.4% of total sales amount is being spent in Irish punts at Ireland plant. Strong US
dollar prices in present has been contributing excellently to the profitability but this also
means that profitability of Irish plant was highly vulnerable to any weakening in US
dollar.
Irish plant is operating at level of 15% profit before tax presently but every 1% decrease
in US dollar price could decrease profit before tax by 0.514%.
Team Members:
Anil Kumar Nayak (CGT19003) | Animesh Kumar Singh (CGT19004)
Ankit Bansal (CGT19005) | Bhavani Shankar (CGT19009)
4|Page GMP – Tata Steel (2019-20)
2. Overvalued US Dollar
Analysis of data given in exhibit 1& 2 shows that US dollar is overvalued in 1984 as
the exchange rate differential is greater than the relative inflation between the USA and
other countries. Thus, if the purchasing power parity comparison between USA and
Ireland holds true then the Irish Plant is right to be concerned regarding their fear of the
US Dollar weakening against the Irish Punt. Moreover, US had 100 Billion US Dollar
trade deficit in the past year which further increases the risk of future devaluation of US
dollar.
Irish plant faces long run exposure to exchange rate risk. Hedging long run exposure is
more difficult than hedging short run exposure as organized forward markets don’t exist
for long term needs. The primary option to hedge long run exposure is to match foreign
currency inflows and outflows. This match isn’t possible in Irish plant’s case as around
51.4% of the sales amount is spent in Irish punts while all the sales to customers are
based on US dollars. Thus, inflow and outflow of Irish punts doesn’t match in Universal
Circuit’s case, making it very difficult to hedge long run exchange rate risk.
Team Members:
Anil Kumar Nayak (CGT19003) | Animesh Kumar Singh (CGT19004)
Ankit Bansal (CGT19005) | Bhavani Shankar (CGT19009)
5|Page GMP – Tata Steel (2019-20)
Analysis
Sales 100%
Direct Cost of Sales 48%
Direct Margin 52%
Operating Expenses 34%
Contribution Margin 18%
Other Income/expense 3%
Profit Before Tax 15%
Observations:
• Irish plant manufactures 25% of total quantity of Universal Circuit’s.
• 51.4% of sales amount of Irish Plant goes as cash outflow in Irish Punts.
• Sales are based on dollar price in US. Thus, fluctuations in Irish punt exchange
rates can’t be passed to customers.
• The exchange rate risk of Irish plant in long term in nature.
Thus, based on above observations, Irish plant has long run exposure to exchange rate
risk and we identify exchange rate risk as significant risk to Universal Circuit.
Team Members:
Anil Kumar Nayak (CGT19003) | Animesh Kumar Singh (CGT19004)
Ankit Bansal (CGT19005) | Bhavani Shankar (CGT19009)
6|Page GMP – Tata Steel (2019-20)
Estimates profit & loss statement for Irish Plant based on consolidated statement of
Universal (given in Exhibit 2 & 3) for year 1983 is as below
For the simplicity of our calculation, this statement can be interpreted as below:
Equivalent Calculations
Amount ($ Millions)
Estimated Sales of Irish Plant 53.5
Total Cost/Expense (in US $) 18.0
Total Cost/Expense (in punts) 27.5
Profit Before Tax 8.0
Impact of 47.5% fluctuation in interest rate from current level on profitability &
cashflows of Universals is as below:
Thus, a revert of exchange rates to 4 years back (1980) level can decrease the Irish
plant’s profit before tax by US $ 13 million.
Total net income of Universal Circuit (1983) as given in exhibit 2 is US $ 18.4 million.
Thus, exchange rate risk at Irish plant can hit the net income of universal by almost
70%.
Team Members:
Anil Kumar Nayak (CGT19003) | Animesh Kumar Singh (CGT19004)
Ankit Bansal (CGT19005) | Bhavani Shankar (CGT19009)
7|Page GMP – Tata Steel (2019-20)
Operational Hedging:
As part of operational hedging efforts, Universal Circuit is already sourcing 70% of
direct cost of sales (raw material & other input supplies) in US currency. Any more
operational hedging from upstream side doesn’t look practical.
Since Irish plant is only 25% of total Universal capacity, it isn’t practical to bill the
customers based on Irish punt rates. So, customers are being charged based on US $
rate and any fluctuations in local currency (sales location) is being passed to customers.
Thus, operational hedging isn’t possible from sales side too.
Although the Irish plant can definitely redesign the wage structure with an objective of
minimizing punt outflow.
Avoidance hedging:
Although Irish plant can work towards efficiency improvement and cost reduction, but
any large avoidance of Irish punt outflow doesn’t seem feasible.
Financial hedging:
Firm can look for following financial hedging options to hedge their exposure to Irish
punt/dollar exchange rate:
• Futures
• Options
• Swaps
• Forwards
• Foreign Debt
In our analysis, we have found that Irish plant management is right in their concerns
about exchange rate risk to plant profitability. As analysed above, Irish punt/dollar
exchange rate is also a significant risk to Universal Circuit as whole. Thus, appropriate
exchange rate risk management seems necessary.
Though Fisher effect and Purchasing Power Parity theory suggest that inflation and
interest rates balance against exchange rate currency in long term but still firm may
prefer to protect itself by adopting any of the above suggested tools to minimize its risk
by HEDGING.
Team Members:
Anil Kumar Nayak (CGT19003) | Animesh Kumar Singh (CGT19004)
Ankit Bansal (CGT19005) | Bhavani Shankar (CGT19009)